Tuesday, February 14, 2012


Features

In Open Letter, CEE Leaders Warn Obama That U.S. Ties May Be Slipping

Former Czech President Vaclav Havel is one of a number of current and former policymakers and intellectuals to have signed the letter to Obama.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Heather Maher
WASHINGTON -- A group of pro-American intellectuals and former policy makers from former Soviet bloc countries have written an open letter to the Obama administration urging it to significantly strengthen its diplomatic and security ties with the region.
 
The signatories warn that the post-Cold War alliances with the United States that helped usher in democracy and bring the region into trans-Atlantic security agreements are in danger of slipping away.

The letter was published in the Polish daily "Gazeta Wyborcza" on July 16 and signed by 22 prominent thinkers and ex-foreign ministers, prime ministers, and presidents from Lithuania, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, Estonia, Bulgaria, Latvia, and Romania.

The signatories include former presidents Lech Walesa and Aleksander Kwasniewski of Poland, Vaclav Havel of the Czech Republic, Emil Constantinescu of Romania, and Vaira Vike-Freiberga of Latvia. They describe themselves as U.S. allies who remain deeply indebted to America for helping bring down the Iron Curtain.

Chief among their concerns is that the Central and Eastern European region has ceased to be a priority on the U.S. foreign policy agenda due to what they consider the misguided notion that the region is largely stable, pro-American, and on a secure path to full trans-Atlantic integration.

To the contrary, the signers say, the region's traditionally close relationship with the United States faces a raft of threats -- from citizens skeptical of NATO membership and increasingly critical of the United States, to Russia's return to what it calls a "revisionist power pursing a 19th-century agenda with 21st-century tactics."

Weakened NATO

The group is most concerned about what it sees as a weakened NATO that seems ambivalent about defending its newest members, and a strong Russia that seems increasingly intent on restoring the old Soviet sphere of influence on its borders.

One of the signatories, Lubos Dobrovsky, a former Czech defense minister and ambassador to Russia, said the group wants Obama to improve U.S. relations with Russia at the same time that it holds the former superpower accountable for its regional aggression.

This is not about something that has been done by the Obama administration. It's much more a kind of a signal that we wanted to send now...
"To me, the main message [of the open letter] is that President Obama should continue his efforts to establish better relationship with Russia, requesting at the same time that they understand [the] demands of Central and East Europeans and stop threatening us with their rockets," Dobrovsky told RFE/RL's Georgian Service. "And [that they] finally give the explicit order to their forces to vacate the sovereign territory of Georgia, i.e. South Ossetia and Abkhazia."

The letter talks of "nervousness in our capitals" over the methods Russia has employed -- from energy blockades to media manipulation -- to advance its interests and challenge the region's trans-Atlantic orientation and aspirations.

And it warns Obama against embracing a "narrow understanding of Western interests" vis-a-vis Russia that could lead "to the wrong concessions."

Ivan Krastev, head of the Centre for Liberal Strategies in Sofia, Bulgaria, signed the letter and said it wasn't written in reaction to anything Washington has or hasn't done, but rather because the group wanted to contribute to the formation of new policy.

"This is not about something that has been done by the Obama administration," Krastev says. "It's much more a kind of a signal that we wanted to send now, when we believe that European policy of the Obama administration is in the making."

Not 'Anti-Russia'

Krastev also said the letter is not meant to be "anti-Russia" but said there is real anxiety in the region over the United States' view of Russia as a global power, which he said masks its revisionist policies toward Europe.

One of the major messages of the letter, he said, is that if the United States wants to rely on the support of Central and Eastern Europe, the Obama administration should strengthen its role as a "European power."

Krastev adds that the White House should also appreciate the fact that its priorities are not the same as the priorities of people and governments in the Central and Eastern European region. The challenges of Afghanistan, Iran, and climate change, for example, are supported, but not important, he said.

"A special policy for Central and Eastern Europe is needed because otherwise, paradoxically, because of its provincialism, Central and Eastern Europe can become a problem for cooperation between the European Union and the United States," Krastev says.

The signatories say they didn't write the letter to add to the Obama administration's already long list of foreign policy problems, but rather to offer a new agenda that, 20 years after the fall of the Iron Curtain, will help ensure another 20 years of close cooperation with the United States.

'Thorniest Issue'

Their recommendations range from the relatively simple -- "the United States should reaffirm its [role] as a European power and make clear that it plans to stay fully engaged in the continent even while it faces pressing challenges" elsewhere -- to the fairly complex: "NATO needs to make the Alliance's [common defense] commitments credible and provide strategic reassurance to all members."

The group says the "thorniest issue" is the United States' planned missile-defense installations, and admits that public opinion is sharply divided throughout Central and Eastern Europe. But it advocates working "as allies" to decide the future of the program and warns that "unfounded Russian opposition" should not determine the final outcome.

The Bush administration reached agreements last year to station interceptor missiles at a base in Poland and a linked radar base in the Czech Republic. Russia vehemently opposes the plan and Obama is skeptical of it and is undertaking a thorough review.

"Abandoning the program entirely or involving Russia too deeply in it without consulting Poland or the Czech Republic can undermine the credibility of the United States across the whole region," the letter says.

Washington has had no official reaction to the letter as of yet.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: DAVID DASTYCH from: WARSAW,POLAND
July 18, 2009 09:27
President Obama's policy versus Russia reminds me of a European appeasement policy versus Nazi Germany and also the Soviet Union. Sounds strong but it might be true in the long run.
The United States shouldn't pursue a foreign policy of a "lonely superpower," without paying proper attention to the rest of the world. But to abandon principles in exchange for temporary gains (like an agreement to fly military personnel and supplies to Afghanistan via Russian territory) could be interpreted (by Russia) as a sign of U.S. weakness.
President Obama tried to link the global missile defense decisions to the behavior of the Iranian theocracy. The plain truth is that the U.S. missile defence program is not being developed solely because of the potential threat posed by Iran's nuclear buildup. What about North Korea and a number of other countries that might reach to nuclear weapons? The missile defense is a GLOBAL issue and a safeguard against ROGUE regimes in the future.
When the President of the United States undermines the credibility of his own country, offering concessions to Russia (or to any other country), without consulting his decision with the NATO allies, it's a very dangerous breach of confidence to the United States.
I do not hesitate to criticize President Obama, not because my voice sounds from Warsaw,Poland, but because his lack of experience and a self-proclaimed "I know better" attitude might be disastrous to the U.S.A. and the world as such.
DAVID DASTYCH
journalist, former CIA covert agent working against the Soviets
intehand@gmail.com

by: Zviad Kavteli from: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
July 19, 2009 04:05
Dear DAVID DASTYCH:
Thank you for doing your job and defending democracy in Europe and the world.

Russian authoritarian and antidemocratic threat is very real. This threat is felt most in Georgia, where I am from. Russia has been destabilizing, undermining and destroying Georgia since 1989, when Georgians voiced their desire to leave USSR. The war of August 2008 was only another stage of Georgia's struggle for democracy and freedom from Russia.

God bless the US, the leader of the free world.

by: Martin Bright
July 19, 2009 22:06
Luckily there are many west europeans who knows better. We don`t want to be the bandwagon of some east european or american antirussianism, and we will fight in our parlaments to block any move that bring us close to a mutual destruction war.
I don`t know if the antirussian people want a war, but I am pretty shure that the western europeans don`t have any appetite for that. If that means that Georgia and Ukraine never enter NATO, so be it. If that means no plan for the Baltics, the better.
We will oppose to any move that increase tension in our backyard, and I say quite frankly to you, the missile defense and protection plans and pacts only lead us to war, and we don`t want war.
If you want to fight the russians, you will fight alone, you won`t count with west Europe. We want good relations with all, including the russians. If that doesn`t taste you, so bad.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (6 total)

Saleem: If successive Pakistani governments have failed to deal with the 'Balochistan problem' then ... More

UN Rights Chief Scathing On Syria

Latest Comment (2 total)

Chechen: "Moscow also has had a deal since 1971 with Syria "
Sorry that was ... More

U.K. Releases Radical Cleric On Bail

Latest Comment (1 total)

Martin : Modern Europe has deteriorated to such grotesque that its end has to be ... More