map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Caucasus Report

Is A Formal Karabakh Peace Agreement Within Reach?

Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian (right) greets OSCE Minsk Group co-Chairman Matthew Bryza in Yerevan.

July 08, 2009
The French, Russian, and U.S. co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group arrived in Yerevan on July 8 for new talks on resolving the Karabakh conflict. It is their fourth visit to the region this year, and could pave the way for a further meeting later this month between the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan, who met in late January in Switzerland, in early May in Prague, and in early June in St. Petersburg.

Whether and to what extent the prospects for signing at least a preliminary accord on resolving the conflict have improved in recent months remains unclear, however.

Speaking on July 4 on Russia's Vesti TV channel, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev implied that the crucial issue of the future status of the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh republic could remain undecided for decades.

"As regards the question of Nagorno-Karabakh's status, a mechanism for a provisional status could be agreed in the first stage [of the peace process], while the issue of the final status will be solved only when the parties agree on that," Aliyev said. "This could happen in one year, in 10 years, in 100 years, or this could never happen. Time will tell."

Aliyev also insisted that the final status will fall short of independence. "We naturally don't see a possibility of Nagorno-Karabakh's existence as an independent state," he said. "Azerbaijan will never agree to that, and we think that the Armenian side understands this. At the same time, the Armenian side reckons that the level of self-rule that exists in Nagorno-Karabakh must be maintained."

The so-called Madrid Principles for resolving the conflict that the Minsk Group co-chairs presented to the Armenian and Azerbaijani foreign ministers in November 2007 are believed to make provision for "a referendum or popular vote" at some unspecified future date on the status of Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan's constitution, however, does not permit a referendum on the territorial-administrative structure of the country.

The decision on Nagorno-Karabakh's future permanent legal status would, moreover, be made only after the consequences of the conflict have been addressed, meaning, after Armenian forces withdraw from seven districts of Azerbaijan contiguous to Nagorno-Karabakh that they occupied between 1991 and 1994.

Aliyev said on July 4 that five of the seven districts would be liberated at the first stage of implementing the peace agreement, while the Lachin Corridor and Kelbacar would revert to Azerbaijani control five years later.

The Madrid, or Basic Principles, however, take into consideration Armenia's insistence on an internationally guaranteed overland link between the Nagorno-Karabakh republic and the Republic of Armenia, and to that end envisage "special modalities" for the Lachin Corridor, which constitutes such a link, and for Kelbacar, which lies between Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia. Specifically, the Basic Principles provide for the deployment of an international peacekeeping force and for "international and bilateral security guarantees and assurances."

Up till now, Armenia has been reluctant to withdraw unconditionally from Kelbacar. Former Armenian President Robert Kocharian's reluctance to consider such a withdrawal until shortly before the envisaged referendum on Karabakh's future status is believed to have been one of the main reasons why he and Aliyev failed to reach a formal peace agreement in 2006.

A further potential obstacle to a breakthrough is Azerbaijan's refusal to condone the return to the negotiating table of Karabakh representatives. The online daily zerkalo.az on July 8 quoted President Aliyev as telling visiting Armenian dignitaries on July 3 that the current format of peace talks is perfectly adequate, and that the inclusion of representatives of the Armenian and former Azerbaijani communities of Nagorno-Karabakh would disrupt it.

Nagorno-Karabakh republic President Bako Sahakian for his part told visiting OSCE Chairwoman in Office Dora Bakoyannis in Yerevan last week that it will remain impossible to reach a comprehensive solution to the conflict unless or until the Nagorno-Karabakh republic returns to the negotiating table as a full-fledged participant to the peace talks.

Despite those obstacles, the Minsk Group co-chairs remain cautiously optimistic. U.S. co-Chairman Matthew Bryza told Reuters late last month that the co-chairs hope that Aliyev and Sarkisian will "agree conceptually" on the broad outlines of the peace agreement when they meet in mid-July.

Bryza said the parties would then go line by line through the 3 1/2 pages of text to agree the fine details. "Once that happens, which we the co-chairs are shooting for by the end of the year, then we could say, it would be true, that a framework agreement has been reached," Bryza added.

-- Liz Fuller and Emil Danielyan
This forum has been closed.
     
Comments
by: Andrey Rankov from: Armenia
July 14, 2009 16:33

I think, mediators trying tօ “settle” the Karabakh conflict for their own hand only.
So named “Basic principles” are openly anti-Armenian as they require Armenians to hand over the security area around Karabakh to the Azerbaijan without anything in return (Uncertain, temporary and delayed status of the NKR described in the "principles" is something, which Karabakh people enjoys now already.)
But such a biased & anti-Armenian “principles” just looks like the Azeri-sided ones. They are strongly inspired by Azerbaijan’s oil contracts with the western countries and recent gas contract with the Gazprom, Russia. So these unscrupulous “principles” (as it is amoral even to find conceivable that Karabakh people may live in Azerbaijan, where anti-Armenian pogroms are common & non-punishable occurence in fact) are not a liberal gift to Azerbaijan, but a very costly purchase made by the latter. And Azerbaijan will have to pay for it during the broad term in the future by its petrodollars, which will flow now into the pockets of the western & Russian oil-barons and policians, but not of the Azeri people.
It is noteworthy that the imposed mechanism of Karabakh conflict resolution (actually, it is ceding of Armenian territories as a payment for Azerbaijani oil & gas delivered to the West & Russia) does not provide a final assignment of Karabakh to any of conflict parties until the last drop of oil and last cubic centimeter of gas will be derived from Azerbaijani reserves.
Obviously, at that time, when Azerbaijan will lose its significance as an oil-exporter, even a moral component of Karabakh conflict - the requirement to provide a basic right of Karabakh people on self-determination - may prevail for mediators.
Thus, only the OECD sharks, which are situated far from the Caucasus, will enjoy the advantages from implementation of “Madrid principles”. And there is nothing else left to do than to wonder how implementation of these vicious “principles” may come true.
Or may be not? As according to them, Armenians will receive nothing at all even formally, and Azeri actually will receive only on the areas surrounding the NKR but at the price, which is higher than if Azerbaijan will conduct the same transaction with Armenia directly and without any mediators.

by: Mr.Cool from: Nagorno Karabakh
July 11, 2009 01:41
Mr.Reality From Turkey.

Your analysis about Nagorno Karabakh Republic and Armenia is wrong. when Azerbaijan started total war on Armenians they lost even with the full strenght of Azeri Army. Armenia now is militarily and morally and legally more stronger to defend itself. Azeri petrol will not help you in the war, the opposit is true and Azerbaijan will pay Trillions for that and for damages.
In case of poor Turkey, it is lost between East and West, Kurds , Cypryots and Armenians have all serious claims against Turkey, because Turkish governments for last 100 year has been a hired criminal puppets will do what it has been told for money or land, but now the Turkish government thinks it is a supper power in the region and helping Azerbaijan for war. therefor Any war in the region will be the responsibility of Azerbaijan and it is nothing to do with Azeri land.

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
July 10, 2009 20:51
Democrat, certainly Nagorno Karabakh is not an independent country but of integral part of Armenia.

Even in 1988. Armenians on both side tried to cede NK from Azerbaijan and join to Armenia.

So you think Nagorno Karabakh has no right to become independent?

What is the difference between the story of independence of Kosovo - which is inhabited by Albanians who also have another separate state - and Nagorno Karabakh?

Independence of Kosovo is accepted moreover supported by your government. Why do you use double standards then?

If Kosovo was allowed to secede Serbia then Karabakh is also should be allowed to determine their own future.

And the future of Karabakh lies outside of Azerbaijan.

Certainly Azerbaijan is allowed to begin a second war but I have to remark your attention that if they do that it is sure that the Russian Federation will intervene as it is an ally of the chistian Armenia and Azerbaijan have to face not only with the forces of Armenia but the whole Russian army.

And the Georgian lesson is showed that even the most developed western type army is useless against the outnumbered if even aging Russian armed forces.

If Azerbaijan attacks Karabakh Russian tanks will cruise on the streets of Baku soon...

by: Mr Reality from: australia
July 10, 2009 12:55
In the last 15 years armenia has become almost bankrupt. it has no major industries and is trying to hold onto land it stole through aggression against the Azerbaijani people. In stark contrast to the armenian situation the Azerbaijani's have been enjoying great posperity through its oil reserves. It has been equipping its military with the latest modern equipment and has been trained by a highly experience turkish military that is training the Azerbaijani's to nato standards. the azeri's military budget is about the same as the armenian GNP. If the armenians fail to agree to the handing back of occupied territories, the azeri's will take it back very soon and i'm sure they wont stop at the border with armenia. they will take the part of armenia that separates the azeri's from turkey. Believe me this will happen. the europeans know this and they dont want a war that will disrupt their energy supplies and any projects that will supply them with energy in the near future, so they are putting pressure on the armenians to agree to the azeri's demands. the americans dont want the azeri's to enter a war for several reasons. the americans have reduced their financial assistance to armenia and have stopped any financial assistance to NK, so i think you can see where the international comunity stands in regards to preventing the imminent war. the armenians have no choice but to hand it back and very quickly. if the armenians heed the warning signs and smarten up they will be rewarded by keeping all of armenia proper and allowed direct access to the largest industrialized economy in the region (turkey) and they have the possibility of being included into several lucrative projects in that region. so the choice is hand back the azeri lands they are occuping or face loosing lands inside armenia. just think realisticly who will stop the azeri's once hostilities start

by: NINO from: Nagorno Karabakh Republic
July 10, 2009 11:40
MR or MRs Democrat from USA. Do not give your opinion from USA about Armenians. come and talk to us in Nagorno Karabakh Republic so you will see the evidence and the truth of the matter.

by: Democrat from: USA
July 10, 2009 06:24
Nagorno Karabakh is an ITEM IN NATIONAL BUDGET OF Armenia. No joke. Nagorno Karabakh is included into the national budget of Armenia; Armenian military recruits serve in Nagorno Karabakh in the military units, which Armenia keeps there, Nagorno Karabakh uses the currency of Armenian republic, its president Robert Kocharian resigns from the "presidency" of Nagorno Karabakh and becomes the elected president of Armenian republic, then he is replaced by another politician from the "independent republic" of Nagorno Karabakh - Serge Sargsyan. But of course, this does not mean that Nagorno Karabakh is not independent. Who are you trying to kid? History has seen many "Nagorno Karabakhs" which had been created by occupying countries, when they did not have the guts to say it openly that they just seized a territory of another country. Manchzhou-Gou - that is what Nagorno Karabakh is. And the more recent example is another "independent" republic in the South Caucasus - Abkhazia. It is also included into the national budget of Russia, it also uses Russian currency, and its borders are protected by the Russian military, but of course it is "independent" just like Nagorno Karabakh.

In 1911 foreign minister of Japan, when asked what to say to the world on the reasons of why Japan wants to capture Korea, he said: "Let us capture territories, we shall always find historians to prove a title to it". With a long tradition of Armenian manipulation of history, i don't think Japanese would need to teach them any lessons. They know. What they don't know is this: Azeris are sick and tired of this and the problem will be addressed, today or tomorrow.

by: ARARAT from: Armenia
July 09, 2009 14:54
Nagorno Karabakh Republic is the only party which matters when it comes to resolving the so called Karabakh Dispute. it is wrong to knock wrong door and expect quick resolution to the matter.

1st- the people of Armenia and NKR are the same and there is no distinction between them, that is first issue must be understood and resolved.

2nd. the Armenian & NKR army are there to hold the cease fire until DURABLE & FINAL solution is made so there is no urgency to remove the army from the disputed areas.

3rd Aliev has lowered his thone but he is still singing the same old Soviet songs which are irrelevant and the whole world knows that.

4th Aliev is still not a genuine partner in the peace process because he still says that Armenian Genocide is a myth, for that Aliev is very lucky that he has an Armenian partner for peace, that is different from Turkey which says it wants to study its history and where it comes from !!

5th. the three hard working Amigos from MINSK negotiators have no control when the dispute will be resolved but they should know by now that the main reason for not resolving the dispute is because lack of trust mainly from Armenian side for the reasons given above. This dipute can not be resolved by unequal promises.

RFE please be kind and give this comment to MINSK negotiators, thank you.
     
TEXT SIZE - +

About This Blog

Written and edited by analyst Liz Fuller, the "Caucasus Report" blog will offer the sort of in-depth analysis that was the hallmark of the "RFE/RL Caucasus Report." It also aims, to borrow a metaphor from Tom de Waal, to act as a smoke-detector, focusing attention on potential conflict situations and crises throughout the region. You can contact Liz at carlsone+rferl.org.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile