map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Features

Islam's Challenges To 'Universal Human Rights'

Sabatina James uses a pseudonym and lives under police protection after fleeing Austria, where her father threatened to kill her for converting from Islam.

December 09, 2008
By Jeffrey Donovan
Sabatina James has one wish. She wants to enjoy the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which is 60 years old this week. But the 26-year-old Austrian of Pakistani heritage, in hiding since becoming Christian, is at the center of a storm between Islam and international human rights law.

After converting from Islam a few years ago, James had to flee from a father who wanted her killed for apostasy -- and from Austrian authorities who instead of protecting her, suggested she resolve the conflict by returning to Islam.

James, who uses a pseudonym, grew up in Linz, a city near the Alps more famous for chocolate than disputes between Islamic and international law. But when she renounced Islam, her father's verdict was clear. "He said, 'In two weeks you have to become a Muslim again or you're dead,'" says James, who fled to Germany, where she now lives under police protection.

On the anniversary of the UDHR's ratification, James's case dramatically illustrates Islam's growing challenge to the principles enshrined in the world's most translated document, including the freedom of thought, conscience, and worship -- and the right to change one's religion.

Many Muslim jurists say Shari'a does not envision such liberties -- and that apostasy is always punishable by death. Although there is growing debate about that interpretation, the tension between Islamic and international law is at the center of James's personal drama as well as Western attempts to accommodate Muslim citizens. It's also behind efforts by Muslim countries to establish new rights frameworks based on Shari'a.*

But what surprises James isn't that Muslim states have sought their own Shari'a-based rights charters. It's that in some Western countries she sees a willingness to have Shari'a applied to Muslim citizens at the expense of their tutelage under national and international laws.
 
For example, when she was first threatened by her father, James asked local police for help. "They said to me, 'Why don't you become Muslim again? Then you won't have problems, Madam. Why are you doing all that? It doesn't matter if you believe in Allah or Jesus.' But for me, it did matter, and I was living in a country which is not under Islamic law. And I was like, 'Why are these people taking the side of my parents?'"

Mounting Problem

There has been no recorded case of a Muslim being murdered for apostasy in Europe. What's more, such punishment is not regularly practiced in the Muslim world, where it is banned in many countries. Famously, it was outlawed in the Ottoman Empire but remains on the books in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran and a real threat to apostates in other countries, such as Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Europe, meanwhile, is increasingly grappling with the legal quandary stemming from Shari'a and a Muslim population that totals some 50 million. Some European courts, religious leaders, and officials have shown a willingness to defer to Muslim rules in the private sphere -- on marriage and divorce or finance, for example.

Last February, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, said it might be "unavoidable" to allow aspects of Shari'a law, such as on marital disputes or finance, to be applied in Britain. Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who said British laws "should be based on British values," shot down his suggestion.

Last year in Germany, a judge refused an application by a Moroccan immigrant to quickly divorce her abusive husband, whom she claimed had threatened to kill her. In his decision, the judge referred to a passage in the Koran that some interpret to mean that a husband can beat his wife.

The main challenges from Islam have been on women's rights, freedom of association and religion, torture, and the death penalty for children.
More recently, France has been gripped by the case of a Muslim who won a legal annulment of his marriage after discovering his bride was not a virgin. Critics saw it as an encroachment by Shari'a into French law, although an appeals court overturned the ruling last month.

But James, who now runs an organization that assists abused Muslim women in Europe, says that beyond the headlines are many more cases of Muslim women in Europe who are not afforded basic international rights, such as those envisaged by the UDHR: "It's happening everywhere, actually. There are women coming to our organization, women from Pakistan; they are really living like slaves and the authorities are helping the punishers more than the victims."

'Regional Specificities'

Most Muslim countries except Saudi Arabia voted to ratify the UDHR in the UN General Assembly in 1948 -- and Arab scholars from Egypt and Lebanon helped draft the text. Yet Muslim countries have sought to distance themselves from the UDHR, which although merely a "declaration" inspired later legally binding global agreements on rights, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention against Torture.

In 1981, Muslim countries passed their own Declaration of Islamic Human Rights. That was followed by the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam and the 1994 Arab Human Rights Charter, a text negotiated under the Arab League which seven countries ratified and which came into effect last March.

The main challenge from Islam has been on women's rights, freedom of association and religion, torture, and the death penalty for children. The Islamic human rights documents all curtail these rights compared to how they are treated by the UDHR and subsequent UN charters inspired by it.

Backers of the Muslim charters argue that they are in line with the 1993 Vienna Declaration and Program of Action on human rights, which reaffirmed the UDHR's principles but also allowed for "regional specificities" on human rights. Champions of the Arab charter say it proves Shari'a is compatible with international human rights.

Western experts beg to differ, voicing particular concern over the rights of women and freedom of religion in the Muslim world. James laments the dwindling acceptance of global human rights in the Muslim world. But she also sees Western compromises to rights declared universal 60 years ago this week.

"We have to say to Muslim people, if they come to Europe: 'We are glad that you are here, and we love you, but we have laws in our countries that must be followed.'" she says. "This is not racism at all. This is protecting human rights."

* This is a corrected version. The original version suggested that Islamic opinion is united behind the idea that apostasy is punishable by death, which is not the case.
This forum has been closed.
 Previous   Next 
Comments page 2 of 4
by: Turgai Sangar from: Nantes
December 11, 2008 10:41
Dursun from Turkey did well to come up with the example of Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

We know who she works for. By associating herself with a major Neocon-Zionist think tank, she has lost all credibility and discredited her cause.

Even more: by doing so, she revealed the real nature and agenda behind all this 'saving oppressed Muslim women' talk.

by: Ahmd shafiq masood from: Afghanistan
December 11, 2008 03:46
Give me complite information think u

by: row2x from: usa
December 11, 2008 00:22
When one understands the Koran (Qur'an) and Sharia Law, one will begin to understand the rules (laws) of Islam.

The Wahabbist fundamentalists are making a shambles of the "Religion of Peace" and those who want to believe that Islam is a religion of peace.

As you read the Koran, you'll find many contradictions. One chapter (sura) or verse will talk of peaceful coexistence while another will talk of jihad as the means of spreading the "Religion of Peace", which then becomes a religion of war. You can't have it both ways.

Christianity had its Reformation in the 15th century. Islam, which is about 14 centuries old, has never had a reformation. Until the "moderates" decide to have a Reformation, the Koran will always be considered the irrefutable word of Allah and accepted as Sharia Law which will rule the morals and mores of the Muslim world.

Now for the Catch 22..."moderate" Muslims are terrified of standing up to the fundamentalists for fear of being killed. When you're in fear for your life, you have a strong tendency to remain silent. Not a good way to start a Reformation.

by: Anthony
December 10, 2008 19:56
Sharia law is a very nasty thing. It needs to be opposed wherever it appears. Sharia is inherently biased against women, children, and non-muslims. It is equivalent to religious apartheid.

by: Denis Egan, Phoenix
December 10, 2008 18:20
In the name of "tolerance", the West is surrendering its mantle as the protector of human freedoms. America, the greatest western symbol of protector of freedoms, is slowly accepting the Islamic world's condemnations which classify it as the "Great Satan", apologizing to its Islamic attackers who have been schooled in the hatred of Jews and western values from childhood. The truest reason for Islamist attitudes toward the West is contained in the title of Brigette Gabriel's book " Because They Hate".They live--not for the love of life, family and friends--but to become hateful, murderous "martyrs" and enjoy sensuous joys and rewards after death for their defense of the faith. Their goal is destruction. They offer nothing positive to mankind.

by: Abdul
December 10, 2008 16:48
In general, excellent article. It should have been noted that ALL 57 Moslem countries in the OIC signed on to the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam which openly declares that Islam is superior to every other religion or social system, and which clearly declares that the ONLY source of human rights is the Shariah. This is the most convincing proof that there is, indeed, a clash of civilizations. Here is what some leading Islamic authorities say about the issue:

AYATOLLAH KHOMEINI:
“What they call human rights is nothing but a collection of corrupt rules worked out by the Zionists to destroy all true religions.”
-------------------

AYATOLLAH MOUSSAVE-KHOMENEHI:

When we want to find out what is right and what is wrong we do not go to the United Nations; we go to the Holy Koran…”

MUHAMMED NACERI, member of Morocco Council of Religious Scholars:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was for complete equality for man and women. For us, women are equal to men in law, but they are not the same as men, and they can’t be allowed to wander around freely in the streets like some kind of animal.”

Former Iranian president ALI KHAMENEI said: “When we want to find out what is right and what is wrong we do not go to the United Nations; we go to the Holy Koran. For us, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is nothing but a collection of mumbo-jumbo by disciples of Satan.”
ABUL MAUDUDI:
When we speak of human rights in Islam, we mean those rights granted by God.




by: MaGioZal from: São Paulo - Brazil
December 10, 2008 14:40
It's deplorable to see Europe, in the name of a so-called “multiculturalism” and maybe distorted “post-colonialist guilt sentiment”, to deny basic human rights protections — enshrined in law since the end of World War II — to Euroepan Muslim inhabitants, treating them as second-class citizens outside the law.

by: Dursun from: Turkey
December 10, 2008 13:33
I got lost in the story. What is the reason that she turned away from Islam? Is it perhaps because she wanted to become famous like the Islam critic Ayaan Hirsi Ali before her? She got a job and protection by the American Enterprise Instutute for that.

by: Turgai Sangar from: Nantes
December 10, 2008 13:10
The core problem is that 'Universal Human Rights' have often been used and continue to be used as a fig leaf for what basically comes to imperialism and neo-colonialism. That is, to subjugate a resource-rich Islamic world.

Sabatina has done something far more fundamental that changing religion: she chose the side of the exploiters against the exploited.

by: roncee from: guangzhou
December 10, 2008 13:04
Wake up Richard from the USA! This is 2008, the US is about to have a negro for President. You can't justify something happening today by going back a hundred or more years to the Old South (USA).
 Previous   Next 
Comments page 2 of 4
TEXT SIZE - +

Editors' Picks

Arresting Images

Photos Of The Week Photogallery

President Van Rompuy

'How's That Again?!' Audio

Karzai Inauguration

The Anticipation Of Change Video

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile