Monday, February 13, 2012


Features

Tajik Cleric Says Textbooks Misinterpret Islam

Tajik schools also ban Islamic dress.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Farangis Najibullah
A prominent Tajik cleric and politician has accused the country's education officials of misinterpreting many historical facts about Islam and the Prophet Muhammad in Tajik schoolbooks.

In an open letter to the Ministry of Education and numerous media interviews, Hoji Akbar Turajonzoda has said that the textbooks' authors have taken an "unprofessional, irrational, and sometimes insulting and offensive stance" toward Islam and Islamic values.

Turajonzoda, who is a member of Tajikistan's upper house of parliament, said the textbooks portray the Prophet Muhammad as a creator of a new religion -- not as the messenger of God -- and suggest that Islam and the Koran were no more than "the product of the prophet's dreams and imagination."

According to Turajonzoda, some of the textbooks, including "The History of the Middle Ages" for sixth-grade students, distort the very principle of Islam, claiming some of God's messages and orders were in fact the prophet's suggestions.

"Among many others issues, there are three major matters in Islam that were divine revelation," the cleric says, "and they include the status of the holy city of Mecca as the center of Islam, the status of the Kaaba as the most sacred site in Islam, and making the hajj the fifth pillar of Islam."

Turajonzoda says he was "outraged and appalled" that the book alleges that the three issues were some sort of political agreement reached between the prophet and leaders of a tribe in Mecca.

"Even Soviet-era textbooks, which were openly atheistic, didn't deny historical facts like our current authors do," Turajonzoda tells RFE/RL's Tajik Service.

The Education Ministry has yet to officially respond to Turajonzoda's open letter. Education Minister Abdujabbor Rahmonov has told RFE/RL that the ministry has been planning for some time to "rewrite some of the textbooks." However, he said, "it's not our top priority; first of all, we have to think about providing textbooks to our schools."

Deliberate Misinterpretation?

But the former head of the State Committee for Religious Affairs, Said Ahmadov, has rejected Turajonzoda's claims about the misrepresentation of Islam in Tajik textbooks, saying the "material has been taken from appropriate Arab-language and other religious sources."

Speaking to RFE/RL, Ahmadov accused the prominent cleric of proposing the censorship of school programs.

Turajonzoda is a former leader of the Islamic opposition.
For his part, Turajonzoda says that the history of Islam was misinterpreted deliberately in textbooks to give the young generation a distorted idea about Islam and poison their minds.

"I don't think the order has come from the president himself," Turajonzoda says. "Government officials who deal with education and ideological issues, most of whom came through the Soviet-era atheistic schools, are involved in it."

Turajonzoda insists it's a part of a wider government campaign to restrict the increasing influence of Islam in Tajik society.

Earlier this week, authorities in the capital Dushanbe's Sino district closed down a mosque, saying it lacked an official license. The mosque has been operating since 1928, despite the Soviet-era clampdown on religious institutions.

In the past two years, dozens of mosques have been closed down all over the country and at least two Dushanbe mosques were bulldozed after officials accused them of failing to register with local authorities. Some former mosques have been turned into pool halls, public baths, and beauty salons.

Many imams who have tried to register their mosques complain about a complicated bureaucratic procedure involving "a lot of unnecessary paperwork."

All In Good Time

At the same time, the wearing of Islamic hijab has been outlawed in public schools and government offices. Last month, shopkeepers in central Dushanbe told RFE/RL that female employees were ordered to remove their head scarves if they wanted to keep their jobs.

The government, however, insists that it maintains complete religious freedom in the country. Unlike during Soviet times, people are free to attend mosque prayers, fast during the holy month of Ramadan, and educate their children in officially registered religious schools.

The Education Ministry has said female students have the right to wear hijab outside schools, but they must observe secular schools' rules banning Islamic dress inside school buildings.

As far as the disputed textbooks and their content on the history of Islam are concerned, Education Minister Rahmonov says: "We're going to revise [the textbooks], but not now, because we have other priorities at the moment. All in good time."

RFE/RL's Tajik Service contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 3
    Next 
by: Turgai Sangar from: Nantes
December 18, 2008 10:25
The current corrupt anti-Islamic regime in Tajikistan does not want to know better than to copy tactics from the USSR and the Iranian Shah because it knows that Islam undermines its legitimacy.

They will fail, just like the Soviet Union and US poodle Pahlavi failed.

by: Abdul from: USA
December 19, 2008 01:07
That imam has a lot of nerve! He wants the school textbooks to preach Islam by saying that the Koran and the rest of it is "divine revelation". That is Islamic religious belief, not fact. People are free to believe what they want (except in Islamic countries, of course), but they have no right to force others to propagate their Islamic beliefs.

by: Sergey from: USA
December 22, 2008 06:07
This Islamic cleric clearly wants Islamic totalitarianism in Tajikistan to replace Communist one. I wonder if this cleric wants to hear about darker side of Islam, such as 1400 year old Islamic Jihad that cost lives of hundreds of millions of people in Africa, Asia and Europe.

Personally, I don't want to hear any more talk from Islamists about "insulting Islam". They simply want to silence any criticism of Islam, including its treatment of "infidels", women and violent campaigns to spread Islam around the world. Nothing is more insulting to Islam than behaviour of those Muslims who believe they have a divine right to spread Islam by force and terror.

Islamists and Communists--two sides of the same coin. They want total control over power and minds of people.

by: Tajik from: Tajikistan
December 28, 2008 09:49
We don't need 'smart' and empty sympathy from you muslim or nonmuslims outside, cause you know what it won't help, thousands miles away, you're sooo tough and saying things, yet so far from the reality you act like you're inside us and feel bad...it's all fake...save it...get a life losers..

by: Sergey
December 31, 2008 16:48
I would also want to add, that even though that current Central Asian regimes are corrupt, autocratic and at times, unjustly brutal toward their political opponents, they are still better than Islamists, like this Tajik cleric. If the likes of Hoji Akbar Turajonzoda will take over Central Asia, it will be a geopolitical catastrophy. Then Central Asia will become another Jihad-land exporting Islamic Terrorism, poverty, misery and thuggish Sharia and tribalist rules. The last thing civilized world needs is more states like Iran, Pakistan or "Palestine".

So for any rational European, American, Russian or Chinese politician, it's better to deal with secular Central Asian autocrats than with Islamists. It's far lesser evil and radical liberals need to stop engaging in their fantasies over "spread of democracy" round the world. Democracy is not good for everyone. "Palestine" had democratic elections a few years ago and Palestinians elected Islamic terror group Hamas elected to power, whose r'aison d'etre (reason for existence) is destruction of the state of Israel.

Also, a few decades ago we had decolonization of Africa, another liberal pet cause. The result--tens of millions of dead Africans in endless wars, famines and preventable diseases. The hasty decolonization also resulted in political monsters, like Mugabe, Idi Amin and Bokassa (cannibal) running their countries. So enough with liberal utopias and let rational pragmatism win.

by: Turgai Sangar
January 04, 2009 14:23
Sergey, take this from someone who has years of experience living and working in both Central Asia and Africa: the Bokassas and Mobutus are EXACTLY the products of your line of thinking.

Why? At the time, Europe, the US and 'Israël' also though it was better to let those wackos rule than to allow the coming to power of what they saw as 'Communists'. Eventually it turned against them and the same mistake is being made today in Central Asia with propping up monsters like Karimov against so-called 'fundamentalists'.

Hamas is not a 'terror group' but a legitimate self-defence unit against Zionist state terrorism.

Like the rebels in Andijan, the Muslim resistance fighters in Gaza are the heirs of the brave Jewish resistance fighters who did the uprising in het Warszaw Ghetto.

by: Sergey from: USA
January 05, 2009 17:26
"Hamas is not a 'terror group' but a legitimate self-defence unit against Zionist state terrorism. "

Really ? They charter calls for Israel destruction and this is legitimate form of self-defense ? They send suicide bombers to Israel to target crowded markets, shops and public transportation and this is a self-defense ? Because Turgai, so many in Islamic world think like you do, I prefer secular dictators, like Karimov, to Hamas.

Islamic world really has to undergo drastic reformation, much deeper than reformation of Roman Catholicism between 15-20 century.

Islamic world still does not accept proper division of responsibilities between secular and religious authorities.
Islamic clerics throughout Muslim world still preach Jihad against infidels(not "spiritual", but terror-military one). They regularly chant in mosques and Islamic schools "Death to America" and "Death to Israel". In Islamic world, "honor killing" of women is still widely accepted and those who seek to convert from Islam to other religion have to live in fear of death or flee their Islamic homelands. On top of that, the vast majority of terror attacks in the past 20 years was perpetrated in the name of Islam, whether you like to admit it or not, including the most horrific, such as 9-11 in New York and Washington, Madrid train bombing, Bali and so on and on and on. Islamic terror groups have nearly a monopoly on all the terror activities, especially since 9-11.

Islamic world really has to undergo drastic reformation, much deeper than reformation of Roman Catholicism between 15-20 century culminating in abolition of inquisition, ending the practice of crusades against those whom Vatican branded as heretics and the 2nd Vatican congress that ended blood libel against Jews as "Christ killers".

Until Islamic world undergoes spiritual transformation and rejects not just in word, but in practice ANY TERROR AGAINST "INFIDELS" and stops entertaining idea of spreading Islam by force or coercion, I want Islam to be treated not as religion but as a totalitarian political-religious movement--like NAZISM and COMMUNISM with all the restrictions necessary.

Sorry if I hurt your feelings, but I don't want to wake up one day living under Islamic Authorities with their Sharia law and Jihad.

by: Turgai Sangar
January 06, 2009 10:36
Sergey, much depends on what one calls 'terror(ism)': one man's terrorist is another one's resistance fighter. Once upon a time the brave Jewish partisans in the Warsaw Ghetto were called terrorists by the Nazis. And given the nature of his regime there is no non-violent way to end the tiranny of beasts like Karimov. That is no 'terrorism'.

In the case of Hamas, it is logical to want the destruction of an entity that oppresses and humiliates you day after day.

You say that Islamist groups dominate militantism/'terrorism' these days as compared to Christian fundmentalists. Maybe. The main difference is that Christian fundamentalists are infiltrated in the political-military establisment of one of the world's greatest military powers with the results we know.

For me personallly, Jews are brothers form a civilisation with great achievements. They are People of the Book. The mess wil remain as long as 'Israël' is being de facto run by a Zionist lobby in the US and as long as the Islamic continues to bear the brunt of the hypocrisy and double standards of the West.

by: Sergey from: USA
January 06, 2009 19:29
"Sergey, much depends on what one calls 'terror(ism)': one man's terrorist is another one's resistance fighter. "

To a certain extent you are right, Turgai, if we decide to be moral relativists. However, let's agree to disagree.

For you, Hamas are "freedom fighters". For me, they are Islamic or Islamo-Nazi terrorist thugs who seek destroy Israel, the only civilized country in the entire Middle East. Israel, as far as I know, does not seek to push Arab Muslims and Palestinians into the sea.

Arab Muslim and Secular Arab Nazi regimes, on the contrary, did everything since Israel was reborn in 1948, to destroy Jewish state and push it with Jews to the sea. Hamas is only the ugliest reincarnation of this evil goal.

My only criticism of Israel is that Israeli politicians were stupid enough to listen to the empty promises of "Land for Peace" mantra for too long. Hopefully they stopped this. With Islamists, Israel ended up with No Peace and if it were to continue giving up to the Islamist demands, it would end up with no land whatsoever.

"Once upon a time the brave Jewish partisans in the Warsaw Ghetto were called terrorists by the Nazis. "

Brave Jewish fighters did not attack indiscriminantly German civilians. They did not blow themselves up in German restaurants in Poland. They did not target German soldiers and officers' wife and children. They attacked Nazi uniformed military, SS units and Police that come to destroy them. So you comparison of Hamas thugs with Jewish resistance is simply ABSURD TO THE CORE.

"In the case of Hamas, it is logical to want the destruction of an entity that oppresses and humiliates you day after day....For me personallly, Jews are brothers form a civilisation with great achievements. "

So let's dig your logic, Turgai. You love Jews, but support the destruction of Israel, the only Jewish state in the world and the essence of Jewish civilization, culture and religion.

Don't you see contradiction here ?

Destruction of Israel would inevitably lead to death of hundreds of thousands if not millions of Jews. It would be a second Holocaust after which Jewry may never recover. Surviving Jews outside Israel would possibly assimilate and disappear as Jews.

In other words Turgai, you "love" Jews, but only when they are either dead or under Islamist foot. Thanks but No Thanks ! Your "Love" is worse than pure hate.

by: Turgai Sangar
January 07, 2009 08:34
"Don't you see contradiction here?"

No. Why? I hate Karimov. Do I hate Uzbek people and Uzbekistan for that?

"In other words Turgai, you "love" Jews, but only when they are either dead or under Islamist foot."

Bollocks. In the end, after some time, we'll have to find a modus vivendi of some sorts.

But that is not possible as long as the Zionist-neocon-Crusader axis basically runs the show.

"Islamic world really has to undergo drastic reformation, much deeper than reformation"

Who is to initiate this process in you opinion? The problem is that there are too much extraneous actors that think that they can dictate/impose this to Muslims, not to 'help Muslims' as they often claim, but to subjugate them.
Comments page of 3
    Next 
               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Turkey Strikes PKK Targets In Iraq

Latest Comment (2 total)

Anonymous: hey jack-UssR :) Kurdish militants are not "freedom fighters". they are "captivate fighters", ... More

Putin Won't Meet Election Monitors

Latest Comment (5 total)

Vakhtang: Mr. Putin is not up to European observers, his head is crammed with ... More

Jolie Earns Serbian Scorn For War Film

Latest Comment (84 total)

e.t: Oh, stop with the 9/11 rhetoric. Even a child knows that the war ... More