Thursday, May 24, 2012


News

Controversy Continues Over Obama's Pick For Ambassador To Azerbaijan

Matthew Bryza was announced in May as the pick of U.S. President Barack Obama to be ambassador to Azerbaijan.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Richard Solash
* Clarification appended

With Congress on its summer recess, Washington's political corridors are empty. But the debate surrounding U.S. President Barack Obama's pick for ambassador to Azerbaijan is in full swing.

This month, it landed on the editorial pages of two Washington newspapers, adding fuel to the controversy that began in May, when Matthew Bryza's nomination was first announced.

Bryza was one of the most visible U.S. officials in the Caucasus region during the administration of former President George W. Bush, serving as deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. He was also the U.S. co-chair of the Minsk Group, which seeks to broker a settlement to the dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Bryza's nomination has been harshly criticized by Armenian groups for what they see as his pro-Azerbaijan bias and alleged personal ties to the regime of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

'Part Of The Game'

At a July 22 hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bryza said the criticism was to be expected given the high tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan. "Being criticized or being thought of as being closer to one side or the other is part of the game," he said.

But at the request of Senator Barbara Boxer (Democrat, California), who represents the largest Armenian-American constituency in the country, the committee's vote on Bryza's nomination was put on hold.

Boxer and her legislative colleagues are far away from Washington at the moment, so they're unlikely to have picked up a copy of the August 23 "Washington Examiner," a conservative-leaning D.C. daily.

In a guest opinion-page column that day, former Republican Senator Conrad Burns came to Bryza's defense.

Burns wrote: "It appears this opposition [to Bryza's nomination] is based upon senators responding to special interest groups whose sole purpose is to oppose all things related to Azerbaijan." The apparent reference was to efforts by the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), an influential Armenian lobbying group, to stop Bryza's confirmation.

Burns continued, "Let's...step forward with strong leaders like Mr. Bryza to work toward a common good for the United States, Azerbaijan, and throughout the Caspian region."

Aliyev Family Link

After the column was published, the ANCA contacted the newspaper to point out a detail in Burns' background that wasn't mentioned in the piece: the senator himself can be linked, albeit in a roundabout way, to the family of President Aliyev.

The former senator is a senior adviser to the Gage Company, a Washington-based lobbying firm. The CEO of Gage is Leo Giacometto, a former political aide to Burns. In addition to being CEO of Gage, Giacometto sits on the board of a company called Silk Way Holding.

As revealed in an investigative report by RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service earlier this month, Silk Way Holding -- which owns more than a dozen aviation industry companies in Azerbaijan -- is partially owned by Arzu Aliyeva, the 21-year-old daughter of President Aliyev.

Conrad Burns, a former U.S. senator from Montana, endorsed Matthew Bryza in an August 23 editorial.

"It came, sadly, as no surprise at all that the people defending Bryza are exactly the people who are close to the Aliyev regime," said Aram Hamparian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee, who added that he used the information uncovered by RFE/RL to connect the dots.

But it was apparently a surprise to the editorial-page editor of "The Washington Examiner," who published Burns' piece.

Two days after the piece appeared, Mark Tapscott wrote a special column that said, "Burns' relationship to a special interest that may benefit by the Bryza appointment should have been revealed by Burns' spokesman when the [editorial] was first proposed. When 'The Examiner' pointed this out to the spokesman after becoming aware of it, Gage Vice President Ryan Thomas offered no explanation or apology."

The column, however, did include a statement that Burns had sent to the paper.

The former senator -- who lost his Senate seat in 2006 in part because of his close ties to lobbyists -- called the ANCA criticism "nothing more than an attack on the messenger."

He denied representing Silk Way Holding and noted that he serves as an adviser to an unnamed company that he said had "business interests in Armenia."

The senator did not respond to requests for an interview with RFE/RL in time for broadcast.

Adil Baguirov, the co-founder of the U.S. Azeris Network, an advocacy organization made up of U.S. citizens of Azerbaijani background, told RFE/RL he didn't understand why Burns' piece had caused any controversy.

In an e-mailed comment, he wrote: "I am not sure what, exactly Senator Burns [is] 'guilty' of. For speaking his opinion and publicly supporting the decision and position of the Obama administration, or working with registered and law-abiding lobbyists, or for something else?"

A Second Editorial

Bryza's nomination also hit the pages of "The Washington Times" this month. An August 11 commentary raising questions about the nomination was co-authored by Jean-Francois Julliard and Clothilde Le Coz, the general secretary and Washington director, respectively, of Reporters Without Borders, an international press-freedom watchdog.

The co-authors refer to a 2007 article that appeared in Azerbaijan's opposition "Azadliq" newspaper that reported that former Economic Development Minister Heydar Babayev had paid for a significant portion of Bryza's Istanbul wedding in August of that year.

Babayev denied the claim and filed a lawsuit against the newspaper. A court ruled that the newspaper was guilty of libeling Babayev and ordered it to publish a correction, but did not fine the newspaper or begin criminal proceedings.

The reporter on the article, Agil Khalil, was later the subject of four murder attempts after the publication of an article he wrote concerning the country’s Ministry of Finance. He has since fled to France.


When asked about the lawsuit by a reporter from Lider TV, Bryza said he understood Babayeva's decision to take action because the report was false.


In its commentary piece, Reporters Without Borders suggested that Bryza's commitment to press freedom could be questioned because the lawsuit concerned the publication of a disputed incident in his personal life.


The co-authors wrote: "There is no doubt that Mr. Bryza's experience in the region could be valuable for improving relations between the United States and Azerbaijan, but we think that because he has been involved in a complaint and suit against a newspaper, his credibility within Azerbaijani civil society and his stated commitment to press freedom can easily be questioned."


RFE/RL's correspondent in Baku described Bryza as an advocate of media freedom and a critic of the government’s arrest record of journalists.

Asked to interpret the spate of local media coverage of Bryza, at a time when lawmakers who will vote on his nomination are away on holiday, the ANCA's Hamparian said it "shows that there's an awful lot here that needs to be examined, both by senators and by citizens."

A confirmation vote on Bryza's nomination is expected in September, when Congress reconvenes.

* This story has been clarified to note that the lawsuit against "Azadliq" newspaper was filed by Heydar Babayev. The opinion of RFE/RL's correspondent in Baku concerning Bryza's record on press freedom has also been added.

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: BGW from: Virginia
August 28, 2010 00:45
Kudos to RFE/RL for their investigative report, which helped reveal the connection between former Senator Burns and the Azerbaijani President Aliyev. Are anyone else’s alarm bells going off? What does it say about a nominee, if the only people defending him from attacks that he is too close to the despots in Azerbaijan, are people associated with those very despots?

by: Taxpayer from: USA
August 28, 2010 03:39
"It appears this opposition [to Bryza's nomination] is based upon senators responding to special interest groups whose sole purpose is to oppose all things related to Azerbaijan."

Most likely by "things related to Azerbaijan" former senator Burns meant OIL that British Petroleum thinks it owns there. With all their troubles in the Gulf, Azerbaijan is an attractive alternative where President Ilham Aliyev allows BP to pollute the Caspian Sea for a small percentage going to his Swiss bank account.

And with that they can pay not only for Matthew Bryza's and his new Turkish wife Baran wedding but also for divorce with his previous wife.

by: John Harduny from: Reston, VA
August 28, 2010 13:36
Most people believe that Azerbaijan's key export is OIL. No true. The top item on Azerbaijan's list of exports is CORRUPTION. Shame to corrupt American bureaucrats from the State Department who betray their country by becoming puppets of nasty oil dictatorships.
In Response

by: Bedir Memmedli from: Washington DC
August 29, 2010 16:54
Plus, shame on those US senators who abuse their veto power to please their Armenian voters so that they can keep receiving their money an vote just to be re-elected.
In Response

by: John Harduny from: Reston, VA
August 30, 2010 00:58
US senators do not abuse their veto power. In fact, their veto actions have little to do with "Armenian interests." "Armenian interests" simply are wistleblowers who pointed to corruption inside the US State Department.

by: Bedir Memmedli from: Washington DC
August 29, 2010 16:44
I dont understand why US Azeris Network (USAN) was presented as a "lobbying organization for Azerbaijan's U.S. interests." This is a complete LIE! USAN is a grassroots community organization dedicated to unite American citizens of Azeri descent and contribute to stronger relations between US and Azerbaijans. As for senators Boxer and Menendes, who keep abusing their veto power, they simply need Armenian vote and funding to get re-elected, nothing new.
In Response

by: John Harduny from: Reston, VA
August 30, 2010 01:03
US senators do not abuse their veto power. In fact, their veto actions have little to do with "Armenian interests." "Armenian interests" simply are wistleblowers who pointed to corruption inside the US State Department, and every normal American politician is obliged to react to Mr. Bryza's misdeeds. Azerbaijan is a corrupt oil dictatorship which is ruled by a clan established by Heydar Aliyev - one of the USSR's nastiest and most brutal Communist boss who killed thousands of innocent people in GULAG concentration camps in Siberia ans elsewhere.
In Response

by: Bedir Memmedli from: Washington DC
August 30, 2010 13:20
In that case, why are you ignoring your homeland Armenia, which is ruled by Sarkisyan who is responsible for the massacre that he committed in Azeri town of Khojali in February of 1992? Just for fairness, maybe you should mention about dozens of Armenian protestors who were killed during the most recent presidential elections. How about suicides and killings spreading to Armenian army thanks to the corruption and negligence in Armenian Defense Ministry?
In Response

by: Taxpa from: USA
September 01, 2010 02:50
Mr. Memmedli should stop spreading his lies and propaganda about the "Azeri town of Khojali" - he should, but he can't because this event is the basis for the Aliyev.s clan illegitimate rule of Azerbaijan.

People always need to ask who benefits? And the only beneficiary of this tragedy was Heidar Aliyev who became the ruler of Azerbaijan after the fall of Khojaly. This is why Aliyev's Family Foundation will never stop bankrolling all sorts of Azeri networks, forums, cultural associations, etc. in an attempt to legitimize their rule.

There was no "massacre ... committed in Azeri town of Khojali" period!

1. Khojali is not an Azeri town - it was an Armenian village in Artsakh that was occupied by Azerbaijan and populated by Turkic refugees from Central Asia who were lured to that place by promises of free land and housing.

2. The civilian population there was used as a human shield for years as Azeri army placed its artillery positions right in the middle to pound surrounding Armenian villages.

3. Artsakh Army warned Kholjali population about the upcoming attack on Azeri military targets and provided a "green corridor" for civilians to escape the fighting.

4. Hundreds of civilians who did not try to escape were not hurt by Artsakh forces and were returned to Azerbaijan after the hostilities ended.

5. Brave Azeri soldiers used the reminder of civilians as a human shield to escape the town via the corridor.

6. Many of these who escaped were found killed on the territory that was under complete control of Azeri army (remember, the victims were expendable refugees - these who could not afford to pay bribes to be evacuated). Weeks before the attack Azeris used helicopters to evacuate their cows and sheep, but left hundreds of refugees behind.

7. After the massacre that happened far away from Khojali and on the territory controlled by Azeri army Aliyev and Co orchestrated a show with TV footage of the victims that caused the fall of the Azeri government and subsequently seized power.

8. Azeri propaganda machine now uses Aliyev's Family Foundation enormous OIL wealth to blame Armenians for this tragedy. They use photos of Kurdish civilians killed by Turkish army, photos of victims of earthquakes and car crashes , etc. as proof of "Khojali Massacre" - many of their cheap tricks are exposed on this website: www.xocali.net .
In Response

by: Taxpayer from: USA
August 30, 2010 01:49
Perhaps it would be beneficial for Mr. Memmedli to read the Foreign Agents Registration Act before asking such questions in RFERL comments...

Here is a link - http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fara/ - scroll down for registration forms and fee schedules.

As the Treasurer (important connection conveniently omitted in the above comment) for this Azerbaijan's lobbying organization he is in the best position to tell us how generous Ilham Aliyev can be to those who try to legitimize his corrupt Azerbaijani regime in the United Sates,

Other organizations lobbying on Azerbaijan's behalf are quite open about this. For example, according to the Foreign Lobbying Influence Tracker web database, Jefferson Waterman International received a $26,000 payment from the Presidential Administration of Azerbaijan just for one phone call to one newspaper to ask them to publish one article!
In Response

by: RFE/RL Editor
August 30, 2010 07:30
An earlier version of this article referred to the U.S. Azeris Network as a "lobbying organization" This has been changed to read, an "advocacy organization".
In Response

by: Murad Gassanly from: London, UK
September 03, 2010 02:26
I'm no fan of the Aliev dictatorship and am a committed Azerbaijani democrat who spent much of my adult life fighting this regime - I was exiled from Azerbaijan in 2005. It is clear that this regime presents a real danger to the proud heritage of Azerbaijani democratic republicanism that has deep historic roots and pedigree. Aliev's corruption is damaging our country's reputation and undermines our aim of ending the Armenian occupation of Karabah and other historical Azeri lands.

Im no fan of US policy in Azerbaijan either - United States and Britain have consistently supported the Aliev dictatorship - as far as Im concerned America is one of the chief sponsors of tyranny in my country. I no fan of Bryza either.

However, the furore around his nomination once again confirms my opnion about Armenia and Armenians. Opposition to Bryza from Armenian lobbyists in the US congress and sympathisers in the media (especially the RFE/RL) does not stem from any concern for American values or concerns about corruption - instead its about the traditional way in which Armenian community, through paid-for support in the US Congress seeks to promote the interests of the Armenian Republic at the expense of US interesst (not that Im particularly concerned about that - in fact I think Azerbaijan should diversify its foreign policy further - US is not a reliable ally as Georgia found out).

As an Azerbaijani patriot and democrat I believe that democratic change in Baku is a prerequisite for liberation of Karabakh. Armenia is a weak state built more on hatred of Turkey and Azerbaijan than anything eles. It is essentially a fascist country that prides itself on its ethnic purity (98% Armenian after a century of ethnic cleansing) and there is a strong strand of Christian fundamentalism and cultural supremacism that runs through practicaly all aspects of Armenian society.

Armenia is also a rogue state whose close relationship with Iran and Russia threatens not just Azerbaijan and Georgia but the wider region. Karabakh aside, Armenia must be contained if the free nations of the Caucasus can ever hope to rid ourselves of neo-imperial ambitions of powerful neighbours and protect ourselves from Western opportunism. Armenian militancy and extremism, as well as her expansionist foreign policy must be checked. It would not be bad to dish out some punishment for Khodjaly and other Armenian-perpetrated atrocities either. Opportunities for that may present themselves sooner rather than later, especially if the US acts against Armenia's allies, such as Iran; and if Obama's Russian "reset" policy ultimately fails (which it will).

To be ready to seize our chance to liberate Karabakh, to return our people to their homes, to significantly degrade and destroy Armenian capacity to make war and threaten us again, Azerbaijan needs a national democratic government with the necessary legitimacy and popular support to mobilise the nation. Ilham Aliev and his regime are not that government. Its important for Adil Bagirov (long-time supporter of the Aliev regime) and people like him to understand that national unity which they often call for is impossible with an anti-Azerbaijani, anti-national regime of the Alievs, who steal our money, imprison journalists and embarass all Azerbaijanis in the international media. Its time for Azerbaijanis to govern their country again.

As for Armenians - they should give daily thanks and pray for Aliev on the regular basis. He is their only chance of winning this war. The day when we topple Aliev, will go in history as the day Armenia began to lose control over the lands she occupiued.

BTW - I am a Karabakhi Azeri - my family is from the village of Malibeyli, Shusha district of Karabakh, Azerbaijan Republic and I will get my land back, one way or another.
In Response

by: Shushali
September 03, 2010 08:52
Thank you, Murad. We'll regain and return to Karabakh!
In Response

by: Alex from: Seattle
August 30, 2010 22:02
Bedir, first Armenians committed "genocide", now "massacres", and now Sargsyan himself is responsible for Kholjaly? The inconsistency stinks, Memmedli. For fairness, let's discuss Aliyev, who made it so that presidents can have an unlimited number of terms, or the questionable elections that brought him to power. Let's discuss Aliyev siphoning oil money and purchasing multi-million dollar mansions in Dubai. Let's discuss Azerbaijan's place as the single most corrupt and authoritarian country in the Caucasus. We don't deny Armenia has it's problems with corruption, but luckily it's nowhere near as bad as Azerbaijan's.
In Response

by: RD
August 31, 2010 17:56
Don't forget money he stole from his country to buy his family luxury real estate in UAE, not to mention nose jobs for his daughters. I always wondered how someone who makes approximately $200k has daughters worth $75 million. All this while 42% of Azerbaijan still lives under the poverty line.

by: Tahir Ceferli from: Baku-Basqal
August 30, 2010 07:09
The issue with the appointment of an ambassador to Azerbaijan remains open, not because the American side pulled back all the bridges between Azerbaijan and the United States and to cease all diplomatic relations with our republic, as they like to present many opposition newspapers and some pro-Armenian publications and reports. Appointment of Ambassador is an internal affair of the United States and no one has the right to intervene in this matter. However, recently, in connection with the discussion of candidates, Matthew Bryza at the post of ambassador to Azerbaijan in Congress are heated debates, which once again shows that the American political elite with which captiousness relate to this issue.
The debate is over the appointment of a person in Congress is in domestic politics and has nothing to do with the foreign policy outlined by the President and the State Department in respect of any country. There will be Bryza, will not change the other-U.S.A strategic policy in the Caucasus, including Azerbaijan.
US-Great Power, so its foreign policy interests are defined in the decades ahead. And at the same time, the events of recent weeks, signing a military agreement between Turkey and Russia, makes the structure of U.S.A foreign policy to adjust their long-term plans. What this means in today's geopolitics? First of all, any decision taken by the Armenian leadership should be coordinated with the Kremlin. This agreement was a surprise to foreign entities the U.S.A, which forced Turkey to sign the "Protocols" and opened the prospect for rapid development of Armenia and its orientation to the West, as well as integration into the Western economy.By this step actually created an obstacle Armenia American foreign policy in the Caucasus region, which is fraught with undesirable consequences for Armenia, which occupied 20% of Azerbaijani lands. I must say the results will not wait long. Soon the UN will consider the question of the Armenian-occupied Azerbaijani lands. If we proceed from the principle that in politics there is nothing accidental, and the UN questions are posed to U.S.A consent, it is clear that Armenia has made his choice, has lost the support that came from the U.S.A
There inevitably arises: in Armenia, not a few smart politicians, why they made such a blunder? The fact that the authorities in Armenia are Karabachos on the genetic roots of the Albanians, who started on the Kremlin's violation of the Karabakh conflict, seized political power in Armenia. And I still look back to Moscow with the adoption of any decision. Therefore , they are rightly called mannequins Moscow.
Kremlin brought them to power, to Armenia with its nuclear technology remained in the Russian sphere of influence. We wrote about ten years ago in the book "Karabakh Trap", which examines the nature of the conflict from the perspective of the geopolitical game, started by the Kremlin analyst for the Russian intelligentsia of the manufacturing sector and a cheap labor force
This geopolitical game allowed Russia to stop the demographic decline. Pay attention to the statistics. Prior to the Karabakh conflict in Armenia lived more than three million people, but now it's less than a million. Reducing the number of population in Armenia is associated with lack of jobs, the collapse of the economy, the futility of life in the country, finding in the shadow of the Karabakh Mafia, etc.
Don’t think that the Russian leadership to change its foreign policy towards Armenia, which gives Russia a cheap labor force, and it will do everything to Karabakh remained in power.
The buzz is around Bryza soon subsides. By the end of the year the U.S.A will have to appoint a new ambassador. And regardless of who is ambassador to Azerbaijan, he will carry out their obligations under the State Department. The most important thing the U.S.A would not consider Azerbaijan as an imaginary enemy, as Armenia.

by: Jeffrey K. Silverman from: Tbilisi Georgia
September 01, 2010 09:48
Considering the mess he made in Georgia with his so-called project, M. Saakashvili, and his Turkish wife's political connection - this seems to be an ill-informed appointment and not done in very good taste. The allegations are many, and his agenda - and connections with the Potomac Institute - and Spies for Hire - is well known in this part of the world. Keep Obama's pick of the litter far from this region.

by: Seymur from: Azerbaijan
September 01, 2010 11:52
Thank you Mr Solash and RFE/RL for serving as a mouthpiece for Aram Hamparian.

by: Jeffrey K. Silverman from: Tbilisi
September 08, 2010 17:48
If you want to stalemate conflict resolution and prompt up corrupt regimes in both Azerbaijan and Georgia then fully support the confirmation of Matthew Bryza. What has he done in the region to support civil society and conflict resolution, and what about the US State Department and their rigging of exit poll results a few years ago with the help of PA Consulting?

I worked as the Editor and Chief of Azerbaijan Today, an English Language Magazine, for several years. He also turns the stomach of many in Azerbaijan - and he is just a hired gun for the same game that was for 8 years under Bush. However, locals are too scared to express their opinion as they could be killed.

Obama's pick of the litter had the opportunity to bring closure to the Khurcha Incident, where the Georgian government almost killed its own citizens on Election Day in 2008, as a half baked ploy to divert attention from widespread vote rigging and physical violence, as Bryza has all the information on that - and what did he do?

Past performance is perhaps the best indicator of how he will act in the future in a key postion.

by: Felipe Munoz from: Chile
September 08, 2010 23:01
First, Memmedli and Gassanly, the so-called ''Khojali Genocide'' doesn´t met the world-wide requirements to be considered as a Genocide, because there's no proof provided by Azerbaijan blaming determinated authorities in Armenia or Karabakh of being the masterminds of that ''genocide''. Besides, this ''Khojali Genocide'' is nothing compared to the extermination masterminded by Ankara and Baku, against the armenian people... Or you forgot what azeris did to armenian in Baku, Sumgait, Ganja (Kirovabad), Karabakh, and counting??. If you are an impartial analyst, you should condemn those attrocities first, before demanding the armenians any recognition of the Khojali Incidents (using turkic language). And second, there´s no reason to feel angry about the armenian claims against Turkey and Azerbaijan... After all, this too ''brothers'' always pursued an ultimate goal in the Caucasus: Total extermination of Armenia. Why??... Just look at a map, and you´ll see that Armenia is the only think that keeps Turkey separated from Azerbaijan; that´s why they share the same wish of finish the bloody mission from their ancestors: Exterminate Armenia. After all... they have the same way of thinking!

by: Felipe Munoz from: Chile
September 08, 2010 23:26
And respecting Bryza... Why the US is taking too much time to choose an ambassador??... choose another person different from Bryza, to be nominated to Azerbaijan, and it's all solved!!... So easily!!. Or the Aliyevs are putting pressure again on the US, in favour of a nomination of Bryza??. Considering the fact that the Aliyev Clan owns Azerbaijan, you can easily expect extortions against US, using their OIl to menace the US european collegues. Like a Mafia... Easily!!
Comments page of 2
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Beaten Ukrainian Gay Activist Unbowed

Latest Comment (1 total)

elizabeth: I am not for homosexuality. It is against Bible principles. So is violence. ... More

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (21 total)

greg: Elnur, i have spent a bit of time in Armenia and met those ... More

R.I. Wants Nagorno-Karabakh Recognition

Latest Comment (21 total)

Ray: Armenia has NO choice but to support Iran. We are neighbors. Imagine how ... More