map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Commentary

Bosnian Schools Teach Reading, Writing -- And Division

Will they learn to get along?

December 12, 2008
By Nenad Pejic
The other day I was with my 6-year-old daughter at the international school she attends in Prague. She particularly wanted to show me the lunchroom, not because the food there is so good but because the ceiling is covered with the national flags of all of the students who attend the school. Fifty-eight flags, it turns out.

In my home country, Bosnia-Herzegovina, schools are completely different. But before I go into that, allow me to mention that Muslims in Bosnia are now celebrating Eid al-Adha (Kurban Bayram), and amid the festivities on December 8 came word that a mosque in the village of Fazlagica Kula, in the Republika Srpska (the Serbian-majority entity of Bosnia), burned to the ground.

Although the cause of the blaze is not known, there is widespread suspicion in the country that such a thing at such a time could hardly be an accident. Incidentally, most of the Muslim residents of Fazlagica Kula fled during the 1992-95 war and few have returned.

The roots of hatred and intolerance in Bosnia today do not only stem from the traumas of the war. After all, the fighting ended 13 years ago, which seems ample time for any competent leadership to at least begin the process of reconciliation. But this has not happened. Instead, each day, families and ethnically divided schools drive those roots deeper and deeper into the national psyche.

The mission of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in Bosnia conducted a study of 230 schools there and documented an alarming national pattern. Many children are spending hours each day just going to and from school. Not because the more distant school is better, but because their parents want them to study in a school where their ethnic group dominates. In some cases, children even cross international borders to go to an "acceptable" school.

The OSCE quoted one child who evidently was repeating the words of his parents: "I am coming to this school to avoid the ethnic provocations that I faced at my other school," he said. "They don't look on us as pupils, but rather as some other kind of people. I want to go to the school where my people go!"

"We should be very concerned," Republika Srpska Education Minister Anton Kasipovic tells RFE/RL. "The key issue here is a lack of confidence among the different ethnic groups of these kids' parents. We cannot fix this with a short-term campaign. We will need a long time to deal with this."

Balkanized Education

But 13 years have passed with little progress to show. There are seven educational systems in Bosnia today, each with its own curriculum and textbooks. Muslim children learn that the events of Srebrenica were "genocide," while Serbian kids are told they were a "tragic accident." Some children learn that separatist aspirations are a legitimate expression of the right of independence, while others are taught such movements are treason bent on dismantling the country.

Everyone studies the history of the country and each ethnic group graduates from school with an entirely different worldview. All the children can recognize the flag of the United States or Britain, but few can recognize the symbols of other ethnic groups in Bosnia.

This kind of "education" is not building reconciliation. It is extending and expanding conflict and division. The Banja Luka (Republika Srpska) office of the Helsinki Committee reported this year that extreme nationalism is on the rise among Bosnian youths.

Local Helsinki Committee Director Branko Todorovic tells RFE/RL that no one is willing to discuss this problem publicly. He agrees with experts who see family life and the schools as the reasons for this potentially disastrous situation.

"I do believe these seeds of hatred and nationalism will bring us new divisions, deeper than what we have today," he says. "And I am afraid this will lead to new conflicts."

Division is the defining feature of Bosnia. Anyone who fights it is branded an enemy, a traitor to one's ethnic kin. Extremism is more a way of life than just a matter of isolated incidents.

There are a few exceptional schools in Bosnia, such as the One World College in Mostar and the Catholic Gymnasium in Sarajevo and maybe a few others, but these are a few and very far between. Most Bosnian kids will grow up knowing only the values of their own community and with a deep suspicion of the country's other two ethnic groups.

And none of them, I fear, will be able to lead a united country.

RFE/RL spoke to a 5-year-old Bosnian boy recently. "Do you know who Croats, Bosniaks, and Serbians are," we asked. "No, I don't," he said.

"Do you know who you are?"

"Yes, I do," he replied. "I am a boy."

Next year, he starts school.

Nenad Pejic is associate director of broadcasting at RFE/RL. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 3
by: Abdul Majid from: Germany
December 23, 2008 00:47
This is so incredibly sad, evil and stupid. Where does it leave those who feel as just Bosnians no matter what their ethnic or religious background may be? Besides that, it is wrong. Must people forever face each other with mistrust, malice and hatred? Don't they have much more pressing problems?
That such a spirit predominates among Serbs is hardly surprising, given that they have been fed the myth of their own victimization for almost two centuries. Oh, even if we admit that the Turks mistreated them in the old times (even though if they had really been that bad, now there wouldn't be many Serbs around), but this is no justification for committing genocide, rape, culturicide and murder against the Bosniaks of today.
Now the Bosniaks feel victimized too (and with much more reason) and now they have a justification for getting back against the Serbs, should they ever decide or feel compelled to do so.
Some have stated that the Qur'an mandates aggression against the Unbelievers. It does indeed state "fight the Unbelievers with all means". But what the Islamophobes conveniently ignore or cover up is that it also says "If they sue for peace, make peace with them." This is not the same as accepting their surrender. Or else it would say "fight them until they surrender; then do with them as you please."
But even if the Muslims come with peaceful intentions, their enemies will just choose not to believe and to trust them, and will still try to exterminate them.
Yet: if I was there and I had to send my little daughter to a school where she was harassed or humiliated for her religion or her parents'ancestry, I would have to place her among her own kind just for sake of her protection. Sad but unavoidable.
Bosnians and Bosniaks must stand together on this. After all the Bosniaks were never interested in having all of Bosnia only for themselves. But since the non-Muslims tried to destroy them it is natural for them that they only trust each other (and even then only a little bit) and deeply mistrust the others, and all anti-Bosniak acts that have happened recently prove them right.

by: abdelkrim
December 20, 2008 18:17
The statement by that little boy just goes to show that man is born good, but society makes him evil (and we might add, television makes him stupid too.)
And Bosniaks have very well existed and continue to do so biologically, except of course for those whose biological existence was ended because they were foully murdered by the Chetniks, and all Bosnian schoolchildren ought to know that. The term "Bosnjaci" first appeared during the medievel Kingdom of Bosnia, continued to be used during the Ottoman Empire (f. ex. Ahmed el Bosnavi; or Bouchnak, which comes from Bosnjak, is the family name of people whose ancestors migrated to Palestine and Tunisia in Ottoman times and became naturalized there; of course these are culturally Arabs today, but nevertheless descended from Bosniaks) and was later applied to Muslim Bosnian soldiers in the Austro-Hungarian army, and to Bosnian Muslims in general.
The Bosniaks were forbidden to call themselves Bosniaks in the times of Royal Yugoslavia, because Serb nationalists would not admit their existence.And also during Tito's time, as a concession to Serb nationalists. Only from the 1970s on did he see it fit to allow the Bosniaks to define themselves, when he felt that Serb nationalism was becoming too strong, and needed to counter-balance it. But denying a people a name, that's monstrous. It is part of the ploy to deny them their existence.
btw: It was so strange to see in a report on Eastern Bosnia which I taped some two years ago, (just in case somebody would like to tell me I made this all up): a group of Bosnian Serb schoolgirls - because there are no Bosniak ones there now - on the bridge of Visegrad (the one built under orders of Mehmed Pasa Sokolovic and which is the subject of Ivo Andric's famous book) singing "U lijepom starom gradu Visegradu" - a Sevdalinka made famous by the Muslim singer Himzo Polovina! What does that tell us? Do these feel more like Bosnians or more like Serbs? Unfortunately the reporter did not ask.
Or in Doboj: is it true that Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Serb schoolchildren go to the same school and play with each other? Are the ones insulted or defamed in the others' textbooks? As always in these cases, the outside world only learns half the truth. But if people weren't idiotized by constant hate propaganda in the media (which is controlled by the local government and not in any way independent) they would see that actually they have a lot in common with their lifestyles, and that nobody is inferior nor deserves to be killed or expelled (at least not those who have blood on their hands). Then things in Bosnia woud sort themselves out and it would become a normal country.
But for their own very selfish reasons the powers that be will do all in their might to prevent that from happening.
I mean, in the meantime there are some Israelis who no longer see the Palestinians as savages who ought to be expelled, and there are also Palestinians who could get along with the Israelis. But this would run against the interests of the powers that be, and that's why the Palestinian mess must go on and on and on. And tere are some who would allow a second one in the Balkans? Well, since nobody can actually be that stupid, they must be incredibly evil.

by: Emir from: Amerika
December 18, 2008 10:17
Bosniaks always existed but the actual term Bosniaks was not alowed from the serbian nationlists in Yugoslavia. The common term for a Bosniak was "muslim" or "musliman" which the term Muslim counld mean anyone in the world who is muslim. Like Muslims from France, England, Germany, Iran, Iraq and on..
Bosnians always existed but never in the serbian history..the serbian nationalists were trying to make Bosnia like it never had inhabitants and Bosnia had inhabitants way before serbs even came. They settled Bosnia in the 7th centry we Bosnians are the decendants of the Bogomils, not croats or serbs.

by: Brazilian Man from: São Paulo - SP
December 17, 2008 14:42
In fact, these divisions in Bosnia in particular and former Serbo-Croatian-speaking areas in Yugoslavia are du to the neurotic association between “nation” and “religion” there. In these aspects, the Balkans are still much more closer to the Middle East authoritarian regimes than to secular democratic Western Europe in terms of mindset evolution.

Personally I don’t believe in “ethnicities” like “Serbs”, “Croats”, “Bosniaks” or “Montenegrins” — for me, all of them are ethnically South Slavs who speak Serbo-Croatian. Period.

What I believe is in communal, local, citizenship categories: Serbians that are born and live in Serbia, Croatians that are born and live in Croatia, Bosnians that are born and live in Bosnia, and Montenegrins that are born and live in Montenegro.

That’s it.

by: Abdelkrim
December 17, 2008 10:36
The Bosniaks are not for the gretaer part, Serbs or Croats who converted to Islasm. There was a kingdom of Bosnia before the Ottomans conquered it, and most of its inhabitants were Catholics, or belonged to the Bosnian church. And many of them converted to Islam very early. For whichever reason is really not relevant today. During most of the Ottoman era, Bosnia had home rule. Its governors and officials were mostly from the country, not sent in from Istanbul. Of course, some Serbs did convert to Islam. (As Ivo Andric writes in "Na Drini Cuprija", many of those were originally from Nis, Uzice and Belgrade, and after Serbia became independent they had to flee to Bosnia or be killed.) So what? Do you want to kill their descendants for that? With what right? And for the most, the Orthodox in Bosnia were brought to settle there by the Ottomans. All right,there were times when the non-Muslim inhabitants of the O5ttoman Empire were oppressed. But for most they had more freedom than, say, the European Jews in the Middle Ages, or the Protestents under the counter-reformation. They were not slaves. Only prisoners of war or those who could not pay their debts were enslaved. If this were not true, why should the Ottomans have alowed the Othodox to build a church in Sarajevo as far back as teh 16th century? Why should Sultan Mehmet II Fatih have given the Franciscans a privilege ?(the relevant document "Ahdnama is still kept in Fojnica Monastery and everyone can see it.) Many Serbs were on the Ottoman side. In the battle of Nikopol (1399) and in both sieges of Vienna (1527 and 1683) there were important contingents of Orthodox soldiers in teh Ottoman army. The Turks had not forced them to convert to Islam (they did force the Janissaries, but the Janissaries were an elite and many of them held important administrative poszts in the Ottoman Empire, and if during the British rule in India, many Muslim or Sikh tribesmen found it honorable to fight under the British, even though the British were Christian, then the Janissaries may not have felt that bad about it too.) And indeed, what did the Orthodox leaders of that time say: "Better to live uder the Sultan's turban than under the Pope's tiara?". So much for old history. It was used by the Serb chauvinists and fascists as a pretext to rob the Bosniaks of all they had. Of course, when the leaders of the Bosnian Croats thought they could easily defeat the Bosniaks they jumped on the bandwagon too. But they got a very bloody nose, and if the West forced them to get together with the Bosniaks again, for the simple reason that the Bosniaks aren't going away. And as the old Arab saying goes "You have to shake the hand that you can't cut off." At least Croatia seems to have learned the lesson, and removed all and any hegemonial claims on Bosnia from its political and official agenda. And it is high time Serbia did that too.
Or what do you want? To make the Bosnian Muslims (no matter if they are descended from Catholic or Bogomil Bosnian, Croat or Orthodox) into the Palestinians of Europe?
This will never happen!
The legacy of the two evil, pitiful, bankrupt pocket dictators must not be allowed to exist any longer!
Bosnia to the Bosnians, and those who reject it can go to Serbia, Croatia, or Siberia!

by: Drazen
December 17, 2008 00:28
As for the treaty of Versailles, after WWI Serbia was promised and given more land. If people were smart at that time and did not have the Pan-Slavic idea in their mind, they would have taken that land and would have not created the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes which was doomed from day 1. But they did not want "Serbia" they wanted a messed up nation created from the Pan Slavic ideology.

by: Drazen
December 17, 2008 00:17
It seems like "Cetniks" are the only ones out to take land that is not theirs. What about the Ustase? Slobodan and Tudjman specifically decided to split BiH into 2 parts, a croatian part and a Serb part. I believe it was Tudjman that said "BiH belongs to the Croats and Serbs, the Turks (Bosniaks) are dirty Muslims that belong in Asia."
Besides "Bosniaks" are nothing but islamified Serbs and to a smaller scale croats, who converted during the Ottoman Rule.
Many Bosnian Muslim politicians are trying and have made it a priority to abolish RS. RS flags and Coat of Arms are not allowed to be used. Why?

"Bosniaks" as a ethnic group biologically do not exist. There was never a tribe in the pre-Ottoman era called the Bosniaks. It`s a newly made up ethnicity, that hardly existed even during Yugoslavia. Bosniaks were called Muslims, Turks etc. no one knows what to call them.
I`ll admit during the break up of Yugoslavia Serbs were the leaders in nationalistic feelings. I personally blame Milosevic for the break up of Yugoslavia. If he had let Croatia separate peacefully like they wanted to since the creation of the nation im sure Slovenia, Macedonia and BiH probably would not be so quick to seperate. But from fear of the same thing happening to them they called for independence as well.

by: abdelkrim
December 16, 2008 17:53
To make it totally clear: I do not hate the Serbs as a whole. I do not hate Serbia as a nation. But I do hate all Cetniks and their apologists. And I will to my last breath!
When somebody mocks, insults or denies the victims of the Srebrenica massacre, he is killing them a second time. And that was just one place, there were many more, look what the cetniks did at Foca and Visegrad, rape innocent women and girls as young as 12. That's the most hideous thing, and may those who did it never find peace, not in this world nor in the next. That's what the Serbs are known today for in the world, out of their own choice. And what do they expect from people like me now, to introduce them to our sisters?
Of course that Peggy person sounds like a Nazi. Fascists are fascists everywhere. And Fascists who claim to have been the victims of Fascism more so. And it is pointless to discuss with them.
That these thugs are permitted to mouth their evil in public is an outrage. Fascism is not an opinion, it's a crime, and a Fascist is a criminal. That children are taught Fascism it a most execrable crime.
If the textbooks in the "RS" really contain or between the lines convey the message that non-serbs, especially Muslims are an inferior people whom it is legitimate to exterminate, this is beyond good and evil. Because then, today's youngsters will be tomorrow's criminals. Or if next time around the Muslims have the advantage, then it will be them who will have to pay for what their elders did.
And who could begrudge the Bosniaks, after what they've been through to call their enemies enemies?

by: Fangoria
December 16, 2008 13:34
The difference between Serbia and post-1945 Japan and Germany is that in the case of Serbia the full invasion of Western troops and tanks did not happen, and the wide reform did not followed.

Structures like the Serbian Orthodox Church, the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, the Serbian Army, the Serbian Police and the Serbian Intelligence Services were left largely unreformed, and unpurged.

The same thing happened to Germany after the Treaty of Versailles: it became a republic, but with a very weak democracy and many elite sectors bitter, furious and vengeful for the lost of prestige and territory.

Serbia just did not slipped into dictatorship again since the death of Zoran Djindjic because of its economical weakness and the “EU Magneto”.

Repblika Srpska was a worst case — there were no Djindjic there, and the power cadres, the "winners" of the 1992-1995 are more Serb nationalist than the Serb nationalists in Serbia itself.

by: abdelkrim
December 16, 2008 09:16
Yes, they should! and even thgough it has already be proved , if I were to write a book of contemporary Bosnian history I coulds corroborate the genocide committed againsttheBosnian Muslims: With names, places , photographs, satellite images of mass graves and transcriptions of intercepted Serb radio communications. The trutrh is out there for all who want to know it.
High tme Serbia was subjected to the same catharsis Germany and Japan were in 1945. It would finally remove fascism, chauvinism and militarism from their agenda.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 3
TEXT SIZE - +

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile