map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

"World Changing Radio"

CNN International reports on RFE/RL's role in Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution, and its continuing mission to spread free media More
More Articles

Features

Abkhazia And The Perils Of 'Independence'

Russian and Abkhaz flags flying in front of Abkhazia's government headquarters in Sukhumi.

June 19, 2009
By Brian Whitmore
SUKHUMI -- A row of Russian and Abkhaz flags flutter in the Black Sea breeze in front of the stately government headquarters in the Abkhaz capital. Along the winding beachfront promenade, locals point out the properties rumored to be earmarked for Russian investors.

It's a poignant vista for this separatist territory that has long been trying to convince the world -- and itself -- that it is an independent country.

There was euphoria here 10 months ago when Moscow recognized Abkhazia's independence from Tbilisi following the five-day Russia-Georgia war. But as Russian troops, cash, and influence pour into this tiny and picturesque Black Sea region, many Abkhaz worry that rather than winning their coveted autonomy last August they may have simply traded one overlord for another.

Sipping iced tea in an outdoor cafe overlooking Sukhumi's beaches and ramshackle piers, local journalist Inal Khashig, founder and editor of the opposition newspaper "Chegemskaya pravda," says Sukhumi's independence bid was supposed to "mean independence not only from Georgia but from any other country as well."

But that dream, he says, appears to be quickly slipping away.

Russian flags are common in Sukhumi, even at gas stations.
"We had a poor understanding of what was going on that day, August 26, when Russia recognized us," Khashig says. 

"It was an emotional wave. Only later did we figure out that we were not getting what we wanted. Earlier, even though nobody recognized us, we were truly independent. Now, after recognizing Abkhazia, Russia is swallowing us. This is happening economically, politically, militarily, and socially. Every day we are becoming more and more dependent."

This dependence is visible in the most basic ways. Most Abkhaz residents carry Russian passports. The Russian ruble is their official currency. They communicate predominantly in the Russian language. And at least 3,800 Russian troops are based on their territory, including many on their frontiers. 

Even some gas stations in Sukhumi fly Russian flags. Russian television dominates the airwaves and Russian newspapers are ubiquitous.

Resisting Assimilation

Russia's presence extends far beyond flags and border guards. Moscow has pledged $68 million in aid for Abkhazia since the war; hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign investment are flowing in as well. Russia's state-run oil giant Rosneft has already signed an agreement with Abkhazia to explore and develop the territory's maritime oil fields.

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.



A aerial view of Abkhazia. The video was filmed by RFE/RL on June 8 from aboard one of the last United Nations flights into the breakaway territory.

The boom could have benefits in a region seems mired in a post-Soviet economic funk. But some here fear it could also provoke a backlash.

"We are worried that the expansion of Russian capital, which our authorities are actively assisting, could lead to society thinking that property here is not something for Abkhaz citizens," says Beslan Bartelia, an opposition member of Abkhazia's de facto parliament.

"This could lead to the growth of anti-Russian sentiments and we don't want that."

Mindful of such concerns, Abkhaz leader Sergei Bagapsh has said his territory will defend its statehood and resist assimilation. But he has nevertheless agreed to grant Russia control over Abkhazia's borders, airport, and railway system.

Russian investors are eyeing Sukhumi's prime beachfront real estate.
Moscow has plans to house a naval base in the port of Ochamchire, close to the cease-fire line separating Abkhazia from Georgia proper. A controversial provision will give Russian soldiers serving in Abkhazia the right to purchase property, which many here fear could lead to a further Russification of the province.

Some of the agreements with Russia have sparked howls of protest from opposition Abkhaz lawmakers, who have vowed to review and amend them during the ratification process.

"We are turning over to Russia all our responsibilities for building this state. This is very bad," Kashig says.

"When half the budget is financed by Russian subsidies, when Russians need to guard our borders, when we can't run our own railways and airport and turn them over to the Russians, this says we are losing hope. If we can't do this ourselves, it means we have doubts over whether we chose the right path in setting up our own state."

To be sure, growing pains are in evidence. Abkhaz officials frequently betray inexperience with basic international norms. UN officials -- whose 16-year observer mission in Abkhazia was shuttered this week after Russia vetoed a Security Council resolution to extend its mandate -- say Abkhaz border guards have attempted to examine the contents of their diplomatic pouch, a violation of international confidentiality laws.

Isolation Anxiety

Still, fears of Russian domination are far from unanimous. And even when they do exist, they are tempered by an even deeper animosity toward Georgia, which considers Abkhazia and a second breakaway region, South Ossetia, part of its sovereign territory.

"The situation is normal. It's better than normal. I'm not afraid we'll be assimilated by Russia. Over the past 200 years we've had experience with the Russians and we've had experience with the Georgians. We know where the danger comes from," says Batal Kobakhia, who chairs the human rights committee in the de facto parliament.

Batal Kobakhia, chairman of the Human Rights Committee in Abkhazia's de facto parliament, isn't worried about Russian influence.
A powerful anti-Georgian current, fed by Russian media, runs through Abkhazia, where bitter memories still remain of the 1992-93 post-Soviet war for independence with Tbilisi. More than 15,000 people died in the 13-month campaign, and 250,000 ethnic Georgians, who made up the largest ethnic group in Abkhazia, were expelled.

The displaced Georgians, Kobakhia says unapologetically, "will never be able to return."

Similar declarations can be heard from virtually every Abkhaz, regardless of political stripe. The West doesn't fare much better, with many Abkhaz complaining the international community has failed to engage the territory.

Nicaragua is the only country, besides Russia, to recognize Abkhazia's independence. International aid organizations and Western investors have kept their distance. Even commercial ventures, like the clothing giant Benetton, cancelled plans for a store in Abkhazia amid protests from Georgia. 

Liana Kvarchelia, the codirector of the Center for Humanitarian Programs think-tank in Sukhumi, says if this is a sign of how the West will behave in the future, then Abkhazia is doomed to remain locked in Russia's embrace.

"I understand that it would be difficult for the international community to change its firm position about not recognizing Abkhazia. But the international community needs to understand that isolating Abkhazia it is not good for anybody, especially for us," Kvarchelia says.

A History Of Resistance


Abkhaz visibly bristle with indignation at the suggestion that they are becoming Russian vassals. They point out that their ancestors fought a series of bloody rebellions against the Russian Empire in the 19th century. The largest of these, in 1866 and 1877, resulted in hundreds of thousands of Abkhaz being deported.

Khashig argues that many Abkhaz view rebelling against foreign domination as something of a birthright.

"Even in the Stalin period we gathered, protested, and demanded our rights," he says. "This in our genetic code. We value what happens here. We can't do much but we have to do something."

The Abkhaz independent streak extends to local politics. Many in Abkhazia proudly remind visitors that Moscow's preferred candidate in the territory's 2004 presidential election, former KGB officer Raul Khajimba, was soundly defeated by Bagapsh.

Despite political tensions, life in Sukhumi is laid back. A group of men enjoy a game of backgammon near the beach.
During that campaign, posters and billboards of Kajimba together with then Russian President Vladimir Putin were plastered all over Sukhumi. Prominent Russian politicians came to Sukhumi to campaign for Khajimba as did the popular singer Iosif Kobzon. Russian State Duma deputy Vladimir Zhirinovsky even threatened that Russia would close its Abkhaz border if Khajimba wasn't elected.

Many Abkhaz say their choice in that election should dispel any doubts that Abkhaz take their independence seriously and will resist any foreign domination:

"Russia supported one candidate and we made our choice. This is the attitude of the Abkhaz when there is pressure to do something that does not fit with their interests or security," Kobakhia says. "Abkhaz never allow anyone to talk to them like this or to force them to live in a way that is different from their style and their traditional values."

Whether the Abkhaz will be able to maintain this stance on Moscow will be tested in December, when they hold their first presidential elections since securing Russian recognition of their independence.
This forum has been closed.
 Previous   Next 
Comments page 2 of 4
by: Abrek from: Istanbul
June 23, 2009 11:43
Zoltan: It is apathetic being sorry for Russian occupation in Abkhazia instead of Georgia. If Abkhazia will absolutely live under authority of another nation, I'm sure they will not make decision according to your reasons.

Sephia Carta has already mentioned that for Abkhazia it is now impossible to live under georgian authority because of war and post war policies.

It is really surprising to see that how Georgians can be such blind that their aggressive policies against all Caucasus is killing the idea of unity.

History is giving us a lot of sample.
In 11 May 1918, caucasus people came together and declare their independence.
All north Caucasus nations joined this state and Abkhazia was one of them. The form of state was federation and union with south caucasus under a confederative structure was expected. Georgia was also attending in these assemblies as observer. And then something happened unexpected: Georgian army invaded Abkhazia which is already joined this federation.

Name of this government was "Union of Mountaineer people of Caucasus"
During the war in 1992, the main power who support Abkhazia was also an organization named "confederation of mountaineer people" which consist Chechen and Adyges. And the main person in this organization was Shamel Basaev who was one of the main character in Chechen independency war. Does it mean something for anyone?


by: VIGON from: Butler, USA
June 22, 2009 20:12
In 1654 Ukrainian Hetman Bohdan Chmielnetsky requested Russian (Moscovite) help in order to gain independence for the Ukrainian Hetmanate from the Polish Commonwealth. He got that 'help' and to this day the Russian leadership continues to think that they own Ukraine. It's a shame the Abkhaz leaders didn't bother to study history.

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
June 22, 2009 19:18
Abkhazia is not independent but occupied now.

If it is independendt then why do they use Russian ruble as currency, why do pensioners get Russian pensions, why do all Abkhaz hold Russian passports, why do Russian flags fly and so on.

Abkhazia is not independent but very much dependent. Dependent on Russia.

A vassal entity of Russia.

A feel sorry for them...

by: Brazilian Man from: São Paulo - SP - Brazil
June 22, 2009 12:28
And the Abkhazian separatists just won the war because of the former Red Army assistance.

The “victory” of the 1992-1993 war was the victory of the minority of the people living in Abkhazia (allied to the old Soviet-Russian Army and KGB-FSB power structures) against the majority of the population of Abkhazia who wanted to be part of Georgia.

And about Kosovo… well, NATO or Albania don't control railways or civillian airports there…

by: Rasto from: London
June 22, 2009 12:18
Abrek
Look on the internet for cenzus in Abkhazia before Stalinistic era and you will find that 40 % of Mengrelians and other Georgian ethnic groups lived in Abkhazia before that era..

by: Brazilian Man from: São Paulo - SP - Brazil
June 22, 2009 12:04
Abkhazia is not a nation. It has no borders and no armed forces of its own, and the Slav tricolour falg is more present than the red, green and white one. Abkhazia is now a puppet-state of Russia — and the iron fist of Moscow will only get tougher and tougher trough time. Many in the region will still miss the so-called “Georgian domination”, but then it will be too late to turn things back. In fact, it is already…

by: sephia karta from: Padua, Italy
June 22, 2009 10:51
Georgi: while I understand that you would prefer Abkhazia to be part of Georgia, purely realistically speaking, you are deceiving yourself if you think that is going to happen within this generation, if at all. The fact is that only through the recognition of Abkhazia's independence can the return of Georgian refugees to their homes be achieved in the foreseeable future. Saakashvili does the Georgian refugees a huge disservice by proclaiming once in a while that they will return within the year, within his presidential term or before the battery of his watch runs out.

Regarding Sicily and Sardinia: I think it would be an excellent idea for them to become independent, its just that the people themselves there don't want that at the moment. I think Europe would be a lot better better of if we broke up all those outdated 19th-century so-called nation states were really one nation dominates the others. Not least of all Russia.

Janis Berzins: if you were better informed, you would know that Abkhazians have always worried about that. But they are hardly to blame that anybody but Russia cares about them. Your country is lucky that Europe did care about Latvian independence (and don't get me wrong, very rightly so).

by: sephia karta from: Padua, Italy
June 22, 2009 10:03
Aki, what you write sounds reasonable. But are you aware that such negotiations already took place in the nineties? A priori the examples of autonomy you mention sound reasonable, and the two sides were heading in that direction before the war. Then Georgia invaded and the fighting laid waste to Abkhazia and caused enormous human suffering. It is impossible that that would not have had consequences for the political relationship between Abkhazia and Georgia.

Still, negotiations were started and the two sides came close to reaching a confederal solution, but in the end the Georgians didn't want to accept that. Perhaps they would now consider it, but the Abkhazians have moved on. What was the reason why the west ultimately decided to support Kosovar independence? At least purportedly because years of negotiations had led nowhere and the present situation was untenable. Well, that's also what the Abkhazians felt, and I guess the May 1998 war when Georgian militias invaded the Gali district didn't help either.

Just as it is inconceivable for Kosovars to to rejoin Serbia, it is inconceivable for Abkhazians to join Georgia. But in a way it is worse. Unlike Kosovars, Abkhazians have for all practice and purpose never lived in the current independent Georgian state. Abkhazia became de facto independent from Georgia while the Soviet Union was still falling apart.

Why do you call Abkhazia's current situation unsustainable? Why is Abkhazian independence unstainable? First we enforce a political and economical embargo on Abkhazia and then we point out: "see, it's not working, you are being assimilated by Russia"? How very very warped.

Lastly, what happened in the past century is imported if you want to know why Abkhazians fear Russian domination less than they do Georgian domination. Russia now (unlike in the 19th century) accepts that Abkhazians live in Abkhazia. Many people point at Chechnya, but even though living under Kadyrov must be very unpleasant, the fact of the matter is that Chechnya enjoys almost unlimited internal autonomy. Even if many Georgian want to live in peace alongside Abkhazians, there are also still many who think that Abkhazia is somehow intrinsically Georgian territory or even that Abkhazians are guests there, and the wars showed the Abkhazians where that can lead to. That's why Abkhazia considers the current situation a much better deal than anything that would involve them joining Georgia.

by: Janis Berzins from: Riga, Latvia
June 22, 2009 08:56
"many Abkhaz worry that rather than winning their coveted autonomy last August they may have simply traded one overlord for another".

Surprisingly, but that has always been obvious to everyone, except, now it seems, for themselves

As of resistance "programmed into their genetic code" - fine. But, if the need will be, Russia will teach them lesson faster than in Chechnya.

Not letting Russians to push them around is a ridiculous and hollow illusion.

by: Giorgi from: Georgia Sukhumi
June 21, 2009 23:10
Aki you are right. Yes Georgians must back in Abkhazia and Abkhazians must receive broad autonomy. Today I see the greatest support from Europe and USA, so Russians do not have chances, time show us soon or later, that Russians will withdraw from occupied Georgian regions, because there is not nation who support separatism (expect Russia and Nicaragua)
 Previous   Next 
Comments page 2 of 4
TEXT SIZE - +

Editors' Picks

'Religious Hatred'

Russia Buries Slain Priest Photogallery

President Van Rompuy

'How's That Again?!' Audio

Arresting Images

Photos Of The Week Photogallery

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile