Thursday, February 16, 2012


Features

Film On Russian Neo-Nazis Is Itself Facing Ban Under Antiextremism Laws

TEXT SIZE - +


WATCH: Excerpts from "Russia 88." Viewer discretion is advised.

By Claire Bigg

When Pavel Bardin shot his film about Russian neo-Nazis, he was probably bracing for some controversy. But one thing he wasn't expecting was a legal campaign to ban his film on grounds that it propagates extremism.

"Russia 88" charts the daily lives of an imaginary skinhead gang in Moscow that attacks non-Slavic minorities and prepares videos of the assaults to post on the Internet.

In one scene, a leading gang member named Blade is seen in a Moscow metro carriage brutally beating up minorities, whom he repeatedly refers to as "parasites."

Pavel Bardin
The film is a rare, often disturbing, cinematic look at Russia's powerful ultranationalist groups, in a country where authorities have long turned a blind eye to the issue.

Russia is one of the world's most deadly countries for ethnic minorities, and rights groups have long accused authorities of contributing to racist violence by allowing offenders to get away with lenient sentences.

One of the most shocking cases saw a St. Petersburg court in 2006 sentence a group of teenagers to short prison terms for stabbing a 9-year-old Tajik girl to death, finding them guilty only of "hooliganism."

Legal Woes

Released in 2008 to critical acclaim, "Russia 88" took prizes at film festivals in Berlin and Khanty-Mansiisk and was hailed as the 2009 "event of the year" by the Russian film critics' guild. (The 88 in the title is a reference to "Heil, Hitler" -- H being the eighth letter of the alphabet.)

But despite the film's success, Bardin has spent much of the past year mired in a court case filed by prosecutors in the Volga city of Samara, who argue that the film contains hate speech and promotes racial supremacy.

He says authorities deeply misunderstood his work, which he says is meant to show the realities of Russian ultranationalism, not to condone it.

"People who suspect us of being underground marginals seeking to stage a revolution are mistaken," he tells RFE/RL's Russian Service. "We are happy to make our film available to anyone who wishes to use it to combat extremism. Many nongovernmental organizations have turned to us, but not a single state organization has done so.

"The first contact with authorities, unfortunately, was this lawsuit. We are not expecting cooperation, but I hope such misunderstandings won't arise again."

Bardin won a respite last month when the Prosecutor-General's Office ordered that the lawsuit be withdrawn pending a more detailed study of the film.

A screenshot from "Russia 88" shows neo-Nazis attacking minorities in the Moscow metro.
But if a court eventually rules against it, the film will be added to a government list of materials banned under Russia's 2002 antiextremism law.

Most Russian movie theaters did not show "Russia 88" due to its sensitive subject matter. The film has largely been restricted to private viewings at universities and film clubs.

Not Just Fiction

While fictional, "Russia 88" is based on what is known of Russian neo-Nazi groups. It illustrates ties between gang members and the police, whose ranks in reality are believed to harbor many ultranationalist sympathizers.

The film also highlights a new, disturbing practice among ultranationalists: posting videos of attacks on the Internet. One of the most horrifying videos to date, released online in 2007, showed neo-Nazis brutally executing two men identified as a Tajik and a Daghestani.

"Russia 88" also includes interviews with real Muscovites speaking out against ethnic minorities, underscoring the xenophobia that remains widespread among ordinary Russians.

Before shooting "Russia 88," Bardin researched white-power gangs by surfing Russian Internet forums. He also consulted the Sova Center, an independent organization that monitors ultranationalist violence in the country.

Sova estimates that at least 71 people died and more than 330 were wounded last year in racially motivated attacks. The number, while high, is a sharp decline from previous years.

Sova's Galina Kozhevnikova attributes the drop to belated efforts by authorities to crack down on ultranationalists. She credits Bardin and "Russia 88," in turn, for doing much to raise awareness about the issue.

"It's a feature film that is accurate is some places and less accurate in others, but it doesn't matter, because the film's aim is not to give an exact portrait of the life of neo-Nazis," she says. "Its aim is to face society and each individual with this problem, and the film does this brilliantly."
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Political Dissident
February 02, 2010 20:44
Low and behold, another example of what kind of former Communist bloc neo-Nazi activity which RFE/RL chooses to highlight over others.

BTW, Ukraine's chief rabbi denounced Yushchenko's deecision to honor Bandera.

I currently see no mention of that in RFE/RL.


by: Johann from: USA
February 02, 2010 20:50
Jews and anti skinhead (antifascists) people in the world needs to form a international organization to fight the evils of Russia and Balkan countries.
They could get advice and training from many sources both in Israel and Scandinavian countries. This organization could provide security to Non CO's
and libertarians around the world. Members should have ex-military experience and have a black belt in martial arts.

by: ROH from: USA
February 03, 2010 16:06
I believe the corrrect spelling is "lo and behold." But typos in no way detract from your argument.

by: G from: Washington, DC
February 03, 2010 21:16
That's a good point about Bandera. Was a good opportunity for RFE/RL to prove objectivity. Historical accounts are pretty clear about him being a Nazi collaborator.

by: EasyNow
February 08, 2010 19:12
Easy now. Watch who you call Nazi collaborator. That is a very serious accusation and it's so easily said from a 21st century point of view. Context is very important here. Ukrainians celebrate Bandera as a liberator, someone who fought for their right to autonomy. Germany, during that time, was seen as the lesser of two evils (mind you, the full extent of Nazi genocide plans were yet to be revealed to the world). Bandera was subject to major manipulation by the likes of Nazi officials, and to them, was seen as someone that they could use to hold the Russians back. And for the record, some Jewish Ukrainians were part of Bandera's liberation movement.

This is not a call to forgive him of his misgivings and any tragedies associated with his name. This is just meant to give some context to your very narrowly put comments

Now I'm not saying that modern day Ukraine does not have neo-Nazi groups among its population. But that number is very small, relatively speaking. Ukrainians are not anti-Semites, in general, and how small of you to even suggest that.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Tehran ‘Ready’ For Nuclear Talks

Latest Comment (1 total)

Gar: The U.N and the NATO allies are total suckers if they go back ... More

Russia Sets Weapons Export Record

Latest Comment (2 total)

Eugenio: How interesting :-). It's just that the other day I read a really ... More

Kosovo Serbs Defy Serbia, EU With Vote

Latest Comment (2 total)

Ruben: There is no "defying".

Belgrade still pays their salaries and needs them to ... More