map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

CNN: RFE/RL is "World Changing Radio"

CNN International reports on RFE/RL's role in Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution, and its continuing mission to spread free media More
More Articles

Features

China's Ancient Silk Road City Of Kashgar Facing Threat Of Bulldozers

Demolition has begun in parts of Kashgar's Old City.

June 30, 2009
By Antoine Blua
The ancient Silk Road trading hub of Kashgar, in China's northwest Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, is being threatened by an ambitious government redevelopment plan that some say has a hidden political agenda.

Kashgar's old city has survived the centuries, and remains an important Islamic cultural center for the Uyghurs, the Turkic ethnic group living in Xinjiang.

According to Matthew Hu Xinyu, an adviser to the nongovernmental Beijing Cultural Protection Center, the densely packed houses and narrow lanes of old Kashgar are the best-preserved examples of a traditional Islamic city in all of China.

Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Province in northwest China
But the government's reconstruction plan, Hu says, is threatening to destroy the picturesque labyrinth that makes up old Kashgar.

"Last fall, I heard that the plan would be carried out through the next three years. I thought we would have some time to organize experts or architects to work on a constructive plan -- to suggest a more conservative plan -- so that the city's heritage can be preserved," Hu said. "But early this year the total investment for the plan has been increased to [$440 million], and the demolition of the old houses started very quickly."

City officials have been moving a number of families out of Kashgar's city center, saying they need to rebuild old, dangerous houses and improve infrastructure. In total, the government says it plans to renovate or reconstruct more than 5 million square meters of old homes and resettle some 45,000 households.

Officials say the project is necessary because an earthquake could destroy old buildings, putting residents at risk. Indeed, earthquakes frequently rock Xinjiang. In 2003, a quake killed some 270 people.

Reports say wrecking crews razed the historic Xanliq madrasah, one of the province's protected cultural sites, on June 15. Mahmud al-Kashgari, the 11th-century scholar, is believed to have studied at the madrasah.

Traditional Lives


Dominated by a gigantic statue of Mao, old Kashgar has seen many changes in recent decades, including the construction of a main street running through the old town center. Cars, buses, and trucks clog the city streets.

If we have the houses removed and rebuilt, then this layout will disappear, and the significance of the city will disappear.
Still, many residents manage to live a far more traditional life. They live in tumbledown mud-brick rentals or two-story homes that open onto courtyards. Artisans hammer metal bowls, pans, and pots, carve wood, and hone brightly decorated knives.

Street vendors sell hand-made candy, fresh mutton, or hand-sewn skull caps. Donkey-cart drivers navigate the narrow streets.

It’s unclear what will remain of the design and way of life of the city, which is hundreds of years old, after the reconstruction project is completed. The city says important buildings will be preserved, while many homes will be rebuilt to better withstand earthquakes while still preserving Uyghur building styles. However, several sectors are expected to be rebuilt with modern apartment buildings, public plazas, and schools.

Officials say infrastructure such as water, electricity, and sewers systems also will be installed.

No Details Forthcoming

The Beijing Cultural Protection Center says nobody denies Uyghurs the right to development, modernization, and security. But the center worries that it has been unable to obtain any details of the reconstruction plan, which Hu says should ensure the preservation of the city’s unique heritage.

A gate in Kashgar's Old City
“If we look at every single one of these Uyghur people's homes [individually], it's not significant, [although] some of them have very interesting carvings on the door frame or on the architecture, the wooden parts," Hu says.

"But this group of [homes] shows a way of life [and] a way of urban planning -- how the city can be organized around different mosques. If we have the houses removed and rebuilt, then this layout will disappear, and the significance of the city will disappear," he said.

China and Central Asian states support a plan to propose major Silk Road sites for inclusion on the UNESCO World Heritage List, an incentive for governments to preserve areas of historical and cultural significance.

Beijing, however, has not included old Kashgar in its list of proposed sites.

Henryk Szadziewski, manager of the Uyghur Human Rights Project in Washington, D.C., taught for several years in Kashgar in the 1990s. He tells RFE/RL that there's no clear indication of what is going to be done with the remaining old city.

"As far as we understand the project, a remainder of the old city would be left, I imagine, to attract tourists. But who is going to manage that area and profit from the tourist revenue?" Szadziewski asks. "The tourist industry is worth about [$90 million] a year in Kashgar. We also have to remember that we have no indication that there was any meaningful participatory process that meant that the old city residents were party to the decision making."

Political Aspects Seen

The preservation of Kashgar's old town is facing challenges similar to those facing the preservation of other Chinese cities. But many see a political aspect to the redevelopment project in Kashgar, which Chinese officials consider a breeding ground for Uyghur separatism.

Chinese officials in recent years have alleged that Kashgar harbors terrorist cells. Uyghur extremists were blamed for a fatal attack on border police; two of the alleged organizers were executed this spring.

Uyghurs at a bazaar in Kashgar
Many see the Kashgar project as an attempt to remove the cultural roots of Uyghur separatism.

“There's definitely a difference between what's happening in eastern China and in Kashgar. That's largely due to the sensitivity over the Uyghurs and their particular concerns over human rights issues," Szadziewski says.

"The [Kashgar] project appears to be a tool to assimilate Uyghurs and to actually stifle peaceful dissent by putting old city residents from an organic living arrangement into a regimented, government-organized living arrangement. The [Chinese] authorities are able to monitor the activity of any peaceful dissent among Uyghurs,” he says.

Szadziewski says the assimilation process is taking place on many different fronts.

“One particular area is language, and we've seen a marginalization of Uyghur language in the economic sphere and the educational sphere," he says. "A 'China Daily' report said that learning Mandarin Chinese will help fight terrorism. The statement in itself may cast a sort of aspersion on Uyghur language itself, that it was a suspect language."

Critics accuse Beijing of using claims of terrorism as an excuse to crack down on peaceful pro-independence sentiment and expressions of Uyghur identity.
This forum has been closed.
 Previous   Next 
Comments page 2 of 5
by: John
July 09, 2009 13:08
Turgai Sangar and Abdulmajid

I am not a fascist, and don’t want to exterminate our brother and sister Uighurs and other minorities. I want to preserve them. They have much higher birth rates than the Han since they are not subject to family control policies. I support the government to find solutions to solve their grievances. When I said to terminate, I mean to terminate those violent terrorists. Why is there so much hatred from the fundamental Islamic people like you? Does you religion teach you that? While the African and Native Americans can find solutions through peaceful means to live with the white Americans, why can you? While the white Americans and Europeans can go and find a place in today’s China to live among Han people and have a new career, why can the native Uighurs? Why is there so much desire to possess the land for yourself? Why?

I now fully understand the true meaning of war on terror. The Russians have done it. The Americans have done it. Because there is so much hatred towards the Han people, it looks like that it may be the turn for China. You can ask for autonomy. You can ask for independence. All I ask you is to be peaceful.


by: Turgai Sangar
July 09, 2009 09:31
This being said, the riots and the fact that members of the supposedly invulnerable Han master race were targeted definitely came as a schock.

Maybe there might be more elightened personalities in the Han establishment who understood by now that it is time for a policy change.

Let's not dream though.

by: Turgai Sangar
July 09, 2009 09:16
I agree with most of what Abdulmajid says.

John: I have been several times in Xinjiang and I know that part of the Han are people who, like the Uighurs, try to make the best of it. The question is not whether ‘anybody/nobody likes the Han’, it is just that ‘for some reason’ their presence and behavior (of part of them) creates irritation in other places than ‘Xinjiang’ too (see e.g. here ‘Rioters attack Chinese after Zambian poll’
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1530464/Rioters-attack-Chinese-after-Zambian-poll.html , and this BTW is in a predominantly and fervently Christian country).

Simon: I don’t think that an independent Uiğurstan of East Turkestan Republic is on the agenda of the rioters, or that the idea is supported or considered feasible by the majority of the Uighurs. What we see in Ürümqi today is especially an outburst of too much cropped-up social frustration, fo wearyness with humiliation. If you have been in ‘Xinjiang’/China at all AND if you were interested in anything more than getting drunk, you would have noticed the the unease has been there for quite some years already.

BTW, nobody has to tell me that the Han vigilantes are not orchestrated ‘from above’. These are not ‘concerned citizens who defend themselves’ but Communist Party thugs.

“People will have to live together.” Yes, also since booting all Han out of Xinjiang is practically unfeasible. It all depends of what you mean by ‘living together’ though... I agree with brother Abdulmajid that as things stand now, “the only open path would be exile or death, because a dignified existence under that master race is impossible.”

by: Abdulmajid
July 09, 2009 09:12
John,
now you have exposed yopur true intentions: TO DESTROY THE UIGHURS UNLESS THEY OFFER UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER. Like the Tibetans. You fascist pig. It is pointless to discuss with someone who is openly hostile to a people who have been given by the PRC only: humiliation, oppression, marginalization and finally destruction. Yes, your side will win in the end because they have more than enough brute force, but they will NOT succeed in selling it to the world as if they are doing right. You can conquer, but not convince. And it is better to live one day as a lion than one hunderd years as a sheep.

Of course it would be better that, as more Chinese acquire not only wealth but also education the most negative aspects of theri totalitarian regime will be finally consigned to the scrap heap of history. Under no circumstances can democracy in China be enforeced from the outside,the only thing the Western world can do is encourage certain tendencies by reacting to the regime's brutality and not endorsing it. But until then, for the Uighurs and the Tibetans it will be too late. They will be what the Australian Aborigines have been for so long: an underprivileged underclass deprived oof identity, of history, of future. Their fate is sealed. They have nothing left to lose. And if I had nothing left to lose then I would take down with me as many of my oppressors as I can.
And when I am saying that I am being hostile to the Han Chinese, you Fascist?

by: Simon from: london
July 08, 2009 22:58
East Turkestan? Uyghuristan? What a joke. From Wikiepedia:
'In the Kashgar region on November 12, 1933, the short-lived self-proclaimed East Turkestan Republic was declared, after some debate over whether the proposed independent state should be called "East Turkestan" or "Uyghuristan."'

So Uighurs are going to claim that it is some kind of homeland? Even though it had independence for all of 1 year. And the rest of the time was mostly under Chinese or Mongol rule. What a complete bunch of imbeciles.

by: John
July 08, 2009 13:01
Abdulmajid,

Whatever grievances need to be expressed in peaceful means. If you do so, you may win sympathy from Han. Otherwise, if you dare to use violence, whatever number of people you take, you will be exterminated in the end. It is just as simple as that.

by: Abdulmajid
July 07, 2009 21:14
Bah, of course it is the Chinese aim to destroy the popular culture of the Uighurs, in order to subdue them. Tis is all only about domination and power. And since the Uighurs have already, like the Tibetans, become a minority in their own contry it is clear what their future is: to live as an underprivilegesd underclass of "trained savages" just like Latin America's Indians, or as the Australian Aborigines. Because who can oppose the Chinese moloch. And of course, in the end, of the Uighur's and Tibetan culture not much more will remain than of the Aztecs and the Incas. Only in exile can it go on living, just like the Tibetan. Sad beyond belief, but in a world where might makes right and power comes from the barrel of a gun, that's how it is.
Orwell portrayed totalitarian society as "a boot stamping on a face", and that the face will always be there to be stepped on. Of course the Chinese will not exterminate the Uighurs and Tibetans. They need them to suppress them, because the repression system would not work if there was not the "enemy" to be pointed at, humiliated, ridiculed, tortured, killed, to distract the own pweople of the system's immanent faults. The repression is aimed at their own people. The Uighurs are the victim, and since they are outnumbered there is nothing they can do. If I had the bad luck of being born there, for me the only open path would be exile or death, because a dignified existence under that master race is impossible. I refuse to bow to them, and to lick their boots as a thank for the kicks I get in my face. And if I have to die, then I would want to take at least five of these vampires with me. Not women or children, mind you, but these bastards wielding clubs and crowbars certainly deserve it. And only if they come to get me, I have no desire to go find them. I will not be the one to attack them. So much for defaming me as a terrorist. But trying to sell the anti-Uighur crusade as "fight against international terrorism" is no longer credible.
I know all the same that there are Han Chinese who are sympathetic to the Tibetan and Uighur people (if maybe not to their independence, but at least they don't want to assimilate them). And they have my sympathy, not the others. For who has no respect for other people and cultures has no respect for his own either (look at how many churches and monasteries the Stalinists destroyed in Russia and look at China's Cultural revolution.)

by: John
July 07, 2009 14:35
Turgai Sangar,

You said that nobody likes Han people. Fine. What can you do? Kill them? Do you think that Uighurs are liked by Han? Nobody likes anybody else for nothing. People will have to live together.

by: John
July 07, 2009 13:25
Turgai Sangar,

If you are a Uighur, I am sure that you want to establish East Turkistan in Xinjiang. And then you go west and establish West Turkistan within Kazakhstan. There re also lot of Uighurs there. Then, you want to unite the Turkistan. So, the Uighurs (I mean some, not all) are just like Kurds, who want to establish a country between Turkey and Iraq. Therefore, it is not a religious problem. It is a problem of separation and unification. I don’t think that Han people will not allow that. Both Han and Uighur will suffer if the Uighurs continues to riot.

by: Abdulmajid
July 07, 2009 09:39
How anybody can be for and support one of the most cruel, repressive and inhuman dictatorships in the world is beyond my comprehension, unless of course he is paid by that dictatorship. In which case any further discussion is pointless.
Besides that he is an Islamophobe. For him, Muslims are only barbarians and troublemakers, they are infra-human, for him it is all right to put them down and to kill them.
 Previous   Next 
Comments page 2 of 5
TEXT SIZE - +

Editors' Picks

'Religious Hatred'

Russia Buries Slain Priest Photogallery

President Van Rompuy

'How's That Again?!' Audio

Arresting Images

Photos Of The Week Photogallery

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile