Wednesday, February 15, 2012


Features

Are The EU's Russian Gas Deliveries Eternally At Risk?

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (right) wrote to the president of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, to warn him of "emerging risks" in the stability of gas supplies. (file photo)
TEXT SIZE - +
By Ahto Lobjakas
BRUSSELS -- This time, at least, the warning came early.

On May 26, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin wrote to the president of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, to warn him of "emerging risks" for stable gas supplies to Europe during the winter ahead.

The letter, seen by RFE/RL, suggests that Ukraine's mounting economic crisis may sooner or later lead to additional cutoffs to consumer nations further west.

Kyiv’s underground gas-storage facilities have become depleted as the country struggles to service domestic demand. And it is not at all clear that Ukraine has the $4.2 billion it needs to pump 19.1 billion cubic meters of gas into them before winter begins.

The gas giant Gazprom has confirmed it has received Ukraine's May gas payment in full -- which Ukraine put at some $647 million.

But officials in Brussels say the payment will only give Ukraine a brief respite before the next bill comes due in early July. In the meantime, preparations for winter storage remain barely under way. 

Forming A 'Pool'

Russia has repeatedly warned that Ukraine does not have the financial wherewithal to pay its bills, and that Europe could be the one to suffer if and when Kyiv comes up short.

Noting Ukraine's storage facilities play a key role in ensuring disruption-free gas transit, Putin, in his letter to Barroso, suggested that Russia and the EU form a "pool" to provide Ukraine with credit.
 
A series of phone calls between Putin and Barroso followed. On June 9, a team of EU foreign policy officials and gas experts left for Kyiv and Moscow to study the options.

Needless to say, any disruptions along the Ukrainian supply route have the potential to hurt the EU. The bloc ships one-quarter of the gas it consumes from Russia; Ukraine is responsible for 80 percent of those transit imports.

The global financial downturn means that money is tight not only for Ukraine, but for Russia and the EU as well. So tight, in fact, that Brussels may play financial calculations above geostrategic ones in future dealings with Ukraine -- meaning no EU credits may be forthcoming for Kyiv.

'Asked To Pay Twice'

A discussion paper prepared by the EU's Czech Presidency for a meeting of the EU energy ministers in Luxembourg on June 12 -- seen  by RFE/RL -- puts it in stark terms.

The paper argues that as the EU already has binding contracts guaranteeing delivery of gas at its border, it should not be "asked to pay twice." It also warns against "short-term fixes" and advises EU unity and preparations to switch to alternative fuels where necessary.

With cash-strapped Ukraine between a rock and a hard place, and Russian gas -- by the EU's admission -- "vital" for one-third of its member states, Moscow's early warning looks like a preemptive attempt to shift blame.

At the start of his letter, Putin evoked the "spirit and the letter" of the early warning mechanism between Russia and the EU created in 2007 to prevent energy shutoffs by monitoring energy supplies from Russia.

That mechanism, however, singularly failed to prevent the crisis in January. And the EU, which sought to upgrade the agreement at its Khabarovsk summit with Russia last month, walked away empty-handed.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: rkka from: USA
June 10, 2009 10:39
Notice that Gazprom has a clear, transparent agreement on gas transit with Poland, and that Gazprom's Blue Stream pipeline to Turkey was used to supply Europe during the last crisis. This indicates that it is not the Russian side who initiates playing games with gas transit.

Yes, Europe's gas supply remains at risk as long as the Ukrainian government has any influence on it.

That is why, if the RFE/RL were really interested in European energy security they would support Nord Stream and South Stream.

But since RFE/RL are a Russophobic propaganda shop, they oppose real measures involving Russia, preferring supply-deficient political gestures like nabucco.

by: to rkka from: georgia
June 12, 2009 09:37
in reality, Nord Stream and South Stream is just increased dependence on Russia which will bring encreased pressure of Russia regarding some other political issues. As soon as and if Nord Stream and South Stream becomes reality, then EU commissioner will start to get letters with other contents, it is clear. So, Ukraine is very important, and does it best to transit gas from Russia, but it is high time to recognize that alterantive supplies from other regions with other routes is the only true way to ensure energy security of Europe. i think, as soon as NABUCCO is realised the EU and Russia will settle gas disputes and trouble in more business friendly environment.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 29, 2009 00:17
NABUKO is a necessity, without it there is no checks and ballances - it must be build.

But there is even larger issue:
Russian concept of total ignorence of International laws, traditions and agreements is unacceptable, specially in energy policy.
Russians always used to say, when I lived in USSR, that if evil can be done it must be done by Russia, till somebody would be able to stop them.
Thus even Nabuko is not enough to waranty that Russia wouldn't invade and grabb it, unless Civilized World will defend CIS nations from Russian annexations, subversive activety, acts of aggression and genocide.
In any case Nabuko will help to accumulate reserves of gas and oil in EU.

Still, can you imagine a Civilized country building pipe-lines that circumvent all their neighbours and poisoning their Seas "from Baltics through Adriatics", instead of building through neigboring countries directly, in most logical and just way for everybody and paying fear for transit and saling fear shear of energy to Ukraine, Baltics, Moldova, Eastern Europe and so on?

What patalogical hate is bruering in Russian ruling classes?

Konstantin.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Iranian Bomber Wounded In Bangkok

Latest Comment (1 total)

arash: As I've said before this terrorist regime must be thrown out of the ... More

Kosovo Serbs To Vote In Referendum

Latest Comment (4 total)

Eugenio: Ah, Alija, your open-hearted admission of desire to cleanse the ethnic Serbs from ... More

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (11 total)

Mah: Really? You wanna divide Balochistan? That's the outrageous idea I've heard so far. ... More