October 27, 2004
Azerbaijan: Ilham Aliyev Ends Checkered Year As President
by Jean-Christophe Peuch
![]()
On 31 October 2003, 41-year-old Ilham Aliyev formally succeeded his ailing father as president of the oil-rich Caspian republic of Azerbaijan. While taking the oath on the Koran and Azerbaijan's Constitution, Aliyev pledged to bring his country "peace, order, progress, stability, and economic prosperity" and to pursue a path toward democratic reforms. While Aliyev's first year in power has brought some positive changes, he seems unable -- or unwilling -- to make a clean break with his father's controversial legacy.
Prague, 27 October 2004 (RFE/RL) -- To be sure, Ilham Aliyev's mandate started under unfavorable circumstances.
The day following his election on 15 October 2003, tens of thousands of opposition supporters took to the streets of Baku to protest the outcome. The protesters called the vote fraudulent and claimed that their candidate -- Musavat Party leader Isa Qambar -- had garnered more votes than any other contender.
At least one person was killed in clashes with police.
In the following weeks, authorities arrested hundreds of opposition activists, closed Musavat headquarters, and imposed a ban on antigovernment newspapers.
Restrictions were subsequently eased. The vast majority of detainees were released after spending a few weeks in jail, where they reportedly endured ill treatment.
Seven opposition leaders, however, went on trial for allegedly inciting Baku residents to revolt. On 22 October, Azerbaijan's Court for Serious Crimes sentenced them to jail terms of up to five years.
International organizations and human rights groups have condemned the ruling and criticized the Azerbaijani authorities for failing to grant the defendants a fair trial.
For Baku-based political expert Rasim Musabeyov, last week's ruling is characteristic of the new regime.
"In this respect, [one sees] little difference between Azerbaijan, Russia, or Armenia. Yet what is even worse is that [Azerbaijan] starts looking like [some] Central [Asian countries]. This is certainly not an innovation brought by the younger Aliyev," Musabeyov said. "The existing system largely owes to the elder Aliyev. Yet, the big difference [between the two men] is that the elder Aliyev felt strong and confident enough to put up with a regime of semi-freedom. But when the younger Aliyev assumed power, the ruling elite became, if not afraid, at least wary and less prone to tolerate that regime of semi-freedom."