Tuesday, February 14, 2012


Commentary

How The Loss Of Empire Made Me Young Again

"I think that was the moment the thought first hit me that the Soviet myth of the empire as a "friendship of different peoples" was a farce, and that the Soviet Union would not last long."
TEXT SIZE - +
By Igor Pomeranzev
I was 5 years old when my parents took me from Lake Baikal in Siberia to Chernovtsy in western Ukraine. The whole family went: mother, father, my older brother Valentin, and me.

In Chernovtsy, aged 5, I was the younger brother, but because I was an emissary of imperialist Russia in colonial Ukraine, I became an older brother to old Hutsul (Carpathian Ukrainian) men with gray beards and Hutsul grandmothers with sagging breasts. It made me feel good.

As I grew up, I was a model older brother: I sympathized with the younger ones. I didn't look down on them, and I even took an imperial interest in learning their language. It was when I was about 18 that I realized I no longer wanted to play this game, or to count myself among the infinite millions of Russians who, without a trace of irony, called themselves a "great nation."

In 1965, almost at my first lecture as an undergraduate at Chernovtsy University, I understood precisely why. The professor teaching the "History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union" asked us what language we wanted him to use -- Russian or Ukrainian.

There were about 60 students. The 50 or so Ukrainians among us said nothing. But 10 older brothers chorused: "In Russian!" I think that was the moment the thought first hit me that the Soviet myth of the empire as a "friendship of different peoples" was a farce, and that the Soviet Union would not last long.

A Younger Brother Once Again

I was wrong. It kept going for what seemed to be an interminably long time: not in terms of historical time, but in terms of a single person and his one and only lifetime. But in the end it came crashing down, flushed down the historical tubes, gone to hell with all the concomitant chthonic horrors.

By now I was in England and obtaining invaluable lessons in the national and colonial sobering-up process. But right up to my departure from the USSR, I was trapped in the older-brother routine. I felt this even when being interrogated by the KGB: they belittled me, mocked my literary ambitions, but they didn't smash my face in and then lock me away in a loony bin or grind me into the dust of a labor camp, like they did with my colonized and more vulnerable younger brothers.

Meanwhile, in England, I shed years all of a sudden and became a younger brother again in the literal sense: a younger brother to Valentin.

In November 2008, I went to Vienna for some Days of Ukrainian Literature. Along with a Romanian and an Austrian, I had been invited as a Russian writer with a Ukrainian connection. I spoke alongside half a dozen Ukrainian writers and poets.

I felt at ease: I liked playing the part of a national minority. I liked the sense of humor shown by Clio, muse of history. Thanks to her irony, at age 60 I felt a boy again, the same lad who once upon a time was growing up in Siberia and loved his mother, father, and older brother, Valentin.

Igor Pomerantsev is a Russian writer and poet who has worked for more than 20 years as a broadcaster with RFE/RL. The views expressed in this commentary, which was translated from Russian by Frank Williams, are his own, and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Dmitriy from: California
February 10, 2010 21:44
If these views "do not necessarily reflect" those of RFE/RL, then why is it that ONLY these kinds of views are published by RFE/RL? When was the last time that RFE/RL published an article about Ukrainian chauvinism? What's the problem, does that not suit the RFE/RL agenda?

The article itself is nonsense. The problem with Pomerantsev is that he doesn't know history and appears to be mentally unstable. Here he talks about western Ukraine, but most ethnic Russians in Ukraine live in the southeast, where they certainly are no more "colonists" than ethnic Ukrainians.

He talks about England and some "national and colonial sobering-up process" but what exactly is the difference between English people in Scotland, Wales and Cornwall, and ethnic Russians in Ukraine? Are we supposed to believe that all those English people are busily learning Celtic languages and not being colonists? What's the difference?

Are white Americans speaking Native American languages and not acting like colonists?

Why are such wildly different standards applied to Russians? Err, maybe because that's the agenda of this media outlet. But we should call it what it is: it's racism.

If you want to talk about colonists, talk about ethnic Ukrainians in ethnically-cleansed cities like Lvlv.

by: rick from: milan
February 11, 2010 08:45
Russian take Sout est Ucraina not from Ukrainians but from Turkish

If for 350 years Russia don't do 13 wars against Turkish

all Ucrainians and many european now should be turkish Muslim !

Remember this !

by: Unknown
February 11, 2010 10:27
What does the author actually want to say in this text? What is this? A poem? An elegy? An analysis? Sorry to say that, but it sounds nonsensical.

by: Boris from: Australia
February 11, 2010 11:24
Ciao Rick from Milano,
Your comments are partly right, the Turkish empire was constantly invading Ukrainian lands for many centuries and during all that time the indpendent forces of Ukrainian kossaks fought them back and defeated them. It was always the kossaks who were in the front line whether in conjunction with Russian or Swedish or Polish allies, it was the kossaks who faced the Turks full on because they were defending thier homelands. Sensa dubbio, If it were not for the (ukrainian) kossaks those homelands would be under Turkish rule.

by: rick from: milan
February 12, 2010 01:01
Ciao Boris from Australia

(Australia ....... when people is boring and i am realy realy tired of this stress , I generally speak them “ stop , if we go on so , I escape to Australia and leave you with your problems )

I thinks that you do a mistake speaking about Cossaks as Ukrainians !

Histroy of Cossaks is not so clear , also because is not an unitary history
But we have none doubt that Cossaks born from tatars ,
also their name is Tatar and means “freeman” or “man who escapes” .

Only after, and from about 1500
other ethnicities were added to Cossaks
generally unfortunate people who free themselves from slavery
but they could be Russian
or Ukrainian
or Polish
or any other people.

only things that truly unites the Cossaks
are Orthodox
and loyalty to the czar (with many exceptions)

Even today the Cossaks exist and are not equivalent to a particular ethnic group .

by: Boris from: Australia
February 12, 2010 10:04
Ciao Rick,
You have some very fixed views, people who study events from a distance see a different reality than those who are living it.
The kossaks were freedom lovers and hence freedom fighters, they lived on the wild steppes which had no name but which history now calls Ukraine, so by todays customs we can call them Ukrainian no matter where they came from. You know, before Risorgimento in about 1861 there was no Italy, only various regions with many different ethicities, there were Lombards and Austrians and Dalmatiansand Sardinians and Siciliani but we are now accustomed to call all those people Italians. Any student of history will understand this.
I can see that you are intersted in history but it is better to know the facts;
the kossaks fought against the tatars and the mongols, they did not originate from tatars.
The ukrainian people suffered from many invasions from the Turkish forces but they managed to beat them off and survive. The people of the balkans and greece were not so lucky.
Yes there are still people who are descendents of kossaks, those who have survived the soviet purges of the last 80 years.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
February 17, 2010 05:27
Dmitriy knows history, comparing to Pomeransev, no more
Than a criminally insane, comparing to his attending doctor,
Which trying to help the mediocre Russia to repent and to go
To a better future with neighbors, her creators and protectors.

Neither Russia wish return to victims stolen land and homes,
Nor pay for its centuries of crimes, nor even modestly repent.
Opposite is true - the Ukraine and CIS nations Dignity dworfs
Their imperio-ambitions - so they reliese vindictive agly ment.

The article is not "nonsence", thought weak in eyes of locals,
Who really suffered under Russian occupation more than us,
Russian and non-Russian strangers among those in a focus,
Affraid express their language, or fillings under Russian bust.

Russia colonized and still do, sabotaging Ukraine South-Eest
And claiming it as Russia, usurping Ukraine WW2 contribution.
Taking not "Scotland" but China, not "Weles" but Canada, if list
Dmitriy's example, if Ukrainians are Indians? By what Institution?

By what institution are Papua "White" and Sarmatians "Indians"?
The only advantage Russian language have is grammar reform
That Georgians did by Peter the First, nephew of Georgian King,
Russia Denied Ukraine, while censoring Georgian by agly forms.

Konstantin.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
February 17, 2010 06:25
Is Unknown in so deep cover, that he affraid invent a pseudonim?
If Rick so rich, as many Russians, plagiarizing my property, that lies,
He might hire a history teacher, to lie more presentably on this podium.
Russia didn't liberate anybody, still usurping CIS effords since old times.

Varangians killed Skifians in Ukraine, last 150 thousands with their King
Received political shelter in Georgia and became one of its best Citizens.
Genocide by Varangia against white Tartars brought to South-East wing
Tataro-Mongols, later Turks that Ukrainian Kossaks resisted to the end.

Boris right, it were many alliences. Russia always betrayed all its allies,
As agreement between Georgian King, his nephew Peter and Latvians
That required Russia, built by its neighbors, shear created resources
To restore and mantain Integrity of Eastern Europeans and Asians.

All mentioned wars were combined compaigns of Eastern Europe
And Central Asia, while Russia that usurped the Peters "pushkas",
And subcequently squized out allied nations and influxed Rushkas.
Ukrainian Kossak is not Russian Sam and Gad, coarsed by Jacob.

They were even less loyal to Czar of Ruissia than Terek's Chechens,
Relocated and forced serve Russia, as were Kossaks of Hmelnitckiy.
Also Caucasian-White nations have make-up clearer that of Russians.
Ukraine was Karpatia, Skifo-Sarmatia plus Medians-Guns-Caucasians...

Konstantin.

by: Yuri from: Winnipeg
February 22, 2010 04:47
To Dmitriy.

I have never heard of Ukrainians being described as chauvinistic before. Many times I have heard of Russians being described this way and rightly so. Russians can have a feeling of superiority towards their neighbours. A Russian chauvinist does not respect its neighbours' languages, religions, cultures and traditions and imposes their own upon them. Chauvinism is invasive and agressive.

If you meant to say nationalism, then that's a separate thing. Ukrainian nationalism does exist. Unfortunately, in today's society, nationalism has been wrongly and intentionally misinterpreted.

A Ukrainian nationalist is one that has a deep love for their nation and people and acts upon these emotions for the betterment of his people. They work in the interest of their nation and are willing to fight to protect and preserve what has been given to them by God any passed down by their ancestors.

You make it sound like Ukrainians took over Lviv.

Yes, before the Second World War Lviv had significant Jewish and Polish populations. During the war, Jews were taken by Nazi's never to return. After the war, borders were redrawn, Ethnic Poles were resettled into present-day
Poland and ethnic Ukrainians were resettled into present-day Ukraine. This was agreed upon by the ruling communist governments at the time.

I found a demographic chart of the city of Lviv in 1959. Ukrainians made up 60% of the population. Russians 27%, Jews 6%, Poles 4%. Ukrainians went from 16% to 60%. Ukrainians didn't come from afar but from the surrounding villages. Russians went from 0% or 1% to 27%!!! Russian colonialism at work.

Latest Commentary

No records found for this widget:963

More Commentary

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (6 total)

Saleem: If successive Pakistani governments have failed to deal with the 'Balochistan problem' then ... More

UN Rights Chief Scathing On Syria

Latest Comment (2 total)

Chechen: "Moscow also has had a deal since 1971 with Syria "
Sorry that was ... More

U.K. Releases Radical Cleric On Bail

Latest Comment (1 total)

Martin : Modern Europe has deteriorated to such grotesque that its end has to be ... More