Saturday, February 11, 2012


Commentary

Moving Beyond Russia's Embrace

Does former Communist Marian Lupu want the Kremlin's friendship?
TEXT SIZE - +
By Irina Severin
Russia enjoys dabbling in the domestic politics of its neighboring countries, publicly supporting its favorite politicians and demonstrating its contempt for those whom it dislikes. But it rarely -- at least among its European neighbors -- gets the result it is seeking. The most recent example is Moldova.

The Kremlin spared no effort to support the Communist Party during the parliamentary elections in April and again in July. But the result is that the party lost power. Worse, although it retains 48 seats in the 101-seat legislature (the largest single faction), no other faction was willing to enter into a coalition with the darlings of the Kremlin.

Now, apparently, the Kremlin is looking toward parliament speaker Marian Lupu, who defected from the Communists this summer to head the Democratic Party in the July elections and is now the ruling coalition's favored candidate for president.

When Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was in Chisinau recently for a summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), he refused to meet with Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko, but found time to chat with the amiable young Lupu. Medvedev went a step further in making Lupu stand out by also refusing to meet Moldova's new prime minister, Vlad Filat. He, evidently, was being punished for daring to mention the word "NATO" a couple of times.

Poisoned Chalice?

To be fair, Lupu did everything he could to attract Medvedev's attention by sending as many positive signals as he could think of. But even he was surprised at the unexpected attention he received. When Medvedev offered to pose with Lupu for photographers, the latter looked decidedly lost.

Perhaps that was because he realized at that moment what this honor might end up costing him. After all, he must have noticed how Moscow's "yesterday man," former President Vladimir Voronin requested a meeting with Medvedev and was turned down. Voronin had to leave the country during the summit to minimize his humiliation. And one wonders if Medvedev really thought that such a demonstrative affront to the old favorite was really a good way to convince Lupu to get on board with Moscow.

Dmitry Medvedev (right) no longer has time for Vladimir Voronin, it seems.
Moldova's current political deadlocks stems from the fact that the four other parliament factions cannot muster the 61 votes needed to elect a president. The coalition needs eight votes, which the Communists can offer -- as the democrats offered their votes to elect Voronin as a president in 2005 to avoid early elections. Lupu has support among the Communists, but the final decision depends on Voronin.

And did Medvedev's gesture help Lupu in his uneasy attempt to build a dialogue with the Communists? After the summit, the party's official newspaper "Communist" wrote: "Marian Lupu's picture against the background of Medvedev won't help him become president." And Voronin declared unambiguously that the Communists will not offer their votes to Lupu.

It seems the Communists have once again found the dignity that they demonstrated under Russian pressure in the 2005 elections, which they won. But the Communists have been unable to modernize themselves -- or the country that they ruled for eight years --sufficiently to gain genuine support among the electorate. This inevitably forces them to rely on Russian support and makes them vulnerable to Russian influence.

Meanwhile, although the Alliance for European Integration continues to insist that Lupu is its candidate for president, his pro-Western partners must be somewhat confused by Medvedev's demonstration of support and are likely wondering privately what kind of political favors Russia might expect from a President Lupu.

Basking In A Manufactured Glow

Why are politicians in the former Soviet countries so eager to have their picture taken with the president of Russia? For the most part, Russia's neighbors associate Russia with unexpected gas cuts, gas-price increases, and painful embargoes that produce misery throughout society. So there is a certain part of the electorate that seeks to avoid these punishments at any cost and wants a leader who can appease this uncontrollable force of nature.

The size of this segment of the electorate is hard to estimate. The Kremlin has agencies in its neighboring countries, such as Eurasian Monitor (a project of the Kremlin-controlled All-Russia Center for the Study of Public Opinion), that are working to improve Russia's image and its standings in the polls. Of course, such polls are primarily intended not to reflect public opinion, but to shape it.

The Kremlin uses the same technique at home -- controlling the media in order to frame issues in the "correct" way and then producing polls, studies, and "expert" opinions that bolster this impression. Judging from some of the comments coming from Russian leaders, it would appear that often the rulers themselves begin to believe the storylines they craft.

Marian Lupu, it seems, fell victim to a desire to share in the Russian leader's apparent popularity. But by doing so, he has placed his presidential ambitions in grave danger. By comparison, it seems Ukraine's Yushchenko made a rare appearance at the CIS summit precisely in order to be snubbed by Medvedev and to give his abysmal popularity rating at home a little bounce -- not exactly the result Russia was seeking.

Maybe it is finally becoming clear that politicians in the former Soviet Union can benefit more from building popular support for themselves than by trying to bask in the illusory popularity of Russian leaders. If they focus on what they can do for their own people, they will be more respected in their own countries. And by the Kremlin as well.

Irina Severin is a journalist and political analyst based in Chisinau. The views expressed in this commentary are his own, and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Kyle from: Russia
October 29, 2009 13:16
What about the American influence in Moldova? That needs to be included or do you just ignore the real truth. Moldova has great people but the work of America on the democracy farce is big time there. I know I have been there and done that...

America in Russia!

Kyle

by: SMIRONOV from: TYRAPOL
October 29, 2009 13:39
well irena...

all these years living under comunism in moldova have finally cought up with you..

your piece lacks direction, balance, objectivity and sadly reality...

this kind of yellow journalisma is exactly the kind you purport to fight.

so what is to be done, irena?,,

im not sure but a jouralist re-education camp is a must...

you may reclaim there the basic tenants of decent and objective journalism.

in your case, that may be beyond your reach unfortunately...

may the editior have a word or two with you and DESIST YOU FROM THE FURTHER CONTRIBUTION TO RFL.

by: vlad from: Moldova / USA
October 29, 2009 14:25
Russian president means billions of dollars, military power. A "small" president boosts his image by good relations with Russia. EU, US, China are other big boys in the town. EU, US do not put 100% of their weight behind Moldova as they did for Baltic states, Russia and China fill the gap.

Lupu needs 8 communist votes. He and Medvedev showed to communists that there is no use to support Voronin. Medvedev probably made a favor to Lupu. Filat and 'radical' democrats might not like such support but they have no choice. They will not get to power without Lupu. I do not understand why Russia dropped Voronin. Probably he irritated Putin thru last 8 years.

People do care about Russian gas. It is cold and apartments are still not heated. At the same time many want to move towards EU. Everybody hopes EU will show real support. Easing EU visa and work permits requirements would be a better support then any million dollars packages.

by: Vlad from: Moldova / USA
October 29, 2009 14:40
Kyle, I am a Russian speaker from Moldova and like many Moldovans have been to many places: Romania, Russia, Ukraine, Germany, Holland, Poland, Turkey... For a number of years I live in the US. I can tell that the US is the best country I have ever seen. Americans treat me as equal giving any opportunity. They do not care about my Moldovan passport as is the case in other places. I wish there was more of the "American influence" in Moldova, EU and Russia.

by: Rock from: Tunguska
October 29, 2009 16:31
Congratulations, Irena! A deep and thoughtful analysis which this site doesn't harbor too often. Please do continue to throw your pearls.

by: Olexandr from: Kyiv
October 29, 2009 17:42

Really insightful!

Good warning for Ukrainian politicians.

Thank you!

by: Michael Averko
October 29, 2009 18:34
Excerpt:

"Russia enjoys dabbling in the domestic politics of its neighboring countries, publicly supporting its favorite politicians and demonstrating its contempt for those whom it dislikes."

****

In comparison, Western neocon to neolib leaning types don't so the same from the prism of their own slant?

Overall, RFE/RL continues to lack objectivity in its selection of articles.

by: geo from: 45km offshore New England
October 30, 2009 03:41
Wow... very forceful and hard hitting article, one must say.

Regardless of one's take from reading this article's message, it must be said that this kind of journalism must be free and must be universal. Unfortunately, even if one disagrees with the message, such bold writings are too often censored.. and in worst cases, suffer even more around our world. So it's good to hear this level of vibrancy and it must now be supported in our modern age.

Personally, I think Kremlin controllers are just as equal to American neo-cons. Every kilo. Equally flawed and negative to progress. So there.. there's my take. Said it.

Independent people's voices for non-politicized and non-exploited humanity must be heard above any party or power-base. It's time now to move on.

Respects to peoples of Moldova, US, Russia, Ukraine... and wherever from our Earth.

by: DE Teodoru from: NYC
November 04, 2009 00:03
How off can one be? The Russians are not the Soviets and for them Voronin was an old whore drawn to the far richer EU, turning tricks for crumbs. But Russia put a relatively large amount of money into his opposition for there Moscow faced competition with the Ukranians and Georgians who wanted Moldova as another link in the stormy chain. Now Lupu, who looked towards exodus from that tiny moustrap of a country, suddenly seems to think his standing is far greater in EU eyes if he brings right and left together into a country that seeks economic survival rather than political turmoil. He also sees no gain in playing East against West. As Yusheko and Sakashvilli disappear, the new men of tomorrow have to think that Russia is very near and America is not only far but very poor, unable to keep either its promises or threats. All this means a new sophistication that thinks in terms of regional economic growth rather than endless political debotchery whose only progeny is poverty. Alas, the RFE professional bitchers and the Diasporic polarizers who have yet to realize that Lenin, Stalin and Mao are long dead, are irrelevant as background noise. Up front is regionalism that even Russia learned is worth a lot more than hegemony. Finally, proof that Stalin is dead is the fact that Medvedev has come to fully appreciate the real meaning of the term "friendly neighbor." Putin was always good at one thing: self-discipline and we see it now as he disciplines himself as well as the near abroad. And then there is Romania where paroxyzmal fraud and corruption are only matched by Wall Street and the lobby of the US Congress. Romania does not want to be seen as Bulgaria in EU eyes. It finally realizes that Romanian votes will go to the leader who develops real clean productive ties with EU, not NATO, an obselete means of poverty and waste. With Israel and the US having escaped one step ahead of the Russians and the latter realizing that it can't afford any more Chechnias, we may come to see (watch Lupu as a centinel sign) MATURATION in East Europe as hard nosed reale economique replaces the old 19th Century fantacies of drunken leaders too blind to see the corruption bleeding their countiries. East Euros are finally learning the meaning of the Anglo-Saxon's industrial revolution terms: productivity and efficiency and civility. Their kids are coming out of school "process oriented" instead of burdened with the older generation's notion of "can anyone see my hand in the drawer?" In such a setting there is no room for the verbal masturbation of polarizing academics imagining all sorts of nefarious political motives. It's a new world and it's time for scholars to understand that that means COMPLEX and process to end-results driven machinery. It's not all there and a lot of clumsy obese crooks are still around in Italian suits. But note the slim, trim young technocrats with eyes in the back of their heads. They, like Lupu, will not settle for an East Europe that's not up to the very West Europe trying to turn it into its Puerto Rico.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

S. Ossetia's Dzhioyeva In 'Serious Condition'

Latest Comment (9 total)

Comments are posted in chronological order. If you are replying to a specific comment, we ... More

South Ossetian Opposition Leader Hospitalized After Raid On Her Headquarters

Latest Comment (6 total)

Andrew: This is the same separatist government that burnt every Georgian village in the ... More

Syrian Army General Killed

Latest Comment (1 total)

Jack: US and Saudi-sponsored Wahhabi terrorists which RFE/RL and CNN and other state-controlled US ... More