Tuesday, February 14, 2012


News

EU, U.S. Diplomats Seek To Ease Bosnia Tensions

Haris Silajdzic (left), a member of Bosnia's tripartite presidency, arrives at EUFOR headquarters in Butmir on October 9.
TEXT SIZE - +
(RFE/RL) -- U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg and Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt have urged members of Bosnia-Herzegovina's tripartite Presidency to work together to solve a constitutional crisis that threatens to destabilize the country.

Gathering at the EU's military base on the outskirts of Sarajevo, the two top envoys met with seven Bosnian leaders, including Bosnian Serb Prime Minister Milorad Dodik, Muslim officials Haris Silajdzic and Sulejman Tihic, and Bozo Ljubic, the head of Bosnia's Croatian Democratic Community party.

Following the meeting at Camp Butmir, the headquarters of the EU's 2,000-strong peacekeeping force, Bildt told journalists, "We have come here, representatives of the European Union as well as the United States, in order to say to the leaders of Bosnia that now is really the time to join the rest of the region in moving forward with European, Euro-Atlantic integration."

Bildt, whose country holds the EU Presidency, said the meeting would be followed by "continued deliberation inside the political parties, between the political parties and between them and us in the days to come."

He said a new meeting with the same participants, including EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn, is scheduled to be held in Sarajevo on October 20.

U.S. diplomat Steinberg said all sides appear to feel the urgency of the moment.

"I come away from these discussions believing that there is a broad recognition, both among the parties we talked to and in the country more generally, that we face a critical time in Bosnia-Herzegovina's future," Steinberg said.

"A critical time that offers both an opportunity to accelerate Bosnia-Herzegovina's Euro-Atlantic integration or, if we fail to take advantage of this moment, continue the stalemate that will not only prevent progress but risk the ability of Bosnia and Herzegovina to move forward and meet the urgent challenges ahead."

For his part, Bosnian Serb leader Dodik said, "We think that there is no need to change the constitution, but our parliament made a decision that we take part in the talks. "

Tihic, a former member of the tripartite Presidency and the current head of the Party of Democratic Action (SDA), said: "The issue of state property was discussed. There is a promise that if we get an agreement by the end of the year, Bosnia will be able to apply for a position of a candidate for the EU membership, will join the Schengen 'white list' and it will be on the road to join NATO."

Bosnian Croat leader Ljubic said he "presented the proposals for constitutional changes the are to be discussed in next week or 10 days with representatives of EU and U.S. and if that is going to be included, we can be part of solution."

At the heart of the crisis are disagreements between the ethnic Serbian, Muslim, and Croatian leaders over how to reach compromises on key issues such as constitutional reform.

'Things Have Run Aground'

Gordana Knezevic, the head of RFE/RL's Balkan Service, says that powerful politicians among all three ethnic groups are trying to shape constitutional reform to suit their own interests.

"Things have run aground due to the quarrel over changing the constitution of Bosnia-Herzegovina. The constitution has to be changed in order to move Bosnia from being a protectorate of the international community into the status of a sovereign state, if Bosnia is to have any hope of one day joining the EU," Knezevic says. "But any change of constitution is rejected by those who fear they will lose the power they have under the current arrangement.”

One of the most vocal critics has been Milorad Dodik, the prime minister of Bosnia's Serb entity, the Republika Srbska. Dodik has threatened to withdraw his entity's cooperation in Bosnia's federal institutions if the constitutional changes fail to preserve the substantial autonomy the Republika Srbska now enjoys.

Bosnia-Herzegovina unites the Republika Srbska with the Muslim-Croat Federation in terms agreed under the U.S.-brokered Dayton accords, which ended the four-year Bosnian War in 1995.

In recent months both Bosnian Muslim and Croat politicians have also expressed reservations about redefining the constitution to increase the powers of the central government.

Knezevic notes that many of those who rose to power during the war or the chaotic years that followed fear that a strong constitution and institutions more in line with those of the EU could jeopardize their positions.

But the constitutional crisis comes as only the latest sign of a generally disintegrating political order in Bosnia that has increasingly worried the international community.

During the first 10 years following the Dayton agreement, the country made several notable steps toward unification. A big achievement was the consolidation of Bosnian armed forces under the impetus of NATO. There is also today a functional, if not completely unified, police force.

But in recent years, progress toward unification has slowed dramatically, partly in response to a worsening economic situation and growing nationalism.

Since November 2008, more than 21,000 Bosnians have lost their jobs, an alarming development in a country already faced with 40 percent unemployment.

Deepened Economic Ties

The Republika Srbska, meanwhile, has deepened its economic ties to Serbia and threatened to stop cooperating with Bosnia's national electricity distributor, Elektropronos.

The international community's top official in Bosnia, High Representative Valentin Inzko, has attempted to bring the Serbs back in line to keep the power grid operational. But that has only fueled the threats by Bosnian Serbs to withdraw from federal institutions altogether.

The Republika Srpska is not the only problem. Croats in the Muslim-Croat Federation have drawn closer to Croatia. Some politicians have even revived calls for autonomy for Bosnia's Croats, like that enjoyed by Serbs in the Republika Srpska.

The tensions in Bosnia will be dramatically illustrated today as representatives of the Republika Srbska and the Muslim-Croat Federation are brought together at Camp Butmir.

The camp is located on the unmarked boundary between the two entities and has two entrances. The Bosnian Serb delegates will arrive by the entrance on their side of the line, Muslims and Croats from the other.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: Ramiz from: RS
October 09, 2009 11:24
Referendum now. Independent Republika Srpska...CCCC

by: Alain from: Paris
October 09, 2009 12:41
You could add that the economic situation is significantly worse in the Croat-Muslim Federation than it is in Srbska - which is in fact doing quite well.

by: Robert from: Canada
October 09, 2009 22:34
Full equality between all 3 sides, meaning an agreement that makes ALL 3 happy. If not, then Croats in B-H should be entitled to their own separate state, which in effect is what republika srpska is purporting to be. However, we wont ethnically cleanse to get it, then get rewarded for it like srpska. The boundaries just need to be worked out, this B-H situation needs to be settled permanently once and for all already. Za dom.

by: Mesha from: New York City
October 10, 2009 21:22
Please, do not refer and use religious term “Muslims” when you address Bosniak ethnic group. That is wrong to reduce entire indigenous national group or people to religious group!??…and you do not call other constituent peoples the Catholics or the Orthodox Christians ,by the way .Situation is worse in Bosniak-Croat Federation because during aggression on Bosnia ,primarily on Bosniaks (not “Muslim” as you refer in this article)
They were victims, the act of genocide was done on Bosniaks .Do you how many invalids, destroyed families, damaged peoples this Federation must help and support from the budget..Do you have any idea?
Besides, most of economy was ruined, majority of the production venues was intentionally destroyed, or stolen, ..You can find it in Serbia. Bosnian territory of Federation, where the Bosniaks mostly inhabit, infrastructure was destroyed by aggressors.

by: shirly from: switzerland
October 11, 2009 01:57
the only fair solution is for those that do not feel they are bosnian to leave bosnia and herzegoviina and either migrate to the republic of croatia or serbia.

It is absolutely unfair that this poor country be cut up again amongst the different ethnic groups. this will only confirm that both serbia and croatia have had the intention all along of building a greater serbia or croatia at the expense of bosnia and herzegovina.

justice needs to prevail here!

by: johno from: new zealand
October 11, 2009 02:15
to make all three people happy is impossible in that country. by giving the serbs the sepearate entity was a way of stopping the war. now if the croats want their own entity it will only be done so by another war. the serb entity should be disolved and bosnia and herzegovina should become a normal european country where all nationalities and religious beliefs are welcomed and not cut up into three different entities.

bosnia and herzegovina should be one entity with three or more ethnic groups living together in harmony or else the country will go to war and fromwhat i hear most in the federation side would welcome it as they believe it was ended by the foreigners unecessarily at a time when they were becoming self sufficient with weapons, which they didnt have at the beginning of the aggression by the serbs. this will then mean a larger scale of violence and human suffering and if the country is in such economic turmoil they will look at a war as nothing more (materialistically speaking) to lose but possibly gain a bosnian state without a separate entity which was created as an award by the western countries for genocide


by: Alain from: Paris
October 11, 2009 19:04
I'm very surprised by the comments on this blog which show ignorance about the sequence of events that lead to the signing of Dayton. The Bosnian Muslims were desperate for a deal at Dayton. The Serbs were not... but signed following intense pressure from Molisevic on the Bosno-Serb leadership to sign.
Silajdzic is whipping up a Bosnian Muslim nationalistic frenzy thinking that he'll get the West to fight his war agains the Serbs. I think the geo-political situation in the West has changed considerably since 1995 and neither Europeans nor Americans want another war.
But if Silajdzic want's a war, he'll get a war - and no matter what the West's puppet Tadic might say or not say... there are 8 million Serbs in the region that will support the Bosnian Serbs.
Looks like - here we go again...
Serb farmers OWNED 65% of the land in Bosnia. Now they own 51%. Serbs were ethnically cleansed from Sarajevo, Tuzla, Croatia, Southern Kosovo. Serbs represent the LARGEST ethnic group of refugees in the region.
There WAS NO GENOCIDE of Muslims in Bosnia. 2,6% of the Muslim population perished during the '92-'95 war. That's terrible, but it IS BY NO MEANS GENOCIDE. For comparison sake, 30% of the total Serb population was exterminated in WW1 and another 20% in WW2 - many by Muslims and Croat Nazis.

by: reader
October 11, 2009 20:46
The Bosnia'n Muslims follow Reis-Ulema Mustafa Ceric's vision of Islam. His is rigid nationalistic leaned to extremely conservative circles of Arab East. That is the key problem.
He dreams a country ruled by Islam. Demagogy of multicultural country is a temporary weapon for him. Temporary....

by: Antifascist
October 11, 2009 21:13
@ Shirly, Johno: Thank you. I could not agree with you more. It's what I've been saying all along. There is a very interesting analysis by Dr. Marko Attila Hoare on www.greatersurbiton.wordpress.com about the options for Bosnia. Now some pro-greater serb posters have said (on the B92 web site) that it would take "RS" 10-15 years to become also de jure independent. And there is the two-part analysis by Bojan Bajic "In favour of a new Serb policy for Bosni-Herzegovina" and "The Bosniaks' Bosnia Policy"; on www.bosnia.org.uk. From all this one can conclude that by the year 2018 there will be a Bosniak majority in Bosnia. So of course the Serbofascists are trying to break away before that happens. Some may say that how can there be a Bonsiak majority after the war if a genocide was committed against teh Bosniaks? Yes, but many young Serbs have emigrated becausde they see no perspectives and they don't love their homeland; and the Bosniaks' birthrate is higher than that of the Bosnian Serbs (at least I could see many young kids in Sarajevo, Travnik and the Bosniak part of Mostar). Now if Bosnia were to be partitioned along ethnic lines not only more ethnic cleansing and violence would follow, but the Bosniaks would be confined to the area around Bihac and the Sarajevo-Zenica-Tuzla triangle. In a ghetto surrounded by hostile people on all sides. Of course the Bosniaks will not accept that. And if Dodik and his cronies think they can break off unilaterally (it does not matter to make an Anschluss to some kind of "lesser Greater Serbia" or to try and stand on their own) then the Bosniaks will no longer be bound by Dayton and would be justified in addressing Dodik and his friends with the only language they understand. And of course the pretext that the Bosniaks will create an Islamic republic in Bosnia is nothing but a feeble and threadbare propaganda lie with which the Serbofascists try to justify, primarily to themselves, why the genocidal anti-Bosniak crusade was necessary and why the Bosniaks, as Muslims, have to be put down.
But they will not succeed. The geostrategic and demographic circumstances are not the same as in 1992, and the Bosniaks will not be caught flat-footed like last time. In 1992 many Bosniaks said "it can't happen here" and Bosniaks and Serbs lived interspersed, and the Serbs had the backing of the JNA and all sorts of heavy weapons while the Bosniaks had none; so, the Bosniaks were very vulnerableToday their areas are more compact; besides that the borders of "RS" are quite indefensible. So, the Bosnian Serbs would be very well advised to seek the Bosniaks' forgiveness and reconciliation. Maybe a few are inclined to do so, but their leaders are not, and they continue to instill hate and fear into their people. Who are only too eager to follow them. So it seems that in the end it will, alas, again have to be decided by the sword. And the Bosniaks will certainly not be inclined to let themselves be led like lambs to the slaughter. And I pity only those Bosnian Serbs who would not harm the Bosniaks. But I have no sympathy at all for their leadership nor for all those who still believe that Karadzic's genocidal project is right and morally justified. So then, let Bosnia be reunified. Over time, people who fled abroad would return. To say that Bosnia as it is today is dysfunctional may be true, but is NO justification to say it never existed and can thus be erased from the map. Milosevic is dead and gone, now his evil project Greater Serbia should be killed. Like "megali idea" was.

by: Antifascist
October 12, 2009 10:10
Alain (Radovan): "But if Silajdzic want's a war, he'll get a war - and no matter what the West's puppet Tadic might say or not say... there are 8 million Serbs in the region that will support the Bosnian Serbs."

OOOOH... now you got us really scared!

And if it was eighty million!
Comments page of 2
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (2 total)

William: It shows why many people across the world don't trust the US government, ... More

NATO Admits Afghan Children Killed

Latest Comment (1 total)

William: NATO dropped some bombs but does not know who it has killed - ... More

Cold Threatens Russian Fruit Crop

Latest Comment (7 total)

Konstantin: As I suggested, you are probably not Chechen. Russian GRU?
It is Russian stile ... More