map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Commentary

Nineteen Years After 'Black January,' Azerbaijan Still Struggles For Freedom

January 20, 2009
By Kenan Aliyev
The bodies of protesters slain by Soviet troops, January 20, 1990




Nineteen years ago today, on January 20, 1990, Soviet troops stormed Baku by order of the Kremlin in an ultimately failed attempt to save Communist rule and put down Azerbaijan's independence movement.

For several days, those 26,000 troops cracked down on protesters, firing into crowds without warning and killing more than 200 people. At least 700 were injured. Moscow declared emergency rule, which lasted for more than a year. Thousands of Popular Front members and sympathizers were arrested, imprisoned, and tortured.

I remember that cold, windy January night well. I was keeping vigil with some friends on one of the main roads leading from the airport into the city. I couldn't get in touch with my parents, who had gone into the city in hope of finding me. Later I saw my father's tears for the first time in my life; he and my mother had gone to the morgues in search of me, finding instead the bodies of dozens of dead lining bloodstained corridors. They saw the bodies of women and children, of Azeris, of Tatars, of Jews, of Lezgins, of Russians. All of them ordinary citizens of Baku.

I remember walking the streets as the sun rose that morning, seeing tanks and armored personnel carriers topped with young soldiers with guns at the ready. The country was in a state of disbelief: no one thought that, after the bloody events in Tbilisi on April 9, 1989, Moscow would dare to use the army against civilians again. We were still gripped by "Tbilisi syndrome" -- the naive belief that such a tragedy could not happen again.

Later, I remember the mass burial of hundreds of victims at Baku's Shehidler Khiyabani (Martyrs' Alley). Millions attended the funeral. The harbor was clogged with small private boats blaring their horns. Azerbaijan was united like never before. The era of the Soviet Union was over.

The traditional 40-day mourning period was marked by a national strike in honor of those who had stood up and sacrificed their lives for freedom. Factories ground to a standstill and people stayed home from work.

Soviet officials tried in vain to spin the tragedy. Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev defended the invasion by citing the supposedly imminent danger of Islamic fundamentalism in Azerbaijan. Other officials used tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region as a pretext for the occupation.

But Defense Minister Dmitry Yazov was more honest. "We came to destroy the political structure of the Popular Front to prevent their victory in the upcoming elections scheduled for March 19, 1990," he said.

Still Hoping For Freedom

The invasion did not turn out as the Soviet leadership intended. The Red Army killed the last shreds of hope among Azerbaijanis that the Soviet Union could somehow be reformed and preserved. Twenty months later, Azerbaijan declared its independence. Hundreds of thousands of people made the symbolic gesture of burning their Communist Party cards.

Looking back on those events from 19 years later, the feeling of pride remains. Azerbaijan is an independent country. It has its own military and currency. It is an important player in regional energy and security issues. It is a major Caspian-region transit hub.

But while independence has been established, freedom has been more elusive. The crowds that faced down the Soviet tanks, after all, were crying out mostly for freedom.

"Not free" is Freedom House's terse assessment of Azerbaijan today. The NGO cites the country's lack of democratic institutions, free media, and an independent judiciary. The Council of Europe decries the detentions of political prisoners. Transparency International, an NGO that monitors corruption, says the government is "highly corrupt."

Free states are stronger than authoritarian ones because they are accountable to the people. Baku's current rulers should remember that even Soviet tanks could not keep the Communist bosses in the Kremlin for long after popular will turned decidedly against them.

In the first week after the 1990 invasion, local state television was shut down. Soviet agents had blown up the Baku broadcast transmitters hours before the tanks rolled in. Only the Azeri-language programs of Radio Liberty, broadcasting from Munich, broke through the media blackout. The short-wave broadcasts of Radio Azadliq were a lifeline to the outside world, and a symbol of hope and the dream of freedom for the protesters.

It is sadly ironic that now -- 19 years later -- the Azerbaijan government has banned international broadcasting in the country and Radio Azadliq, its mission far from accomplished, is again broadcasting only on short-wave frequencies.

Could Azerbaijan witness another "Black January"? Russia's military intervention in Georgia in August gives a new meaning to the term "Tbilisi syndrome," and suggests that anything is possible.

Moscow's growing ambitions in what it still calls "the near abroad" should not be underestimated. The conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh remains unresolved and continues to afford the Kremlin an excuse for meddling in the region. If a crisis comes, can the government in Baku count on the support of its citizens?

January 20, 1990, was a crucial trial by fire for Azerbaijan as a nation. Today's anniversary reminds us that the struggle for what the protesters then demanded remains largely unfinished.

Kenan Aliyev is the director of RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL.

     
Comments
by: Mark from: London
January 21, 2009 15:23
According to Human Rights Watch, "while the Kremlin's ostensible reason for the military action was to safeguard the Armenian population, most evidence simply does not support this contention. For example, documents of the military procurator's office in Baku examined by Human Rights Watch/Helsinki indicate that the military action was being planned even before the January 13, 1990 pogroms".[3]

The Soviet army was trying to rescue the authoritarian regime, the rule of Communist Party and Soviet Union.

by: Elman from: Baku
January 21, 2009 09:19
Kenan didn't mention Armenian pogroms because it's related to "black january" only indirectly. Pogroms lasted 3 days from January 13th till 16th, many Armenians were saved by members of Popular Front whose structures formed the only organized resistance to those provocations (while federal/soviet agencies were silently observing the situation) and by the time of invasion that particular threat was over. Kenan also didn't mention Armenian pogroms because then he'd have to go into the history of this bloody conflict which by the time of January 1989 left not a single Azeri out of more than 200 thousand in Armenia, with several hundred killed during the latest pogroms by Armenians...

by: Sergey from: USA
January 21, 2009 05:42
Kenan conveniently "forgots" to mention that prior to Jan 20, 1990 there was 2 weeks of anti-Armenian pogroms and massacres. For all the faults of the Soviet Union under Gorbachev, Azerbajani Islamo-Nationalists have their own share of innocent blood on their hands.

by: Yandunts
January 21, 2009 01:48
Sorry for parochialism, but one would wonder how many of those killed on January 20 participated in the Armenian pogroms of the days before? Since thousands participated in the pogroms I wonder if there is an association of some kind representing them?

by: nermin from: US
January 20, 2009 19:36
Thank you Kenan,
I remember the broadcasts with Mirza Hazer and Borchali screaming what was happening.

The Georgian and Azeri cadets were locked into their barracks so they would not revolt.Etibar Mamedov was constantly on CNN, the blockade of the harbor was broken by the Russians, Pres. Bush was on TV congratulating Gorbachev, (citing uniforms found "proving" a coup).
Even the female President of the republic burned her communist ID card.

Someone had to be made an example, and it certainly was notgoing to be the Lithuanians, who had clout in Washington.
This was followed by Turks giving blood for the wounded Azeris, which was rejected by Russia.
I've always wondered how Bush 41 would not have known what RL was saying and parroted Gorby's lies to the American people.
This type of coverage set the stage for the later years of disinformation about Azerbaijan.
Controlling information is certainly the surest method of creating history.

by: Brazilian Guy from: São Paulo - SP - Brazil
January 20, 2009 19:09
It’s good to remember that former KGB chief Heydar Aliyev was part of the Soviet government at the time of the massacre… and he deposed the Popular Front government some years later.
     
TEXT SIZE - +

Editors' Picks

Arresting Images

Photos Of The Week Photogallery

President Van Rompuy

'How's That Again?!' Audio

Karzai Inauguration

The Anticipation Of Change Video

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile