Friday, May 25, 2012


Commentary

Azerbaijan And The West: Beyond Interest, Toward Commitment

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with the Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Baku in July
TEXT SIZE - +
By Elnur Baimov
A friend in need is a friend indeed. I couldn’t agree more. Yet, it is the times when we are savoring our success or trying ever harder to reach our goals that we appreciate a friend’s supportive smile or pat on the back. Whether we get it or not does not affect our success, but it does ease our way and make it more pleasant.

The greatness of success has always depended not just on how it is achieved, but on being able to share it with those who have accompanied you throughout the sweet and bitter journey.

The cooperation Azerbaijan forged with the West, especially with the United States, has over the years been characterized as strategic by many, short-term by some, and untruthful by others. However, even when relations reached an all-time low, Azerbaijan never wavered in its commitment to its partnership with the West. Time and again, when buffeted by strong winds, Azerbaijan has needed understanding and a firm stance from the United States, while the United States has expected the same from us, however strange it might seem given Azerbaijan’s size on a global scale.

When Azerbaijan was forced into full-scale war with its neighbor in the early 1990s, it expected no less than a balanced approach from the West. Instead, all it got was Section 907, banning any direct U.S. aid to the Azerbaijani government. History might not repeat itself, but it does rhyme. Ten years later, the United States’ government was in need of friends, big and small, to support the war on terror. In the blink of an eye, while most of the region’s countries were still hemming and hawing, Azerbaijan contributed peacekeeping troops to the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq and served shoulder-to shoulder with a U.S. Marine battalion, providing security for the Haditha Dam, a vital infrastructure in Al Anbar Province that produced one-quarter of Iraq’s electricity. With 11 rotations and more than 1,000 troops, Azerbaijan underscored its loyalty to the United States.

The same year, 2002, Azerbaijani troops also joined the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan, becoming the first CIS member to contribute troops. Six years later, in 2008, when many allies were pulling out of Afghanistan in despair, President Ilham Aliyev submitted a bill “on the status of Azerbaijani troops carrying out peacemaking operations abroad” to the Azerbaijani parliament, which envisaged doubling the peacekeeping troops in Afghanistan.

In yet another gesture, the Azerbaijani government demonstrated an unfeigned faithfulness to its friendship. More than NATO 100,000 troops flew through Azerbaijani airspace in 2009 alone. Approximately 25 percent of the coalition’s supplies going to Afghanistan pass through Azerbaijan. NATO member states transport 1,500 containers every month to the war-torn country through the territory of Azerbaijan. The growing size of Azerbaijan’s military contingent, the open airspace, and Baku’s full cooperation on the battlefield says a lot more than mere words can express.

Facing pressure from the Armenian diaspora, the United States Congress fell flat with a biased approach to the Nagorno-Karabakh problem. It used the role of lobby groups as an excuse for a lopsided approach. Azerbaijan, on the contrary, in its commitment to its promise on the war on terror, successfully prevented and dealt with terrorist threats, including those from Iran, despite constant pressure from the latter. Numerous plots were intercepted, criminals detained, potentially tragic scenarios avoided.

Because of its continuous good terms with the United States, Azerbaijan was accused of “cooperating with the Great Satan” on Iran’s Sahar-2 television channel -- which is broadcast in the territory of Azerbaijan without authorization -- and threatened by the Iranian authorities. It is not difficult to appreciate that pressure from 71 million Iranians is a much greater problem than pressure from 1.5 million Armenian-Americans.

Favoring Western Companies


Azerbaijan stands for and does many things that, for some reason, go unnoticed around the world. Astonishingly, Azerbaijan is one of the only major Caspian hydrocarbon-producing countries that has exported almost exclusively to the West. The biggest oil-and-gas contracts signed since 1994 -- including Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli (ACG) and Shah Deniz -- favored Western companies over Russian, Chinese, Iranian, and other options.

As for the pipelines, construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC), Azerbaijan-Georgia-Romania Interconnector (AGRI), and Azerbaijan’s repeatedly positive attitude toward the Nabucco pipeline are clear evidence of Azerbaijan’s willingness to forge effective energy cooperation with the West. Despite Russia’s evident disapproval of such cooperation, Azerbaijan stays true to Euro-Atlantic projects. Azerbaijan took great steps to secure its oil revenues for future generations by creating the State Oil Fund, the transparency of which is maintained internationally by Western experts.

Azerbaijan has proven itself as the world’s fastest-growing trade route and a telecommunications hub in Eurasia. Azerbaijan, almost solely, is financing the construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars-Istanbul railroad, one that will connect Central Asia with Europe along the shortest route. The country took gigantic steps to contribute to the improvement of the East-West corridor. The question is not whether the source of these projects is in Azerbaijani oil revenues, but whether the outcome is worth the input. For everyone should know that Azerbaijan’s vibrant growing economy and regional power are strengths, not weaknesses to be ashamed of.

Taking into account the complexity of U.S. involvement in the region and the juxtaposition of its foes and allies, Azerbaijan automatically becomes a country best suited for cooperation and partnership. Azerbaijan is one of the very few secular Muslim states of the region that has displayed a model of religious tolerance throughout its history. The cultural links that Azerbaijani people share with Americans might have been limited in the early 1990s, but following countless education and cultural-exchange programs, promoted both by the U.S. and Azerbaijani governments (such as FLEX, IREX, Muskie, Fulbright, State Oil Company (SOCAR), Azerbaijan State Scholarship and U.S. Peace Corps programs), understanding between the two states has grown immensely.

When U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was on an official visit to Baku, aside from all other official meetings, she requested a special gathering with a group of young Azerbaijani leaders. She got to meet 10, five of whom were graduates and alumni of U.S. high schools, universities, and other educational-exchange programs. Nothing could embody the spirit of Azerbaijan’s Western stance more than this outcome of cooperation over the years -- Azerbaijan’s outstanding young people.
 
However, as much as the Azerbaijani government can do to maintain its friendship with the United States, it is ultimately the determination of the United States upon which this partnership will rely. The famous business speaker Art Turock once said: “There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you are interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstances permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results.”

Circumstances did not permit Azerbaijan to send its troops to Afghanistan, Kosovo, and Iraq when there were young soldiers dying from Armenian bullets every day on the front line. The circumstances were not in our favor when we were resolute in our attempts to thwart Russian pressure against engaging in full-fledged energy cooperation with the West. Nor were they positive when we had to face Iran numerous times to support the United States. Interest is what government officials and decision makers rely on; commitment is what the ordinary people expect.

All in all, it is not promises we need from time to time from our great ally across the ocean, but a little genuine understanding and appreciation of who we are and what we stand for.

Elnur Baimov is editor in chief of the news.Az and armenia.Az information agencies and founder of disput.az, Azerbaijan’s biggest social network. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 3
    Next 
by: Jean Citroen from: New Orleans
September 29, 2010 14:57
Azerbaijan’s present partnership with the US and other Western allies are due to the inherit characteristics of that country and its people – their culture, history, geography and energy riches. These ties still exist in spite of the ruling Aliyev regime, not because of the government’s “commitments" to the pro-Western course. No doubt that Azerbaijan’s efforts and potential as a Western ally should be appreciated and supported by the US. But the corrupt dictatorship in Baku actually presents an obstacle and danger to this relationship.

The author writes: "Nothing could embody the spirit of Azerbaijan’s Western stance more than this outcome of cooperation over the years -- Azerbaijan’s outstanding young people." Well, when two of such young western-educated individuals, Emin Milli and Adnan Hajizada, tried to promote the very basic ideas of tolerance and democracy they learned to appreciate during their studies in the West – the Aliyev regime sent its henchmen to brutally attack them and then threw them into jail under fabricated “hooliganism” charges. No wonder that the Azerbaijani authorities have also stopped the state funding for Azerbaijani students undergraduate studies in the US, so the only remaining “educational ties” much touted by the author are the ones sponsored by the US.

As far as “favoring western companies” – these companies were the only ones capable of guaranteeing the latest technology and much needed funding for Azerbaijan’s oil exploration when these projects were planned in 1990s. That is the only reason why they were “favored” and it does not prove any “pro-Western” tendency of the Aliyev regime, especially considering that it was the democratically elected Popular Front government (overthrown by the Aliyev clan in a military coup) who invited Western oil companies to Baku in the first place.

The Aliyev regime’s present cooperation with the West is nothing more than a tactical trade-off needed to secure its grip on power and its control over the oil revenues appropriated by the ruling circle of oligarchs and invested/ spent in the Western economies. And when the Western media and governments put too much pressure too reform their repressive and corrupt domestic policies - Ilham Aliyev’s government threatens to withdraw from Nabucco, expel US oil companies, withdraw from Afghanistan efforts, draw closer to Russia etc…

To have a reliable ally, the US should be friends with and support the interests of Azerbaijani people, not the corrupt Aliyev dictatorship that violates their rights, robs them of the oil revenues and then claims credit for the country’s pro-Western tendencies. Otherwise, we will simply get yet another “friendly” Middle Eastern dictator, which can turn against us at some point (does anyone recall Saddam Huseyn?) or be overthrown by an anti-American force (remember Iran 1979?).

by: AS from: Houston
September 29, 2010 17:42
What a one-sided article. Nagorno-Karabakh is a historical Armenian territory and belongs to the Armenian people. Azeris were killing Armenians in their own land and that is why they had no choice but to declare independence from Azerbaijan and fight a war. Don't forget Azeris are Turks - the same Turkish Ottoman blood that massacred 1.5 Armenians in the Armenian Genocide of 1915.
In Response

by: Merolanna from: London
September 30, 2010 12:35
AS from Houston - can you please be a little more principled when making comments like this? Armenians and Azeris have enough problems of their own without bringing all the Turkish-Armenian baggage into it. Azerbaijan was never part of the Ottoman Empire, and as I am sure you know, ethnic Kurds were central to the actual killing in the Armenian Genocide. So it's not about eternal Turkish-Armenian hatred... Move on!
In Response

by: Karabakh from: Vancouver
September 30, 2010 20:47
the war in Karabakh was started by the Armenian neo nationalist! Azerbaijan did not start the war neither killed Armenians! more than 200,000 Azerbaijanis were forced to move from Armenia in 1988, when Armenians in major Azerbaijani cities were still living a great life! they were only had to move out two years later in 1990. Azerbaijan was always friendly to armenians. the opposite! the people who started the war are sill holding the power in Armenia stripping its people from basic freedom!
In Response

by: Alex from: Seattle
October 01, 2010 15:05
No, it was started by Azerbaijan, who couldn't tolerate an independent Nagorno-Karabakh. It was sort of the climax of the increasing inter-ethnic violence in Azerbaijan, you know, especially after those bloody pogroms in Baku and Sumgait. Of course, we don't deny that Armenia suffers from an oppressive government and corruption, but it doesn't come anywhere near to Azerbaijan's insufferable, oil-soaked, militaristic, paranoid, corrupt, and egomaniacal dictator known as King Aliyev the Second, who received power in the same dynastic way Kim Jong-il received his. Worry about your own autocratic regime, "Karabakh from Vancouver."
In Response

by: Karabakh from: Vancouver
October 06, 2010 16:45
Alex, you are missing the point!

1. Why would Azerbaijan tolerate succession of part of its territory? of course Azerbaijan had to take all measures to restore its territorial integrity and protects its citizens.

2. incidents in Baku and Sumgait happened well after the conflict was started and there was no single Azerbaijani left in Armenia. do not forget that. Those refugees coming from Armenia (1988-89) were very surprised to see Armenians living happily in Azerbaijan. Armenians left Azerbaijan only in 1990. two years later

3. Aliyev is a corrupt dictator but he has never killed innocent man, women and children. he has not committed war crimes as did Kochariyan and Sarkisyan, current and former presents of Armenia. T

In Response

by: Alim from: Baku
October 07, 2010 04:50
Do you know about Khojali tragedy? Pour armenian shopuvinist.. After several years there will not be any borders. You came from the past..

by: John Harduny from: Reston, VA
September 29, 2010 20:01
RFERL has recently published as many as three reports, one after another, about Azerbaijan. Two of them featuring idiotic comments written by Azerbaijan's oil dictatorship's nastiest propaganda agents. Is this private hire-a-paper business by RFERL's editor O'Sullivan?
In Response

by: Bedir Memmedli from: Washington DC
September 30, 2010 15:47
As always, when some Armenian don't like something written in media that reflects the reality, it is always about lobyying and oil money. But when it comes to some US corrupt legislators who have close ties with Armenian lobby and who rely on Armenian funding to get re-elected, it is all about justice.
In Response

by: Alex from: Seattle
September 30, 2010 19:34
Yet Azeris can't seem to properly explicate the meaning of the words "corrupt politicians with ties to the Armenian lobby" and other such variants of the same sentence. What is more powerful in the United States, Bedir? Oil, or a grassroots lobbying group?

Reality is that Azerbaijan is a petro-dictatorship that the US feels the need to kiss up too. Reality is that the last few articles featuring US-Azerbaijan ties were written by Azeris in an overtly very biased manner.

by: Neriman Huseinov from: Baku
September 29, 2010 20:07
This “intellectual” commentary is a ridiculous misrepresentation of reality in Azerbaijan. First of all one cannot say Azerbaijan when describing the relations the current regime has with the US – Azerbaijan as a state exists de-jure only. De-facto it’s a feudal kleptocracy run by the ruthless and one of the world’s most corrupt despots-Ilham Aliyev. The “government” of Azerbaijan joins alliances and sign treaties not based on the interests of Azerbaijan and its people, but based on the interests of the ruling clan. If a certain treaty will prolong the despotic system established by the KGB General Geidar Aliyev, then the regime will sign it, if not then not. Azerbaijan to the US is what Iran once was to the US during the despotic rule of the Shah, but on a smaller scale. Sooner or later the US will realize that building a relationship with a despotic regime does not pay off, but I am probably too optimistic because the US did not learn from Venezuela, Vietnam, Iraq, Iran and Cuba.
In Response

by: Sara from: Baki-Basqal
October 01, 2010 12:05
Often in our forum appear Armenians in the Azerbaijani image: from the Azerbaijani name and the name. Be careful readers of the site. Notice how they are disguised in this manner.
In Response

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
October 02, 2010 10:05
Sara, have you heared about "opposition"?

This concept will help you to understand that there could be people who do not share the official position of the current Azeri leadership.

But probably it is hard to understand for you while there is no independent media operating in Azerbaijan...

by: Vardan Gasparyan from: California
September 29, 2010 20:51
Genuine cooperation requires genuine deeds and statements. Unfortunately for you, your article is anything but genuine. Perhaps the United States understands what your country represents a little better than you think it does.

by: Democrat from: USA
September 29, 2010 21:50
This Elnur's article is a bit different from the other Elnur's article. This one does not talk about the flagpole success, it talks about feelings. Feeeeeeeeelings... ow, ow ow, feeeeeeelings. Poor, underapreciated dictator is sitting in Azerbaijan, being so sad, waiting for a pat in the back, but gets unpleasant questions like "why do you jail your journalists?" or "why do you suppress freedom of speech, assembly?" "Why do you falsify the elections?" Why not to forget all these, and just cooperate and love each other, just two of us, the United States and Azerbaijan. I am getting carried away. Elnur, stop supporting a dictator, stop building a website for him, stop opening a youtube page for him and don't start writing articles in his support. Otherwise you risk becoming the first Elnur, the Flagpole Elnur.

by: RD
September 30, 2010 02:13
What is the author's name? Bozo?

by: Nemesida from: Baku
September 30, 2010 06:15
One more line to the author's bio. He is also responsible for president's website president.az .
In Response

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
October 02, 2010 10:01
Thanks for this info.

Then probably he is an independent figure...

by: Christian Jenkins from: Houston
September 30, 2010 13:31
Great article indeed. It highlights Azerbaijan's longstanding commitement to cooperation with the West despite the fact that the country is located between anti-American Russia and Iran and aggressive Armenia to the west which still occupies 20% of Azerbaijani territories. This is how Azerbaijan is rewarded by US just because of Armenian lobby money which is poured into the pockets of US lawmakers such as Frank Pallone, Boxer, Menendez, etc. Ironically, US lawmakers always bash Azerbaijani and other governments for existence of corruption while the biggest corruption scam is ongoing in US through "legal" donations to lawmakers such as those given by Armenian lobby
In Response

by: Vardan Gasparyan from: California
September 30, 2010 22:30
Is that why we have not yet been able to pass the Genocide resolution in Congress? Mr. "Christian Jenkins", please give us your real name.
In Response

by: Christian Jenkins from: Houston
October 01, 2010 17:16
The reason why the "genocide" resolution hasn't passed is the correct stance of the executive power in US while the legislative branch is largely feeding on Armenian donations. Study some politics, it'll help.
In Response

by: Alex from: Seattle
October 02, 2010 20:10
Well Mr. "Jenkins", can you substantiate your claims that the entire legislative branch of the United States "feeds off" of Armenian donations? Can you actually do that? Or are you making an assumption?

Perhaps you should study politics, especially American politics.
In Response

by: Vardan Gasparyan
October 05, 2010 20:05
What is your real name?
In Response

by: Vardan Gasparyan from: California
October 05, 2010 20:19
The Genocide resolution has not passed in CONGRESS. Study some reading comprehension, it’ll help.

by: Red White Blue from: Texas
September 30, 2010 13:49
How about Azerbaijani leadership showing some “little genuine understanding and appreciation of who we are and what we stand for” here in America: freedom, democracy and fundamental rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness? How about listening to the concerns of the US and other Western “allies” and finally freeing journalists and bloggers, conducting free and fair elections, stopping persecution of dissidents, allowing free assembly? And, finally, how about curbing some of the rampant corruption Azerbaijani president and other government officials are known for and which makes it very embarrassing for our own leaders to shake their tainted hands?
 
Or maybe you, Elnur Baimov, want Azerbaijan to remain a despotic and corrupt gas-station with nothing to show for except for useless giant flagpoles, jailed “donkey bloggers”, and mega-million dollars Dubai mansions belonging to the president’s 11-year old son? With friends like these... indeed!
Comments page of 3
    Next 

Latest Commentary

No records found for this widget:963

More Commentary

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (23 total)

greg: Rafi. you go through round after round accusing me of raping and killing ... More

Loophole Offers Legal Out For Doctor Convicted In Bin Laden Case

Latest Comment (3 total)

khan: i think everyone in the paki gov should be hanged the traiters suking ... More

Putin Wants To Party Like It's 2007

Latest Comment (3 total)

nirvichara: It is so boring to hear all this crap about Putin's "old KGB ... More