map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Features

Milorad Dodik -- One Foot In Bosnia, But His Heart In Serbia

Republika Srpska Prime Minister Milorad Dodik: ''We accept Bosnia because we must, and because it is part of the agreement we signed.''

April 28, 2009
BANJA LUKA -- Milorad Dodik, the prime minister of Bosnia-Herzegovina's Serbian entity, has evolved from a onetime darling of the international community to one of its most voluble critics.

The 50-year-old Dodik, who once disappointed fellow Serbs by opposing former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, is now an unabashed Serbian nationalist and the greatest threat to Bosnia's fragile, multiethnic peace.

Ljudmila Cvetkovic of RFE/RL's South Slavic and Albanian Languages Service traveled to Banja Luka and spoke with the Republika Srpska prime minister about his views on Bosnia's future, his close ties to Serbia, and how the international community has failed the region.

RFE/RL: You've joined talks with Bosniak and Croatian officials on constitutional reform, which are generally seen as critical for any future bid by Bosnia-Herzegovina to join the European Union. But you've made it clear that you won't accept any changes to the constitution that seeks to centralize the federation at the expense of Republika Srpska's autonomy. Is there really a possibility for dialogue here?

Milorad Dodik:
The process of negotiations has resolved many difficult questions in Bosnia during the past few months, and we've even managed to jump-start the process of Euro-integration. The budget -- a long-standing problem -- and the future of the [self-governing] northern Bosnian town of Brcko are being resolved. There's no reason to think about constitutional changes. We [in Republika Srpska] took part in the process only because we think it's good to listen to others.

Our basic stance is that we don't want to change the constitutional position of Republika Srpska, and nobody can ask us to do so. When the right time comes, a new Bosnian constitution has to include all the democratic achievements of the modern world, including the UN charter that gives every people the right to self-determination and the right to separation.

RFE/RL: You support the idea of Bosnia as a loose federation. It wasn't possible to negotiate that framework before the Bosnian war in the 1990s. What makes you think it will be possible now?

Dodik:
An agreement isn't possible under pressure from the international community, but I believe that, left to our own devices, we can reach an agreement between ourselves here in Bosnia. However, that agreement would have to be based on a few crucial premises -- and they do not include the centralization of Bosnia.

We're not raising the question of the territorial disintegration of Bosnia, but simply the preservation of our autonomy and the 1995 Dayton agreement [breaking Bosnia into two entities, a Muslim-Croatian federation and a Serbian republic].

RFE/RL: How viable is Bosnia-Herzegovina, given the difficulties you allude to in reaching any sort of agreement?

Dodik:
We've seen excessive use of force in Bosnia. That will surely leave some sort of mark on the country. Paddy Ashdown [the international community's high representative in Bosnia in 2002-06] is directly responsible for this destabilization and for the growing dysfunction.

If Bosnia has any future, then its only chance for survival lies in the coming together of its domestic elements without any interference from the international community, whether it's Europe or the United States.

RFE/RL: You've described Bosnia-Herzegovina as an international protectorate where the Office of the High Representative rules by decree. Lately you've said you're going to take the initiative in terms of exerting pressure on the international community. How far do you plan to go in carrying through with that threat?

Dodik:
What I wanted to say was that we could no longer give in to outside pressure, and that it was high time for us to start applying some pressure of our own to further our own goals and ideas. That is both democratic and legitimate, and that's how my statement should be understood.

No Love For Bosnia

RFE/RL: You say that, as a man who respects law and order, you recognize the state of Bosnia-Herzegovina. But at the same time, you announced in Belgrade that Serbs from Republika Srpska only live in Bosnia, and consider Serbia to be their true homeland.

Dodik:
Of course.

RFE/RL: I've heard similar things from people here in Banja Luka. Why do Serbs in Republika Srpska find it so difficult to identify with Bosnia and feel at home within its borders?

Dodik:
Well, it's because of the policies of the international community, as well as Bosniak policies, which tend toward centralization and upholding the interests of the Muslim religious community, which plays a significant role in the Bosnian state and shapes much of Bosniak politics.

At the same time, there are fewer and fewer Serbs in Sarajevo. The president of the Bosnian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, who is himself a Bosniak, claims that Sarajevo is an ethnically clean city. Of course, I accept the Dayton agreement and Bosnia as such. But in terms of sentiment, it's natural that we Serbs think of Serbia as our homeland, and that we feel Serbia is part of us, much more than Bosnia-Herzegovina.

We accept Bosnia because we must, and because it is part of the agreement we signed. But that agreement says nothing about love, and if we're talking about love, it's an intimate feeling and I have the right to feel the way I do.

In other words, we will continue to support the Serbian football team, just as I rooted for Novak Djokovic in the finals in Monaco, and just as I celebrate every victory by [Belgrade's] FC Partizan. No one can deny me that right, because it's what I love.

RFE/RL: Some people may interpret such statements as a desire to break with Bosnia and unify with Serbia.

Dodik:
We want Serbia to sort itself out and become powerful, and we will always look to Serbia for understanding and consolation. It's not aimed against anything or anyone. Again, we respect the [Dayton] agreement, but we feel uncomfortable inside Bosnia because the role of Republika Srpska is constantly being diminished, and its authority undermined, as a result of Bosnian centralization. It's a state of permanent unease.

RFE/RL: But isn't it possible that all the talk about a referendum and ties with Serbia could provoke a sense of anxiety among Bosnia's other two ethnic groups?

Dodik:
If we both respect the Dayton agreement, there should be no problem. We're not the ones working to undermine Dayton or threatening the existence of Bosnia-Herzegovina in that way. We just want to be inside -- and nothing else. We don't want the Bosniaks and Croats to feel anxious.

In the last few years, no one has documented any ethnic violence in Republika Srpska. But relations within Bosnia as a whole are something else. The Bosniaks are good people. But this is not a matter of good or bad people, it's a matter of politics. And Bosniak politics are not the same thing as Bosniak people.

Kosovo Parallel

RFE/RL: When Kosovo declared independence last year, you refused to draw any parallels between it and Republika Srpska -- even though Vojislav Kostunica, who was then the prime minister of Serbia, frequently did. Is that analogy still a nonstarter for you? Might that change once the International Court of Justice rules on the legality of Kosovo's independence?

Dodik:
Kosovo was taken away from Serbia illegitimately. We don't have the right to start any similar adventures here. We're only interested in democratic and legitimate procedures. Whether the conditions will one day arise for Republika Srpska to make a decision like that remains to be seen. I personally believe that it will happen, that the time will come when the world will say the people have a right to choose.

RFE/RL: You seem to have a very close relationship with Serbian President Boris Tadic. How much support do you get from Belgrade?

Dodik:
I don't know. I just think that we have the right sort of relationship. As a country that also signed the Dayton peace accords, Serbia has respect for that document. There's no pressure, no special requests, coming from Belgrade. Nothing like that exists.

RFE/RL: And support?

Dodik:
I was a supporter of Tadic [in Serbia's 2008 presidential vote], and he was hosted by my political party here in Banja Luka. We share the same values, and we'll continue to do that.

RFE/RL: And that's all?

Dodik:
The relationship between Serbia and Republika Srpska has to develop further. We have to set common goals which are not in conflict with Dayton and not an obstacle to regional or any other kind of cooperation. And that is what we are doing.

RFE/RL: For someone who has been in politics as long as you have, you often allow yourself to be overcome with emotions, and make surprising statements. Why is that?

Dodik:
Because that's the kind of man I am.
This forum has been closed.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 5
by: Antifascist
May 05, 2009 21:40
Batorb, it is not the textual wording but the feeling that is contained in it. Besides that it is the truth that most emigrants from the former Yugoslavia left it to quit the Tito regime, and maong thes ea high number of them were Chetniks. Chetniks are ultranationalists whose primary goal was and is to cleanse Serbia and what they consider to be Serb lands from "foreigners": Muslims, Jews, Catholics, Roma, etc. I have a Serb book from the 1930s or 40s which is so full of this.

by: Antifascist
May 05, 2009 16:31
@ Jill Starr: Of course not, they are fine fellows, they defended Europe from the barbaric Mohammedan hordes. So why don't we nominate them for the Nobel Peace Price too? And give them all European and American military medals? Oh, better yet, the Orthodox Church can make them into saints too!

by: Batorb from: Australia
May 05, 2009 11:31
"But now I 've got confirmation from you that most Serb emigrants are Serbofascists, ultranationalists and anti-Bosniak at heart."

When did I ever say this? I don't remember saying this. you are making up lies. all you have are lies.

by: DefenderOfTruth
May 04, 2009 17:26
If Mr. Dodik feels that Serbia is his true homeland then he should consider moving and "serving" there. If he, as an elected politician in Bosnia and Herzegovina, can not serve his country with fidelity and honor then he should resign to live and "serve" in Serbia. I'm sure they need another arrogant, corrupt, good-for-nothing politician in Serbia to the same degree they need one in Bosnia. Dodik is the greatest hurdle for Bosnia's development. Every country in the Balkans is now moving faster towards joining the EU and NATO then Bosnia and Herzegovina and the main reason for this delay is that Mr. Dodik and his cronies do not want to see the formation of a functional multi-ethnic, multi-religious, tolerant, and democratic Bosnian state free from corruption. For the past several years he has obstucted every major effort to reform the country and implement a new constitution that meets European standards. All of Mr. Dodik's empty rhetoric and fear-mongering is not helping the citizens of the country and on top of that him misusing tax-payer money in order to buy $1000 dollar ash-trays is making their lives even worse. The Bosnian Serbs and all Bosnian citizens deserve a better leader, one who actually has a trace of integrity, to serve them and to help move the country forward in the direction of joining the EU and NATO.

by: Jill Starr from: Bloomingdale NJ USA
May 04, 2009 16:41
#I don't think that Radovan Karadzic or Ratko Mladic are war criminals at all. I invite everyone to view some of the evidence in my possession about it at my blog site. I think it is easily proven that the CIA and Richard Holbrook are the Balkan War culprits.
Respectfully Yours,

Jill Starr

##

#What It’s Like to Chill with the Most Ruthless Men in the World
Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic:
Confessions of a Female War Crimes Investigator


Retrospectively, it was all so simple, natural and matter of fact being on a boat restaurant in Belgrade, sitting with, laughing, drinking a two hundred bottle of wine and chatting about war and peace while Ratko Mladic held my hand. Mladic, a man considered the world’s most ruthless war criminal since Adolf Hitler, still at large and currently having a five million dollar bounty on his head for genocide by the international community. Yet there I was with my two best friends at the time, a former Serbian diplomat, his wife, and Ratko Mladic just chilling. There was no security, nothing you’d ordinarily expect in such circumstances. Referring to himself merely as, Sharko; this is the story of it all came about.


http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/jillstarrinternationalnewshttp://sites.google.com/

http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/

http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/

http://obamavideos.bottmer.com/i-am-a-witness-in-the-icc-war-crimes-trials-10047.barack

http://lpcyu.instablogs.com/feed

http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa

by: Antifascist
May 04, 2009 16:39
Chetniks killed Bosniaks, and mostly Bosniaks, in WWII and in 1992-95.
I don't think the Sorbs in Germany are so closely related to the Serrbs (except that they are Slavs, of course. But so are the Bosniaks, they are not Turks).
And you haven't addressed my point on anti-Bosniak and anti-Muslim genocide. You still pretend nothing wrong was done to them, or if it was, that's life.
And if you Serbofascists were honest about your intentions you'd admit that you just want to get rid of the Balije or subdue them, because you are afraid of them. So we killed as much as we could and destroyed their cultural landmarks to make them disappear as a people. This was not collateral damage, these were our targets. Well, the Nazis tried to do the same with the Jews.
And if you think I like communists better than fascists, you're wrong. Where I come from we suffered long enough under the Communist dictatorship and tyranny.
But now I 've got confirmation from you that most Serb emigrants are Serbofascists, ultranationalists and anti-Bosniak at heart.

by: Batorb from: Australia
May 04, 2009 12:49
Oh and by the way, my family members were forced out of Croatia and Bosnia, so I think their first-hand stories, rather than your fourth-hand media 'fantasies' have more authenticity. One more note, NATO dropped bombs on Serbia to oust the army from Kosovo, this was an act of war without any declaration of war, which is a war crime, and these bombs had depleted uranium (which has killed many [Italian] peacekeepers). No, NATO had no idea this would kill civilians. So don't preach about who is innocent in the world

by: Batorb from: Australia
May 04, 2009 12:45
@ Antifascist
It's clear that we won't agree on things, but my problem with your argument is that you are quick to dismiss anything that non-Serbs did as a reaction or as insignificant. Your claims that others never had the intention to cleanse serbs from their borders is not only ludicrous but begs the question 'how do you know this?', 'What are your sources?'. The only people that know are the ones who fought the war, not you or I. Croats ethnically cleansed the Serbs from Croatia with US backing. Only now do the Serbs return. Yes, I agree, Serbs are the only ones in the world who have done anything wrong with the intention to do it, yes we killed many civilians, we were the only ones who intended to do it. If you couldn't tell, I was being sarcastic. PLEASE, you cannot be serious, next you're going to tell me that the War on Terror and Iraq (against Muslims) was all Serbia's idea and they wanted to kill more muslims, because they can't quench their thirst. Anyway, let's agree to disagree, you feel strongly about your argument and I feel strongly about mine. I agree more with Abdulmajid, that each race doesn't have a problem with the other, it is individuals.

by: Batorb from: Australia
May 04, 2009 05:41
@ Antifascist
You say that Serbian nationality wasn't established until the 1800s. Yes Serbia gained independence from the Ottomans in the 19th Century, but what of the Serbian kingdom prior to the battle of Kosovo in 1389. The kingdom that encompassed Montenegro, FYR Macedonia, Greece, parts of Bosnia/Bulgaria. No Serbian nation back then eh? The fact that the slavs migrated in the 6th century AD from 'White Serbia' in Poland/Germany, where still to this day they speak the Serb dialect, not Polish. Yes Serbia is only something relatively recent. Get your facts straight. Also your constant reference to Chetniks.. Your source on this is wrong, Chetniks were anti-fascist and anti-communist, they were monarchists. So here is my point. Croats became the Ustasha, who were fascist, but not all Croats were fascist. My grandfather was a Chetnik and he was a Serb from Croatia. His division, the Dinaric Division, had Croats in it as well. He was in a displaced persons camp in Italy with a Chetnik general that was Croat. These people supported the Yugoslav Monarchy and fought together against fascism. Get your facts straight please.

by: Abdul Majid
May 03, 2009 21:31
Even though to secede is what Milorad would like, one could get the impression that it seems not likely he'd really try. Maybe the Americans talked him out of it ("your side will then get more kick-ass than in 1998" or something like that; no way to know unless he would tell. And it doesn't matter.) But, if Bojan Bajic's analysis (in "Dani", Nov. 23.,2007 and Jan.16., 2009) is correct, and based on the assessment of Bosnian demographics and the resulting projection, I have strong reasons to believe it is, then the situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina can be solved without secession or without it becoming like Cyprus. So I would strongly advise all three peoples to arrange themselves with each other, because firstly, peoples don't hate each other, individuals do, and secondly, no matter how much they hate each other, neitehr one is going away. And since Croatia has relinquished any further injerence in Bosnian affairs, it is high time Serbia did too.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 5
TEXT SIZE - +

Editors' Picks

President Van Rompuy

'How's That Again?!' Audio

Karzai Inauguration

The Anticipation Of Change Video

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile