Tuesday, February 14, 2012


Commentary

Islam Does Not Imprison Women

A young Afghan woman shows her face in public for the first time after five years of Taliban rule in November 2001. Does the Koran really call for such standards of decency for women?
TEXT SIZE - +
By M. D. Nalapat
Many of those who have not read the Koran (or who have read but misconstrued it) regard the word of God as conveyed to the Prophet Muhammad between 610-632 A.D. as sanctioning such practices as the mandatory wearing of the chador by women, as well as covering the face entirely, in the fashion dictated by the Taliban in Afghanistan.

But this is emphatically not the case. The Koran expounds a gentle, moderate philosophy entirely in keeping with the Almighty's self-depiction as being the essence of graciousness, benevolence, and mercy.

At the time the Koran was revealed in Arabic, the condition of women in the Arabian Peninsula was pitiful. They had become the playthings of males, who would take possession of them in a predatory fashion, and deprive them of wealth, liberty, and very often, their lives. It was only after the Prophet Muhammad received the divine revelations that the condition of women improved substantially, and they were given rights for the first time.

It is therefore ironic that many Western commentators regard as "pure Islam" the Kharijite practices followed by groups such as the Taliban, who claim that Islam legitimizes their policy of forcing women indoors except when absolutely necessary; wearing a chador that covers even the face; depriving women and girls of access to education and employment; making them in effect the chattels of their menfolk. Contrast this with the example of the Prophet Muhammad, who did not hesitate to serve as the employee of a woman, and who gave considerable freedom to the womenfolk in his care.

'True Believers'


Indeed, in the section on women, the Koran is explicit in the moderation and mercy of its message. Consider these lines: "As for those from whom you apprehend infidelity, admonish them, then refuse to share their beds, and finally [if such admonitions do not cause a change in behavior] hit them [gently]. Then, if they obey you, take no further action against them." Contrast this gentle directive with the stoning to death practiced by those who claim to be following "pure" Islam, but in fact are deviating entirely from the word of God as revealed to the Prophet Muhammad.

The Koran teaches the believer to "be good to your parents, to relatives, to orphans, to the needy and the neighbor who is a kinsman and the neighbor who is not related to you," for "God does not like arrogant, boastful people who are miserly." Contrast such teachings with the arrogance of those who claim that they, and they alone, are the only true Muslims.

It is important to note that throughout the Koran, the word "believer" means those who believe in God, rather than more narrowly, those who accept the tenets revealed by Muhammad. Hence the significance of the command: "No believer should kill another believer, unless it be by mistake.... If anyone kills a believer deliberately, his reward shall be eternal hell." Those who are expecting a paradise filled with delights after they carry out acts that extinguish the lives of so many who are God-fearing will find that they have, instead, been sent to an entirely different place, for having ignored the teachings of the Koran.

The Prophet Muhammad was only the last in a series of more than 100,000 prophets who came before him, and whose teachings are therefore valid. Yes, the Koran talks of severe punishment, but only for the man "who denies God, His angels, His Scriptures, His messengers, and the Last Day." The plural form of "scriptures" and "messengers" need to be noted, as they show that the Koran referred to believers in God in general, rather than only to those who became known as Muslims.

If a contrary picture has emerged of the teachings of the Koran, the reason is the higher decibel level of those who seek to impose on the rest of the Muslim Umma a code of behavior drained of the divine qualities of benevolence, compassion, graciousness, and mercy. Why so many scholars in the West considered such misguided individuals to be votaries of a "pure" Islam is a mystery.

In what follows, the teachings of the Koran will be examined in the context of the efforts of some Kharijites to impose severe restrictions on the rights of women in the name of Islam. They claim that the dress code imposed by the Taliban in Afghanistan conforms to the teachings revealed by the Prophet Muhammad.

True Qualities Of Islam

However, the truth is quite different. All that the Koran enjoins is that women "should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments what [must ordinarily] appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty" to males, except to certain categories of close relatives.

There is not a single admonition to cover the face, or to drape the entire body from head to foot, as is the case when wearing a chador. The sole exception was the Prophet's own wives and daughters, who are enjoined to "cast their outer garments over their persons" so that "they should be known [as wives and daughters of the Prophet] and not molested." This is immediately followed by the words," God is oft-forgiving, most merciful." Indeed, mercy, compassion and benevolence suffuse the Koran.

For those who seek to condemn women to a single color and mode of dress, the Koran has this to say: "O Children of Adam, wear your beautiful apparel at every time and place of prayer," for "We have bestowed raiment upon you to cover your shame, as well as to be an adornment to you." Note that the words are "Children of Adam," and not simply males, as some have argued.

Also, it needs to be borne in mind that on several matters, the Koran is detailed, but not on the question of what precisely constitutes modesty. It is clear that flexibility has been given to the believer to adapt to the circumstances prevailing at different times and in different locations.

The stringent codes of dress and conduct imposed on some societies is alien to the spirit of democracy and enquiry taught in the Koran. A woman does not have to wear a chador to appear modest, nor is wearing one an infallible mark of purity. As for the face veil, it is totally alien to Islam, and harks back to primitive, pre-Islamic practices, as do other restrictions such as the denial of rights to women.

During the past two centuries, there has been a conscious effort to winnow out of the teachings of the Koran the very qualities that qualify the Almighty, whose 99 attributes include Ar-Rahman (The Most Compassionate, Beneficent and Gracious), As-Salam (The Bestower of Peace, the All-Peaceful), Al-Ghaffar (The Forgiver), Ar-Rauf (The Most Kind, The Clement) and Ar-Rahim (The Merciful).

Where are such qualities in the life, the teachings and the deeds of those who by their words and deeds seek to portray Islam as a compassionless faith? Who seek to justify the killing of innocents? For too long have the moderate majority shown indifference in the face of that Kharijite attempt to hijack a great faith. It is time for this majority to wrest back for all believers, male and female alike, the moderation and tolerance that is central to the teachings of Islam.

M. D. Nalapat holds the UNESCO Peace Chair at Manipal University, India. The views expressed in this commentary are his own, and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: Scott from: Prague
February 20, 2010 18:20
What an interesting article, for the first time it gave insight into Koran. This discovery should be publicized to explain the true meaning of Kuran to people like me who live in the west. There are so many misconceptions about Islam.

by: Obvious
February 21, 2010 14:38
Let's see what Koran says about women:

4.34": Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great. "

Of course, you still have a right to your own opinion.

by: Historyscoper from: USA
February 21, 2010 17:52
Sorry, but Islam did little more than codify subjection of women and slavery with its horrible Sharia. Why let Muslim disinfo. artists tell you what Islam is when you can study its hairy 1400-year history free online with the Historyscoper and find out yourself how deep the rabbit hole goes? To get started click http://go.to/islamhistory

by: Muhammad Jameel Ahmed from: Pakistan
February 22, 2010 10:25
Women are the twin halves of men.

The world and all things in it are valuable; but the most valuable thing in the world is a virtuous woman.

The best women are the virtuous; they are the most affectionate to infants, and the most careful of their husband's property.

When a woman performeth the five times of prayer, and fasteth the month of Ramadan, and is chaste, and is not disobedient to her husband, then tell her to enter Paradise by whichever door she liketh.

Verily a great number of women are assembled near my family, complaining of their hubands; and those men who ill-treat their wives do not behave well. He is not of my way who teacheth a woman to stray.

Asma, daughter of Yazid, said, "Victuals were brought to Muhammad, and he put them before some of us women who were present, and said, 'Eat ye.' But notwithstanding we were hungry we said, 'We have no inclination.' Muhammad said, 'O woman! Do not mix hunger with lies.'"

Whoever doeth good to girls, it will be a curtain to him from hell-fire.

Whoever befriendeth two girls till they come of age, will be in the next world along with me, like my two fingers joining each other.

Whoever befriendeth three daughters, or three sisters, and teacheth them manners, and is affectionate to them, till they come of age, may God apportion Paradise for him.

Whoever hath a daughter, and doth not bury her alive or scold her, or prefer his male children to her, may God bring him into Paradise.

Shall I not point out to you the best of virtues? It is your doing good to your daughter when she is returned to you having been divorced by her husband.

God enjoins you to treat women well, for they are your mothers, daughters, aunts.

The rights of women are sacred. See that women are maintained in the rights assigned to them.

by: Abdulmajid
February 23, 2010 00:44
Islamophobioa is the new fascism, as many comments here illustrate and there is no need for you islamophobes to say you aren't fascists or rightists, for you demonize and dehumanize 1.6 billion human beings, insult them and deny them their right to live, and THAT is fascism. One can very well be a fascist even if he does not wear a Nazi badge. Even, and especially if he or his ancestors have once been victims of fascism themselves. So, to all Islamophobes out there, you are genocidal fascist MORONS, and none of you should EVER come near me or try to touch me. And Islam DOES NOT IMPRISON WOMEN! Patriarchalism does! In traditional Orthodox, Hindu or Chinese or african society women are very much mistreated. In Traditional Hindu society a widow isd forbidden to remarry but must spend teh rest of her days as an unpaid drudge in her husband's family. In China, female babies are killed or femele fetuses are aborted. Islam put a stop to that practice! In Greece, Builgaria, Serbia and Russia you ghave such a hihgh degree of violence against women. And in the West too of course. Female genital mutilation is not an Islamic invention but was practiced even in Ancient Egypt and also exists among Christian Ethiiopians and in many animist societies, very recently the Sheik of l Azhar condemned it as unislamic, afte rseeing a documenrtarays of what its implications are. But the Islamophobes are not fazed by that. Instead they constantly cherry pick the worst aspects of Islam (I don't deny that they exist) and compare them with the best examples of Christianity or whatever, and thus dehumanize and demonize ALL Muslims. One of those IDIOTS even had the nerve of saying that my father-in-law loves and cherishes his daughters DESPITE OF Islam's teachings. Neither I nor anyone in my family has EVER imprisoned our womenfolk nor forced them to wear burqa! And if my daughter wishes to wear Hijab in the house, at school or in public then this is NOBODY ELSE'S #&%ing business and certainly NOT the Government's, neither to forbid nor to enforce it! Also if she chooses not wear it! And if somebody as much as touches her for that or even glances askance at her I will at least slap him! Islamophobic rhetoric leads to murder and genocide and I consider all and any Islamophobic fascist moron as the intellectual author of the murder of Marwa Al Sherbiny and of the genocide in Srebrenica and other palces of Bosnia or wherever else Muslims are made to suffer at the hands of non-Muslims!! If only for the ill will such, ah, people feel for us. TO Hell with your neofascist diatribe!

by: Abdulmajid
February 23, 2010 09:54
There is a LOT of gender violence going on amomg non-Muslim societies, and much of it is due to alcoholism. Which is much less of a problem among Muslims. As teh Messiah, peace upon him, said "You see the straw in my eye but not the log in yours". In other words, first sweep before your own doorstep before spitting on ours!

by: Balaqardash from: Sumqayit
February 26, 2010 13:51
A hijab or ḥijāb (Arabic: حجاب, pronounced [ħiˈdʒæːb]/[ħiˈgæːb]), as commonly understood in the English-speaking world, is the type of head covering traditionally worn by Muslim women, but can also refer to modest Muslim styles of dress in general. Similar head coverings are wimples (or wimpels) worn by Christian nuns and snoods often worn by married Orthodox Jewish women. The wimple is a garment of medieval Europe worn by women. It is a cloth which usually covers the head and is worn around the neck and chin. At many stages of medieval culture it was unseemly for a married woman to show her hair. A wimple might be elaborately starched, and creased and folded in prescribed ways, even supported on wire or wicker framing (cornette). Italian women abandoned their headcloths in the 15th century, or replaced them with transparent gauze, and showed their elaborate braids. Both elaborate laundry and elaborate braiding demonstrated status, in that such grooming was being performed by others. Today the wimple is worn by some nuns who still don the traditional habit. The King James Version explicitly lists "wimples" in Isaiah 3:22 as one of a list of female fineries, although the Hebrew term is rendered as shawl or cloak in other versions.
The Arabic word literally means curtain or cover (noun), based on the root حجب meaning "to cover, to veil, to shelter". Most Islamic legal systems define this type of modest dressing as covering everything except the face and hands in public.According to Islamic scholarship, hijab is given the wider meaning of modesty, privacy, and morality; the word for a headscarf or veil used in the Qur'an is khimār (خمار) and not hijab. Still another definition is metaphysical, where al-hijab "refers to the veil which separates man or the world from God.
The Qur'an instructs Muslims to dress in a modest way. The following verses are generally interpreted as applying to all Muslim men and women.

by: Balagardash from: Sumqait
February 26, 2010 13:54
The surah 24:30-31 say:[7]… Auzi billehi minal shaytani regim
Bismillahi Rahmani Rahim!

And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband's fathers, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their right hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O ye Believers! turn ye all together towards Allah, that ye may attain Bliss; [...] (Qur'an 24:31)

by: Jack from: Belgrade
March 05, 2010 09:14
I am sincerely disappointed with RFERL's decision to publish this ridiculous piece of biased conjecture. The translations that Mr Nalapat gives are laughable in their inaccuracy. Without getting into a semantic discussion on ancient Arabic - of which I am no such expert - I have never seen the passage about infidelity be translated as 'hit them gently'. The word is always 'beat'.


However, this is secondary. What is truly unbelievable is that Mr Nalapat is actually trying to use a passage which condones (nay encourages) the beating of women! As soon as I read that argument - that the Koran is kind because it 'only' says to 'hit women gently' - I knew that I was not reading anything new or intellectual.

The whole article is full of holes, but I have no inclination to delve into them here - any reader with an ounce of sense will be able to see through Mr Nalapat's ridiculously weak attempt at making Islam seem non-misogynistic. His point about the plural form of messengers and scriptures being in the plural form - and thus allowing other gods to be worshiped - is absolutely insane. It is well known that the Koran rails against non-believers at every turn, and that the punishment metered out is usually death (at a minimum). Take a look at any moderate Muslim website (people who often campaign to have many passages in the Koran re-interpreted in light of the modern world).

I am deeply saddened, because I do not believe Islam to be an evil, hateful or spiteful religion. I have spent much time in Islamic countries, and have learned to love the hospitality and warmth of their people. However, when people like Mr Nalapat make such spurious claims, it only undermines the cause of Islam. The first step in making Islam compatible with the rest of the world is to admit that some if not many passages are deeply prejudiced against women (for one). Scholarly work can then begin to reinterpret them as required by the UN Charter of Fundamental Rights, or some such well-thought out doctrine.

by: AHMAD SHARIEF from: LOS ANGELES
March 08, 2010 15:53
Thanks for your casting lihht onthis issue of Chodor, but still hitting allowed in ISlam according toyour writing, "getele" but still is hitting, and that differentiate West fro East. Or civil law from Religious law. Islam law was fantastic 1300 yeas ago but no today!!
"As for those from whom you apprehend infidelity, admonish them, then refuse to share their beds, and finally [if such admonitions do not cause a change in behavior] hit them [gently
Comments page of 2
    Next 

Latest Commentary

No records found for this widget:963

More Commentary

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (6 total)

Saleem: If successive Pakistani governments have failed to deal with the 'Balochistan problem' then ... More

UN Rights Chief Scathing On Syria

Latest Comment (2 total)

Chechen: "Moscow also has had a deal since 1971 with Syria "
Sorry that was ... More

U.K. Releases Radical Cleric On Bail

Latest Comment (1 total)

Martin : Modern Europe has deteriorated to such grotesque that its end has to be ... More