map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Features

Abkhazia And The Perils Of 'Independence'

Russian and Abkhaz flags flying in front of Abkhazia's government headquarters in Sukhumi.

June 19, 2009
By Brian Whitmore
SUKHUMI -- A row of Russian and Abkhaz flags flutter in the Black Sea breeze in front of the stately government headquarters in the Abkhaz capital. Along the winding beachfront promenade, locals point out the properties rumored to be earmarked for Russian investors.

It's a poignant vista for this separatist territory that has long been trying to convince the world -- and itself -- that it is an independent country.

There was euphoria here 10 months ago when Moscow recognized Abkhazia's independence from Tbilisi following the five-day Russia-Georgia war. But as Russian troops, cash, and influence pour into this tiny and picturesque Black Sea region, many Abkhaz worry that rather than winning their coveted autonomy last August they may have simply traded one overlord for another.

Sipping iced tea in an outdoor cafe overlooking Sukhumi's beaches and ramshackle piers, local journalist Inal Khashig, founder and editor of the opposition newspaper "Chegemskaya pravda," says Sukhumi's independence bid was supposed to "mean independence not only from Georgia but from any other country as well."

But that dream, he says, appears to be quickly slipping away.

Russian flags are common in Sukhumi, even at gas stations.
"We had a poor understanding of what was going on that day, August 26, when Russia recognized us," Khashig says. 

"It was an emotional wave. Only later did we figure out that we were not getting what we wanted. Earlier, even though nobody recognized us, we were truly independent. Now, after recognizing Abkhazia, Russia is swallowing us. This is happening economically, politically, militarily, and socially. Every day we are becoming more and more dependent."

This dependence is visible in the most basic ways. Most Abkhaz residents carry Russian passports. The Russian ruble is their official currency. They communicate predominantly in the Russian language. And at least 3,800 Russian troops are based on their territory, including many on their frontiers. 

Even some gas stations in Sukhumi fly Russian flags. Russian television dominates the airwaves and Russian newspapers are ubiquitous.

Resisting Assimilation

Russia's presence extends far beyond flags and border guards. Moscow has pledged $68 million in aid for Abkhazia since the war; hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign investment are flowing in as well. Russia's state-run oil giant Rosneft has already signed an agreement with Abkhazia to explore and develop the territory's maritime oil fields.

Your JavaScript is turned off or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.



A aerial view of Abkhazia. The video was filmed by RFE/RL on June 8 from aboard one of the last United Nations flights into the breakaway territory.

The boom could have benefits in a region seems mired in a post-Soviet economic funk. But some here fear it could also provoke a backlash.

"We are worried that the expansion of Russian capital, which our authorities are actively assisting, could lead to society thinking that property here is not something for Abkhaz citizens," says Beslan Bartelia, an opposition member of Abkhazia's de facto parliament.

"This could lead to the growth of anti-Russian sentiments and we don't want that."

Mindful of such concerns, Abkhaz leader Sergei Bagapsh has said his territory will defend its statehood and resist assimilation. But he has nevertheless agreed to grant Russia control over Abkhazia's borders, airport, and railway system.

Russian investors are eyeing Sukhumi's prime beachfront real estate.
Moscow has plans to house a naval base in the port of Ochamchire, close to the cease-fire line separating Abkhazia from Georgia proper. A controversial provision will give Russian soldiers serving in Abkhazia the right to purchase property, which many here fear could lead to a further Russification of the province.

Some of the agreements with Russia have sparked howls of protest from opposition Abkhaz lawmakers, who have vowed to review and amend them during the ratification process.

"We are turning over to Russia all our responsibilities for building this state. This is very bad," Kashig says.

"When half the budget is financed by Russian subsidies, when Russians need to guard our borders, when we can't run our own railways and airport and turn them over to the Russians, this says we are losing hope. If we can't do this ourselves, it means we have doubts over whether we chose the right path in setting up our own state."

To be sure, growing pains are in evidence. Abkhaz officials frequently betray inexperience with basic international norms. UN officials -- whose 16-year observer mission in Abkhazia was shuttered this week after Russia vetoed a Security Council resolution to extend its mandate -- say Abkhaz border guards have attempted to examine the contents of their diplomatic pouch, a violation of international confidentiality laws.

Isolation Anxiety

Still, fears of Russian domination are far from unanimous. And even when they do exist, they are tempered by an even deeper animosity toward Georgia, which considers Abkhazia and a second breakaway region, South Ossetia, part of its sovereign territory.

"The situation is normal. It's better than normal. I'm not afraid we'll be assimilated by Russia. Over the past 200 years we've had experience with the Russians and we've had experience with the Georgians. We know where the danger comes from," says Batal Kobakhia, who chairs the human rights committee in the de facto parliament.

Batal Kobakhia, chairman of the Human Rights Committee in Abkhazia's de facto parliament, isn't worried about Russian influence.
A powerful anti-Georgian current, fed by Russian media, runs through Abkhazia, where bitter memories still remain of the 1992-93 post-Soviet war for independence with Tbilisi. More than 15,000 people died in the 13-month campaign, and 250,000 ethnic Georgians, who made up the largest ethnic group in Abkhazia, were expelled.

The displaced Georgians, Kobakhia says unapologetically, "will never be able to return."

Similar declarations can be heard from virtually every Abkhaz, regardless of political stripe. The West doesn't fare much better, with many Abkhaz complaining the international community has failed to engage the territory.

Nicaragua is the only country, besides Russia, to recognize Abkhazia's independence. International aid organizations and Western investors have kept their distance. Even commercial ventures, like the clothing giant Benetton, cancelled plans for a store in Abkhazia amid protests from Georgia. 

Liana Kvarchelia, the codirector of the Center for Humanitarian Programs think-tank in Sukhumi, says if this is a sign of how the West will behave in the future, then Abkhazia is doomed to remain locked in Russia's embrace.

"I understand that it would be difficult for the international community to change its firm position about not recognizing Abkhazia. But the international community needs to understand that isolating Abkhazia it is not good for anybody, especially for us," Kvarchelia says.

A History Of Resistance


Abkhaz visibly bristle with indignation at the suggestion that they are becoming Russian vassals. They point out that their ancestors fought a series of bloody rebellions against the Russian Empire in the 19th century. The largest of these, in 1866 and 1877, resulted in hundreds of thousands of Abkhaz being deported.

Khashig argues that many Abkhaz view rebelling against foreign domination as something of a birthright.

"Even in the Stalin period we gathered, protested, and demanded our rights," he says. "This in our genetic code. We value what happens here. We can't do much but we have to do something."

The Abkhaz independent streak extends to local politics. Many in Abkhazia proudly remind visitors that Moscow's preferred candidate in the territory's 2004 presidential election, former KGB officer Raul Khajimba, was soundly defeated by Bagapsh.

Despite political tensions, life in Sukhumi is laid back. A group of men enjoy a game of backgammon near the beach.
During that campaign, posters and billboards of Kajimba together with then Russian President Vladimir Putin were plastered all over Sukhumi. Prominent Russian politicians came to Sukhumi to campaign for Khajimba as did the popular singer Iosif Kobzon. Russian State Duma deputy Vladimir Zhirinovsky even threatened that Russia would close its Abkhaz border if Khajimba wasn't elected.

Many Abkhaz say their choice in that election should dispel any doubts that Abkhaz take their independence seriously and will resist any foreign domination:

"Russia supported one candidate and we made our choice. This is the attitude of the Abkhaz when there is pressure to do something that does not fit with their interests or security," Kobakhia says. "Abkhaz never allow anyone to talk to them like this or to force them to live in a way that is different from their style and their traditional values."

Whether the Abkhaz will be able to maintain this stance on Moscow will be tested in December, when they hold their first presidential elections since securing Russian recognition of their independence.
This forum has been closed.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 4
by: Andrew Webb from: Auckland
June 30, 2009 07:08
Well Sephia,

Obviously you have a fairly limited understanding of history and archaeology.

There is quite a bit that a building can tell us about who built it, and who lived in it.

Georgian Churches have been built in a definative style for over 1500 years, and those found in Abkhazia during the last 1000 years or so (earlier Churches have not survived) also bear period inscriptions, both within the buildings, on the exterior, and in the grave markers that both date the buildings and give the ethnicity of their builders and users.
Then there are the period frescoes and Icons that are inside the Churches.

It is similar with the fortresses (castles) and bridges in Abkhazia.

Once again, you are doing the typical (and quite racist) Abkhaz trick of taking one quote to justify your position, and ignoring the whole library of information that condemns your argument.

Due to the fact that the Abkhaz were religious chameleons, and frequently changed their religion to suit the occupying power, as "Moslems" they were spared the worst of the Turkish drives to clear Abkhazia of its Christian population during the 15th to 18th centuries, the brunt of which fell on the Georgian population.

Historic writers of the ancient/classical, medieval, and neo-classical period describe Abkhazia as part of Georgia. This too is historical fact.

As for the 47 or 50% argument about the population of Abkhazia in 1992, well that is open to debate. There is the matter of "paternalism", many of my in-laws were classed as Abkhaz/Apsu due to having a line of Abkhaz paternity, but having 3/4 of the family tree Georgians. This tends to skew the numbers a little.
Your statement that the majority of other ethnic groups supported the separatists is not bourne out by the facts.
Armenians certainly supported the Abkhaz, but the Russian community was split, you should know that a large number of ethnic Russians were victims of Apsu ethnic cleansing, while the Turkomen, Azeri, Jewish, and Greek populations generally supported the Georgians.
All non Apsu groups suffered severely at the hands of the separatists,as documented by UNOMIG, OSCE, & HRW observers, the Abkhaz murderous rampage affected all non Apsu, and a reign of terror was imposed on those seen to be "collaborating" with non Apsu ethnic groups.

War crimes were comitted by both sides, but as the UN, OSCE (Council of Europe at the time), HRW, and even Russian human rights groups all put the vast majority of the blame for crimes on the Abkhaz separatists.

I agree that all crimes should be condemned, but the simple fact of the matter is that the majority were comitted by Abkhaz, they were truly genocidal in nature due to the attempt to wipe out the Georgian presence in Abkhazia, and the use of mass murder, rape of adults and children, and destruction of cultural monumnents.

Abkhazians still attempt to justify these actions, rather than apologise and have reconciliation with their Georgian neighbours and relations.

Once again, Abkhazia is a criminal statelet, it will not gain international recognition due to the fact that it was created through mass ethnic cleansing of the largest ethnic group in the province, through mass murder, and in violation of accepted international law.
It still acts in a racist manner towards those of its citizens not of Abkhaz ethnicity as evidenced by the actions of its government towards the population of Gali.

by: alaverdi
June 29, 2009 17:48
Dear sephia karta

How many times do you want to read the words: "look, now that the Russians chased away the Abkhazian the land is empty..."? How many times We have to Cry for you? How many years & centuries do you need to convince you that Russia would never allow return of refuges living in Turkey? Why? For the same reason they will not let "megrelian" refuges return.
But you are right comparing Abkhazians to megrelians because these are both small & similar tribes. Many tribes make the whole of Georgia.

My dear compatriots it is utterly important that whatever the conditions we do not loose our NATURAL liberalism.
It is bitter struggle to resist the deceitful & cruel force, but when we mix the bad with the good all is poisoned. You cannot see one more blemish on the face of serial killers, corrupted mob that rules the breakaway regions. But each time they corrupt us to use their language, to use even few bitter words it steals a little of our identity.
True majority of Georgia has respect to individual's values & talents. The true Spirit of Georgia is & will remain liberal. It does not matter what tribe & when has joined our Georgian Family, if my ancestors met them with embrace why should I reverse to hostility?
Few People know that original Caucasian unity in 1917 that Abkhazia was member only with right of ONE representative allowed for tribes less then 20000, was not created as independent state but a temporary self governing unit until Russian Federation was formed. People seam to be not informed that after Georgian Independence was declared in 1918 26 May, Sokhumi has negotiated with Tbilisi to retain The National Army units In Sokhumi as they would remain without any defense. It is generally unknown fact that Abkhazians were released from military duty to their country but they were allowed to join as volunteers if they pleased. Also, it is little known fact that Abkhazian Government had no funds & the rest of Georgia came to rescue with donations of money to help forming the Abkhazia’s local government. The Georgia as happily offered not only money but also experienced people to aid the new formed government in Abkhazia. Today’s Abkhazians are grossly misinformed, they do not have much information of their chance of freedom entirely depended on good will of the government of Georgia that was most accommodating , providing much needed funds, army , experts, and even donated territory of Samurzakano that at a time was not under the government of Sokhumi. Samurzakano is today’s regions of Gali & Ochamchire. Gali & Ochamchire was given to Sokhumi administration in feb 1918. Sadly today’s megrelian population which incidentally is 95% suffering the consequences of that deal. It is all disheartening, it is painful when Georgia has single-handedly supported Sokumi /Abkhazian government and today all Georgian can look forward to returning of the prodigal son (Hopefully not perished in Russia). I cannot blame Georgian government of 1918 they did what was right. Abkhazia was part of Georgia with autonomy or not they had to help their kinsmen. The Bolshevik army of Russia toppled all efforts for freedom but it would be far more unforgivable to betray Sokhumi in the face of peril.

by: sephia karta from: padua
June 27, 2009 13:35
Andrew Web, can you point out anything I wrote that is not true? Conversely it seems you are "either naive or somewhat disingenious".

You correctly give the percentage of Abkhaz in Abkhazia as 17%, but you conveniently round up the percentage of Georgians in Abkhazia from 46 to 50%. But what matters more is that the other parts of the population generally sided with the Abkhaz, Georgians were in a minority. The referendum on the new union treaty for the Soviet Union was adopted by a majority, and only a minority approved the Georgian independence referendum.

Yes, crimes committed by Abkhaz have been documented, but so have crimes committed. All have of them have to be condemned, and I don't see what they add to the present discussion.

The archaeological data don't prove anything definite either way, how do you want a castle to tell you who lived in it, or a church who used it?

But we have a 19th-century Georgian writer on record as saying: "look, now that the Russians chased away the Abkhaz the land is empty, let's send in the Mingrelians to colonise it".

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 27, 2009 02:37
My respond to Sephia and Abrek were not placed here, probably because Free Europe support their line of expanding Russia and bashing by lies CIS and Georgia, using lies against Stalin.
(Expulsion of conquering foreign Mudgehedins, like Abrek's alleged ansestors, from South Russia and their Gads and Pechenegies doesn't make them Abkhazians! It was an evil invention of Russian Military and Intelligence headquarters since 1954-56. Abkhazia was always populated by genuin ethnographic groups of Ibero Caucasians - Georgians.
"Caucasian Federation" was just Lenin's Cossacks army of expansion and genocide, that included some South Russian Gads).

NOT LENIN'S CAUCASIAN FEDERATION BUT LEAD BY GEORGIA REGIONAL COMON WEALTH OF IBERO-CAUCASIAN RACE BETWEEN BLACK AND CASPIAN SEAS!

The reason for locking some of my entries is the 1954 pact of Russians with the Quin and Bechtel family.
Also it is misguided German sentiment against Stalin (blaimed for victory over Nazi Germany).
Wrong sentiment for Germans because:
Stalin's speach at the end of Postsdam conference (and his stand till he was killed) blaimed Russians and British and obliviance of American delegation for trying to annex Eastern and Central Europe after WW2.
It is what lead eventually to Unification of Germany and liberation of Eastern Europe from illegal occupation by ethnic Russian usurpers.
Wake up, Germans!
You were used before by Russian and British Cousins and Lenin and Serafimovich that used Germans to corrupt and destroy Germans in the process...

Konstantin.

by: Alaverdi
June 26, 2009 17:07
The worst evil is not mixture of false statements but false statements tinted with few bright & attractive true statements that seduce the listener.
It is more damaging if the listener is left ignorant of the past. I love the fact that Abkhazians have their own language. Georgia has many dialects & languages but (until 19th century) only one written language that we refer to as “Georgian for literature”. I would go back to Abkhazian language later but firs I want to discuss different example: Megrelian language is ancient to say the least, nevertheless it always has been a “domestic” language never used in public documents or literature. It was not due to lock of creativity of various Georgian tribes, who all contributed to the rich common Georgian Literature. I am stating the obvious truth that Georgia has three scripts, three ancient alphabets created different times but none of the alphabets was designed for Megrelian, Svanian, Lazian, or Abkhazian, because these were “domestic-intimate- kinsmen” languages. I do not think that Abkhazians are resolved to state that they had no history until 19th century, nor I expect them to believe that Cyrillic base to the Abkhaz alphabet was logical choice because Abkhazian is not related to Russian language. There are Abkhazian written documents in Arabic but Abkhazian but this was result of ottoman occupation. Ironically, Abkhazians do not wish to learn Georgian but their true history is precisely written in Georgian. My argument is the very idea of the separatism, which Abkhazians ascribe to their own will, is designed through Cyrillic AKA by Russian (Tsarist, communist and now Putinist) Governments.

Only place they are not assimilated, but accepted as a family is Georgia. Why? Because the rest of Georgia still teaches children that alienation of Abkhazians is temporary. Abkhazians are part of the kaleidoscope of the Georgian Nation, Abkhazians are ONE of many jewels that make the Georgian Nation. They are part of the Georgian Kaleidoscope that creates beautiful picture each time is settles after re-shuffling through the turmoil of time (imposed by enemies or by massive ignorance of Georgian citizens). No Caucasian will be ever free of its family. When one gets freedom from the kinsmen, one looses part of the identity. If Abkhazians remain Abkhazians we can always hope for the future embrace, but if they loose identity they are forever our grief.

If there were no Russians in Abkhazia the rest of Georgia would sign any document with joy not to use force in Abkhazia, but war never was against Abkhazians. I hate phrase “Georgia Proper”. Should we call the rest of Georgia improper? In our hearts Abkhazians will be always part of Georgian Community even if you are evicted to Russia in the near future. It is not only the land that is part of every Georgian citizens extended body that aches each time our homeland bleeds, you Abkhazians are part of our National identity & I promise we will never give up on hope that our shattered souls will be mended. I am sorry that in 1990s I had no voice, silenced by the guns of Kremlin endorsed thieves. Today I will try to speak my mind even when expect skeptical & hostile listeners.

Abziaraz.

by: Kartlos Adeishvili from: San Francsico
June 25, 2009 18:00
If there was a wide consensus internationally that the demand of Abkhazians for independent state was legitimate, then it would surely have found a way to top the agenda of influential countries in the world, to say the least. However, the reality is much grimmer then what we are offered to believe. Whatever Abkhazians base their argument for independence, one thing is clear. The path they chose, does not, and WILL NOT lead to such eventual outcome and here is why: first and foremost, when 18% of population starts to demand right for self-rule, more than what they already have through the status of Autonomy, is going to encounter major resistance from other part of the population. Second, when the desire to become independent is realized through internationally prohibited acts of ethnic cleansing of major segment of population (Georgians, who were 44% of total) will most definitely cast doubts on fairness and legitimacy of such action, not only regionally but internationally. Third, when there is overwhelming evidence that the idea of Abkhazia’s independence was NOT born in the capital of Abkhazia, Sokhumi, but in the capital of Russia, Moscow, and it was orchestrated by the Russian military officials, also will lead many to think that ethnic conflict in of 1992-1993 had nothing to do with Abkhaz desire for independence, but more for Russia’s desire to use it as a bargaining chip. Finally, when after recognizing this so-called “independence”, Russia practically annexes this territory by deploying its border guards, builds military basis, takes over all the important strategic infrastructure and in return allows Abkhaz to live in the illusion of independence, the smallest hope of giving any legitimate reason for independence was killed.

This article lightly mentions how Abkhazians are waking up to the current reality. This process will be slow and painful. With as much concentration of influence, while at the same time being the sole state which fully recognized Abkhazia’s independence (unlike Nicaragua, parliament of which has not ratified the recognition, therefore it cannot be counted) Russia has gotten what it wanted. The process of Russification conducted since the Tsar times, will slowly continue, eradicating Abkhaz language, which it already has done so very successfully. When Abkhazians realize what they have gotten themselves into, it will be way too late to wake up and the irreparable damage will have been done. If this is what they wanted, they have gotten it, and their appeal on international community that they need help will not be heard since they have long ignored all the rules of internationally accepted behavior. Best of luck on your way to eventual disappearance and peaceful handover of “your” land to Russia. You have well earned it!

by: Andrew Webb from: Tbilisi
June 25, 2009 06:51
Sephia, Either you are naive, or somewhat disingenuous.
The Apsu/Abkhaz ethnic group made up only 17% of the population of Abkhazia prior to their genocidal ethnic cleansing campaign against ethnic Georgians (50%), Pontic Greeks, Azeris, Turkomen, and Russian ethnics who supported the Georgian government, in the process forcing 70% of the provice of Abkhazia to flee or be tortured, raped, and killed.
The crimes of the separatists have been well documented by the OSCE, HRW, Memorial, and the UNOMIG.
The Abkhaz separatists are required by international law to allow the return of the refugees, but in the manner of all racist regimes they refuse to follow UN resolutions.
They have no interest in creating a multi ethnic state in any form whatsoever. Just look at the racist hate articles posted on circassianworld or any one of a number of KKK style Abkhaz websites.
In addition look at the racist and opressive behaviour of the Abkhaz "government" (mafia) towards the Georgians living in Gali, where they make up 95% of the population. They want to ban the Georgian language from Georgian schools, the UNOMIG has noted with great concern a massive increase in Abkhaz attacks and provocations against the Georgian population.

As for your assertion that the Georgians only came into Abkhazia in the 19th C, unfortunately history does not bear this out.
Strabo describes Dioscuras/Sukhumi as a Svanetian city, Abkhazia was part of the Cholcian kingdom, the kingdome of Abkhazia-Egrisi also known as the kingdom of Lazica, the Kingdom of Imereti, and the united kingdom of Georgia of the medieval period.
There are many Georgian monuments, Churches some suriving from the 7th century, and many other artifacts from the bronze age that show that Georgians have lived in Abkhazia for thousands of years, Abkhaz nationalists often forget that many Georgians were ethnically cleansed from Abkhazia in the 16th, 17th, & 18th century by the Turks, with whom the Apsu cooperated.

Both Georgian and Abkhazians have lived in the province for all of known history.

Your best chance to retain your culture is with the Georgians, as the Russian policy of Russification is still alive and well.

by: dinara from: Sukhum, Republic of Abkhazia
June 24, 2009 16:06
Why to be dependent on Washington, and even to have the central avenue in the capital named after G.W Bush, is good, and to have Russia as na ally is bad, particularly when there is no other country cared to stop the georgian lunatic of a president?

by: sephia karta from: Padua, Italy
June 24, 2009 09:08
Giorgi: how do you imagine it happening? According to which scenario will Abkhazia join Georgia within the next twenty year?

The difference between Abkhazia and Eastern Germany is that East Germans and West Germans are both Germans, and that East Germans wanted to join Germany. Abkhazians don't want to join Georgia.

The reunification of Germany was quite an exception, the trend of the last 50 years has been for new states to form. Even Moldova didn't join Romania after it became independent.

I believe that when the Georgian refugees return, an independent Abkhazia can be really multi-ethnic, because no group will dominate. In the long run the Abkhaz have to let Armenians and Mingrelians participate politically, and I believe the result will be much more ethnically balanced than if Abkhazia were to join Georgia.

by: Giorgi from: Georgia Sukhumi
June 24, 2009 00:27
sephia karta:)) you do not respect the internation laws. you must remmeber that, Abkhazia was recognized by Russia, Nicaragua and Hamas! even Belarus did not recognized it. Abkhazia never be the member of UN. Abkhazia was is and will be part of Georgia. Georgians will return, soon or later, nobody believed but 1989 Germany returned the occupied lands from USSR. Russia will lose power.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 4
TEXT SIZE - +

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile