Sunday, February 12, 2012


Features

Hopes Raised Anew About Future Of Nabucco Gas Pipeline Project

Reinhard Mitschek, Nabucco's managing director
x
Reinhard Mitschek, Nabucco's managing director
TEXT SIZE - +
By Bruce Pannier
After a long, cold winter for the Nabucco pipeline project, March has brought a fresh wave of energy to the long-stalled Western plan to diversify Europe's natural gas supplies.

Nabucco, which aims to bring some 31 billion cubic meters (bcm) of Caspian and Middle Eastern natural gas to Southern and Central Europe, has long been seen as an opportunity for the EU to break a dangerous dependence on Russian gas and pipelines.

The project has stumbled so frequently on funding and supply issues that some have dismissed it as unfeasible. But it now appears on track to meet its target date for first deliveries in 2014.

The new momentum began on March 4, when the Turkish parliament ratified an intergovernmental agreement on Nabucco transit. Turkey was the last of the five transit countries -- Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania being the other four -- to approve the agreement for the 3,300-kilometer pipeline.

"This intergovernmental agreement is indeed a significant document," Reinhard Mitschek, Nabucco's managing director tells RFE/RL, "because it provides a legally unified transport regime across five countries. And that's very, very important for a transnational pipeline like Nabucco."

Mitschek pointed out that the intergovernmental agreement "was signed in the form of a treaty, which means it goes beyond the national laws of the five countries. It has a duration of 50 years." That's important, Mitschek says, because it "provides comfort, security, and reliability for investors, for banks, and also for shippers."

Turkey's hesitation before ratifying the deal could have been due to negotiations with Azerbaijan. The Nabucco pipeline starts at the Georgian-Turkish border, from where it connects to a pipeline originating in Azerbaijan. Ankara and Baku are regional allies but talks to settle on a price for incoming gas from Azerbaijan have been slow.

'Clear Contract'

Federico Bordonaro, an authority on energy affairs and a lecturer on geopolitics at the University of Rome, says a recent deal between Turkey and Azerbaijan helped end Ankara's reluctance to ratify the intergovernmental agreement.

Path of the Nabucco gas pipeline (click to enlarge)
"What wasn't there before was a clear [pricing] contract between the Turks and Azeris," Bordonaro says. "So as far as I understand, Ankara will now impose a transit tax, but no entrance fee, for the gas that will flow from Shah Deniz in Azerbaijan to Turkey and then from Turkey to the Balkan area and the European Union."

Bordonaro says the "really new and interesting thing" about the agreement "is that the Turks and the Azeris now have a written agreement with clear-cut decisions about taxes, fees, prices, etc. So now there is a solid legal basis [for Nabucco] and the [EU's] southern [gas] corridor can really function on a legal basis."

Another big breakthrough for Nabucco came on March 10 when one of the project's six shareholders, Germany's RWE Supply & Trading, signed a memorandum of understanding with Azerbaijan to develop the Nakhichevan field in the Caspian Sea, some 50 kilometers off the coast of Azerbaijan. The gas from that field will almost certainly be destined for Nabucco and may soothe long-standing anxieties that the project is short on suppliers.

RWE last year signed a contract with Turkmenistan to develop one of that country's offshore Caspian fields. Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan have frequently been named as the two key potential suppliers for the project, and RWE CEO Stefan Judisch has noted that Turkey's ratification of the transit deal means Baku and Ashgabat now have no legal impediment to concluding gas contracts with Nabucco.

Asked if he is feeling more confident about Nabucco's ability to fill the pipeline following the latest RWE deal with Azerbaijan, Mitschek says it has never been a serious concern. But he credits the initiative of Nabucco's partners in finding suppliers, noting, "Luckily, the project has very active shareholders such as RWE for Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, [Austria's] OMV for Azerbaijan and Iraq, and [Hungary's] MOL, also in Iraq.

We have a very exciting year...to prepare everything -- open season, financing, technical elements, etc. In 2011, we will start construction as foreseen, and as scheduled, at the end of 2014, the first gas will flow to Europe.
"I'm convinced that we cannot only manage to fill it with 8 to 10 billion cubic meters at the beginning of the startup of the project," Mitschek adds, "but we will build up to 31 billion cubic meters relatively soon." (The remaining three shareholders are Turkey's BOTAS, Romania's Transgaz, and Bulgarian Energy Holding.)

More Money From EC?

Another piece of potentially good news came from the European Commission on March 4, the same day the Turkish parliament ratified the intergovernmental agreement. Last year, following the wintertime shutoff of Russian gas to the EU amid a Russia-Ukraine pricing dispute, the commission allocated 1.5 billion euros ($2.1 billion) for projects aimed at improving the EU's energy infrastructure. Nabucco received 200 million euros of that money.

This month, the European Commission added 2.3 billion euros to help fund energy projects for Europe. Mitschek indicates Nabucco would welcome an extra infusion of cash but says that "we are now concentrating on this 200 million [euros] funding topic." He says Nabucco shareholders are "in permanent contact with the commission," but he stresses that "financing for the project is not the real obstacle, in principle."

Mitschek says that "especially prior to FID [final investment decision] -- we're now in the development phase and preconstruction phase -- it's very important and quite significant support from official sides to receive this funding." As concerns possible additional funding, Mitschek says, "The more the better. We will check if we can increase the 200 million euros, but so far we're concentrating on that amount."

In a further sign Nabucco is forging ahead, Mitschek says: "We are preparing prequalification and tender procedures for suppliers of long-lead items, materials, and construction works. On the other hand, we are also preparing the open season for offering transport capacity to market participants.

"Both will happen this summer," he adds. "The open season maybe will start in August-September."

Mitschek's confidence in financing makes more remote a suggestion from Paolo Scaroni, chief executive officer of the Italian major Eni, a partner in the Russian-backed South Stream gas pipeline that is seen as a rival to Nabucco. Scaroni last week suggested that Nabucco and South Stream be merged for the last section of their routes into Europe, as a cost-saving measure.

Sergei Shmatko
The managing director of Nabucco does not entirely dismiss such a possibility, although he says he does not want to comment on such speculation. Mitschek acknowledges that "it's highly competitive, commercially and technically, to realize the project." But he says, "We know the markets, we are confident of realizing the project on time and on budget, and any kind of change of the project's scope is up to the discussion and decision of the shareholders."

'We Are On Schedule'

Russian Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko ruled out such a merger on March 15, saying South Stream -- which will have a capacity of 63 bcm -- is "more competitive" than Nabucco.

In response to the ultimate question -- Will Nabucco be ready on schedule? -- Mitschek responds, "I can say, yes, we are on schedule. We have a very exciting year, 2010, to prepare everything -- open season, financing, technical elements, etc.," he says. "In 2011, we will start construction as foreseen, and as scheduled, at the end of 2014, the first gas will flow to Europe."

Bordonaro says a new sense of urgency on the part of the European Union should also help give Nabucco a boost. "The European Union has witnessed the increasing competition for Central Asian reserves. We have witnessed the Chinese and the Iranians become more and more assertive in the Turkmen and Kazakh energy markets," Bordonaro says. "And I think that the European Union perceives that the increased competition forces it to be quicker."

Bordonaro says he expects Nabucco to grace the front pages of the specialist press soon, especially since "the next six to eight months will be really decisive for this project."
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Agata Loskot-Strachota from: Warsaw
March 16, 2010 16:00
An interesting article. I agree that something is slowely changing when it comes to Nabucco, and it may be that some kind of speeding up this project or whole Southern Corridor is to be seen in months to come. Or maybe it is just the last chance for Nabucco, which is witnessing competition not only from Russian backed projects but also Azeri ones (see Bakus plans to export CNG/LNG via Blac Sea to Romania/Bulgaria). And I impatiently wait for the deals with Turkmens and Azeris that media announced that are to be signed by one of Nabucco consortium companies in the next few months. But beside that there are some other thing which should/could be done.
The crucial issue is to get united and firm EU stance with regard to the project, clarity over CDC or other buying schemes, possible financing (maybe in the reformed TEN-E framework), and to clear out transit issues. And here I am not sure if there was any break-through in Turkish-Azeri relations, which would be crucial not only for Nabucco but also several other projects included in Southern Corridor concept. Additionally there is an issue of troublesome relations between Turkemenistan and Azerbaijan when it comes to gas/energy issues. Enabling effective solution of these problems would certainly account for visible acceleration of Nabucco

by: RD
March 16, 2010 20:21
Thomas Edward Lawrence once said; "There is honor amongst thieves, but none between politicians". Let us assess the situation. Azerbaijan kicks dust at the prospect of Armenia and Turkey normalizing relations after centuries of enmity. In recent weeks, Turkey's parliament shows diminishing signs that the protocols agreed between Armenia and Turkey in October of 2009 in Switzerland will be ratified by Turkey's parliament. Then, suddenly, a quick pricing agreement is reached between Turkey and Azerbaijan. For Azerbaijan, peace and stability in the South Caucasus can be compromised for the sake of more money lining Ilham Aliyev's pockets so he can buy more appartments in Dubai using an 11 year old boy called Heydar Aliev. Maybe this time he will be smarter and use some other made up name.

by: Kohlz from: 45km Offshore New England
March 17, 2010 02:58
Regarding Nabucco's 'uncompetitiveness'... it is true that in life it's often justified to pay a slight premium for something which provides added benefit of some kind.

This example of strategic 'diversity' is such a case in my opinion and would indeed buffer against the potential, natural, beast-of-nature to exploit an eventual position of extreme dependency (via hegemony), no matter which source. To pay slightly more for added independence therefore and not to mention for raw, emergency reserve capacity (i.e. insurance) can actually be calculated as a long-term savings.

Besides, more supply available = more economic development potential in addition to better balanced energy unit cost probability (sort of like a suspension system, if you wish). At least the way I see it in this time and age.

by: Bill Webb from: Phoenix, AZ, U.S.A.
March 17, 2010 13:37
The economic development aspect of the Nabucco project opens the floodgate for cooperation between the particpants in an unlimited number of ways.

by: Levent from: Australia
March 18, 2010 10:37
This is a very positive analysis. It shows that the EU and Turkey can make concrete steps together on issues which are of mutual benefit. It is very promising.

This agreement may mark the start of a EU-Turkic axis competing with a China-Iran-Russian axis for Kazak and Turkmenistan (which are Turkic countries) gas reserves.

My view is that this technically minor but geopolitically very significant project will exemplify the interdependancies between the EU and Turkey. Security of this pipline will be a mutual issue drawing the EU and Turkey closer together.

Once Turkey has a political say in the EU (that is being an EU member) only then will the EU be able to have TOTAL energy security against Russia, Iran and China.

Hopefully this gas pipeline will succeed and benefit both the EU and Turkey and all the supplier countries too.

by: Steve Wolson from: UK
March 20, 2010 14:28
Western Europe does not need this expensive pipeline - the world is currently awash with gas, and going through 5 countries means paying fees to 5 countries... Of course Turkey is happy with it !
In Response

by: Kohlz from: 45km Offshore New England
March 23, 2010 05:45
Steve W,

As far as Western Europe being awash in gas... actually, Europe will be requiring far more gas than currently supplied, by 2020, and extreme demands by 2030. Moreover, this proposed line will of course not just supply various western European consumers - it's more broad southern and central consumers could possibly even include as north as Poland now.

That being said, about 30% of the financing is apparently due from the partner nations (who will gain from the investment) and the remaining financing coming from commercial investors - if deemed viable. That financial-worthiness decision will apparently be made by end of 2010.

It could be argued as being more geo-integrating as well as economically benefiting, if it could be expanded beyond Caucuses to Trans Caspian and potentially even Arab pipelines. Optional and consolidated Russian gas could further be supplied via South Stream linkage. Egypt's and Irak's economies would benefit, as well as Iran potentially, if EU/US can ever sort out that political end.

So the greater potential exists far beyond just Turkey benefiting from the project (no, I'm not Turkish ethnicity btw) and the stated potential long-term diversified access to this system could be far more reaching than even conceived today - proving a well constructed win win investment. I guess we'll have to just wait and see later this year how partners and consortium investors conclude final assessments for this long-term viability. Cheers.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Cold Threatens Russian Fruit Crop

Latest Comment (2 total)

Vakhtang: The cold is certainly bad.
But as it is known that the russian fruit ... More

Libya Asks Niger To Extradite Qaddafi Son

Latest Comment (9 total)

John: you obviously have no idea what an islamic state is. please be quiet ... More

Iran To Make Nuclear Announcement

Latest Comment (9 total)

Chechen: Saudi Arabia and Muslims is Iran's enemy. The midget submarines, Chinook choppers, F-14's ... More