Commentary

Fundamentalist Calls To Ignore Norouz Go Unheard In Iran, Afghanistan

Norouz celebrations included trips to holy shrines, like that of this Afghan woman and her son in Kabul.

Norouz celebrations included trips to holy shrines, like that of this Afghan woman and her son in Kabul.

March 21, 2010
By Abbas Djavadi
Maryam had invited her two daughters and their husbands and grandchildren for Norouz, the New Year's feast, to her home in western Tehran when I called her on Saturday. It was after 9:02 p.m. when "tahvil," the change from the old to the new year, 1389 after Iranian calendar, was celebrated at Maryam's apartment, as it was in hundreds of thousands of other households in Iran and other countries. She had prepared a beautiful Haft Seen, the Norouz table, and cooked delicious Iranian food. The television was on to follow the announcement of the "tahvil," after which everyone congratulated each other and the children received their New Year's presents. Then they put on CDs to hear good, entertaining music -- something happier than what they always hear from local radio and television.

Every year on the eve of the first day of spring, millions of people in Iran, Afghanistan, the Caucasus, Central Asia, and parts of Iraq, Turkey, Pakistan, and India celebrate the beginning of a New Year, rendered as Nowruz, in Persian: "New Day." Others call it Navruz, Nevroz, Nevruz, or Norouz (which is also RFE/RL's style for the holiday). It is a time of new beginning, peace, joy, and family -- very similar to Christmas and New Year's in much of the Western world. Celebrated since the sixth century BC, it has become an integral part of numerous peoples' culture and tradition. Last February, the United Nations' General Assembly recognized the "International Day of Nowruz, a spring festival of Persian origin."

For Maryam, this year's Norouz ritual started as it did every year -- with a spring clean-up of the apartment two weeks before Norouz. Later, on the last Wednesday of the old year, her sons-in-law and grandchildren went out for "Chaharshanbeh Suri," the fire festival in which people light small fires and spring over them, singing their wishes for the next year.

An Iranian boy joins in celebrations of the ancient Festival of Fire ahead of the new year.
This year, as so often in the last 20 years, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had issued a fatwa, or religious advisory. The fire festival "has no religious basis and will create a lot of damage and [moral] corruption," the Khamenei's fatwa noted, asking people not to attend it. Still, tens of thousands of Iranians went out into the streets or suburbs to mark the fire festival.

In an e-mail to RFE/RL's Radio Farda, an unnamed Iranian said: "Khamenei has again made clear that he is hostile to our traditions. But the fatwa also shows that he [Khamenei] is ready to sacrifice political wisdom to what he thinks is religious dogma."

Using the occasion, Iran's opposition Green Movement had called on people to mark the fire festival and raise democratic demands for change. Iran's police chief, Ahmad Reza Radan, later reported that "around 50 people were arrested in connection with the ritual."

Maryam's sons-in-law and their children hadn't used the Festival of Fire to shout any politically loaded slogans. Asked if she knew about Khamenei's fatwa, Maryam said: "To be honest, I didn't. And even if I had, so what? This is about our culture and tradition, and we don't want to give it away just because it is older than our religion or because the [supreme] leader asks us to ignore it."

"Not only the Chaharshanbeh Suri [the fire festival but]...Norouz itself is pre-Islamic," added Ahmad, Maryam's husband. "I remember [the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ruhollah] Khomeini himself tried right after the revolution to ban Norouz by saying it is un-Islamic. But people didn't even want to hear it. So they had no way but to swim with the stream. Since then, Khamenei himself congratulates the people every year on the occasion of Norouz. But they would ban it, if they could."
Norouz celebrations in Kabul on March 21


A similar attempt was made last week in Afghanistan to ban Norouz. Seventy-five Islamic clerics and lawmakers, headed by former Kabul Governor Mullah Taj Muhammad Mujahid, issued a statement calling Norouz "un-Islamic and a tradition of fire worshippers [Zoroastrians]" and asking Afghans not to celebrate it. Those calls also went unheard, and Afghanistan celebrated Norouz as always. A Kabul-based listener of RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan said: "This is a very strange call. We have done so in the past and we still want to start a new year with joy and hope."

This year's Norouz strangely united fundamentalist Iranian Shi'a and Afghan Sunnis in rejecting century-old national traditions. And it thus naturally united Iranians and Afghans -- regardless of their Islamic beliefs -- in defying those efforts.

Abbas Djavadi is an associate director of broadcasting at RFE/RL. The views expressed in this commentary are his own, and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
     
Comments
by: Hamik C Gregory from: Reno, NV USA
March 22, 2010 17:36
Norouz-New Years, and Chahar Shanbe Suri-Iranian Fire Festival, were bequeathed to us by our Pre Islamic ancestors who created the Achamenean, Parthean, and Sassanid Empires. These celebrations are completely internalized. They have become part of our blood and woven into our national consciousness. No one can tell us not to celebrate them.
Some clerics in Tehran, think, teach, and preach exactly the opposite of what people in Iran are used to. They are not exactly in tune with what Iranians in general cherish and respect! For the sake of their own safety, they have isolated themselves so well from the general public that they have lost touch with Iranian cultural reality!
I wonder why?!

by: HS from: Seattle, USA
March 22, 2010 21:35
So if it's un-Islamic it cannot be celebrated, and should be ignored? The name "Iran" pre-dates Islam. So perhaps Khamenei should issue a fatwa against using the name "Iran"!
In Response

by: Turgai Sangar from: Eurasia
March 23, 2010 10:28
'Persia' was officially renamed 'Iran' under Reza Shah Pahlavi I in 1935, so I would not say that it predates Islam really.

by: Turgai Sangar from: Eurasia
March 23, 2010 08:42
It is indeed an un-Islamic, pagan celebration yet if it has to be I prefer Nawruz to the Western-Soviet new year because Nawruz is actually the natural beginning of something (spring), unlike the Western-Soviet new year which is merely a calendar day and a vulgar boozing spree.

by: Hamik C Gregory from: Reno, NV USA
March 23, 2010 19:00
Norouz celebrations come down to us from our Zoroastrian ancestors who created our pre Islamic Persian Empire. They were not pagans! Mr. Sangar don't forget that in Iran, Zoroastrians are declared as People of The Book. In another words, Shias, but not Sunnis, accept Avesta to be divinely inspired scriptures.
The concepts of Good and Evil, Heaven and Hell, and Angels and Archangels do not appear in the Bible until after Hebrew prophets of Babylonian captivity came in contact with the Zoroastrians of the Persian Empire. One can easily imagine how deeply this ancient faith has influenced Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. As far as I am concerned, Zoroastrianism is the forefather of the abovementioned three divine religions. There are absolutely nothing pagan about Norouz or Zoroastrianism
In Response

by: Turgai Sangar
March 25, 2010 16:19
Hmyes in fact you're right in the sense that Zoroastrianism is recognized in Iran and not really 'pagan' as one of the first monotheistic religions (it may indeed have influenced early Judaism). Hence let us keep it at 'a non-Islamic' holiday despite the fact that it is often being popularily being dubbed as an 'Islamic tradition' in ex-Soviet Eurasia for instance.

I'd also add that it is misleading to (as some do) present history as if everything was great, nice and an orgy of harmony in pre-Islamic Persia, Khorassan, etc... In fact, Christians have been persecuted under Zoroastrian rulers (e.g. the Sassanids) and the caste system pushed many to turn to Christianity and Islam.

If I may: are you Armenian Christian?

by: An Iranian from: Sweden
March 26, 2010 16:15
Dear commentators;

Firstly, I do not understand why should one argue about the name “Persia” that is an English word for a part of Iran while “Iran” means the land of Aryans. I believe that most of the people in the region, independent of religion, have the same Aryan root.
Secondly, why should one separate people because of faith, while all religions, if one believes in them, has just one God with the same basic commandments for all the people, independent of how he/she is called or who the prophet was.
Thirdly, although, most of the commandments of different religions have been altered by their so called “men of god”, the root of every religion is based on thinking good, doing good and saying good that is what Zoroastrian believe in. In that case, who could even imagine to call Zoroastrians pagan?
Fourthly, why should one judge historical behaviors with recent mankind belief? What if in hundreds years from now, people believe in completely different way and judge us with their beliefs. Note also that in similar situations, even much more recently, so called “righteous” and “democratic” westerners discriminated and killed believers of other religions and ideologies.
Fifthly, if one should bring up historical events, then why not mention the “human rights”, which had been declared by “Cyrus the great”, a man who had the greatest power at his time, but is recognized recently and almost 2500 years after his death by the westerners.
I have to point out that “Nowrooz” is the natural point of the year to celebrate a new year, independent of religious beliefs. Therefore I hope you all have a good year ahead of you.

by: Hamik C Gregory from: Reno, NV USA
March 26, 2010 18:17
Mr. Sangar you are correct! Less than half a dozen Sassanid Shahs did indeed persecute Christians in their empire. So nothing was necessarily honky dory as you said. But lets be clear about this! They did not like Christian missionaries preaching and converting their population. It would have caused disharmony and conflict in their vast domain. As much as they could, they tried to keep the peace between different nationalities that constituted their empire. They also persecuted some Christian merchants who were more prosperous than others and would not pay extra in taxes.
Let’s keep this in mind that the shahs were not inherently greedy or cruel and they did not have a systematic plan to eliminate Christians from their empire. They imposed heavy taxes because they were primarily interested in empire building. In order to expand their domain, they needed to recruit soldiers, and to keep their soldiers, they need to impose taxes to pay them. Some of this tax burden fell on Christians!
With the advent of Christianity and Islam, Zoroastrians who converted to Christianity stopped celebrating the Norouz and started celebrating the New Years according to the Christian Julian calendar! Those who converted to Islam adapted the Iranian Solar Calendar and kept celebrating the Norouz!
Norouz is very important for the Iranians because unlike others in the Middle East, they have a very strong historical memory of their past! They have not forgotten their Zoroastrian ancestors, and they do not wish to!
Yes! I am an Iranian Armenian Christian!

by: Sober
April 09, 2010 02:26
You don't have to hate your past Sanjar, including the Soviet one. People talk here of how they like Iran and Nowruz and give no schit whether you hate/like Soviet New Year or not. Even more sothey hate the way you are mentoring them - go to school to share your thoughts, but don't poison us with your hatred.
     
TEXT SIZE - +

Latest Commentary

Editors' Picks

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile