Accessibility links

Rice Could Meet With Iranian Counterpart


http://gdb.rferl.org/66219E67-7C63-4439-9AB5-860B919128DA_w203.jpg --> http://gdb.rferl.org/66219E67-7C63-4439-9AB5-860B919128DA_mw800_mh600.jpg Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (file photo) (ITAR-TASS) April 5, 2007 -- The U.S. State Department says Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice does not rule out a bilateral meeting with Iranian counterpart Manuchehr Mottaki on the sidelines of an international conference on Iraq in early May.


Spokesman Sean McCormack says Rice could bring up Iranian activities in Iraq if such a meeting does take place. Washington is on the record as accusing Tehran of providing material support to militants.


McCormack said the possible bilateral meeting would not address the Iranian nuclear program, which is to be discussed by the six powers involved in the talks to date -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France, and Germany.


Rice said earlier she would be attending the ministerial gathering meant to be a continuation of the international conference on Iraq's security, which was held on March 10 in Baghdad and which brought together 17 countries and organizations, including major powers and Iraq's neighbors.


The upcoming meeting is expected to be held in Istanbul.


Also in Washington today, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the United States is not inclined to release five Iranians captured in Iraq in January.


Gates told reporters in Washington today that the U.S. military believes the captured Iranians were supporting Iraqi insurgents.


He also said U.S. and Iraqi officials are discussing the possibility of allowing Iranian access to the captured men but added that such access was not obligatory.


(compiled from agency reports)

Afraid Of Sanctions?
Comprehensive sanctions could further slow development in Iran's strategic oil and gas sectors (Fars)

WHAT DOES TEHRAN REALLY THINK? On August 22, Radio Farda correspondent Fatemeh Aman spoke with Alex Vatanka, Eurasia editor for Jane's Information Group, by telephone from Alexandria, Virginia. Vatanka discussed the possible impact that comprehensive sanctions could have for Iran.

Radio Farda: Some Iranian authorities are trying to create the impression that they aren't concerned about the possibility of international sanctions against it. They emphasize that what Iran has achieved so far has happened despite the sanctions already in place against it. Are they really not afraid of sanctions?

Vatanka: I think that what the Iranians are trying to do is to continue to play this balancing act. On the one hand, they are trying to say, "Look, we have done without you for 27 years; we can continue." On the other hand, if you look at every other major Iranian overture toward the U.S., obviously what they are hoping to do is remove those sanctions. It is the sanctions that have been the biggest obstacle to a genuine expansion in the Iranian economy. It is the sanctions and U.S. policies vis-a-vis Iran that have, for instance, kept Iran from joining the World Bank. It is sanctions and so on that have made the Iranian oil industry have such a tough time in bringing investment into the strategic oil and gas sectors. People like [former Iranian President Ali Akbar Hashemi-]Rafsanjani back in the mid 1990s even kept certain fields untouched because the idea was that U.S. companies should have those once the sanctions were lifted.
I think sanctions are quite important to the Iranians, but at the same time what they are trying to say is, "Don't assume that we are going to fall off our chair just because you mentioned the sanctions card." It is part of a kind diplomatic chess game going on by Tehran. But remember if we look and listen to Iranian reformists, this is being openly debated inside Iran. The question that is being asked of [President Mahmud Ahmadinejad and his entourage] is, "What is the ultimate objective?" Is it just Islamic independence? Is it just the ability to enrich uranium? The debate in Iran by the reformists -- and I think a lot of people would sympathize with this -- is, "What are we being sanctioned for exactly and what policies do you have to make sure that those sanctions don't hit us harder than we have already been hit?"
Remember, the big issue here is this: Iran has been sanctioned by the U.S. Iran has never faced comprehensive United Nations sanctions. The Iranian people have never suffered on a scale that the Iraqi people, for instance, suffered because of such sanctions. So it is kind of disingenuous of these senior leaders to pretend that Iran has already gone through comprehensive sanctions. Iran has not. And it will be totally different set of circumstances that will have a totally different impact on Iranian society and the economy, should the UN impose comprehensive sanctions on the country.


THE COMPLETE PICTURE: RFE/RL's complete coverage of controversy surrounding Iran's nuclear program.


CHRONOLOGY

An annotated timeline of Iran's nuclear program.

XS
SM
MD
LG