Tuesday, February 14, 2012


News

EU Foreign Ministers Discuss Growing Eastern Instability

Benita Ferrero-Waldner is expected to tell EU foreign ministers that the bloc has no choice but to seek closer ties with its neighbors.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Ahto Lobjakas
Keeping its eastern neighbors on the path to stability and prosperity has become a formidable test for EU foreign policy in recent months.

As she unveiled an annual review of the bloc's European Neighborhood Policy, EU External Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero Waldner told the 27 EU foreign ministers it has been a "difficult year" -- particularly in the east.

But Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg, who chaired the meeting, said the EU is resolved to push on with its Eastern Partnership initiative, which is designed to forge closer ties between the bloc and six eastern neighbors.

"We believe that sending a strong message to the six partnership countries -- Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan -- is very important in the light of the recent developments in the region, and that we need to engage with our neighbors more closely in order to promote good governance, the rule of law, and transparency," he said.

Brutal Crackdown

One need look no further than this month's unrest in Moldova to know that this will not be easy.

That country is still recovering from a brutal crackdown on mass public protests in the capital, Chisinau, following a landslide win for the ruling Communists in parliamentary elections. In the wake of the violence, the country's increasingly Russian-leaning president, Vladimir Voronin, pointedly accused neighboring Romania -- an EU member -- of fomenting the unrest.

Moldova then expelled the ambassador to Romania and imposed a summary visa regime on Romanian visitors. And sources in Brussels say Voronin told Kalman Miszei, the EU special envoy, that Moldova has "friends elsewhere."

Now, at Romania's request, EU foreign ministers meeting in Luxembourg discussed Moldova during talks over lunch -- a setting usually reserved for issues of particular concern.
 
The EU adopted a declaration saying it has "serious concerns" about developments in the country, and Czech Foreign Minister Schwarzenberg said Moldova "poses a challenge" for the EU.

"The current tensions in the country pose a challenge for the European Union. Our task is now to find a proper way to strengthen our policy of bringing Moldova closer to our standard," he said. "We expect Moldova to behave in a European way, not only vis-a-vis the European Union and its members, but first of all, of course, internally."

But, Schwarzenberg stressed, the Eastern Partnership initiative remains "no doubt the right tool" to bolster reforms in Moldova.

Cutting Some Slack

Czech Prime Minister Miroslav Topolanek, who was in Chisinau last week representing the EU Presidency, reported that neither the government nor the opposition appears to have the political will to meet the other side for talks -- a key EU wish.

Moldovan President Vladimir Voronin (right) meets with Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek in Chisinau on April 22.
The Netherlands is the lone advocate of a tougher EU stance on Moldova (and another problematic partnership member, Belarus). But Germany and Poland head the EU's mainstream in arguing that Moldova must not be isolated and needs greater EU support.

The country's economy is seen by many in the EU to be on the brink of collapse.

Moldova's decision to slap visas on Romanians is, however, likely to have repercussions. The European Commission has called the measure unacceptable in light of EU-Moldova visa facilitation talks and is likely to raise it at an EU-Moldova meeting in a few days.
 
Moldova's partner on the EU lunch agenda was neighboring Ukraine, where there has been no public unrest but where mounting political and economic paralysis increasingly threatens the country's viability.
 
Again, Germany and Poland appear to be closely coordinating policy, with the two countries' foreign ministers reported to have addressed a joint letter to the EU's Czech presidency last week expressing concern at the economic and political situation in Ukraine.

The two ministers are said to have floated the idea of an EU assistance mission to Ukraine to facilitate dialogue among all political leaders. However, it is generally feared that a resolution to the political crisis in Ukraine is improbable before the 2010 presidential elections.

The EU's foreign-policy chief, Javier Solana, said after the meeting that the EU would now study ways of stabilizing the country. "After the discussion today we will see how we can help prior to the elections and after the elections, the presidential elections, to see how we can arrange the economic situation and the political situation," he said.
 
Is Lukashenka Coming?

The EU foreign ministers on April 27 will also discuss the agendas and guest lists of two important upcoming summits.
 
On May 7, representatives of Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan have been invited to attend a summit in Prague on its Eastern Partnership, which is meant to extend special benefits to the EU's eastern neighbors.

Belarusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka
Much speculation is circulating over whether Belarus's authoritarian president, Alyaksandr Lukashenka, will attend. The invitations to the summit are not personal, giving every country's leader the choice of whether to turn up in Prague in person. Many EU nations expect Lukashenka to send a stand-in.

A joint declaration signed by the 27 EU member states and the six partner countries is planned for the summit. The text of the document is still being discussed with the partners and is expected to be finalized a week in advance of the summit.
 
On May 8, the EU will hold another summit in Prague, dedicated to what has become known as the Southern Corridor of energy provision.

This meeting will be conducted under the auspices of the EU "troika" of Topolanek, Solana, and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso. The three will face officials representing Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan.
 
Six 'Observers'

Together, the five countries represent the EU's main hope of securing significant amounts of natural gas deliveries without resorting to Russian supplies or mediation.
 
Six "observers" have also been invited -- Iraq, Egypt, and Uzbekistan as potential supplier countries; and Russia, Ukraine, and the United States as other major interested parties.
 
The presence of the last three has been the subject of some controversy within the EU. Germany led a long-established group of countries -- including France, Italy, and Spain, among others -- which overcame resistance from others and secured an invitation for Russia.
 
The Southern Corridor is explicitly defined by the EU as a direct link to energy resources in the Caspian Sea region bypassing Russia.
 
A draft summit declaration, seen by RFE/RL, breaks new ground for the EU by saying the bloc intends to "give strong political support" to the construction of the Southern Corridor -- including the "trans-Caspian link."

This is a planned gas pipeline running from Turkmenistan to Azerbaijan which would link Central Asia directly with the Nabucco pipeline projected to run from Baku to Europe, circumventing Russia.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: terry from: USA
April 27, 2009 14:16
Certainly a HUGE change from a year ago where the RF's position seemed unconquerable!

by: John
April 27, 2009 20:11
A number of things are clear about the situation in Moldova:
1) The Communist party abused its power in the run-up to the election through its use of administrative resources for campaigning, especially with respect to the state-owned media.
2) The communists also falsified the election results by stuffing the election rolls with dead or imaginary voters, and by giving mulitple votes to their supporters.
3) Sever human rights abuse has been committed by the communist authorities in the wake of the elections. Betaings and killings are documented facts, and there is also strong evidence of rapes occurring in Police precincts.

I do not understand why the EU is pussy-footing around. It has every right to demand of a partner in an association agreement that it respects democratic values and human rights.

A) It should demand that the Moldovan authorities allow a full review of the election rolls and results by a big-four accounting firm, and that the Moldovan authorities and opposition agree to abide by the results of such a review.
B) It should demand that the state media be placed under truly independent control to facilitate political pluralism.
C) It should demand that those who gave the orders to maltreat protesters face the full force of the law within Moldova.

The EU is not without levers that can be used. There are the 'carrots' of financial aid, facilitated visas and a path to EU membership. There are also the 'sticks' of travel bans, asset freezes and ICJ indictments for those guilty of falsifying the election results and abusing the nations' youth.

After two weeks of messing around and talking, it's time to take some action.

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
April 27, 2009 20:57
John, probably the elections in Moldova were falsified more or less. But meanwhile the truth is that unfortunatelly the far most popular party even without falsification is the Communist Party...

The Communists would have won this election even without ditry tricks. What is important that they do not have enough seats to elect the next president without the support of the opposition. This is an important momentum. Now the opposition have the power to influence the personality of the next leader. (to choose a more softliner one)

by: Anna
April 29, 2009 10:34
I totally agree with Zoltan that the Communists would have won elections even without manipulation of electoral ballots. It is the most popular party for the moment in Moldova. It is opposition's job to work harder and become more popular. People are tired of all these 'democracy' and 'freedom' talks and want real actions: higher salaries, pensions, more jobs, etc. The communists were able to provide at least some of these. Would opposition be able to do better? I doubt...

John - Moldova does not have an association agreement with the EU, if it did, the EU's levers (that you talk about) would be much more effective!

The EU should be more committed in promoting security and democracy in its Eastern neighbours. Nobody is saying that the EU should grant Moldova membership straight away, but the EU should at least be explicit about this possibility and signal it clearly to the Moldovan government. This will give a great boost to opposition and generate debate in the society that might eventually bring about change of power. This is exactly what happened in Slovakia in the late 1990s when Meciar lost power to more moderate political forces.

by: Arini
April 30, 2009 22:32
Actually, there is no freedom in Republic of Moldova. How can a party become "more popular", when the state television, the Police, the mass-media is mostly dependant od Governement? There is no low, and everyone knows about it, but is affraid to speak their mind.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (2 total)

William: It shows why many people across the world don't trust the US government, ... More

NATO Admits Afghan Children Killed

Latest Comment (1 total)

William: NATO dropped some bombs but does not know who it has killed - ... More

Cold Threatens Russian Fruit Crop

Latest Comment (7 total)

Konstantin: As I suggested, you are probably not Chechen. Russian GRU?
It is Russian stile ... More