map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

"World Changing Radio"

CNN International reports on RFE/RL's role in Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution, and its continuing mission to spread free media More
More Articles

Commentary

In The Balkans, The Newspapers Tell The Story

Serbia's ''Politika'' -- accustomed to governing

January 02, 2009
By Nenad Pejic
The children at one Sarajevo kindergarten were waiting excitedly a few days ago for Grandfather Frost to drop by with gifts and treats, as he had done for the last 50 years. But the school's director, Arzija Mahmutovic, was having none of it.

"You have to understand," she said on local television, "Muslims do not want Grandfather Frost because he has never existed in the tradition of Bosniaks...." So, instead of Grandfather Frost, Auntie New Year appeared and the kids got their goodies.

Other Sarajevo schools, though, continued to welcome Grandfather Frost, and he even participated in a demonstration on the capital's main avenue. "Grandfather Frost is an international, apolitical symbol," Sanel Huskic, who played the role at the demonstration, said. "People are attempting to further divide the citizens of Bosnia-Herzegovina along ethnic lines by kicking Grandfather Frost out of the kindergartens. We need to learn to be more tolerant. Anyone who wants Grandfather Frost should be able to have him."

How can someone like Grandfather Frost be transformed into a divisive figure? And why are important issues forgotten amid squabbling over who should hand out treats to children? The arguments about Grandfather Frost, on both sides, really have nothing to do with this tradition and everything to do with the endless discussion of history, the never-ending story of the Balkans.

Looking Behind The Titles

Just a glance at the titles of some of the main newspapers in the region is enough to demonstrate why these countries remain divided even as they search for their true identities. The main daily in Macedonia is "New Macedonia," reflecting the country's struggle for recognition. After all, Greece blocked Macedonia's NATO membership bid last year over the long-standing dispute between the two over Macedonia's name. Bulgaria is still offering Bulgarian passports to any Macedonian citizen. Serbia does not recognize the Macedonian Orthodox Church. And so on.

A bit to the west, the main daily in Montenegro is "Victory." Montenegrins pride themselves on being citizens of the first recognized state in Balkan history -- their 1878 independence from the Ottoman Empire having been achieved by the valor of its military. In Bosnia, the main newspaper is "Liberation." The country has always been controlled by outsiders -- either the Ottomans or the Habsburgs or, in the postwar period, by Tito's Yugoslavia. Identity is a problem there too.

In Kosovo, the leading paper is "Rebirth." Ethnic Albanians there have long cherished the dream of seeing their nation reborn. They were the first to settle the Balkan Peninsula and have been systematically pushed back ever since.

In Serbia, identity has never been an issue -- or so most Serbs think. They think in terms of governing rather than being governed and so their main daily is simply called "Politics." The main paper in Croatia -- a country that has always thought of itself as belonging more to Europe than the Balkans -- is just "News." Further north, Slovenia has always been a communications crossroads. People there could watch Austrian and Italian television even in communist times and even back then they found ways to adopt Western ways of doing things. Their main daily now is "Work."

This list of newspapers, then, from the south through the Balkans to the northwest is impressive and speaks volumes -- "New Macedonia," "Victory," "Rebirth," "Liberation," "Politics," "News," and "Work." With the exception of Slovenia, these countries are all still overshadowed to some extent by their pasts. They have no capacity for leaving history to the historians.

Nenad Pejic is an associate director of broadcasting at RFE/RL. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 2
by: Ariana from: Independent Kosovo
January 15, 2009 19:44
Honestly guys, you're so obsessed as to who settled in first. Yes, they were Albanians. Asia Minor??? Come on, you must really have a deep knowledge to enter this site and read it. Otherwise, there are plenty of nationalistic sites where you can express your views. Settled or stolen, Kosovo will never ever be under Serbia again. So get used to it.

by: Ivo
January 13, 2009 11:07
Betsy, BREAKING NEWS: the fact that he wrote it doesn't mean it's true. And even if it were true it hardly matters. The Balkans have been populated since prehistory with all sorts of peoples.

by: Betsy from: Texas
January 09, 2009 19:45
Mr. Pejic, Thank you for writing that ethnic Albanians were the first in Balkans. It's nice to finally see a writer with the courage to tell the truth without backing down to the serb bullies. I've found the Albanian people to be the most brave, the most hospitable, and the most proud in my travels to the Balkans....with the Croats a close second and the Bosnians third. :-)

by: Pavle from: DC
January 09, 2009 17:48
An interesting way of looking at the region! My only complaint is chronological, not political-- how accurate is the correlation between headlines and "national sentiment," when some of these papers were named decades ago? Eg, "Politika" was founded in 1904... how accurately can the title reflect the cares of contemporary Serbian society?

by: Ivo
January 05, 2009 16:17
Ah, yes, the Bulgarians (or as Trayko prefers 'Bulgars') are such racists that they were the first country to recognize the Republic of Macedonia and then continued to back that country during the blockades by its neighbours AND despite the not-always-friendly (to put it mildly) towards Bulgaria attitude of its leaders.

And I long stopped reading Nenad Pejic's articles.

by: Marco from: NY
January 05, 2009 12:43
To AO KS:

Mr. Pejic is not Serbian, he is Croat..about 30 seconds worth of googling revealed that..As an employee of RFE (since '93) he's receiving his paychecks from the Pentagon (and their views are plain). This article is full of utter nonsense, as other posters have already revealed.Even his most basic "facts" are simply, undisputably, wrong..Not to mention that trying to derive some useful political or historical insight from the names of a few hand-picked newspaper names reminds me of something a senile old grandfather might mutter to himself while sitting in his rocking chair. If I were mr. pejic I'd be ashamed to associate myself with such drivel.

by: Edvin
January 03, 2009 09:22
Oslobodjenje or "Liberation" was founded in 1943 as an anti-Nazi newspaper and was named newspaper of the year of Yugoslavia more than once. The title has nothing to do with Bosnia being controlled by outsiders and it was not controlled by outsiders after WWII. Bosnians were part of the government during Tito's time.

by: J. P. Maher from: Chicago USA
January 03, 2009 03:04
Mr Pejic repeats propaganda on a subject of which he personally knows nothing. The claim of Albanian chauvinists and their sponsors (e.g. Frank Wisner, the ENRON man) to be the first settlers of the Balkans is nonsense. Dr. J. P. Maher
Professor Emeritus of Linguistics
Northeaster Illinois University;
formerly University of Hamburg (Germany).
Scholars of Napoleon’s time used the term “Illyrian” to refer to Serbo-Croatian. In a lecture at the University of Ljubljana in 1990, an ethnic Albanian professor from the University of Pristina demonstrated that Albanian is of northern origin since it shares with Rumanian, and only with Rumanian, a set of some 60 vocabulary items that are not found in other languages of the region.
Competent scholars reject as a political fiction, like Nazidom’s “Aryan” concept, the claim that Albanians are descendants of the aboriginal Balkan people, who were pushed into the Dinaric Alps by waves of Slavic Serb invaders in the 6th Century AD. After the Huns migrated into the Balkans the region was sparsely populated. Greeks and some Hellenized peoples were the immediate predecessors of Slavs in the Balkans, and they themselves had migrated from the north into a land already settled for millennia by pre-Indo-European peoples.
If the ancestors of Albanians weree present in the Balkans classical times, there would be loanword evidence in Greek and Latin. There are no Albanian nor Slavic loan words in Ancient Greek, which however does evidence old contacts with Celts, Scyths, Persians, Semites (Phoenicians) and Egyptians. The Albanian lexicon is full of Greek, Slavic and Latin vocabulary.
Previous to Old European civilizations the Balkans were inhabited by hunting bands, e.g. at Lepenski Vir on the Danube in Serbia. Marija Gimbutas [1921-1994] demonstrated that agricultural “Old European” civilizations go back to 7000 BC in the Balkans. No Indo-European, hence Greeks, Latins or Slavs, above all no Illyrians, no Albanians.
The Albanians occupy part of the former territory of the Illyrians... Albanian is first attested only in the fifteenth century, already having undergone very substantial phonological changes.” [J. P. Mallory and D. Q. Adams, Editors. 1997. Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. London & Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.]. It is most probable that the modern language only recently called “Albanian” and “Sqip” is NOT descended from ancient “Illyrian”.
Indo-European languages are divided into two groups, termed centum-and satem-languages, respectively from the Latin (centum) and Avestan (satem) words for ‘hundred ‘ Ancient Illyrians inscriptions are in a centum-language. Modern Albanian is a satem-language. –Wikipedia has good discursions of these terms. See also

Louis.H. Gray. 1939. Foundations of Language. New York: Macmillan. Professor of Comparative Linguistics in Columbia University NY. (Gray was an expert in the subject.)

J. P. Mallory. 1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans. London & New York: Thames & Hudson.
Marija Gimbutas’s biography and bibliography see Wikipedia

by: Hank from: Australia
January 02, 2009 23:31
Seeing FYROMacedonia as they are Slavic tribe and didn't move into the region until a thousand years after Alexander the Great they share about as much in common with ancient Macedonians as an average American today shares with a native Americans. Greeks are the primary ethnic/cultural descendants. Fifty two percent of ancient Macedonia is already in Greece and there are more Macedonians(Greeks) in Greece than in the entire country of FYROM.
Greece is protecting its ethic/heritage/cultural rights.

by: Jasmine
January 02, 2009 22:21
Nenad, you are an insult to anyone who knows anything.
First of, Nova Makedonija is not the "main" daily paper as you claim. Rather, perhaps the fifth or sixth in line.
As for your attempt to establish some kind of historical perspective of who came first to the Balkans, it was very poorly done, almost idiotic.
The Albanians came from Asia Minor. Today, the Albanians and the tribes in Asia Minor are the only people who for centuries practice 'eye for an eye' - blood revenge. Most Albanians presently live in Greece and Albania.
Ask Theodoros Pangalos, he is Albanian.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 2
TEXT SIZE - +

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile