Sunday, February 12, 2012


Features

Will Turkey-Armenia Deal Lead To A Season Of Change In Nagorno-Karabakh?

TEXT SIZE - +
By Brian Whitmore


WATCH: Born in war and raised in an uneasy peace, an entire generation of young Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh is reaching adulthood and could see its world change yet again. With momentum building for a final settlement that could mean an end to the region's isolation, the author traveled to the enclave and spoke to young people about their views on the conflict and their hopes for the future.

STEPANAKERT/BAKU -- Aleksandr Osipov likes things just the way they are in Nagorno-Karabakh. In fact, he wouldn't change a thing.

Enjoying the autumn sunshine in a well-manicured park in downtown Stepanakert, Osipov, an animated 85-year-old ethnic Armenian pensioner with a thick shock of white hair, dismisses any talk of the breakaway republic ever returning to Azerbaijani rule.

"The people of Karabakh have conclusively decided to be free," Osipov says. "If we are part of Azerbaijan, we will never live freely. We want to live in our republic. We are Armenians and want to live with Armenians."

Aleksandr Osipov
But Osipov's comments come amid a season of change that may dramatically alter the status quo in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The mountainous region, which was the site of a bitter six-year war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, has enjoyed de facto independence since a cease-fire was declared in 1994. But with an Armenian-majority population on the one hand, and legal ties to Azerbaijan on the other, Nagorno-Karabakh's long-term fate is far from settled.

And the issue is once again under the spotlight, following the October 10 signing of an accord reestablishing ties between Armenia and Azerbaijan's historic ally, Turkey.

Ankara severed relations with Yerevan in 1993, in solidarity with Baku over Armenia's occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh. (An unresolved dispute over the World War I-era mass killings of ethnic Armenians by Ottoman Turks has also contributed to historically sour ties.)

Last weekend, after months of coaxing by the international community, the foreign ministers of Turkey and Armenia met in Zurich and signed accords restoring diplomatic ties and opening the countries' border.

There is no formal link between Nagorno-Karabakh and the Turkish-Armenian rapprochement. But analysts say the presence of officials from the United States, Russia, and France -- the three countries that serve as co-chairs to the OSCE Minsk Group, which monitors negotiations on Nagorno-Karabakh -- made the connection implicit.

"The presence of the Minsk Group co-chair countries during the signing ceremony proves that there is a link -- almost a formal link -- between the progress at the Turkey-Armenian rapprochement and progress in the negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan," says Baku-based political analyst Ilqar Mammadov. "Armenia has no way to avoid this connection."

The deal was welcomed in the West but has stirred anxieties in more local corners like Nagorno-Karabakh, where residents fear their region's unresolved status may prove to be a chip in a grand bargain between Turkey, Armenia, and Azerbaijan.

Those worries may have intensified on October 11, when Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan stated flatly his country's parliament might refuse to approve the peace accord unless Armenia agrees to withdraw from Nagorno-Karabakh.

A man stands in front of a poster in Stepanakert depicting scenes from the Karabakh war.
The Armenian president, Serzh Sarkisian, dismissed Erdogan's statement as intended for audiences in Turkey and Azerbaijan. Sarkisian confirmed his intention to travel to Turkey on October 14 for a landmark visit to watch a Turkey-Armenia World Cup qualifying match at the invitation of his Turkish counterpart, Abdullah Gul.

And in Nagorno-Karabakh, ordinary citizens like Osipov bristle at the mere suggestion of an Armenian withdrawal, or the return of Azerbaijanis forced to flee during the war.

"If the Azerbaijanis return, they will say they are in charge here, that this is their land, and  that we must leave," Osipov says.

One Toilet For 100 Families


Meanwhile, 350 kilometers away from Stepanakert, in the Azerbaijani capital, Baku, Azeris displaced by the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict have worries of their own.

Nearly 700,000 Azerbaijanis were forced to flee the fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding territories. Fifteen years later, the vast majority of them are still living in unbearable conditions, many in squalid dormitories provided them by the state.

Residents of one ramshackle, Soviet-era building say that as many as eight people are forced to share a single room, that they often go without water and gas, and that more than 100 families share one toilet.

"Nobody would want to live in a single room sharing it with seven other people. Nobody would want to queue up for toilet with 85 people," says Yosuf Abbasov, a lanky 43-year-old who fought in the 1988-94 war before fleeing to Baku.  

"Instead of fighting with each other in this queue for the toilet, it would be better to fight with Armenians to get back our land," he says.

Heyvagul Abbasova escaped the fighting along with her then-infant son
Heyvagul Abbasova, a 43-year-old woman who escaped fighting in Lachin with her son, then an infant, works in a kiosk selling cigarettes, newspapers, and soft drinks outside the dormitory. She weeps softly as she recalls her homeland.

"If I see Karabakh in reality -- not in my dreams, but for real, with my own eyes -- I'm afraid my heart might give out on me," Abbasova says. "If I were told today that our lands were freed, I would run there without anything. I would walk there barefoot. It is always in our dreams."

She says she constantly tells her children that they "have not always been refugees" and once had a home and "a normal life on our own land."

But like many of the displaced,  Abbasova  is skeptical that the latest round of negotiations will result in them returning home.

"We'll always live with the hope that one day we could return to our land. But we don't see any results from the negotiations. For almost 18 years already, they've been telling us that the occupied lands will soon be freed. But there are still no results," she says.

"My 4-month-old son, who left Karabakh in my arms, is now 18 years old and he will join the military service soon. How can I believe in these negotiations?"

Azerbaijani officials had been pushing for Armenia to agree to return five districts surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh and to allow displaced persons to return to their homes as preconditions for Turkey reestablishing diplomatic ties with Yerevan.

But while officials described a meeting between Sarkisian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on October 8 as "constructive," there was no breakthrough ahead of the deal between Yerevan and Ankara.

Azerbaijani officials are clearly nervous about the Armenian-Turkish rapprochement, which deprives Baku of a degree of leverage over Yerevan.

In an interview with RFE/RL, Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry spokesman Elkhan Polukhov described the Turkey-Armenia deal as "completely against the national of interests of Azerbaijan," because it comes without a resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Noting a growing disappointment with Turkey, Polukhov added that energy-rich Azerbaijan has the means and will to defend its interests itself, even if Baku's international allies do not.

Men outside a Baku dormitory for internally displaced persons from Nagorno-Karabakh
"Azerbaijan is not a puppet country that can be manipulated," Polukhov says. "We are a major power in the region. We are an active and irremovable part of many international projects that involve many big powers."

Azerbaijani officials have subtly suggested that Baku's participation in international initiatives like the Nabucco pipeline project, which would transport gas from the Caspian Sea region to Europe, could be in jeopardy if its interests were not taken into account in Nagorno-Karabakh. (In an interview published just ahead of the Zurich signing, Aliyev noted significantly that the price of Azerbaijani gas sold to Turkey had not yet been finalized.)

'We're Speaking About Our Future'

Just as the Armenia-Turkey deal has Azerbaijani officials worried about being left out in the cold, many in Nagorno-Karabakh are concerned that Yerevan may cut a deal over the territory behind their backs.

The Minsk Group is urging Yerevan and Baku to agree to a series of confidence-building measures, known as the Basic Principles, as an interim step before the territory's final status will be discussed.

These include the return of Armenian occupied lands surrounding the territories to Baku's control, an interim status for Nagorno-Karabakh that provides for self-governance, the establishment of an international peacekeeping mission, and the return of tens of thousands of Azerbaijanis displaced by the 1988-94 war.

Azerbaijan has embraced the Basic Principles, while Armenia has remained noncommittal. Officials in Nagorno-Karabakh, who complain that they have no representative in negotiations that will ultimately determine the territory's fate, have rejected the proposal out of hand.

In an interview with RFE/RL, Nagorno-Karabakh's de facto deputy foreign minister, Vardan Barseghian, says the entire peace process, in which Azerbaijan and Armenia negotiate under the auspices of the Minsk Group, needs to be overhauled.

"Karabakh needs to be present at the negotiating table. This current format needs to be reviewed and reset, and the Basic Principles need to be modified," Barseghian says. "We're speaking about our future. We're speaking about the future of this region and the future of these people, who have a desire to live in freedom."

Officials like Barseghian, as well as ordinary people in Nagorno-Karabakh, point out that not only Azerbaijanis were displaced by the 1988-94 war. Some 140,000 Armenians from Azerbaijan were also driven from their homes during the conflict.

Many of them, like Vladimir Agamirov, a feisty 74-year-old, settled in Nagorno-Karabakh. A native of Baku, Agamirov fled to Armenia shortly after the conflict broke out in 1988.

Vladimir Agamirov, a Baku native who now lives in Stepanakert
He eventually settled in Shusha, a former resort town a short drive from Stepanakert, where he is repairing a rundown apartment for his family.

Agamirov says he has fond memories of living with Azerbaijanis before the war and is not opposed to seeing them return to Nagorno-Karabakh now. He adds that it is high time for politicians to finally resolve the protracted conflict over the territory.

"We all need to live in peace. Everybody. All people need to live in peace," Agamirov says emphatically.

"Nobody needs another war. Let them come to an agreement. If the politicians want a war, let them fight it themselves. Neither the Azerbaijanis, the Armenians, nor anybody else needs another war."

Lucine Musayelyan of RFE/RL's Armenian Service contributed to this report in Stepanakert. Ulviyye Asadzade of RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service contributed to this report from Baku
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: Mike
October 14, 2009 01:44
"Ankara severed relations with Yerevan in 1993, in solidarity with Baku over Armenia's occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh."

Ankara and Yerevan never had relations to severe. There were no embassies, treaties, anything. Turkey (a NATO member protected by my tax $$) unilaterally closed its border with Armenia in an attempt to starve the population of this landlocked country. This is an act of war in international law. When Soviet Union tried to do this to West Berlin, we were all "Ich bin ein Berliner." When an important military customer does it to its neighbor, oh well, may be Armenians shouldn't be that laud about the genocide Turks committed so long ago... That's why Turkey feels very comfortable developing and trading Sudanese oil while their Arab government commits a genocide of its black citizens.

by: Richard from: Seattle, WA
October 14, 2009 02:51
As an observer of this conflict, one can not avoid the conclusion that the fundamental core of the problem involves the security of the Armenians, or rather the lack of it. Turkish-Armenian relations and Karabakh are indeed related, but with a directionality opposite of that which is often portrayed. It is inevitable that Armenians would viscerally feel insecure under any Turkic administration precisely because of, and not independent from, the history of mass extermination and genocide to which they were so clearly subjected by the Ottoman Turkish state. The unrepentant denial of that period by modern Turkey, echoed by Azerbaijan, only amplifies the existential threat Armenians must feel today. Karabakh, and Armenian-Turkish reconciliation, should be explicitly connected, but, it appears, with Turkic atonement as the prerequisite. In order for Armenians to be expected to feel any semblance of security, whether in Armenia proper or in Karabakh, Turkey will likely need to recognize explicitly, and redress, the attempt (arguably largely successful) to expunge the Armenians from this part of the world. Otherwise, it is fantasy, and likely irresponsible, to believe that Armenians-- or any other people in an analogous situation-- would ever feel sufficiently secure in such a region and context to make any compromise related to their physical security.

by: Tom
October 14, 2009 09:09
Thank you for good article, very inrteresting. Bravo

by: Hamo
October 14, 2009 10:17
"Fifteen years later, the vast majority of them are still living in unbearable conditions"...if Azerbaijan government "cares" this much about own people, how they would treat Armenians? A question to people who are talking about the possibility of reunion of NKR?
Almost every day I see reports about this, but it is a rear thing if an international journalist speaks about Azerbaijan's military spending, which brought to violation of international treaties such as The Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe??? Maybe instead of buying tanks and aircrafts it would be more humanistic to build a couple of more toilettes and thus convince some Armenians of NKR that Azerbaijani leaders care about people?

by: Kamil from: Baku
October 14, 2009 11:19
Armenian diaspora should listen to 74-year -old Agamirov:

"We all need to live in peace. Everybody. All people need to live in peace,"

"Nobody needs another war. Let them come to an agreement. If the politicians want a war, let them fight it themselves. Neither the Azerbaijanis, the Armenians, nor anybody else needs another war."

You dumbells in diaspora...Everybody had enough of your murmurs and mumbles. Keep drinking your wine and Starbuks coffee and just move over...


by: Prof.OMAR (ret)
October 14, 2009 12:13
The 85 year old Mr.Osipov summarised the feeling of the Karabakhi Armenians. the solution is very simple, each nation must live on its land designated by Soviet time and when there is area of mixed people then they must come up with sharing system, e.g. so called occupied zones or in Baku region.

The issues of the refugees are on both side. but it is obvious to all that Azeri leaders are using oil money and refugee aids to buy arms for future wars, so that is the main reason here you have Azeri tent cities, because Azerbaijan does not want fair solution and USA,EU, Russia and RFE/RL must understand this point, otherwise all are manupelated by few AZERI warmongers. Turkey knows this point and that is why she opted to welcome Armenia.
THANK YOU.


by: Fariz from: USA
October 14, 2009 14:43
The only solution is to force Armenia to withdraw from the lands of Azerbaijan that Armenia invaded. Azerbaijan's borders are internationally recognized and Armenia should be forced to respect it. Armenians had lived in peace in Azerbaijan before they wanted to separate the country. This is not acceptable. These territories have historically belonged to Azerbaijan and if Armenians moved there and lived for so many centuries this shows how peaceful and hospitable Azerbaijanis are. It is ironic that the only monoethnic country in this region is Armenia. If we talk about the Armenians living in Azerbaijan, they why don't we mention Azerbaijanis who used to live in Armenia? What happened to them? Why were they forced from their lands? Despite of the war, there are 40,000 Armenians living in Azerbaijan yet today.
Armenia is the only hostile coutnry in this area and it is urgent to force Armenia to end its aggression, withdraw from Azerbaijan's lands.

by: ibrahim from: london
October 14, 2009 16:46
guys from USA. before write something you must be sure what you saying (richard, mike)whay do you know about genocide? without knowing history nobody can say about fake Armenian genocide. If you really interesting about genocide then check the Khodjali genocide which made by armenians against peaceful Azeris. Also what USA did with hindu ,afganistan and Iraq clearly shows about you and your taxs.We are people in Azerbaijan and Armenia dont want war ,but our occupied lands must be freed. so if you dont support occupider country like Armenia then they would not carry on with occupation.Guys from USA if your taxs goes to kill people in Iraq,Afganistan and anywhere else dont be stupids.just react against it. We dont mind if Turkey opens borders because then armenian will all run from Armenia which is they are now doing.They know that if there will be war there will no chance to them at the end.The armenian occupier only survive with your taxs and support americans. Hope peace will come to our countrys.

by: Master V from: USA
October 14, 2009 18:12
This is yet another issue in the world that will always occur with land and people, its just the way it is. There will always be war and there will always be killing, unfortunately its been like this since the beginning of civilization. Be it for Natural resources, such as water and fertile soil or just plain arrogance and pride combined with military might. People are in conflict with each other all the time, neighbors that live side by side, Gang members who claim a territory or an area of turf in their city, countries who claim the land belonged to them first. But hey, Armenia did have a lot more land over 100 years ago then they do now, so what about that. Israel and Palestine which claim it was Palestine before, India and Pakistan with Kashmir. Russia, Georgia, Chechnya, need I go on. We all know atrocities were commited, wheather its the Khodjali and Agdam incidences, or 1915. This is only gonna continue perpetually, pointing fingers at each other, or who started what first. Why dont all of you just leave things the way they currently are and continue living life. The bottom line is "You cant keep everyone happy" Open the Damn borders if you choose, let Karapagh maintain their way of life. No one wants another war, but it doesnt matter what I say or anyone else says, we all know what will eventually happen, I worry that Azerbajian and their increased military spending will find their way fighting and attacking Karapagh in the near future. So now is the waiting game, Good luck and Godspeed you you all.

by: Johnny Be Good from: City Of Angeles
October 15, 2009 01:18
"Before write something you must be sure what you saying (richard, mike)whay do you know about genocide? without knowing history nobody can say about fake Armenian genocide"

First of all, it's what do you know about genocide not whatever the FU%* it is you wrote, secondly my grandparents and the relatives of my brothers and sisters in the Diaspora where subjected to the horror's of what you called "fake Armenian genocide" So I wish the Azeri’s would start another war in Nagorno-Karabakh, because I know the world would see how the Diaspora would reacted. The same way they did in 1991

Comments page of 2
    Next 
               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

South Ossetian Opposition Leader Hospitalized After Raid On Her Headquarters

Latest Comment (8 total)

Michael: This is obviously putin's kgb tactics, that just never seem to end. The ... More

Baby Girls Seen As Mixed Blessing In Afghanistan

Latest Comment (6 total)

mohammadnabi: really the afghan society has this problem .but the org ion of those ... More

Iran To Make Nuclear Announcement

Latest Comment (6 total)

Dirty Dave: True. It's sad how this article, like a cheap campaign speech, is filled ... More