Monday, February 13, 2012


Features

Minsk Group Co-Chairs Hopeful Of Karabakh 'Breakthrough'

Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian (right) meets with members of the Minsk Group on July 8
TEXT SIZE - +
By Liz Fuller
The visit by the French, Russian, and U.S. co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group to Yerevan and Baku may have brought a formal settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict one step closer.

Meeting with the Minsk Group co-chairs on July 8 and 10, respectively, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan agreed to meet in Moscow on July 17. That meeting will be the sixth between Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in just over a year.

Speaking in Baku on July 10, Russian co-Chairman Yury Merzlyakov said the co-chairs are hopeful that next week's meeting between the two presidents could lead to a breakthrough. But he said it is unlikely that any document will be signed at that meeting.


French co-Chairman Bernard Fassier said in Yerevan on July 8 that the conflict parties have agreed on almost all the 15 or so points of the Basic Principles for resolving the conflict.

He said they still have to reach agreement on the future status of Nagorno-Karabakh and on security guarantees for its predominantly Armenian population.

Azerbaijan's President Aliyev told a Russian television channel last weekend that the final status of Nagorno-Karabakh could remain undecided for 10 or even 100 years.

Armenia and Azerbaijan still disagree over whether Nagorno-Karabakh should join the peace talks. Aliyev said this is unnecessary and would be "disruptive."

But Russian Minsk group co-chairman Merzlyakov told journalists in Yerevan on July 8 that the co-chairs would like Nagorno-Karabakh representatives to join the talks after the signing of the Basic Principles.

Snipers

Speaking today at a conference in Stepanakert, de facto Nagorno-Karabakh leader Bako Sahakian said no peace agreement is possible without Karabakh's participation.

"Karabakh, which is the main party to the Azerbaijan-Karabakh conflict, has been left out of the negotiations, and we must achieve the return to this important principle. It is impossible to realize any solution without the consent of the people of the Nagorno-Karabakh republic," Sahakian said.

The co-chairs hailed on July 8 the stated readiness of both Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia to withdraw the Armenian snipers deployed along the Line of Contact that separates Armenian and Azerbaijani forces. Snipers kill dozens of servicemen on both sides every year. Azerbaijan, however, has not yet agreed to withdraw its snipers.

A further potential sticking point is the timeframe for the withdrawal of Armenian forces from seven districts of Azerbaijan they currently control. The Basic Principles require a withdrawal from five of those districts and the deployment of international peacekeepers in the other two, which lie between Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia.

Karabakh Defense Minister Lieutenant General Movses Hakopian was quoted on July 9 as saying no one has asked Karabakh to withdraw from those districts, and that the unrecognized republic's leadership does not intend to give them up.

The French, Russian, and U.S. presidents issued a statement on July 10 at the G8 summit in Aquila calling on the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan to resolve the remaining differences and complete the conflict resolution process.

RFE/RL's Armenian and Azerbaijani services contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Ararat from: Armenia
July 11, 2009 02:01
Nagorno Karabakh Republic is the only party which matters when it comes to resolving the so called Karabakh Dispute. it is wrong to knock wrong door and expect quick resolution to the matter.

1st- the people of Armenia and NKR are the same and there is no distinction between them, that is first issue must be understood and resolved. i.e. Karabakh Armenians chose by democratic means to live with Armenia and not with Azerbaijan after Soviet Union collapse.

2nd. the Armenian & NKR army are there to hold the cease fire until DURABLE & FINAL solution is made so there is no urgency to remove the army from the disputed areas.

3rd Aliev has lowered his tone but he is still singing the same old Soviet songs which are irrelevant and the whole world knows that.

4th Aliev is still not a genuine partner in the peace process because he still says that Armenian Genocide is a myth, for that Aliev is very lucky that he has an Armenian partner for peace, that is different from Turkey which says it wants to study its history and to find out where it comes from "for a hint, look at Central Asia, close to Mongolia and China among the nomadics "

5th. the three hard working Amigos from MINSK negotiators have no control when the dispute will be resolved but they should know by now that the main reason for not resolving the dispute is because lack of trust mainly from Armenian side for the reasons given above. This dispute can not be resolved by unequal promises.

RFE please be kind and give this comment to MINSK negotiators, thank you.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
July 12, 2009 18:13
Hints, created by Russian military headquarters and their "Club Veselyh i Nahodchivyh", grabbing real estate in Sochi and Suhumi, are not prudent...

For consultation:
Sentral Asia and Turkmenia were a part of Median United Nations, Azerbaijan (Caspian Albania) was part of United Median Kingdoms. All Media's UN members benefitted from its cultural and technical advancements in society, housing and agriculture...
It was before Chaldean Neanderthals from Messopothamia incited Persian hords invade Media and tried to annex Median UN members-countries.
Even before the Macedonian pervert invaded most of Civilised world, including Asia...

Konstantin.

by: Andrey Rankov from: Armenia
July 14, 2009 16:36

I think, mediators trying tօ “settle” the Karabakh conflict for their own hand only.
So named “Basic principles” are openly anti-Armenian as they require Armenians to hand over the security area around Karabakh to the Azerbaijan without anything in return (Uncertain, temporary and delayed status of the NKR described in the "principles" is something, which Karabakh people enjoys now already.)
But such a biased & anti-Armenian “principles” just looks like the Azeri-sided ones. They are strongly inspired by Azerbaijan’s oil contracts with the western countries and recent gas contract with the Gazprom, Russia. So these unscrupulous “principles” (as it is amoral even to find conceivable that Karabakh people may live in Azerbaijan, where anti-Armenian pogroms are common & non-punishable occurence in fact) are not a liberal gift to Azerbaijan, but a very costly purchase made by the latter. And Azerbaijan will have to pay for it during the broad term in the future by its petrodollars, which will flow now into the pockets of the western & Russian oil-barons and policians, but not of the Azeri people.
It is noteworthy that the imposed mechanism of Karabakh conflict resolution (actually, it is ceding of Armenian territories as a payment for Azerbaijani oil & gas delivered to the West & Russia) does not provide a final assignment of Karabakh to any of conflict parties until the last drop of oil and last cubic centimeter of gas will be derived from Azerbaijani reserves.
Obviously, at that time, when Azerbaijan will lose its significance as an oil-exporter, even a moral component of Karabakh conflict - the requirement to provide a basic right of Karabakh people on self-determination - may prevail for mediators.
Thus, only the OECD sharks, which are situated far from the Caucasus, will enjoy the advantages from implementation of “Madrid principles”. And there is nothing else left to do than to wonder how implementation of these vicious “principles” may come true.
Or may be not? As according to them, Armenians will receive nothing at all even formally, and Azeri actually will receive only on the areas surrounding the NKR but at the price, which is higher than if Azerbaijan will conduct the same transaction with Armenia directly and without any mediators.

by: Nasser from: Baku
August 04, 2009 12:00
Dear everybody,
Let me present a new joke that I have heard recently:
A new football team is formed consisting of different Caucasian Nations:
1) Forwards from Chechnya, because of they allways attache!
2) Halfbacks from Georgians, because it is tough to negotiate with them;
3) Defence line from Azerbaijanies, because no way to pass them without good bribe!;
4) The goalkeeper from Armenians, because even if somebody score a goal, any proof will be automatically denied!

This just a joke, but, as they say, in every joke therei a small portion of joke.
Thanks and regards.
               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Cold Threatens Russian Fruit Crop

Latest Comment (2 total)

Vakhtang: The cold is certainly bad.
But as it is known that the russian fruit ... More

Libya Asks Niger To Extradite Qaddafi Son

Latest Comment (9 total)

John: you obviously have no idea what an islamic state is. please be quiet ... More

Iran To Make Nuclear Announcement

Latest Comment (9 total)

Chechen: Saudi Arabia and Muslims is Iran's enemy. The midget submarines, Chinook choppers, F-14's ... More