August 03, 2005
Iran: Ahmadinejad Takes Reins As Khatami’s Term Ends
by Golnaz Esfandiari
President Khatami giving a farewell speech at the Interior Ministry on 31 July
![]()
The tenure of Iran's pro-reform President Mohammad Khatami ended today as his successor Mahmud Ahmadinejad was formally installed as president. Khatami came to power in 1997 with huge support especially among youth and women, to whom he had promised more rights. In 2001, he was re-elected with some 70 percent of the vote. However, many of his one-time supporters have criticized Khatami for failing to deliver on his promises. Other observers, though, say that during Khatami's eight-year tenure some positive changes took place.
PRAGUE, 3 August 2005 (RFE/RL) -- Iran’s outgoing President Mohammad Khatami said last week that one of his biggest achievements was granting the Iranian people the power to protest.
He said the more his government was criticized, the more it was successful in realizing the idea of democracy in Iran.
Khatami also said that the Iranian people are the best judges of his achievements.
“The final judgment about the success of the government, which was moving on the difficult and long path of democracy in Iran, is with the nation," Khatami said.
The charismatic Khatami -- who was seen by many reformists as the best hope for democracy in the Islamic Republic -- was not able to implement his idea of “Islamic democracy” in Iran.
Many of his reform plans were blocked by hardliners. His government’s granting of scores of licenses for new, liberal publications was quickly rolled back by the hard-line judiciary. Judges closed more than 100 newspapers and magazines and summoned twice that number of journalists to court. Many intellectuals, human right activists, and students were jailed. (See HRW Says Tehran Uses Torture To Suppress Dissent.)
Khatami has been criticized by many of his supporters -- including student activists -- for failing to stand up to the hard-liners and responding weakly to opponents of democracy. Khatami has answered those criticisms by saying that “clashes and chaotic conditions” would have not been in the interest of the Islamic Republic.