Monday, February 13, 2012


Commentary

A Baha’i’s Plea For Understanding

The symbol of the Baha'i Faith
x
The symbol of the Baha'i Faith
TEXT SIZE - +
By Christopher Schwartz
Throughout the Muslim world, Baha'is are routinely subjected to systematic derision in the form of elaborate conspiracy theories. Hostile political, religious, and media figures portray Baha'is as a secretive and miserly network of heretics who serve Zionism and Freemasonry to sow discord and undermine a harmonious Islamic society. Worse, we are also often portrayed as deformed subhumans with hidden devil tails and horns.

These claims may be fantastic, but they actually distort certain innocent facts, and the record needs to be set straight.

The accusation of subhumanity is the most hateful. It's the same kind of the superstitious hate-mongering that has plagued religious minorities throughout human history, including Muslims themselves in the former Yugoslavia. Unfortunately, such slander frightens the Muslim general public and prevents them from learning the truths behind the other accusations.

The accusation of heresy is the most insidious. We do not identify ourselves as Muslim, but as a separate and distinct dispensation and religion. The rationale for this lies in our vision of history. We understand the Koranic statement that Muhammad was the "seal of the prophets" to mean that he was the culmination of a specific spiritual cycle in human history. We are now in a new cycle, one that began in the 19th century with the Baha'i Faith's two prophets, the Bab (literally, "the gate"), and Baha'u'llah (literally, "the glory of God").

Yet, because we believe the relationship between God and humanity is an ongoing story -- there will be yet more cycles and prophets in the future -- we are seen by many Muslim authorities as a challenge to Muhammad's status as the ultimate vicar of God. Consequently, we're also seen as a challenge to their own authority, whereas in fact, we have no such ambitions.

To be clear, we believe human history is progressing, under divine guidance, toward world unity and peace. It's an article of our faith that Baha'is will have a critical -- if not the critical -- role to play in this development, one of education and example. However, we also believe that peoples of all faith persuasions and traditions, including Muslims, will make key contributions to this process.

The accusation of Zionism is cynical. Because our World Center is in Haifa and our holiest city is Acre, it’s insinuated that we are Zionists or that we work for the Israeli government in exchange for land. In actuality, Acre's holy distinction derives from the fact that Baha'u'llah was exiled there. The site of the World Center was purchased during Ottoman and British rule through laborious fundraising within the Baha'i community.

Unfortunately, what really bothers some of our detractors is that we have any formal relationship with Israel at all. In truth, the relationship is one of historical necessity, since Baha'is need official Israeli permission to go on pilgrimage. You'll find very few Baha'is living in Israel or the occupied territories because our leadership asked the community there to leave the country in the 1940s.

Moreover, Baha'is such as myself consider the debate over Israel's right to exist incompatible with our commitment to the unity of humanity and a distraction from the vital task of peacemaking. We believe in transforming the human landscape into a just and divine order, which means not getting lost in partisan murk.

Finally, the accusation of Freemasonry is just ridiculous. We are often confused about where this charge comes from. Perhaps it’s our scriptures' themes of illumination and mystical assent or our community's commitment to collective democratic decision-making. Whatever the case, the accusation overlooks the fact that one of our early leaders, Shoghi Effendi, stipulated that Baha'is cannot be members of secret societies, including the Freemasons.

Of course, I'm a Baha'i. So all I've said above could be artful lies. But we Baha'is also believe in every person's God-given right to investigate truth on their own. So I challenge you: Find a Baha'i and ask to see our activities with your own eyes. Have a little faith in yourself and in your fellow human beings. You'll find most monsters are nothing more than the shadows of fear.

Christopher Schwartz is a member of the Baha'i Faith and a graduate student of Islamic philosophy and history. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Amason
August 22, 2010 15:34
Rather that denigrate Freemasonry, it may be better to say that is is not a path favored by the Baha'i faith. But, interesting to note, all faith traditions are welcome to the Masonic lodge, and none is elevate his faith above another.

Your suggestion of a portrayal as deformed subhumans with hidden devil tails and horns is frequently a charge made against Freemasons, which couldn't be anywhere close tot he truth.

I implore you to find out more and recommend you visit http://www.freemasoninformation.com
In Response

by: Masud from: Switzerland
August 24, 2010 09:07
I don't think Christopher was denigrating Freemasonry. He was just saying that we are sometimes associated with Freemasonry and it's not true, although we have great respect for Freemasonry. What part of the article did you take issue with?

I myself have met a fewFreemasons and they were delightful people.
In Response

by: Schwartz
August 24, 2010 11:58
@Amason: As the author of the piece, if I may chime in for a moment, I, too, have known several Freemasons, and they are indeed delightful people, involved in a lot of charity work. Historically-speaking, they were also critical to the development of modern democracy -- a fine legacy indeed.

As I understand it, the key issue between the Baha'i Faith and Freemasonry is the latter's lack of transparency, nothing more, nothing less. Ultimately, we feel that secrecy is not conducive to human unity. I hope this clarification helps.
In Response

by: Farhan from: France
August 24, 2010 21:16
As a Baha'i I have many excellent friends who are Free Masons, who are often protective of Baha'is and have many principles that are close to Baha'i principles of unity. However, as it has been said, Baha'is cannot take part in party politics, be actively engaged as members of churches or adhere to secret societies such as Masonic movements, just as they believe in Christ, but cannot adhere to specific churches whose principles are not totally in harmony with Baha'i teachings. Saying Baha'is are Masons or spies for Zionism is in Iran just another way of breeding suspicion by saying they have underground activities. Other such calumnies include child abduction, incestuous relations and even poisoning tea in such a way that those who drink become baha'is. The whole idea is to discourage people from studying Baha'i teachings for themselves and gaining an understanding that might show them a brighter path than that of religious intolerance which is promoted by the IRI, In 1983 they executed the 17 year old Mona because she claimed the right of explaining her religious beliefs to her fellow students; this shows to what point the truth about Baha'i teachings is felt as a threat to the regime.

by: Andrew from: Nottingham
August 23, 2010 17:00
Unfortunately the article goes on the defensive so much that it underplays what the Bahai Faith actually says and does.

"we're also seen as a challenge to [Muslim authorities] own authority, whereas in fact, we have no such ambitions."

On the contrary. Bahaullah was very clear when he founded the Bahai Faith: He is the Manifestation of God (prophet) for this Age. The time for Muhammed and Christ and Buddha and so on has gone. It may be politically wise to downplay this, but it is factually untrue.

"Because our World Center is in Haifa and our holiest city is Acre, it’s insinuated that we are Zionists"

Interesting comment as well, particularly as its also untrue. The holiest places in the Bahai Faith are not in Haifa, Acre, Delhi or London. They are actually in Baghdad, Iraq and Shiraz, Iran.

When the Bahais tried to develop those sites they were seized from them, and they were persecuted. So logically, the Bahais focused on those areas they were most free and secure - particularly Israel and to a lesser extent, Turkey and England.

To portray this as some kind of accident of history is to misunderstand the dynamics of the situation.
In Response

by: Masud from: Switzerland
August 24, 2010 10:12
Andrew,

"The time for Muhammed and Christ and Buddha and so on has gone. It may be politically wise to downplay this, but it is factually untrue."

I beg to differ. What you wrote doesn't contradict the fact that we aren't challenging "Muslim authorities". This article was probably referring to the Iranian Muslim authorities, given that the topic at hand is the oppression of the Baha'is, specifically in Iran. And we Baha'is are in no way challenging the authority of the Iranian Mullahcracy, as we're not allowed to participate in partisan politics. Furthermore, implied in what you said is that the "Muslim authorities" nowadays (whether in Iran or elsewhere) are the legitimate leaders according to Islamic scripture. I would take issue with that.

As to your contention about the holiest place in the Baha'i Faith, first of all, the article stated that the holiest "city" is Acre, not the holiest "place". Secondly, could you cite a reference for your claim that Baghdad is the holiest place (or city) in the Baha'i Faith? While it's true that the House of Baha'u'llah was referred to by followers as Bahá’u’lláh’s “Most Holy Habitation”, ("habitation" is not the same as "place") I don't recall the city itself being referred to as the holiest in the Baha'i World. In William Sears' book "God Passes By" it reads (emphasis mine): The Bayt-i-A'zam (bait-eh-a...Zam), Bahá'u'lláh's Most Great House in Baghdad, is 'regarded as a center of pilgrimage second to none EXCEPT the city of 'Akká,...'. (p. 110). Peter Smith's "A concise encyclopedia of the Bahá'í Faith" also corroborates this (pp.66-67).

"So logically, the Bahais focused on those areas they were most free and secure"

It's not that we "focused" on them; we just had no choice BUT to go on pilgrimage to those areas. We cannot go on pilgrimage to Iran or Iraq. And there is no accident implied here. There has been a deliberate ongoing effort to oppress Baha'is. One of the ways in which this has been done is through historical fabrications and obfuscations such as those addressed by this article.
In Response

by: Schwartz
August 24, 2010 12:07
@Andrew: if I may add to Masud's clarifications: (a) Acre is the compass point of our daily prayers, which is indicative of the city's status for us; and (b) ultimately, the notion of "holy place/city/shrine" is very nuanced in our faith. Consider the following quote from Shogi Effendi:

"[The short midday prayer] has no genuflections and only requires that when saying it the believer turn his face towards Akka where Bahá'u'lláh is buried. This is a physical symbol of an inner reality, just as the plant stretches out to the sunlight -- from which it receives life and growth -- so we turn our hearts to the Manifestation of God, Bahá'u'lláh, when we pray; and we turn our faces, during this short prayer, to where His dust lies on this earth as a symbol of the inner act." (From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, June 24, 1949: Spiritual Foundations: Prayer, Meditation, and the Devotional Attitude, op. cit., in Lights of Guidance, no. 1523)

Ergo, yes, Baha'is may have multiple holy sites, but the gradations between them, such as we may even speak of gradation, are subtle.

by: Owen Allen from: Australia
August 26, 2010 01:56
Re-reading, recently, Baha'u'llah's 'Epistle to the Son of the Wolf', several broad themes emerge. One: Baha'u'llah's iteration of His own station and role in which He assures that he cannot dissimilate (a survival strategy in Islam that became a machievellian strategy). Two: Baha'u'llah describes clear socio-political ideas for the progress of the nations, but relegates the idea to the individual's pursuit, whether ruler or commoner. Three: Baha'u'llah persistently and repeatedly directs the readers attention that social, political and material progress is only achievable through love, devotion and fear of God, and an attitude of service to humanity. Further, Baha'u'llah's son, Abdu'l-Baha, in 'The Secret of Divine Civilisation' encourages establishment of instrumentalities for human happiness, defined as the best endeavour individual's, communities and nations can apply to civilisation and justice.
As Baha'u'llah seems to be indicating, political techniques commonly undermine the case of progress. So progress can only truly occur by a movement towards a better humanity in which the individual's acquisition of knowledge and personal commitment to that betterment, is primary. He did hope and encouraged that leaders would take up this notion to the best of their political will, but cautioned against people who took up His mission from becoming embroiled in the political technique.
In Response

by: Schwartz
August 26, 2010 06:41
@ Owen: Thanks for the remark, especially the clarification on taqiyyah (dissimulation) in the Islamic tradition. However, may I ask what you mean by "political techniques"?
In Response

by: Owen from: Australia
August 28, 2010 23:07
Hi Schwartz, I use the term 'political technique' as a coverall for those many devices that are aimed purely at gaining power. They would fall under a few categories: Dishonesty (misconstruing information, hiding information, evading question); Character assassination (backbiting, slander, libel, distortion); Manipulation of support (bribing, auctioning, blackmail inc emotional). These techniques are applied in what is euphemistically called 'spin', all political advertising, certainly are at the heart of all significant conflicts in the world, and underly the fear of an educated populace by power mongers, notably in Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea, Burma but all through Africa.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Jolie Earns Serbian Scorn For War Film

Latest Comment (83 total)

writer: Serbians did not start the war in Bosnia but they were killed and ... More

Greek Parliament Passes Austerity Bill

Latest Comment (1 total)

Eugenio: Here is one of those countries - Greece - that joined the EU ... More

Azerbaijani Aviation Engineer Seeks Niche In Civilian Drone Market

Latest Comment (3 total)

ferrum: if i see a machine like this on the sky, i will surely ... More