Friday, May 25, 2012


Features

As Yerevan Gets Face-Lift, Many Armenians Lose Their Homes

Yerevan's Noragyugh neighborhood has been targeted for redevelopment. Residents fear they will be the next to be given meager compensation for their homes.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Tatevik Lazarian
YEREVAN -- Nune Hambardzumian was evicted from her home in downtown Yerevan in late December, as the authorities began clearing out residents to make room for new commercial and residential districts.

"This is anarchy! They can just come and throw you out of your house," she says. "This is my husband's ancestral home. But it turns out that one day you wake up and find out that it is already somebody else's property."

This is the dark side of urban renewal. As the Armenian capital undergoes a face-lift, with private investors moving in to gentrify what was once a dreary post-Soviet cityscape, residents like Hambardzumian are finding themselves kicked out of their homes with little or no compensation.

The Yerevan authorities are using eminent-domain legislation -- or as it is called in Armenia "prevailing public interest" -- to turn over entire neighborhoods to private developers, who then build lucrative high-end shops, hotels, restaurants, and upscale housing.

Thousands of families have been displaced in the past decade and some 30 neighborhoods in Yerevan are currently slated to be renovated under eminent domain. While such legislation has traditionally been reserved for public-works projects like schools and roads, it is increasingly being invoked to make way for commercial projects run by private investors.

Watch: Residents complain of being evicted from their homes in downtown Yerevan (in Armenian).



The State's Needs

"A redistribution of property is being carried out under the guise of state needs," says Sedrak Baghdasarian, head of the NGO Victims of the State's Needs, which helps evictees win adequate compensation in court.

"When I hear 'state needs,' I understand that to mean the construction of a reservoir or an airport. But look what the government has done -- it has taken property from one owner and handed it over to another to construct a building and make super profits."

When residents are evicted from their homes, Baghdasarian explains, they also lose their registration as residents of their district, meaning they are unable to vote in elections, get passports for their children, or use municipal services.

Baghdasarian himself was evicted from his home back in 2004 and offered just $300 per square meter in compensation, a fraction of the price new residences constructed in its place are now being sold for. After failing to win legal redress in Armenia, he and 15 other evictees have taken their case to the European Court of Human Rights.

Vahe Grigorian, an attorney who is representing some of the evicted tenants in the European Court, says Armenia's justice system is deeply corrupt and subservient to the authorities and real estate developers.

"The courts have been used as tools by the developers and the authorities in order to deprive people of their property and give them as little compensation as possible. It's very difficult to believe that courts have changed their ways now," Grigorian says.

"The real and primary reason for the wholesale violations of the rights of Yerevan residents is that there wasn't and isn't now a system of justice in the Republic of Armenia. The presence of any law by itself does not imply the protection of human rights."

Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov (center) and Armenian officials discuss a major redevelopment project.
Yerevan officials say they are simply trying to improve the city, and need private investors to do so. "We are not depriving people of their property. We are simply dealing with the unsanitary condition of the city," says Levon Hakobian, the director of the department dealing with construction in Yerevan's City Hall.

"The whole purpose of this development is to implement an urban development project so that the city will be beautiful," Hakobian adds. "And they [the residents] are trying to get as much money as they can, which is natural. What else can you say?"

Luzhkov Branches Out

The wave of redevelopment in Yerevan began a decade ago, in 2000, with the Northern Avenue project, a pedestrian boulevard in downtown Yerevan that now houses chic boutiques, shops, and cafes.

According to local media reports, a key investor in that project was the Russia-based company Inteko, which is controlled by Yelena Baturina, the wife of Moscow's powerful Mayor Yury Luzhkov.

The Moscow mayor has already expressed interest in another planned urban-renewal project in Yerevan, a business center in the city's central Noragyugh district. The $6 billion project will be spread across 184 hectares and will also include residential properties and foreign embassies.

Luzhkov himself visited Yerevan in January and toured the site with Yerevan Mayor Gagik Beglarian. Luzhkov said at the time that the "location is good.... That's why we will pay serious attention to this project." Luzhkov added that his first deputy mayor would visit Yerevan in March, when construction is scheduled to commence, to further assess the project.

Luzhkov has his own problems related to real estate development back home. Critics have long accused him of staging regular "land grabs" in order to clear prime real estate of low-budget tenants in order to move ahead with lucrative development plans. Most recently, residents of the Moscow suburb of Rechnik resisted efforts to evict them.

For his part, Beglarian assured Luzhkov that he would "do everything" to assure that the residents of Noragyugh "move from here gladly." Beglarian said the residents would be relocated to new apartments elsewhere in the city.

But that is small comfort to those currently living in Noragyugh, as they anxiously await their fates.

"If you were in my place, wouldn't you be afraid?" one resident asks. "They forced people in Northern Avenue out of their homes and did not pay proper compensation to them. People turned into tramps. Will the state give me the amenities that I already enjoy? No, it won't."

RFE/RL correspondent Brian Whitmore contributed to this report from Prague
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: George Vaughan from: Wales
February 26, 2010 15:08
If the Northern Avenue development was possible, no Yerevan resident should feel secure in their home. This dismal pastiche runs almost right into Tamanian's city centre architecture. If you want to be able to 'develop' wherever you like, this is a shrewd place to start. Its relevance to the city is such that here you can play 'spot the shopper' in the absurd boutiques. No doubt the theory is that the Armenian standard of living will rise sufficiently to make the Avenue viable. One imagines that, to keep the developers in the style to which they are accustomed, before that happens the whole thing will have to be pulled down and something new put in its place.
Noragyugh might be regarded as a little suburban. Kond, for instance, is closer to the centre. It's not pretty so why should something that represents pre-20th century Yerevan be a problem? I'm sure the residents - like those in some of the run-down blocks even nearer to the centre - would be happy to move on.
But really this is avoiding the issue. If we want genuine development, eventually we have to bite the bullet. What is so sacrosanct about Tamanian's architecture?

by: Micha M. from: Paris
February 28, 2010 09:34
George,
I guess each city has its history and something sentimental to preserve. For many Yerevantsis, the Tamanian's architecture is a symbol of renewal and rebirth. Actually, before Tamanian, there was architecture. May be Tamanian is not as huge as Haussman is for Paris, or Mackintosh is for Glasgow in the eyes of professionnals, but for local inhabitants he is a titan.

by: George Vaughan from: Wales
March 02, 2010 13:15
Misha,
Maybe I should clarify the point I am making. Not only, as you say, does each city have its history and heritage to preserve, it seems to have its developers. Experience closer to home suggests these frequently have little regard for either people or architecture.
As regards Tamanian, perhaps he is better or worse than others - I wouldn't know - but his architecture makes Yerevan an unique city. I will say this: it is difficult to judge from photographs and you have to actually see it to appreciate how impressive it is and how it defines Yerevan.
In a nutshell, the question I was asking was this: without constraints, how far would developers be prepared to go and how far should we allow them to?

by: Donovan from: PA
March 03, 2010 01:40
To George and Micha: in my opinion Tamanian was a rather unimaginative architect, particularly in his treatment of the unique landscape of Yerevan and its surroundings. But would I entrust modern day nouveau riche real estate goons with touching Yerevan? Definitely not!

by: Aram from: U.S-Armenia
March 12, 2010 03:49
There is no doubt in anyone's mind or aesthetic that Noragyugh HAS TO GO.
The fair , patriotic and humanitarian question is "What about the PEOPLE
who rside there ?"

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (23 total)

greg: Rafi. you go through round after round accusing me of raping and killing ... More

Loophole Offers Legal Out For Doctor Convicted In Bin Laden Case

Latest Comment (3 total)

khan: i think everyone in the paki gov should be hanged the traiters suking ... More

Putin Wants To Party Like It's 2007

Latest Comment (3 total)

nirvichara: It is so boring to hear all this crap about Putin's "old KGB ... More