Friday, May 25, 2012


The Power Vertical

Eighty Seats In The Duma

Mikhail Kasyanov (left) with Vladimir Putin in 2003.
TEXT SIZE - +

Unlike viewers of Russian state-controlled television, readers of The Power Vertical will know that on September 16 leading opposition politicians created a new movement called For A Russia Without Arbitrariness And Corruption.


You can hardly blame Russian television for ignoring this development, since all the mainstream media in the country seem to have simultaneously discovered the long-standing corruption allegations against former Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov and are still rushing to catch up on that story (it is a larger and more pathetic version of what happened when Russian state television suddenly discovered the Khimki highway story a couple of years after the fact and had to suddenly start covering it in the middle after President Dmitry Medvedev suddenly mentioned the controversy).


But I would like to return to the anticorruption coalition of former Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov, former Deputy Prime Minister Boris Nemtsov, former Deputy Energy Minister Vladimir Milov, and former Duma Deputy Vladimir Ryzhkov for a moment because the Levada research center this week released the results of an opinion poll on the topic.


I’ve written before about the need to look at opinion polls in Russia very carefully and have been critical of some analysts who take at face value the surveys that consistently show Vladimir Putin as the “most popular” politician in Russia, with Medvedev tagging along closely at his heels. Ignoring Russia’s closed and manipulated information bell jar, these observers cherry pick the results of these polls while ignoring poll after poll that show Russians strongly disapprove of the antidemocratic and kleptocratic policies that Putin has pursued over the last decade.

Levada Center polls have found that 94 percent of Russians feel they have no influence over what happens in the country, one-third are concerned about human rights abuses, 68 percent feel the law does not protect them, and only 4 percent think their property is secure.

The fact that most Russians see no alternative to the tandem is a result of political oppression in Russia, not of Putin’s supposed charisma. When he wins a free election, we’ll take another look at his popularity.


But the Levada poll on For A Russia Without Arbitrariness And Corruption is worth consideration because it gives at least some baseline feeling for how popular the so-called liberals are among the Russian public. And it also conveys pretty strongly that Russians are not fooled by the pseudo-democratic political theater that the Kremlin is trying to pass off as something other than authoritarianism.


First, the poll found that 86 percent of Russians had no idea that any such coalition had been formed. Never heard of it. Maybe Russian state media didn’t think the story was worth mentioning because Medvedev seems to have largely given up on his anticorruption mantra in recent months in favor of the “modernization” mantra.


Second, Levada asked the interestingly worded question “will the creators of the coalition succeed in registering it as a party with the Justice Ministry and in participating in the elections for the State Duma in 2011 and the presidential election.” It would be more honest to ask if the authorities will allow these things to happen, since the matter is much more up to the presidential administration than it is up to the leaders of the new coalition.


But respondents saw through the question anyway, with only 8 percent saying “definitely yes,” with 24 percent saying there is a chance the Kremlin might find a minor role in its political theater for such a movement, and 38 percent saying either that “most likely” or “definitely” the new coalition’s creators would not “succeed” in registering or participating in the elections.


To my mind, the most interesting question was “could you vote for a party based on the coalition.” Here, 3 percent said “definitely” and 15 percent said “maybe.” Fifty-two percent said “most likely” or “definitely” not. And 31 percent couldn’t answer.


Now an 18 percent potential electorate (leaving aside the 31 percent that is up for grabs) is pretty impressive for a week-old movement that has already been aggressively marginalized by the political system. In fact, if the party was registered and if the party was allowed to participate in the election and if that election was reasonably competitive and if something like 18 percent of the people voted for it, it would be the second most popular party in Russia, after United Russia. It would rank higher than any of the other parties currently holding seats in the State Duma, the so-called systemic opposition.


Just to recap, in the 2007 Duma elections, United Russia was awarded 64 percent of the vote and handed 70 percent of the seats in the legislature. The Communists came in a valiant second with 11.6 percent, getting 13 percent of the seats. The Liberal Democratic Party of Russia polled 8.1 percent and got 9 percent of the seats. And A Just Russia pulled up the rear with 7.7 percent and 8 percent of the seats.


A party that polled 18 percent could have ended up with more than 80 seats in the Duma.


But projecting such speculation forward to the 2011 elections is an exercise in what might be called “counterfactual futurism.” No such party will be registered, no reasonably competitive election will be held, no party that is not controlled by the Kremlin will get any significant number of seats in the Duma.


And opinion polls will continue to show that Vladimir Putin is the most popular person in Russia.


-- Robert Coalson

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: HWilliams from: T&T
September 30, 2010 16:43
It is laughable how the author demonstrates double standards,he speaks about cherrypicking the results of a poll and then he goes ahead and does the same thing.Levada polls have continuously showed over the past decade that Putin is very popular and will most likely remain so for a decade.The author cherrpicks results of a poll about what Russians like and do not like about their country and crudely manipulates the data to prove a point apparently thinking that readers are stupid.He conveniently forgot to mention that 1/3 believes the country is democratic;over half of the population would like to see the judiciary controlled by the executive (that is Putin and Medvedev),that 1/3 would like to see a soviet style of govt or that 1/3 does not find western style democracy suitable .He also omits that the findings that he listed have more to deal with situations in their country and not with Putin's popularity.In a similar manner ,people who support obama in the US may not like things about their countries but this may not mean that they dont like him.Similarly he crudely manipulates poll findings to give nemtsov and co more popularity.Only 3% have said they definitely support himThe author somehow manages to stretch this to mean that they can get up to 18%.The author omits that Yeltsin was a deeply unpopular person in the country,with ratings of 2% and it is their association with yeltsin that makes these liberals so unpopular."(nemtsov was a deputy pm and possible successor to yeltsin).Whilst it is true that putin and co do take advantage of the media and state resources to maintain their popularity and destroy the opposition ,one should also look at the fact that the communists and the liberal democratic party of zhirinovsky,who also dont enjoy the advantages of media are far more popular than these liberals.The reason being is that these liberals have very little genuine support in Russia.As scholar Anatol lieven pointed out ,if putin is to fall from power the people to replace him wont be the liberals but somebody from the communists or ultra nationalists.It is rather ironic that the author talks about democracy in russia ,whilst seeking to disregard te true opinions of russians by looking to downplay their obvious preference and praising someone like yeltsin who was deeply unpopular in russia and even looking to suggest that nemtsov has some popularity in Russia which he does not.The author should look at reality instead of twisting and manipulating it to match his opinion.
In Response

by: eric from: new york, ny
September 30, 2010 23:59
sir, you are forgetting that robert coalson and brian whitmire have been described in the past as "senile" when it comes to their obsession with anti-putin propoganda

http://winthrop360.blogspot.com/2008/12/robert-coalson-cant-mandate-reality-and.html
In Response

by: Robert from: Prague
October 01, 2010 09:18
Eric, Anonymous name calling is a pretty cowardly and unconvincing form of argument. You can do better. But if you are going to direct readers to "winthrop360"'s analysis, this one is my personal favorite: http://winthrop360.blogspot.com/2008/03/robert-coalson-is-stupid.html

In it, Colleen calls me "stupid" for pointing out that Russian companies had too much debt by arguing that American companies had much more. She mentions, in March 2008, companies like AIG, Citigroup, General Motors. We all know how that story ended. Colleen practically predicted the U.S. financial crisis, but argued that it didn't matter and the only conclusion she could draw from it was that I am "stupid."
In Response

by: Robert from: Prague
October 01, 2010 09:13
Mr. Williams -- Thank you for reading and for taking the time to comment. You don't give sources for the polls you cite, but I'd mention that if 1/3 of Russians believe the country is democratic (and Medvedev is apparently among them!), then 2/3 believe it is not. Likewise, by your unverified statistics, 2/3 do not want a Soviet-style government and 2/3 find Western-style democracy suitable.

I do not "omit that the findings he listed deal with situations in their country and not with Putin's popularity." I argue that although Russians say they support Putin personally because he has marginalized/eliminated all political competition (which, since you are so interested in Yeltsin, is something Yeltsin did too), they actually do not support very many of his policies or actions. That is, the Kremlin propaganda machine can sell the idea of a macho Putin a lot more easily than they can convince Russians that it is a good idea not to have elections or a free press.

You are correct that I "omit" things about Yeltsin. In fact, I don't mention him at all and the piece is not about Yeltsin. I have, however, in other posts on this blog, not "omitted" the fact that Yeltsin was unpopular. Your claim that I "praise someone like Yeltsin" is baffling -- I don't mention him. Perhaps you should take your admonition to "look at reality instead of twisting and manipulating it" to heart yourself, Mr. Williams.

You claim that it is Nemtsov's association with Yeltsin that makes him "unpopular." Nemtsov was deputy prime minister under Yeltsin and, at a time when it was still possible to say something about genuine popularity in Russia because the media were much freer than now, he was often mentioned as a successor. You, however, "omit" that Putin was prime minister under Yeltsin and was actually named successor and became that successor. Perhaps Putin, too, is "unpopular" because of his association with Yeltsin? Or perhaps Kasyanov is "unpopular" because of his association with Putin?

You casually concede that "it is true that Putin and co. do take advantage of the media and state resources to maintain their popularity and destroy the opposition." That is the point of this blog post. The difference between you and me, I think, is that you treat this kind of unconstitutional activity as an innocent peccadillo, while I think it is a criminal betrayal of his oath and obligation to the Russian people.

You try to maintain the Kremlin fiction that the Communists and the LDPR are some sort of opposition force, but it is obvious from their voting records in the Duma that they are just as much a part of the Putin machine as United Russia. They have far more access to the state media than the genuine opposition. Zhirinovsky was the first guest on Vladimir Solovyov's political talk show "Duel," for instance, and was all over state TV during the Luzhkov smearing. However, I still maintain that it is impossible to judge how "popular" they are in Russia now because of the manipulated environment there. I think it is a safe bet they are both far less popular than they were before it became obvious that they are allied with Putin.

I'm not familiar with the Lieven quote you cite, but the fact that you cite it points to another difference between you and me. Many Putin apologists assert without evidence that Russians don't deserve democracy because they would pick someone even worse than Putin -- a communist! An ultranationalist! I suppose maintaining that fiction is one of the reasons why Putin keeps the Communists and the LDPR around and makes sure Zhirinovsky gets plenty of airtime. Personally, I have a lot more faith in the Russian people than you do.
In Response

by: Hwilliams from: T&T
October 02, 2010 07:14
My dear Robert,
You have proven my point by the first statement you made since my source for the polls that I cited was your link! Why is it that you can remember the facts you listed above and not those important facts as well as some other important points,such as the fact that 3/4 of those polled dont think democracy is fair or that 65% find it hard to describe what democracy is ?Why do you cite 1/3 of those in your argument above but then rebut against it in mine?I hoope you do realize that this does make it look like you have cherry picked facts!Anyway,the figures listed here do show that russians whilst not undeserving of democracy dont understand it or have a negative meaning associated with it,because as you and i both know democracy is the best form of governance there is..Why do you think this is?Don 't you think that this is because of the chaos in the 90s ?Why do you think they called it shitocracy?Seeing that this is the case dont you think that anyone associated with "Democracy" in their minds wont be unpopular?This my friend is why i mentioned Yeltsin.He gets praised in the western media for introducing democracy to Russia when really ,this was due to Gorbachev and he did a lot to destroy the ideals behind this wonderful thingf.Also,the fact that the ultra-nationalists and communists have consistently performed fairly well since the 90s shows that they have significant support in society.The fact that 82 % feel little responsibility for what goes on in the country , 56 % trusts the govt to run the judiciary (which by the way is more proof that russia does not understand democracy very well) ,and that figures like general lebed were popular in Russia shows that Russians support strong man rule and that Putin is genuinely popular which was the point of my post whilst i agree with some of your criticism of him,I also would like to state that it is ironic and hypocritical to lecture about democracy in Russia whilst ignoring the popularity of putin and hoping to see pro-western figures like yeltsin and nemtsov get voted,which is something the western media does.One final thing ,i think it may take decades before democracy reaches russia.

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
September 30, 2010 18:37
Wishful thinking...

About This Blog

The Power Vertical is a blog written especially for Russia wonks and obsessive Kremlin watchers by Brian Whitmore. It covers emerging and developing trends in Russian politics, shining a spotlight on the high-stakes power struggles, machinations, and clashing interests that shape Kremlin policy today. Check out The Power Vertical Facebook page or

Listen

​​