Friday, May 25, 2012


Features

Assault On Aid Ship Sounds Death Knell For Israeli-Turkish Strategic Ties

A demonstrator waves a Palestinian flag during a protest against Israel in front of the Israeli Consulate in Istanbul on May 31.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Robert Tait
Strategic relationship? What strategic relationship? "I don't think we can use that word anymore," one Turkish official grimly opined, describing the diplomatic aftermath of Israel's deadly commando raid on an aid flotilla bound for the Gaza Strip with Ankara's blessing.

With that terse assessment, an intimate bilateral partnership that spawned not only burgeoning trade and arms ties, but a mutual trust prompting intensive diplomatic efforts by Turkey to mediate between Israel and its Arab adversaries, finally bit the dust.

Relations between Ankara and Tel Aviv have been on a downward spiral for 18 months -- ever since a prolonged Israeli military assault on Gaza that left around 1,300 Palestinians dead triggered a furious backlash in Turkey. That culminated in Turkey's tempestuous prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, storming out of a debate at the World Economic Forum in Davos in January last year after clashing with the Israeli president, Shimon Peres.

Things were subsequently patched up -- at least publicly -- despite the persistence of underlying tensions. The pattern repeated itself when Turkey blackballed Israel from taking part in NATO military maneuvers last October, and then again in January, when Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon deliberately humiliated Turkey's ambassador to Tel Aviv, Ahmet Oguz Celikkol, by upbraiding him before television cameras over a Turkish TV series that depicted Israeli intelligence agents as baby snatchers.

'Serious Ramifications'

The chances of a similar kiss-and-make-up this time are much slimmer. Despite talk among officials of using "silent diplomacy" to "salvage as much as we can," the outlook for a relationship once described as "perfect" by the Israeli Foreign Ministry appears bleak. That description may have been part self-delusion; in truth, things have been on the slide since Turkey hosted the exiled Hamas leader, Khalid Mishaal, in 2006, much to Israeli dismay.

An Israeli military vessel (left) escorts one of the boats from the Gaza-bound aid flotilla.
"Relations were not very rosy anyway. This will make things go further back," said the Turkish official, who was speaking on condition of anonymity. "I don't know how we are going to get past this.... It's looking very bad."

His comments came before the Turkish cabinet announced it was requesting an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council -- of which Turkey is currently a member -- and withdrawing Celikkol from his ambassador's post in Israel. A decision by Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to cancel a scheduled meeting in Washington with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and fly instead to New York, where he was expected to confer with officials at the UN, suggests tensions had assumed international crisis proportions.

Mensur Akgun, foreign-policy program director at the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation, an Istanbul-based think tank, says the latest incident dwarfs previous disagreements and could have long-term effects on Turkish foreign policy.

"It's much more significant," Akgun says. "It will have long-lasting ramifications for the bilateral relations and, depending on the reactions of the EU and also the U.S. and probably within the Security Council framework, Turkey's near foreign policy will be reshaped."

'Worst Kind Of Prevention'

That the May 31 storming of the Turkish vessel, the "Mavi Marmara" -- with the death of at least 10 activists, including Turks -- happened at all is a graphic demonstration of the extent to which Turkish-Israeli relations had already become a dialogue of the deaf.

Officials in Turkey's Justice and Development Party (AKP) government had been expressing concerns for months about a worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza and had accused the world of turning a blind eye.

Turkish TV shows Israeli commandos storming the 'Mavi Marmara' off Gaza.
One of the most striking disclosures to emerge after the incident was that Davutoglu had held talks about the aid convoy with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak as it sailed toward Gaza. Davutoglu, who has publicly pursued a policy of "zero problems" with Turkey's neighbors, is said to have stressed that its purpose was humanitarian and that Turkey did not want any "incidents."

Selim Yenel, deputy undersecretary at the Turkish Foreign Ministry, acknowledges that Israel had expressed its determination to prevent the ship reaching Gaza, but says Turkey's anger is directed at the lethal use of force, which he describes as "the worst kind of prevention."

"The Israelis had told us that they didn't want this, that they would take necessary measures," he says, "but, look, this is a ship of peaceful intent carrying only humanitarian aid and of course the Israelis may not want it to come through to one of the ports. But the way to prevent this, there are many ways to do it and many them, actually, do not entail force."

End Of The Affair

In their depiction of the raid as a breach of international law, Turkish diplomats are also stressing that the incident happened 70 nautical miles off Gaza's coast, well outside the 20-mile exclusion zone Israel has imposed around the territory.

They are pinning the blame for the decline in relations on the uncompromising approach of the current Israeli coalition government, led by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, and especially on its hard-line foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, who has dismissed reports of a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which Israel regards as the incorrigible heartland of its bete noir, Hamas.

Turkey's Erdogan leaves a debate with Israel's Peres (left) -- a sign of things to come?
Akgun says the deaths of Turkish nationals ensures that public opinion -- a factor the Erdogan government has already stressed as its attitude to Israel has grown more critical -- will play a key role in how the crisis unfolds. "On such an issue, they cannot neglect public opinion," he says. "It's hardly possible that Turks will forget what has happened to this 'Mavi Marmara ship.'"

The strength of public sentiment was clear in the angry crowds that gathered outside the Israeli Consulate in Istanbul this morning, in scenes that reprised the anti-Israel feeling that was widespread in Turkey during last year's bombardment of Gaza.

Erdogan played to those emotions with his histrionic walkout at Davos, which led to him being given a hero's welcome by cheering crowds when he arrived back at Istanbul's Ataturk airport.

With a general election due in Turkey within the next year, the temptation to use hostility toward Israel as a potential vote winner will loom large.

Meanwhile, a once-harmonious relationship that saw Peres address the Turkish parliament and frequent mutual exchanges of senior ministers appears doomed to wither on the vine. Turkey may be seeing more of Mishaal and his allies in future.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: nazreen from: malaysia
May 31, 2010 17:13
its just a humanitarian AID for god sake, and it is for palestinians. why should they the Israelite prevented it? some more, they killed people there!

the whole world know the palestinians conditions and they rely on aid, is the israelite do not have any compassion and mercy on their condition?
they are the reason the palestinians life worsen and now they want to destroy the aid for palestinians. for god sake,who are they to prevent that?! its not for them,its for the poor palestinians!

by: Tony from: New York City
May 31, 2010 19:27
It's for the poor Palestinians, who, with their fundamentalist allies in Turkey, are arming themselves for war this summer.

by: Ronnie Moseley from: Orlando, Florida
May 31, 2010 20:32
This is another act of murdering innocent people ,with the use of weapons sold to them by the U.S..

by: J from: US
June 01, 2010 02:21
Not so fast. Too early to tell.

by: vytautasba from: vilnius
June 01, 2010 05:05
Israel has pretty much shown the world and especially its US ally that it can and will do what it pleases irregardless of international law when its security concerns are at stake. Pity that this policy just sows more dragons teeth.

by: Anonymous
June 01, 2010 07:07
Israel transfers more supplies every week than the flotilla hope to transfer in a one time action. Their purpose was to provoke the soldiers, and not to give humanitarian support to the people of Gaza.

Should they wanted to do so, like many other do - they could have passed their cargo through Israel or Eygpt - but they didn't. Instead, the chose to penetrate Israel's border, cursed the ships that intercepted them, and committed actions of violence when were boarded.

Any sovereign country have the right to check the cargo of a ship aimed at entering it's waters, We all know what happens to immigrant ship illegally trying to enter Europe or the US. I don't want to imagine what would happen to a "freedom flotilla" trying to enter Syria, Turkey (for Kurds), Russia (for Chechen people) and so on and so forth
In Response

by: J from: US
June 01, 2010 12:43
I agree, they were warned several times.
In Response

by: Anonymous
June 03, 2010 15:26
you mean bring the aid from israel where they seize 80% of the brought aids as banned materials, proven by UN during UN aid sessions. Are you seriously kidding me or are you on a course to defend israel whatever israel does against international law and get away with it. ships were 70 nautical miles off Israels water, they were on international waters, as soon as the ships enter your waters you have the right to investigate the cargo, not on international waters, dont try to blur minds here, and about israel transferring aids, according to the latest UN report on the issue, total amount of aid being transferred through israel is about one fourth of what is need!!

by: Abbas Djavadi from: Prague
June 01, 2010 08:20
"The street" in Muslim countries will be more agitated against Israel. From the PR point of view, it's not helpful for Israel or the U.S. We won't, however, see any practical gain for Turkey or any other Islamic country from the whole recent conflict. What does Ankara intend to achieve with this confrontational course? The Turkish government acted not as a "wise entity" to calm down passions and prevent emotional actions and seek solutions. It rather took sides with groups and individuals trying to deliver aid to the Palestinians in Gaza. And it used the occasion not to gain anything practical and pragmatic but to campaign against Israel and in favor of the Palestinians.

This has not been the typical Turkish foreign policy of the last few decades that has been formulated by pragmatism rather than ideology. But events such as PM Erdogan's outburst in Davos at Israel and now the confrontational approach in the flotilla crisis indicate that Ankara's course is being derailed.

by: Eli from: London
June 01, 2010 11:31
The recent incident has proven that Turks are ideologically and naturally should be besides their Arab neighbours. However, a vital crisis that involved Turkey for more than 50 years remained unanswered yet. What about 20 Millions ethnic Kurds whom have not been granted with their basic human rights such as freedom of using the mother-language and having local assemblies and so on. It seems that Turkey should prove first that it belives in humanity then condemn others for breaching international rules. Overall weldone Turkey for your semi-independent new policy.

by: Orhan ertugruloglu from: the Netherlands
June 01, 2010 12:31
The Israeli government is heavily criticised after the dramatic interception of the convoy full of activists which went out of control. Many questions arose about the operation.
The conditions under which this operation was carried out and which gave way into an international crisis should rapidly be clarified.
Next to the predictable expression of Israeli hate in the Arab world and in some religious circles inTurkey, the Europe criticized the military intervention which is described as disproportional use of force.
After previous disasters, like, Dubai assasination operation by the Israeli secret services, Israel is facing more isolation in international field.
At the same time it should not be lost out of sight that Gaza is fully under the control of Hamas, an extremist and undemocratic organisation which collaborates with Iran. This duo is forming a real threat for Israel. This isat least the Israels peception of threat. The sea blockade is according to Israel a legitimate measure in the conflict to cope with the Iran supported Hamas.
In spite of the warnings from Israel to obey to the rules of blockade and the offer to bring the humanitarian aid to Gaza via an Israeli or Egyptian sea port, the convoy tried to force its way through the blockade and bore the consequences.. These activists, among whom there might be some members with terrorist connections preferred a fierce confrontation in stead of handing over the humanitarian aid to the inhabitants of Gaza.

by: gearoid from: ireland
June 01, 2010 14:30
It seems Israel has become so accustomed to murdering civilians in Palestine and Lebanon. And so used to flouting international law - illegal settlements and assassinations in Dubai; that its feels it can simply slaughter activists in international waters and walk away.

Lebanon, Gaza, Goldstone, Dubai and now this. Israel is clearly a rogue state spiraling out off control.
Comments page of 2
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (23 total)

greg: Rafi. you go through round after round accusing me of raping and killing ... More

Loophole Offers Legal Out For Doctor Convicted In Bin Laden Case

Latest Comment (3 total)

khan: i think everyone in the paki gov should be hanged the traiters suking ... More

Putin Wants To Party Like It's 2007

Latest Comment (3 total)

nirvichara: It is so boring to hear all this crap about Putin's "old KGB ... More