Monday, February 13, 2012


Features

Ex-Taliban Ambassador Says Work Needed To Bring Taliban To Talks

Abdul Hakim Mujahid (in file photo) was ambassador to Islamabad when Pakistan was one of just three countries to recognize the Taliban regime.
TEXT SIZE - +
Although the United Nations never formally recognized the Taliban regime in Afghanistan as the country's legitimate government, Abdul Hakim Mujahid served as a Taliban representative and point of contact for the UN. He also served as the Taliban's ambassador to Pakistan -- which was one of just several countries to recognize the Taliban government. Years ago, Mujahid reconciled with the government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai. In an interview with RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan correspondent Ahmadullah Takal, Mujahid discusses the possibility of reconciling today's Taliban insurgents through a traditional Afghan Loya Jirga -- a grand assembly of elders.

RFE/RL: Do you see the Taliban agreeing to peace talks if they are asked by a Loya Jirga -- a traditional grand assembly -- to do so?

Abdul Hakim Mujahid: The issue is that the problem of Afghanistan is not in the hands of its president, the people or a Loya Jirga. The real problem is that the troops of 40 countries are stationed in Afghanistan and NATO, the U.K., and the U.S. are heading these troops. So [reconciliation talks will not work] as long as the foreign powers -- the United States and Britain in particular -- don't agree with this.

And it has to involve friendly governments who can influence the Afghan government and its armed opponents. They have to help in homework and facilitation of back channel discussions between the two sides. The issue of Afghanistan cannot simply be addressed by calling a Loya Jirga and inviting the opposition to come for talks.

Taking Exception To Sanctions

RFE/RL: But previously all the Western countries unanimously supported such talks with the Taliban. What makes you say that the required homework has not been done already?

Mujahid: It is very obvious and has been practically proven that no prior groundwork has taken place. The first important thing is to lift the sanctions on the leaders of the armed opposition. They are blacklisted and multimillion-dollar rewards are offered for some leaders of the opposition. They have not been recognized as a legitimate part of the political process. But no such step has been taken place so far.

So it is not logical to invite a person who has a bounty of millions of dollars [on him for his capture and] ask him to give up his sanctuary and attend this Loya Jirga. He might get captured the next day and end up in Guantanamo Bay [prison]. Who will guarantee their safety? Our president has no authority to even release somebody from Bagram [the main U.S. military prison in Afghanistan].
It is not logical to invite a person who has a bounty of millions of dollars [on him for his capture and] ask him to give up his sanctuary and attend this Loya Jirga.


These are all make-believe plans. Nobody would believe such talk unless foreign troops in Afghanistan act honestly, announce clear and transparent plans for addressing the issue, and announce there is clear platform about the presence of foreign troops.

RFE/RL: You just mentioned that some countries have influence over the Taliban. Which countries are they and what can they do?

Mujahid: For instance, I can take the name of one country, and that is Saudi Arabia. I think it will be effective if Saudi Arabia is brought into this process and, at the same time, the foreign troops act with honesty.

Atmosphere Of Mistrust

RFE/RL: But in the dialogue which is said to have already taken place in Saudi Arabia, the Taliban indicated they are unwilling to join negotiations unless all the foreign troops leave Afghanistan. What can be done in such a situation? What is the way out?

Mujahid: This main problem is that there is no atmosphere of trust.

RFE/RL: So is it your conclusions that this atmosphere of mistrust can only disappear after foreign troops leave Afghanistan?

Mujahid: This atmosphere will only go away when the foreign forces -- the UN, the United States, and the United Kingdom -- get rid of contradictions in their policies. Their policies are now riddled with contradictions. Sometimes they say we [will] not negotiate with the hard-liners fighting against us but have no problems talking to the moderates.

Right now, several moderate leaders are living in a Kabul who are not even hostile to [the government]. But still they are under sanctions. These are the issues which increase mistrust. How can the armed opposition trust the process when several high-ranking people -- [former Taliban officials] -- are still under sanctions? How can you convince those who want to join [the peace process]?

RFE/RL: What can those Taliban based in Kabul who are not fighting do in terms of bringing the moderate Taliban and linking them with the government?

Mujahid: If they [foreign troops] were honest, first they should have treated humanely those who left the armed opposition. But they have put them in prison and these [Taliban] leaders went through lots of difficulties. And they are still being discriminated against.
First they should have treated humanely those who left the armed opposition. But they have put them in prison, and these [Taliban] leaders went through lots of difficulties. And they are still being discriminated against.


What Next?


RFE/RL: Can you specify which measures you think the Afghan government should take in order to encourage them toward negotiations?

Mujahid: First of all, the government of Afghanistan should come to an agreement with the foreign troops based in Afghanistan in forming a unified strategy. Only then it can make progress in negotiating with the opposition.

As long as there is no coordination between the Afghan government and the international troops, the plans for negotiations won't move forward. In the past the Afghan president presented plans for negotiations. But they were vetoed by the foreign powers.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Paul from: USA
November 26, 2009 16:25
These Taliban are ridiculous. Before all this started they harbored criminals that killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11 in a terrorits attack. Before the USA went in they tried at least 3 times to negoiate with the Taliban to turn over the criminals and they did not. Had they done so the foreign tropps never would have been there and the world would be a better place today. Instead the Taliban decided to harbor criminals and terrorists that have clearly admitted on live news that they did the deed. Osama clearly stated they did this because the USA was on Saudi territory during the Gulf war 1991. The Saudis invited us in not us. Blame them. Osama never complained of the downfall of Saddam. So, the Taliban thinks they can habor criminals and terrorists and get what they want? WRONG!!!! Here are the conditions. The Taliban gives up all Al Queida in both Afghanistan and Pakistan including Osama and we all pull out. Simple. No more we can do anything to you and you have to give up and let us have what we want. Iraq was a mistake for the USA but Afghanistan as long as the Taliban wants to support terrorists is right.

by: KONSTANTIN from: Los Angeles
November 27, 2009 19:44
The interviewer and the Pole from USA ask questions
That Afghans do not understand, but answere it right:
Colony of British again? What is the West intentions?
To pass Afghanistan again to the Russian genocide?

Why wouldn't West make clear what is Afghan future?
The technicallities again, for patriarchal Afghanistan:
Why had hospitality to co-fighters against Russians?
Why respect patriarchal laws - unlike the Prussians?

Wants USA free Afghanistan, at least as Federation,
Or, manipulated by Russia and UK, try colonization?

Konstantin.

by: Herman Ensz from: BC, Canada
November 28, 2009 16:21
He should be listened to.

by: Rina Alabaster from: USA
November 29, 2009 01:21
Rina Alabaster, member, www.warrenpeas.com
President Obama recently declared his aim to bring the Afghan war to an end before he leaves office. This conjures memories of Miss America contestants gushing before a microphone claiming their desire for world peace. I think that both ends are equally unattainable.

Obama is correct when he asserts this war as being inherited. But it wasn't inherited from former President Bush, it was inherited from the annals of history which extends back to the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632.

Diplomacy- check, sanctions- check, military action- check, the list is complete -all available options crossed off. The Islam v Infidel (primarily Christian and Jewish) battle has its roots wound through the Qur' an. Sura 9:29 of the Qur'an declares: "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, of the people of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

When you are in nursery school in the West, you learn ABC's, take a nap on a little blanket, have some cookies and juice and get finger paint everywhere but your fingers. When you attend preschool in the Middle East, however, you learn about Jihad, the enemies of Islam and martyrdom. Fifteen years later you are in mandatory military service target shooting at the current American President.

Diplomacy is a joke, sanctions just make the region stronger in self-sufficiency and ethnocentrism. As for the battleground- for every Islamic militant killed, one hundred stand behind him ready to fight, kill and die in his name.

Mr. Obama, your intentions are equally ambitious and noble. But I'll add unattainable. We are 1,400 years into this war, you cannot reverse a culture which pervades every day life in just a few years. Pull our troops out and pour those resources into domestic protection; if not, you are simply giving soldiers, time, money and attention into an abyss.

by: Ali from: Kanbera
November 30, 2009 09:46
please the game with such a fool topic. me as a person who was student during the Taliban Fascist Pushtun and i personally have the experience of my ethnic Hazara group in Mazar sharif, Bamyan and Kanda Pusht in Paktiya provinces. i served as Human rights activist and Afghan official. People in afghanistan need democracy not Pushtun tradition and wildness under this shit name. they are not only agaist the presence of other ethnic groups but also they are the group which denies half of population. if this is the right of citizens let them choose otherwise what u westerners supported them by Osama at the begining you can commit such a wrong mistake again for next 9/11gifts for you all
               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Cold Threatens Russian Fruit Crop

Latest Comment (2 total)

Vakhtang: The cold is certainly bad.
But as it is known that the russian fruit ... More

Libya Asks Niger To Extradite Qaddafi Son

Latest Comment (9 total)

John: you obviously have no idea what an islamic state is. please be quiet ... More

Iran To Make Nuclear Announcement

Latest Comment (9 total)

Chechen: Saudi Arabia and Muslims is Iran's enemy. The midget submarines, Chinook choppers, F-14's ... More