Tuesday, February 14, 2012


Features

Iraq's Turkomans Feel New Political Strength

Iraq's Turkoman minority has become increasingly vocal in demanding recognition since the fall of Saddam Hussein.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Charles Recknagel, Muhammad Tahir
The Turkomans themselves express it best. Outside of Iraq, they say, people know about Sunnis, Shi'a, and Kurds. But almost nothing is known about the ethnically Turkic minority known as the Turkomans.

Now, in the wake of the March 7 parliamentary elections, Iraq's Turkoman community is determined to change that picture.

In the elections, the Turkomans -- the second-largest group in northern Iraq after the Kurds -- mostly allied with the nationalist Al-Iraqiyah list of former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi.

The alliance proved surprisingly successful. Five Turkoman candidates running with Al-Iraqiyah won local elections in Kirkuk and Mosul and will represent their community in the Baghdad legislature. That compares with just one Turkoman deputy in the previous legislature elected in 2005.

Now, Turkoman political leaders say, they plan to make their voice heard in the capital. And they say the neck-and-neck finish between the two front-running lists in the election gives them the chance to do it.

Orhan Ketene, an analyst and former Washington spokesman for the Iraq Turkoman Front, says that the Turkomans' five deputies give "a critical balance" to Al-Iraqiyah, because the difference between Al-Iraqiyah and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's State of Law bloc is only two deputies.

"So, the [Turkomans] have five deputies, and if they pull out, Al-Iraqiyah will fall into second place and al-Maliki will be in first place," Ketene says. "So, they have a very delicate balancing role."

The Turkoman deputies hope to be part of an Iyad Allawi-led government.
In other words, the Turkomans join the list of potential kingmakers in Baghdad -- a position they have never held before.

Coalition Calculus

It is a position they share with several other, larger ethnic or sectarian groupings that are currently not tied to either of the two front-running parties. Those include the Kurdistan Alliance and the Shi'ite religious parties' Iraqi National Alliance.

All these players are currently negotiating hard in Baghdad to form a bloc large enough to get a parliamentary majority. The first chance to propose a ruling coalition goes to Allawi's Al-Iraqiyah, as the narrow election winner. But there is nothing to rule out either defections among allies or new partnerships in bargaining that most observers expect will take months before a new government emerges.

Ketene says the Turkomans have two aims: "Their main aim is to preserve the unity of the country and, particularly, they would like to save Kirkuk from being included in the [Kurdish] northern autonomous region."

That goal, he says, is endorsed by both Allawi and Maliki. Whichever of the two leaders takes the strongest position on Kirkuk, he adds, is the one the Turkomans will follow.

In addition to the five Turkoman Al-Iraqiyah deputies, at least another two Turkoman candidates won parliamentary seats in alliances with Shi'ite religious parties. The two groups of Turkoman deputies can be expected to make common cause over the Turkomans' basic demands.

Fighting Over Kirkuk

The Turkomans' rising political strength highlights what many analysts believe could ultimately be Iraq's toughest hurdle on the way to future stability. That is, how to find a successful power-sharing arrangement in multiethnic, multilingual northern Iraq that can survive the withdrawal of U.S. forces.

In one measure of the challenge, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, General Ray Odierno, last month reportedly proposed keeping one combat brigade in Kirkuk beyond Washington's August deadline for withdrawing combat troops.

At stake in northern Iraq is oil, and the divided city of Kirkuk is at the heart of the tensions. The Kurdish regional government wants to bring Kirkuk and surrounding Tamim Province into its self-rule region, claiming it as the Iraqi Kurds' natural and historic capital.

Iraq's demographics present a puzzle.
The Turkomans, along with Kirkuk's Arab minority, adamantly oppose that, with the Turkomans also claiming the city as their historic cultural center.

"So far, no document has ever been found indicating Kirkuk is a Kurdish region. In all historical documents, Kirkuk has been recorded as a Turkoman city," says Muzaffer Arslan, the adviser to the Iraqi president on Turkoman affairs.

Federalism Versus Separatism


"The Kurdish claim is connected with the energy resources of Kirkuk," he adds. "In case of any independent Kurdish state in northern Iraq, everybody knows this energy would be their only economic resource for maintaining their independence. Therefore, they are struggling to include Kirkuk within their boundaries."

Those, of course, are fighting words in Iraq and the neighboring region, where the question of whether the Kurds intend to secede from Iraq is hotly debated. But such statements help to position the Turkomans as champions of Iraq's national unity and as the natural ally of both Allawi and Maliki, who campaigned as nationalist leaders.

Arslan, who is a Turkoman advising President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, is on the front line of the sometimes violent rivalry between northern Iraq's two largest ethnic groups. He and other Turkoman leaders are pressing for a "special status" for Kirkuk as an alternative to either incorporating it into the Kurdish autonomous region or maintaining the current tense status quo.

One model proposed in recent years has been a so-called Brussels arrangement, where political power in the city is shared according to a quota system between its communities.

"Yes, this proposal was published many years ago in a newspaper, describing the Brussels model as a suitable solution for Kirkuk," Arslan says. "Frankly speaking, we are not against it. If there would be a healthy system in place, why not? The most important thing is, the administration of Kirkuk shouldn't belong to a single ethnic group."

A True Count


But if the Turkomans see the Brussels model as an alternative, a long fight looms ahead. Kurdish parties, which have at least 57 deputies in the new parliament, are expected to press hard for a referendum in northern Iraq to settle Kirkuk's future status.

Kirkuk continues to be one of the more dangerous cities in Iraq.
The referendum would be in accordance with Article 140 of the Iraqi Constitution, which originally set a date of no later than the end of 2007 for the poll. The Kurds want to set a new date, while the Turkomans and many nationalist politicians in Iraq say the expiration of the deadline means Article 140 should be null and void.

What all sides agree is needed to solve just about any question in northern Iraq is a census to resolve the many claims and counterclaims about which community holds a majority where.

Previous censuses conducted every 10 years during the Saddam Hussein era are hopelessly unreliable because of efforts at the time to "Arabize" northern Iraq. That included registering Kurds and Turkomans as Arabs, as well as the forced settlement of Arabs from other parts of Iraq in the region.

But all sides also know that conducting a fair census today in northern Iraq's tense atmosphere is all but impossible. In a reflection of those tensions, Baghdad exempted Tamim Province from provincial elections in 2009 for fear they might spark violence. Kirkuk's provincial parliament is still disputed, after Arabs and Turkomans largely stayed away from the first provincial election in 2005, handing the Kurds a majority.

History Intertwined With Iraq

Perhaps the only certainty to emerge now with the Turkomans' strong showing in last month's national elections is that the community will be emboldened to organize further.

The Turkomans trace their presence in Iraq to ancient times. Historical documents show Arab rulers of northern Iraq brought Turkic fighters into the region soon after the Islamic conquest to bolster their forces. That was in line with the long-standing tradition of so-called "slave soldiers" -- soldiers who in many cases went on to usurp a ruler's power for themselves.

At the time of the Seljuk conquests, many more Turkic tribes moved south from Central Asia into modern Iran, Iraq, and Turkey. The tribes, from the Oghuz branch of the Turks, shared similar cultures and languages and many of those ties survive to this day.

Iraq's Turkomans -- whose language is close to Azeri -- mostly live in northeastern Iraq, where they enjoyed a privileged status under the Ottoman Empire.

Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey claimed the oil-rich area around Mosul partly on the basis of the historic presence of a Turkic population. Instead, the area was included in British-mandate Iraq, whose authorities portrayed the Turkomans as distinct from the people of Turkey.

Since 2003, the Turkomans have emerged from decades of cultural suppression and now have their own language schools and a television station. Their activities receive some cultural and economic support from Turkey but no financial support from Baghdad.

There is no accurate estimate of the Turkoman population. Ketene puts it at some 3 million but says the true strength of the Turkoman community in Iraq has yet to be determined. That is because Turkomans not only exist in northern Iraq but historically also migrated to parts of central and southern Iraq, where they mixed with Arab tribes. He says these mixed tribes, which today speak Arabic, still feel a sense of separate identity.

"The [Turkoman] population is not only in Kirkuk or Mosul or Diyala, it is also in central Iraq, western Iraq, with the tribes of the Karagulis and Bayats," Ketene says. "But right now these are unused resources; they are dormant."

How much the Turkomans can organize politically across Iraq remains to be seen. It is something that is likely to be closely watched by Iraq's better-known communities -- the Shi'ite and Sunni Arabs and Kurds -- and now, perhaps, by many who are just beginning to learn of the Turkomans as well.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Zoltan from: Hungary
April 01, 2010 15:32
It is interesting that Turkoman language have survived despite of living as a minority among mainly Arabic and Kurdish population.

For example the Mamluks in Egypt have lost their Turkic identity and language and assimilated into the majority Arabic population.

It is also interesting that while the Mongol-Turkic invaders in the Ilkhanid Persia have also assimilated and lost their own language the Turks have prevailed in Anatolia over the original Greek population.
Although I guess the Azeris living in Noth-Western Iran and in the Republic of Azerbaijan are the descendants of those nomadic Turkic invaders.

The Turkish victory in Anatolia was also in a sharp contrast with the final failure of the Turkic Golden Horde in Eastern-Europe. The Golden Horde was unable to assimilate the original Slavic population.
In Response

by: AG from: Baku
April 01, 2010 18:23
Dear Zoltan,

I think there are some disputes among historians regarding ethnic roots of Mamluks. Some believe that they were not of Turkic origin but hailed from Northern Caucasus indigineous tiribes i.e. chechens, ingushs, avars, dargins... who always held high ranking positions in Muslim Armies since Caliphate as mercenaries or recruits and they were just ruling elite in Egypt and never comprised majority of population

What is amazing that Ilkhanids or Mongols of Hulaku Ulus always regarded as invaders in the oral tradition of local seljuki or oghuz turks of Azerbaijan while ruling elites even 300 years later tried to proof their connections to Chengiz in order to legitimize right of power.

But in the oral tradition of some local indigineous Caucasus speaking minorities like for example "rutuls" who live in the North of Azerbaijan azeris are still called "mogols".



In Response

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
April 02, 2010 08:36
Hi AG,

it is interesting what you say. I know another language called 'mogol' or 'mogholi' which is spoken in Afghanistan.

It is a language close to original mongolian. I know about this language because it was researched also by the Hungarian orientalist Lajos Ligeti before the WWII.

Ligeti was searching for remains of Mongolian heritage in Afghanistan. He found that the Hazara people despite of their look alike a Mongolian their language does not related to Mongolian.

And while he was searching he found this small population called 'mogols'.
In Response

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
April 02, 2010 08:45
That is an interesting question whether the 'victory' of a language requires a majority of a population.

This is what I wrote in a comment at the previous article:

" The history and language of Turkic people is especially interesting for me as a Hungarian.

As you probably know Hungarians came from the region of the Ural mountains in present Russia. And although we speak a Finno-Ugric language the nomad ancestors of us spent so much time among Turkic tribes that our language are filled with many Turkic words.

Like father and mother in Hungarian is:
- apa
- anya

Almost the same as in Turkish.


Historical migration of people is also an interesting question. For example the migrating population of Hungarians around 895. when they arrived to the region currently occupied by Hungarians were inhabited mostly by Slavic population. The original population was much bigger than the invading Hungarians but despite of this finally Hungarian became the main language.

But as an opposite case the Bulghars who were a Turkic tribe from the region of Volga river from the present Tatar Republic of Russia are migrated to the lower Danube region of the present Republic of Bulgaria.

But although the Bulghars originally spoken a Turkic language they assimilated into the Slavic population which inhabited that land.

It is an interesting question why a specific language prevails or fails in such circumstances. "
In Response

by: Halil
April 01, 2010 21:06
I think they do not speak original Turkmen at all, I am not sure if Turkoman and Turkmen represent the same national identity. But the ones in Iraq feel that they are Turks more than Turkmens in Central Asia. It is the same in their culture.
In Response

by: SMHaroian from: United States
April 01, 2010 21:45
The Turks prevailed over the original inhabitants of Anatolia through a direct policy of genocide, discrimination, and persecution. The modern republic was built on the blood of those indigenous inhabitants. Keep that in mind when labeling it a "Turkish victory".

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
April 02, 2010 13:09
Dear SMHaroian,

partially you are right. But this "who came first" mentality leads nowhere.

Every nation and every country throughout the world have predecessors on its land. It is no use about talking "indigenous inhabitants" as there are no indigenous inhabitants in this world.

People in history used to move from one place to another. This is how the homo sapiens conquered the whole world.

If I follow your logic than every nation outside of Africa have "stolen" its land from other species.
The homo neanderthalensis could say to us "go back to Africa".

Of course one can state that Armenians were there earlier than Turks. But does this matter anyway?

Hungarians were coming to their current land 1000 years ago. Should we go back to the Ural? Do we usurp the land in Central-Europe?

Or one can have a look at the USA. A country which is made by European immigrants (simultaniously with the almost total extermination of indigenous population)

So I honestly see this mentality absolutely pointless.

People should live in peace with each other. And put aside their historical grievances which results nothing but poisons the everyday life.
In Response

by: AG from: Baku
April 02, 2010 22:31
Dear Zoltan,

When I was young and first heard songs of Hungarian pop group Chengiz khan on TV I was a little bit confused. I did not understand anything but emphasys and intonation were so close to turkic that I sat before the TV and tried to understand something because I was sure that I was feeling this language.

Also I know that the Hungary has one the best Turkology or Altaic studies schools in the World.


All the best,
AG
In Response

by: AG from: Baku
April 06, 2010 06:27
Dear Zoltan,

I am sorry but I mixed up things. I forgot the name of Hungarian pop band which was very popular in early 80-s. (it is certainly not Chengiz khan which is German group)

Best,
AG


by: Akz from: Kirkuk
April 03, 2010 07:18
What a one-sided and biased article! Whatever happened to good-old professioanl and balanced reporting. In this article, we heard what the Turkomens are demanding, but what about the Arabs and the Kurds? The authors should have bothered to interview all sides and report the whole story, not just one side of the story.

And one othe thing, with 3 million people, you could get at least 20 parliamentary seats.

by: Babagurgur from: Europe
April 04, 2010 20:53
I am afraid that you got some information from members of the Iraqi Turkmen Front which is financed and administered directly by Turkish authorities and prefere the Turkish interests. They get huge finans from Turkey and they considers themself the only legal representative of the Iraqi Turkmen. The Turkmen members in the former Iraqi parliament was 9, but in the new elected parliament is 7.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Officials: Tymoshenko Rejects Health Check

Latest Comment (1 total)

rick: Stealing Popcorn Part 1

http://youtu.be/GHLrf652yRk

Stealing Popcorn Part 2

http://youtu.be/mNZGrq06PnI

Stealing Popcorn Part 3

http://youtu.be/TqaObLs7baA

Stealing Popcorn ... More

Reports: Assault On Homs Continues

Latest Comment (3 total)

eli: As opposed to Russia and China, who could do something about it and ... More

Three Police Killed In Caucasus Clash

Latest Comment (1 total)

Marko: The use of the word Russian is clearly inaccurate in more than one ... More