Friday, February 10, 2012


Features

Islam's Challenges To 'Universal Human Rights'

Sabatina James uses a pseudonym and lives under police protection after fleeing Austria, where her father threatened to kill her for converting from Islam.
x
Sabatina James uses a pseudonym and lives under police protection after fleeing Austria, where her father threatened to kill her for converting from Islam.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Jeffrey Donovan
Sabatina James has one wish. She wants to enjoy the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which is 60 years old this week. But the 26-year-old Austrian of Pakistani heritage, in hiding since becoming Christian, is at the center of a storm between Islam and international human rights law.

After converting from Islam a few years ago, James had to flee from a father who wanted her killed for apostasy -- and from Austrian authorities who instead of protecting her, suggested she resolve the conflict by returning to Islam.

James, who uses a pseudonym, grew up in Linz, a city near the Alps more famous for chocolate than disputes between Islamic and international law. But when she renounced Islam, her father's verdict was clear. "He said, 'In two weeks you have to become a Muslim again or you're dead,'" says James, who fled to Germany, where she now lives under police protection.

On the anniversary of the UDHR's ratification, James's case dramatically illustrates Islam's growing challenge to the principles enshrined in the world's most translated document, including the freedom of thought, conscience, and worship -- and the right to change one's religion.

Many Muslim jurists say Shari'a does not envision such liberties -- and that apostasy is always punishable by death. Although there is growing debate about that interpretation, the tension between Islamic and international law is at the center of James's personal drama as well as Western attempts to accommodate Muslim citizens. It's also behind efforts by Muslim countries to establish new rights frameworks based on Shari'a.*

But what surprises James isn't that Muslim states have sought their own Shari'a-based rights charters. It's that in some Western countries she sees a willingness to have Shari'a applied to Muslim citizens at the expense of their tutelage under national and international laws.
 
For example, when she was first threatened by her father, James asked local police for help. "They said to me, 'Why don't you become Muslim again? Then you won't have problems, Madam. Why are you doing all that? It doesn't matter if you believe in Allah or Jesus.' But for me, it did matter, and I was living in a country which is not under Islamic law. And I was like, 'Why are these people taking the side of my parents?'"

Mounting Problem

There has been no recorded case of a Muslim being murdered for apostasy in Europe. What's more, such punishment is not regularly practiced in the Muslim world, where it is banned in many countries. Famously, it was outlawed in the Ottoman Empire but remains on the books in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran and a real threat to apostates in other countries, such as Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Europe, meanwhile, is increasingly grappling with the legal quandary stemming from Shari'a and a Muslim population that totals some 50 million. Some European courts, religious leaders, and officials have shown a willingness to defer to Muslim rules in the private sphere -- on marriage and divorce or finance, for example.

Last February, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, said it might be "unavoidable" to allow aspects of Shari'a law, such as on marital disputes or finance, to be applied in Britain. Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who said British laws "should be based on British values," shot down his suggestion.

Last year in Germany, a judge refused an application by a Moroccan immigrant to quickly divorce her abusive husband, whom she claimed had threatened to kill her. In his decision, the judge referred to a passage in the Koran that some interpret to mean that a husband can beat his wife.

The main challenges from Islam have been on women's rights, freedom of association and religion, torture, and the death penalty for children.
More recently, France has been gripped by the case of a Muslim who won a legal annulment of his marriage after discovering his bride was not a virgin. Critics saw it as an encroachment by Shari'a into French law, although an appeals court overturned the ruling last month.

But James, who now runs an organization that assists abused Muslim women in Europe, says that beyond the headlines are many more cases of Muslim women in Europe who are not afforded basic international rights, such as those envisaged by the UDHR: "It's happening everywhere, actually. There are women coming to our organization, women from Pakistan; they are really living like slaves and the authorities are helping the punishers more than the victims."

'Regional Specificities'

Most Muslim countries except Saudi Arabia voted to ratify the UDHR in the UN General Assembly in 1948 -- and Arab scholars from Egypt and Lebanon helped draft the text. Yet Muslim countries have sought to distance themselves from the UDHR, which although merely a "declaration" inspired later legally binding global agreements on rights, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention against Torture.

In 1981, Muslim countries passed their own Declaration of Islamic Human Rights. That was followed by the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam and the 1994 Arab Human Rights Charter, a text negotiated under the Arab League which seven countries ratified and which came into effect last March.

The main challenge from Islam has been on women's rights, freedom of association and religion, torture, and the death penalty for children. The Islamic human rights documents all curtail these rights compared to how they are treated by the UDHR and subsequent UN charters inspired by it.

Backers of the Muslim charters argue that they are in line with the 1993 Vienna Declaration and Program of Action on human rights, which reaffirmed the UDHR's principles but also allowed for "regional specificities" on human rights. Champions of the Arab charter say it proves Shari'a is compatible with international human rights.

Western experts beg to differ, voicing particular concern over the rights of women and freedom of religion in the Muslim world. James laments the dwindling acceptance of global human rights in the Muslim world. But she also sees Western compromises to rights declared universal 60 years ago this week.

"We have to say to Muslim people, if they come to Europe: 'We are glad that you are here, and we love you, but we have laws in our countries that must be followed.'" she says. "This is not racism at all. This is protecting human rights."

* This is a corrected version. The original version suggested that Islamic opinion is united behind the idea that apostasy is punishable by death, which is not the case.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 4
    Next 
by: richard from: usa
December 10, 2008 04:06
Just substitute "states' rights" for "regional specificities" and
"Jim Crow Laws" for "Shari'a": the old South (USA) denied humanity to Negroes just as Islam does to women.

by: Levent from: Los Angeles USA
December 10, 2008 04:17
This article points out several problems of Muslims (not Islam) in Europe and it does a great service in pointing out these issues. We should all have the courage to do the same with all religious and political groups.

The other aspect of this article is that the manner in which the issues are discussed cast a blanket tone on bigotry towards Islam. The article is a mere reflection of Islamophobia very prevalent in Europe. Islam is a religion of peace as is Judaism, Christianity and all great religions of the world. So do not the hate mongers define Islam and the vast majority of Muslims as perpetrators of violence because of the crimes of the few.

by: ronceee from: guangzhou
December 10, 2008 04:25
There's an old adage that goes: "When in Rome do as the Romans do." To you thickheaded Muslims that emigrate to a nation that is in conflict with your beliefs, go back to where you came from, no one will miss you. For a government such as Austria to kow tow to some religious quirks is appalling. The police officials should have been fired for even suggesting that the woman should go back to being a Muslim. They should have arrested and tried the father for terroristic threatening.

by: Mohinder S. Bains from: Canada
December 10, 2008 04:34
I express my heart felt deep sympathy for Sabatina, whose Universal Human Right including her independent choice of becoming a Christian. My question to the western proponents of Universal Human Rights, is very simple, Are the Islamic countries part of the same Universe that all other countries are part of, or do the Islamic countries have a separate Universe of their own? All citizens or any European, and the entire western world, live under the modern value system which guarantees freedom of choice in matters of faith for all citizens irrespective of their parents religions. Then, why doesn't the United Nations protects her choice of adopting Christianity, which is being threatened by her father, who could be charged with crime against humanity in violation of the fundamental universal right of choice of faith of her daughter. I am neither a Christian, nor a Hindu, nor a Muslim, but I do not exercise any control on the rights to freedom of choice of faith of my children. I vote to defend her freedom of choice in matters of her relgion, where her father has no business to control her because she is not his property as a human being.

by: Scott Bronner from: USA
December 10, 2008 05:20
I would like to ask the writer how he came to the conclusion, "What's more, such punishment (death for apostasy from Islam) is not regularly practiced in the Muslim world, where it is banned in many countries."?? From what I've read and people I know in Muslim countries, this practice is still very much alive and well. Statistics naturally need to be taken with a grain of salt from whence they come, so I would doubt that in countries where such crimes against humanity take place that records are freely shared.

It is good to hear some more moderate Islamic countries have disavowed this practice but even there there can be local areas where the official disavowment means nothing.

My concern is that this is not treated as some isolated, unusual case. At times the punishment might not go all the way to death but given the number of people who become Christian (or some other faith) out of Islam, I think this custom still holds sway and in fact causes many to leave their home to avoid a death sentence.

Many including me hope that Islam will head toward greater tolerance similarly to the politicized Christianity that showed equal intolerance in Spain and other countries during the Middle Ages. We, however, have no record of Jesus commanding anything but love toward one's enemies, certainly nothing that Christians are to do to punish those to leave the faith. The Koran does have parts that would indicate such punishment depending on how they are interpreted, so it is vital that those in Islamic leadership make clear that such apostate killing is against the concept of a "benevolent, beneficient" Allah.

by: Hilary Smith from: Cotati, CA
December 10, 2008 05:38
Respect for religion can only go so far. If religion is crippling a person's quality of life, secular government must intervene. And remember, religion doesn’t exist to protect rights and liberties; it’s there to preserve order and ritual.

by: SteveM from: Vancouver, Canada
December 10, 2008 06:11
Islam is named here, but other religions have similar problems. But I will not compromise on allowing women's rights to be eroded to placate followers of any religion. If women, half of the world's population, are not considered equal, than human rights becomes a joke. If women are not equal, than why not some groups of men who may not be 'righteous' enough, and so on.

This clash of ideas is going to be a big stuggle, no doubt, but my message to the judges and legislators who must lead on this, remember where the moral high ground is before making any decisions. And it's not with any man who will kill his daughter or beat his wife for religious (or any) reasons.

by: Callum from: Jakarta
December 10, 2008 07:02
There seems to be a trend in some quarters in the West to elevate anachronistic belief systems to the point that they become acceptable under the guise of multi-culturalism. Just because some cultures seem to think it is OK to kill people who change their religious beliefs or are homosexuals does not mean we have to accept or tolerate that belief system. Morality and laws are not static, they are a works in progress. We used to accept slavery, but our morals and laws changed. Just because some wish to remain stuck in the 7th century, does not mean we should alter our beliefs or laws to suit them. Humankind progresses and so should its laws.

by: Shewta from: Indian
December 10, 2008 08:07
There is no issue in conversion. Whey these Muslims are aganist it. There is no issue. Everyone has choice to chose his/her own religion.

I request to all muslims try to learn humanity and make appropriate corrections in your shariat law. Its old and cannot be acceptable. So change it and make world a happier place to live.

by: james from: bristol
December 10, 2008 08:34
PLEASE LOOK AND EXPAND THE SOME OF ITS PAPHALATES READ BETWEEN THE LINES ,YOU WILL FIND ALL THE GOOD PART OF THE KORAN COPIED FROM TORA,BIBBLE FROM BOOKS WRITTEN BY OTHER CULTURE ON MANY DIFFERENT SUBJECTS EVEN TEACHS TODAY OF THE TIMES WWW.WAMY.CO.UK WHO PRINTED CLEARLY THAT OTTAMAN TURKS GANG STOLE ALL THE GOOD STUFF FROM TORA,BIBBLE,CHEMISTRY,PHYSICS,MATHEMATIC MEDICIAN,LOT MORE FROM GREAT CIVILIZATION TO INCULDE IN KORAN KITAB:BOOK, (KELM:PEN,KAVI:STORY TELLER,KAVITA:STORY STOLE FROM SANSKRITE MOTHER OF ALL THE THE LANGUAGES ) TO MAKE MOHAMMED AS APPEALING MEN, WITHOUT ANY PICTURE OF HIM BECAUSE OF FEAR OF DEATH BY HIS OTHER TRIBLE ENAMY,BIT LIKE SOMALIN HAVING SAME COLOUR OF THE SKIN AT PRESENT TIME AS TERRORIST,HIJACKER.

when moral decline than only immorality grow like weed.WHEN 4 WOMEN ARE USED FOR SEX I.E MARRIAGE THE WHERE OTHER 3 WOMEN WILL CAPTURE FROM OTHER COMMUNTIES BY ONE MAN THEN IT IS CLEAR THAT MIND OF SUCH HUMEN BEING ARE STILL BELONG TO ANIMAL KINDOM,WHAT DO YOU TALK WHEN YOU MEET STRANGERS 35 TIMES A WEEK YOU ONLY WILL ENDUP TALKING ILL OF OTHERS.SUCH DICPLINES ARE ONLY SEE IN COMMONISIUM WILL MEANS KILL MANEY IN THE NAME OF TRADITIONS.GREED OF MUSLIM WORLD IS SIMILAR TO THE WEED GROWN ON THE EARTH BY GOD.MUSLIM IN 2008 IS LIKE THIS .JUST IMAGENE HOW WOULD IN 780 A.D. WHEN SORD IS ONLY ANSWERS TO ALL THE PROBLEMS. IT CLEAR THAT IN CIVILIZED SOCIETY THERE MUST NOT BE ANY ROOM TO EXIST FOR MUSILIM TRIBLISM .IT IS THE OTTAMAN OR OUTCAST TURKISH WHO DID NOT ACCEPTED CHRISTAIN REGION WHO THEN IN BAGDAD INSTRUCTED AND PAY THE ALL SUBJECTS TEACHER OR SCIBERS TO WRITE FROM OTHERS CIVILIZATIONS ABOUT POLITIC ,MATHEMATIC. MEDICIAS ETC. CHECK WWW.WAMY.CO.UK TRANSLATED/COPY VERSION IN ARABIC LANGUAGE TO BE
INCULDED IN KORAN KITAB ,SO THAT TO TEACH UNEDUCATED BADOVIEN TRIBES OF ARAB LAND TO PROMOT CIVILIED SERMON TO HUMENISED THE ILLITERATE VODOO/ PRACTICIANSERS FROM JUNGALS ,JOIN THE TRIBLE GANG FROM SHUDRA BECOME SUDHIA THE DEAD AMINAL KEEPER FOR MEAT AND SKIN. INDIAN AS LOW CAST.
Comments page of 4
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Gaza Hamas Leader Arrives In Iran

Latest Comment (1 total)

JohnWV: Israel, not United States, is Iran's enemy. An Iran with nuclear weapons will ... More

Swiss Probe Armenia Genocide Remarks

Latest Comment (10 total)

RD: Genocide deniers always use puerile comments such as "Many Turks died during WWI". ... More

How To Rig An Election

Latest Comment (4 total)

Frank: So says Kolpakova, without being particularly specific, along with Kommersant as quoted and ... More