Accessibility links

Breaking News

Qishloq Ovozi

(Left to tight:) Indian Vice President Hamid Ansari, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, and Turkmen President Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov take part in a ceremony to launch the construction of the TAPI pipeline in Mary on December 13.

The leaders of Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the vice president of India gathered near the Turkmen city of Mary on December 13 to launch the construction of the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) pipeline.

It was reminiscent of December 14, 2009, when the leaders of Turkmenistan, China, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan gathered in Saman-Depe, Turkmenistan, near the Uzbek border, to launch another gas pipeline.

There is a very big difference in the two launches, however.

The 2009 event in Saman-Depe marked the actual start of gas supplies from Turkmenistan, through Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, to China. The pipeline (the first of four) in this case was complete.

The 2015 event was more about a hope that many feel is misplaced. Not one section of pipe has been laid and there are formidable obstacles in financing and hazards along the proposed route.

To understand how difficult it would be to construct the 1,814-kilometer TAPI pipeline to eventually carry some 33 billion cubic meters of gas from southern Turkmenistan all the way to Fazilka, India, RFE/RL's Turkmen Service, known locally as Azatlyk, assembled a Majlis, a panel discussion, to review the situation for TAPI as construction begins in Turkmenistan.

Moderating the panel was Azatlyk director Muhammad Tahir. Participating from Ottawa was Dr. Robert Cutler, a senior research fellow with the Institute of European, Russian & Eurasian Studies at Carleton University. William Byrd, senior Afghanistan expert at the U.S. Institute of Peace and former country director for Afghanistan at the World Bank joined the conversation from Washington. And I was, of course, delighted to throw in some comments of my own.

The idea of TAPI has been around for two decades. From the Majlis to the Qishloq Ovozi blog, we've covered some aspects of this topic in recent months, so to keep things "fresh" here, we'll summarize earlier information and concentrate on newer developments.

Deteriorating Security

The route is fraught with peril, as Byrd noted. "Certainly the security situation is really worrisome and the pipeline route actually goes through some of the more insecure parts of Afghanistan, particularly in the south areas, which basically the Taliban has a large degree of control over and also over areas where individual warlords have some influence."

And for the last few years, the security situation in northern Afghanistan, just across the border from Turkmenistan has been deteriorating rapidly. Questions about security for the pipeline start less than one kilometer inside Afghanistan from the Turkmen border. In 2015, militant groups -- Taliban and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan -- briefly captured villages right on the border with Turkmenistan.

And, Byrd added, the situation does not improve much when the route exits Afghanistan. "Let's also not forget," he said, "the pipeline goes through a pretty insecure part of Pakistan as well, [Balochistan] where there's been separatist movements for many decades and so you can't even say for sure that the pipeline is completely secure in parts of the Pakistan route.

Byrd suggested that, for TAPI to be built, some sort of arrangement with the Taliban, as well as the Afghan government, would be necessary, though it was noted during the discussion that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani had pledged a 7,000-strong force to guard the pipeline and its construction.

Now to newer, non-security obstacles.

At various times during the TAPI project's history major international companies have expressed an interest in joining, and possibly managing, the project. That is no longer the case due largely to reasons just mentioned above.

So Turkmenistan's state gas company Turkmengaz has promised to contribute 85 percent of the cost of building the $10-billion pipeline.

Cutler asked, "For a country like Turkmenistan in which the gross domestic product is about $45 billion what sense does this make?"

Cutler also questioned the timetable. Turkmenistan's President Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov confidently predicted at the TAPI launch that the pipeline would be functional by 2019.

But Cutler pointed to construction of the East-West pipeline, which runs from fields in eastern Turkmenistan to near the Caspian coast. "TAPI is more than twice as long and it will cost five times as much," Cutler said.

"Now recall that this [East-West pipeline] was announced in 2008 or so; it took seven years for this to be constructed," he added.

Cutler also reminded us that the East-West pipeline was internal, located solely inside Turkmenistan, whereas TAPI passes through four countries.

As Cutler explained, "You're going to need an organizational design, you're going to need specialists, you're going to need experts, it's not even clear, honestly, that the Turkmenistan government…has access to…the expertise that they would require for the construction of the pipeline."

Rising Costs

And that is only the technical part of the project. Cutler also suggested that the $8.5 billion the Turkmen government has pledged translates to an obligation to raise that money by luring international investment into the project.

But, as Cutler said, "it's equally unclear, equally doubtful, that they [the Turkmen government] have the negotiating skills that would be required to craft a credible, legal, institutional, and organizational-infrastructural framework [for a pipeline project]."

And, concerning funding, Byrd said that, in his opinion, "the interesting thing is not related to Afghanistan but why, if this is so beneficial for India and Pakistan, why they're not contributing almost anything at all."

As it currently stands, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India are actually obligated to each come up with five percent of the project's cost, so $500 million per country.

Cutler also explained that the estimated cost of the project, today, is $10 billion. "The costs of these projects tend to grow over time and not to diminish," and he recalled that in 2008 the cost of TAPI was estimated at $7.6 billion.

The discussion was not all gloom and doom, however. Valid points about the importance of the project to the region were discussed and that importance provides some guarantee that TAPI will not be forgotten any time soon. The panel discussed in greater detail all these topics and other matters.

An audio recording of the talk can be heard here:

please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:43:56 0:00
Direct link


Most of Karakalpakstan is desert and areas of the northwestern part are an environmental disaster area due to salinization caused by the desiccation of the Aral Sea. (file photo)

In a refugee camp in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, a small group of people remembered a day few in the world know about.

December 14 marked 25 years since the parliament in Karakalpakstan adopted a declaration of state sovereignty -- effectively independence. It never came to be.

Karakalpakstan today is an autonomous region in the western part of Uzbekistan and there are no signs that that will change anytime soon, despite the wishes of some ethnic Karakalpaks, such as Aman Sagidullaev.

Sagidullaev is one of the Karakalpaks living in the refugee camp in Bishkek. His dreams of an independent Karakalpakstan ultimately led to him having to flee his homeland. Now he lives in constant fear that he will either be deported or simply abducted by agents of Uzbekistan's National Security Service (SNB).

Karakalpakstan accounts for more than one-third of Uzbekistan's total territory, though most of Karakalpakstan is desert and areas of the northwestern part are an environmental disaster area due to salinization caused by the desiccation of the Aral Sea. Only some 1.7 million people live there, and of that number only about half a million are ethnic Karakalpaks, a people more closely related to Kazakhs than to Uzbeks.

However, there are large deposits of oil and gas in Karakalpakstan. And while in some places that might be a boon to the local population, in Karakalpakstan people see few benefits from this wealth, while at the same time these hydrocarbon deposits ensure the territory will remain part of Uzbekistan.

Uzbekistan's government officially reincorporated Karakalpakstan into Uzbekistan proper in 1993, but made it an autonomous region and offered a concession that after 20 years the region could vote to remain with Uzbekistan or secede. When 2013 came, that promise was apparently forgotten.

Sagidullaev has been the leader of the Alga Karakalpakstan (Forward Karakalpakstan) movement since 2008. Uzbek authorities largely ignored the group initially but finally went after Sagidullaev in 2011, accusing him of embezzling some $1 million while he was head of an agricultural-equipment manufacturer in Karakalpakstan.

Sagidullaev fled Uzbekistan with his family that same year, eventually winding up in the refugee camp in Bishkek. Uzbek authorities did not show much interest in Sagidullaev or the $1 million he allegedly stole until 2014, when Alga Karakalpakstan started using social networks to appeal to the World Bank to withhold a $411 million loan intended for projects in Karakalpakstan.

Alga Karakalpakstan also used the messages to the World Bank to chronicle the plight of the Karakalpaks -- the illnesses attributed to alkaline soils, the closure of industries in the region, the inability to promote the Karakalpak language and culture and, most disturbing, allegations that Karakalpak women were being sterilized as part of a campaign to reduce their numbers.

Uzbekistan issued a warrant for Sagidullaev's arrest and extradition shortly after the Alga Karakalpakstan messages started appearing on social networks, and Uzbek authorities started referring to Sagidullaev as a separatist.

For now, Sagidullaev enjoys some protection while the office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees considers his case. But the situation does not look promising and there is a possibility that Sagidullaev will not receive refugee status, in which case he will be essentially out on the streets in Bishkek.

More than one year ago, Qishloq wrote about Sagidullaev when he said he suspected SNB agents were watching the camp he was in and making inquiries about him and his family.

More recently, Qishloq has noted that there is reason to believe that Uzbek authorities will pursue perceived enemies of the state far beyond the borders of Uzbekistan. Kyrgyzstan, right next door to Uzbekistan, has not proven to be a safe haven for some Uzbeks wanted back home. They have been snatched off the street and taken back across the border to face charges in Uzbekistan.

I met with Sagidullaev when I was in Kyrgyzstan covering the parliamentary elections. He seemed resigned to the fact that an independent Karakalpakstan would remain a dream for a long time to come. What he really wanted was to be granted refugee status so he could relocate somewhere farther away from Uzbekistan, somewhere in Europe hopefully.

His future in Uzbekistan would be a prison cell and Karakalpakstan's future seems, for the foreseeable future, for it to remain a needed but neglected part of Uzbekistan.

Load more

About This Blog

Qishloq Ovozi is a blog by RFE/RL Central Asia specialist Bruce Pannier that aims to look at the events that are shaping Central Asia and its respective countries, connect some of the dots to shed light on why those processes are occurring, and identify the agents of change.

Bruce Pannier
Bruce Pannier

Content draws on the extensive knowledge and contacts of RFE/RL's Central Asian services but also allow scholars in the West, particularly younger scholars who will be tomorrow’s experts on the region, opportunities to share their views on the evolving situation at this Eurasian crossroad.

The name means "Village Voice" in Uzbek. But don't be fooled, Qishloq Ovozi is about all of Central Asia.

Subscribe

Listen

Majlis Podcast: A Reality Check On Uzbekistan's Cotton fields
please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:46:02 0:00
Podcast: Majlis
Latest episode
Majlis Podcast: A Reality Check On Uzbekistan's Cotton fields
Podcast: Majlis
XS
SM
MD
LG