Tuesday, February 14, 2012


Features

Georgia Rethinks The 'Reset'

A man holds a sign investing hope in U.S. President Barack Obama at a Georgian opposition rally in Tbilisi in November 2008.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Brian Whitmore
TBILISI -- Couples are sipping wine in sidewalk cafes and children are frolicking in fountains, seeking relief from the heat. Old men are playing chess on park benches, and sidewalk traders are hawking their wares.

All the usual sights and sounds of summer are visible in Georgia's scruffy, chaotic, and charming capital city.

All, that is, save one: For the first time in recent years, the onset of warm weather in Tbilisi has not been accompanied by rumors of war.

The placid calm this season contrasts sharply with the sweltering summer of 2008, which culminated in Russia's invasion of Georgia that August. And it's a marked departure from the jittery atmosphere a year ago, when fresh saber-rattling in Moscow led many politicians and pundits to predict -- incorrectly as it turned out -- that armed conflict could break out anew.

Officials in Tbilisi were openly frustrated by the lack of U.S. support during the 2008 conflict, despite years of boosterism from then-President George W. Bush. But they now say the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama deserves much of the credit for defusing the tensions last summer, and keeping the situation calm since.

"The immediate danger of a large-scale attack by Russia has been -- if not completely eradicated -- significantly reduced by a very active position by the U.S. administration," says Giga Bokeria, Georgia's deputy foreign minister and a close confidant of President Mikheil Saakashvili.

Specifically, Bokeria says Obama made a "very concentrated effort" to be clear about the U.S. position on Georgian sovereignty during his landmark visit to Moscow in July 2009.

Senior Georgian officials tell RFE/RL that behind the scenes, Obama warned Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin that an attack against Georgia would have "grave consequences," and that Washington -- distracted during the 2008 war by the looming presidential election -- "would not stand aside" were such a conflict to be repeated.

A White House spokesperson declined to confirm the warning, saying, "we don't discuss private conversations." But whatever was said, it appears to have stuck -- and people in Tbilisi have taken notice.

Then-U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice with Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili in Tbilisi in mid-August 2008, just a week after the Russia-Georgia war broke out.
After initially expressing fears that their interests would be sacrificed on the altar of warmer U.S.-Russian relations, Georgians appear to be coming to terms with Obama's reset policy with Moscow. Closer ties between the former superpower rivals, politicians and analysts here say, have allowed Washington to exert quiet -- albeit effective -- influence over Moscow, and to enhance Georgia's security in the process.

"Russia should have something to lose if it attacks Georgia," says Political analyst Giga Zedania, director of the Institute for Genealogy and Modernity at Tbilisi's Ilia State University.

"One of the problems of the Bush administration was that it had no leverage over Russia, because there was no cooperation [between Moscow and Washington]. When these links are established that mutually benefit Russia and the United States, Russia will have more incentive to think twice before it does something like it did in 2008."

Linkage And Leverage

One of the things Russia now has to lose is on full display this week as President Dmitry Medvedev makes his first White House visit in Washington.

In addition to talks with Obama on a variety of bilateral issues, Medvedev plans to seek American support for Moscow's bid to join the World Trade Organization (WTO). Medvedev began his visit with a trip to Silicon Valley in California, where he courted investors for his ambitious plans to modernize Russia's hi-tech sector.

U.S. officials say, however, that the Russian president can also expect to hear a thing or two about Georgia during his visit. Specifically, the Americans are likely to address Russia's continued occupation of the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and its failure to reduce troops there as required by an EU-brokered cease-fire signed by Medvedev.

In a June 10 speech at the Peterson Institute of International Economics in Washington, Michael McFaul, Obama's chief Russia adviser, said the U.S. administration was not satisfied with progress on the issue and planned to press the matter with Medvedev during his visit.

"Is it a foreign policy objective of the Obama administration to help end Russia's occupation of Georgia in a peaceful manner and restore Georgia's territorial integrity? Absolutely yes. That's an objective we have. Have we made progress on that central objective? My answer is no, we haven't. That's the truth," McFaul said.

"We have a goal," he added. "We have a strategy that we are pursuing, and we'll pursue it again when President Medvedev is here."

To further underscore the U.S. commitment to Georgia, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is due to visit Tbilisi in early July during a swing through the South Caucasus region that will also take her to Armenia and Azerbaijan. Vice President Joe Biden already paid a visit to Tbilisi last summer.

U.S. President Barack Obama (left) and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in Singapore in November 2009.
"To be sure, Georgians still feel they have lost standing with the United States since Obama came to office. The country's NATO bid, which appeared tantalizingly close just a couple of years ago, now appears indefinitely on hold. And the attention once lavished on Georgia by George W. Bush -- who has a street named after him in Tbilisi -- is a thing of the past, as the Obama administration struggles to address more pressing foreign policy issues like Afghanistan and Iran.

But the tense atmosphere of Cold War-style conflict, with Georgia serving as a proxy battleground for the United States and Russia, is also receding.

"I strongly believe that if the U.S.-Russian relationship expands and grows closer, it will only benefit Georgia," says Irakli Alasania, Georgia's former ambassador to the United Nations and currently a leader of the opposition.

He cites Georgia's "enormous security problems," especially after its lightning war with Russia in August 2008, saying Tbilisi "will not cope with these problems alone."

"At this point what we can do is to not solicit any more aggressive behavior from Russia, to keep things quiet," Alasania says. "But to resolve the problems which were not resolved by the war, we need strong partners. And we need our strong strategic partner to have a good relationship with the Russian Federation."

Russia First?

U.S. engagement with Russia, however, is not without its critics.

In July of last year, a group of prominent Eastern European intellectuals and former officials -- including former Czech and Polish Presidents Vaclav Havel and Lech Walesa -- published an open letter to the Obama administration expressing their fears that the interests of smaller states like Georgia would be cast aside as relations with Russia improved.

After the Obama administration resubmitted the so-called 123 nuclear cooperation agreement with Russia to Congress -- an agreement that had been in limbo since Bush withdrew it after the Russia-Georgia war -- accusations of betrayal flew fast and furious.

In an op-ed published in "The Washington Post" on May 15, David Kramer, who served as deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs in George W. Bush's administration, charged that the Obama administration was moving from a "Russia first" approach to a "Russia only" approach.

In a recent interview with RFE/RL's Georgian Service, Kramer said the resubmission of the 123 agreement raised concerns about the Obama administration's priorities.

"I think the problem is that the administration has become so focused on its reset policy with Russia that it is pursuing it almost to the exclusion of relations with other countries in the region," Kramer said.

"I think that is a concern those countries, it is a concern for Europe, and it is a concern for the United States."

In his speech at the Peterson Institute, McFaul pushed back hard against such a claim, saying the administration was "deliberately not pushing for the end of the occupation of Georgia to resubmit the 123 agreement."

"That doesn't mean we're ignoring Georgia. We're doing these things in parallel, but we're not linking them," McFaul said.

"Conversely, we're not allowing our Russian colleagues to link things that they want to link. We're not ending our assistance to Georgia, throwing the Georgians under the bus in the name of a UN Security Council resolution. That was a proposition put to us a long time ago, and we said we're not going to play that game."

A senior Western diplomat in Tbilisi, speaking on condition of anonymity, says the differences between the Bush and Obama approaches to Georgia are largely cosmetic -- and greatly exaggerated.

"There is less change than the public perception would suggest," the diplomat said. "The relationship wasn't unconditional under the last administration and hasn't changed as much under the current administration as some would like to think. No fundamental policy principles have changed. What has changed are the conditions in the neighborhood."

Bokeria agrees, and stresses that at no stage in Obama's reset with Russia were Georgia's interests sacrificed.

"There has been no shift in the administration's policy," Bokeria says.

"We know they have a reset with Russia and they have important issues to be discussed with Russia. But there has never been any single important occasion [in this process] when it was suitable to the context where Georgia's sovereignty and security was not highlighted."
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Peter Laurie from: San Diego
June 24, 2010 23:24
If Georgia will not invade Russia then Russia will not invade Georgia.
P.S. Abkhazia and S. Ossetia are independent countries.
In Response

by: Andrew from: Auckland
June 25, 2010 09:15
Not according to international law Peter (or should that be Pyotr?)

Abkhazia and South Ossetia are the beneficiaries of massive ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, and should be punished accordingly.

BTW, Georgia did not invade Russia, Georgian forces were acting on their own internationally recognised (even by Russia at the time) territory.

Please get an education Pyotr, before you comment on items about which you obviously have no understanding.
In Response

by: Johann from: USA
June 26, 2010 02:25
Georgia versus Abkhazia is the same and Serbia versus Kosovo. In both cases people of different religion, nationality, culture and language wanted to split from the bigger part of that state. People should also remember that the south part of the great United States of America tried to split away from the north. The south was called, the Confederate States of America !!!
In Response

by: Richard
June 27, 2010 00:14
During Gamsakhurdia's time, the mantra in Georgia was: "Georgia for Georgians." These sentiments, sadly, haven't diminished much at the turn of the 21st century. Georgia tried to conduct campaigns of ethnic cleansing in Abkhazia and South Ossetia in the wars there in the 90's, and an Ossetia without Ossetians could very well have been the result of the war in 2008 . Sadly, like in Kosovo, where ethnic Albanians cleansed the remaining Serbs after Milosevic's dastardly attack on his own citizens failed miserably, (just like Saakashvili's attack on South Ossetia did), the opposite happened. In fact, attrocities comitted against Georgians in Abkhazia and South Ossetia were a direct result of attrocities they (Georgians) had comitted against Abkhazians and Ossetians. Sad, but you reap what you sow.
In Response

by: Andrew from: Auckland
June 28, 2010 07:24
Once again, more drivel from "Richard"
Georgia did not conduct campaigns of "ethnic cleansing" in either Abkhazia or South Ossetia during the 90's, in fact in 1993, during the Abkhazian war, the Apsu language was made an official language of Georgia.

Many members of the pro Georgian administration of Abkhazia were ethnic Apsu, such as Raul Eshba and Guram Gabiskira, who were executed by separatists when Sukhumi was captured, along with many other Apsu who were attempting to protect their Georgian neighbors.

In addition, the slogan "Abkhazia for Abkhazians" (meaning Abkhazia for Apusa) began far earlier than Gamsakhurdia's "Georgia for Georgians", as did Abkhazian racist crimes, such as the attack which killed or injured over 300 ethnic Georgian students and teachers at Sukhumi university.

Georgian troops were by no means innocent during the war, but it is interesting to note that looting by government forces affected all citizens (including ethnic Georgians) and that there was no (according to the UN, COE, HRW, & Memorial observers) attempt by the Georgians to commit ethnic cleansing. Ethinc Apsu remained in towns under Georgian government control during the war, received rations and supplies the same as their Georgian neighbors etc.

This is in stark comparison to the behavior of the separatists, who (according to the same observers) carried out a deliberate and preplanned campaign of ethnic cleansing, rape, mass murder, looting, and destruction of cultural monuments against not only the Georgians, but the Greek, Jewish, and Azeri populations in Abkhazia. Not only did they rape, mutilate and murder Georgian civilians, but they murdered Apsu who attempted to stop them from doing so.

In addition in South Ossetia there was no attempt in either conflict, that of the early 90's, or that of 2008, by the Georgians to commit ethnic cleansing, there are more Ossetians living in Tbilisi than in Tshkinvali, and Ossetian students have the right to study in Ossetian language schools.

Once again, compare this to the ethnic cleansing committed by Russian and separatist forces in 2008.

Really Richard, you seriously need to get an education.

Please also try and remember that Apsu were 17% of the population of Abkhazia, and Georgians 47%.

Next time before you comment, try reading the HRW or UN reports on Apsu crimes against humanity.
In Response

by: John
June 25, 2010 09:24
Of course, because ethnic cleansing is the only way to establish an independent state... in your dreams mate!
In Response

by: Tornike from: georgia
June 25, 2010 11:59
for pepole like you which do not know our history and do not have yoursef is easy to say words like these mr. Peter Laurie

by: Resani Kikava from: London
June 25, 2010 08:34
What a primitive thinking PETER from San DIego... in case this is your real name and you are not something like Vladimir Ivanov from Moscow...

by: Rezo
June 25, 2010 08:42
Peter Laurie

how can you people ignore hundred of thousend ethnicly cleansed people, what kind of human you are Peter, look at your self...
"Georgia invade Russia" - very funny , did you take your pilss today, peter?:))

by: Sandra from: Zurich
June 25, 2010 09:50
It's Georgia who attack South Ossetia and Abkhazia again and again. Georgia is not victim but guilty. They must rethink about it and try to find a peaceful way for its neighbours.

by: Rick from: Italy
June 25, 2010 11:53
Peter ......

US propaganda never finish !

we can be sure that for the US history never change this :

"Russia start war with Georgia "

this is a dogma .


But ... US don't was the country of free and indipendent opinion ?

by: Richard from: London
June 25, 2010 16:04
The US is not going to fight Russia in the Caucasus over Georgia, and won't jepoardize the reset for the benefit of some deluded policymakers in Tbilisi.
In Response

by: George Japaridze from: USA
June 25, 2010 19:24
Richard, let me remind you the words of compatriot of yours, Neville Chamberlain, said in 1938:

"How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas masks here because of a quarrel in a far-away country between people of whom we know nothing. It seems still more impossible that a quarrel which has already been settled in principle should be the subject of war."

Let me also remind you that this idea did not work out well at all.
In Response

by: Katy from: Sokhumi, Georgia
June 26, 2010 09:43
Richard from London,

How are policymakers in Tbilisi deluded exactly? Explain please.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 26, 2010 08:50
Read Chronology of Russian invasion in 2008
on www.WorldFreedomAndTruth.info all those
That Putin's FSB created - more than 100 baits,
TV Stations, lying as Russa's genocidal hoses.

Konstantin.

by: Anonymous
June 26, 2010 11:34
The article and all comments following highlight the ultimate in naivety.

by: Richard from: London
June 27, 2010 16:37
What is it with with this blog being a mouthpiece for Georgian policymakers anyway? Why don't you go to Sukhumi and talk to policy makers there?
In Response

by: Andrew from: Auckland
June 28, 2010 11:21
Because the Russians like to keep their puppets on a short string Richard.

Anyway access to Apsu policymakers requires a trip to Moscow in reality.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 28, 2010 03:35
Richard must be Russian,
Hard to imagine otherwise,
It is not his "Chemberlen",
Unless he anti-Artur "hen"
For Richard's "plunderize".

Konstantin.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (6 total)

Saleem: If successive Pakistani governments have failed to deal with the 'Balochistan problem' then ... More

UN Rights Chief Scathing On Syria

Latest Comment (2 total)

Chechen: "Moscow also has had a deal since 1971 with Syria "
Sorry that was ... More

U.K. Releases Radical Cleric On Bail

Latest Comment (1 total)

Martin : Modern Europe has deteriorated to such grotesque that its end has to be ... More