Saturday, February 18, 2012


Features

Afghans Express Mixed Reactions To Obama's New Afghan Strategy

Ordinary Afghans have definite opinions about the prospect of some 100,000 U.S. forces fighting in their country.
TEXT SIZE - +
(RFE/RL) -- Afghans are expressing mixed feelings about a new strategy announced by U.S. President Barack Obama that entails deploying an additional 30,000 American troops in Afghanistan beginning in early 2010 to counter the insurgency led by Al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

In a major speech before cadets at the United States Military Academy at West Point, Obama outlined his plans for the war effort in Afghanistan, which will bring the total number of U.S. forces in the country to about 100,000.

However, many Afghans questioned by Radio Free Afghanistan said they are convinced that military force alone cannot bring peace and stability to their country.

Sadeq Yusufi, a young journalist, said the United States should focus on the training and upgrading of Afghan forces.

"How long do we sit and wait for the U.S. to solve our problems?" Yusufi says. "The United States should train our army and police. Then there wouldn't be any need to deploy troops here."

During his address Obama sketched out an exit strategy for U.S. troops deployed in Afghanistan, saying the U.S. military commitment in Afghanistan is not "open-ended."

Obama said his administration's plan is for U.S. forces to begin pulling out of Afghanistan in July 2011.

Until that time, Obama said, "We will pursue a military strategy that will break the Taliban's momentum and increase Afghanistan's capacity over the next 18 months."

Speed Up 'Afghanization'


Afghan Foreign Minister Dadfar Spanta said he is confident that the 18-month time frame will be adequate to train and strengthen Afghan national forces to take responsibility for the security of their own country.

"An 18-month time frame is appropriate for us. We have to speed up the process of the 'Afghanization' of security responsibilities and nation-building," Spanta says.

"At the end of the day, Afghans should take responsibility. We are not alone in this process. The [U.S.] president has said they will provide us with the assistance necessary for us to become capable of defending our country."

WATCH: RFE/RL Radio Free Afghanistan Director Akbar Ayazi talks about reservations among Afghans toward Obama's new AfPak strategy:



Obama's speech was broadcast live on Afghan television channels, including the private television stations Aryana and Shamshad. In remote areas, Afghans were able to listen to Obama's speech by radio, including on Radio Free Afghanistan (known as Radio Azadi) and the BBC.

Wais, a man from Kabul's Wazeer Akbarkhan neighborhood who would only give his first name, described Obama's strategy announcement as "the news of the day in Afghanistan."

He said he believes the presence of additional U.S. forces will "bring positive results" in defeating the insurgency in Afghanistan, "as long as the U.S. knows where to deploy them."

The 30,000 new U.S. troops are reportedly to be deployed mainly in southern and eastern Afghanistan and will focus on establishing security in urban centers such as Kabul, Khost, and Kandahar.

Wais suggested that "the U.S. soldiers should be deployed in border areas near Pakistan and target Taliban and Al-Qaeda leaders."

"They shouldn't stay among residents in Kabul and other towns and villages...and they should be able to differentiate between a Taliban and an ordinary village man," Wais added.

During his speech, Obama stressed the importance of establishing a partnership with Pakistan based on "mutual interest, mutual respect, and mutual trust" in order to combat insurgents. The U.S. president mentioned Al-Qaeda numerous times, while naming the Taliban by name sparingly.

Taliban 'Will Use It As An Excuse'

In a statement issued today, Pakistan's Foreign Ministry agreed that "Pakistan and the U.S. need to closely coordinate their efforts to achieve shared objectives. There is certainly the need for clarity and coordination on all aspects of the implementation of the strategy."

But the statement also said that Washington must work with Islamabad to ensure "there would be no adverse fallout on Pakistan."

Hares Kakar, an Afghan media worker questioned in Kabul, warned that the deployment of extra U.S. troops could be used by the Taliban to boost their cause.

"We already have some 100,000 foreign troops in our country, and they couldn't achieve much in bringing security," Kakar says. "I don't think sending additional foreign troops will benefit Afghanistan. I'm afraid the Taliban will use it as an excuse to try to gain support for their cause among some people."

The Taliban was, indeed, quick to capitalize on Obama's speech, telling numerous outlets that it planned to step up its campaign against U.S. forces and that more U.S. troops would only strengthen its resolve.

"Obama will witness lots of coffins heading to America from Afghanistan," Taliban spokesman Yousuf Ahamdi told the French news agency AFP.

"The extra 30,000 troops that will come to Afghanistan will provoke stronger resistance and fighting," he added.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Zan from: USA
December 02, 2009 22:40
"Wais suggested that "the U.S. soldiers should be deployed in border areas near Pakistan and target Taliban and Al-Qaeda leaders."

"They shouldn't stay among residents in Kabul and other towns and villages...and they should be able to differentiate between a Taliban and an ordinary village man," Wais added."

That IS just one of the many troubles with this plan. Who is a Taliban, who is an Al Qaeda? Please, no more troops in Afghanistan; stop policing the world USA, and take care of your people at home by paying for some health care in stead.

by: Orhan Ertugruloglu from: the Netherlands
December 04, 2009 12:52
Many Turks interviewed by the Turkish daily Hurriyet Daily News in Istanbul said they beleive Turkish forces has no business in Afghanistan. According to the daily Hurriyet The message from the streets in the City Center in Istanbul to the US is clear. You borke it. You fix it.Also the majority of the man in the street thinks that interfereng in another countries domestic affirs will cause backlash..

by: Siddieq Noorzoy from: California
December 06, 2009 01:44
After eight years of war what is needed is a peace plan, not another two or more years of war. The Afghan people demand peace and real help with rebuilding Afghanistan, providing jobs to the 60% unemployed Afghans and the poor and the refugees.The American people, the majority of them, support an end to this war also. With 100,000 soldiers in Afghanistan fighting the US will spend $100 billion annually. And if the NATO countries spend a quarter of that the war expenditures of the 42 countries with military forces in Afghanistan will amount to $125 billion per year. Can the world afford to apply that much resources for destruction? With 10% of that for the same period under the control of honest and capable individuals will rebuild war devastated Afghanistan and will bring long term friendship between Afghanistan and America. The present US policy is headed in the wrong direction and is costing in lives and funds.
Siddieq Noorzoy
Professor of Economics, Emeritus
Director, Afghan Research Society International
www.afghanresearchsociety.org

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Tymoshenko: 'I Fear For My Mother's Life'

Latest Comment (3 total)

C. M. Greene: It is inspiring to see a strong woman like Yevhenia Tymoshenko speak out ... More

Russia Sets Weapons Export Record

Latest Comment (10 total)

Dog Bar: Jzack You for got to say That the Taliban beat Russia in the ... More

Israel Alleges Network Of Bomb Plotters

Latest Comment (6 total)

Dog Bar: Isreal is most at fault. For what happened to them by the hands ... More