Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

North Kosovo Still Big Challenge As Pristina Marks Independence Anniversary

Soldiers from the NATO-led peacekeeping force KFOR have reinforced Kosovo's police
TEXT SIZE - +
By Ron Synovitz, Arbana Vidishiqi
PRISTINA -- Kosovo today marks two years since ethnic-Albanian officials in Pristina unilaterally declared independence from Serbia. Since then, 65 countries have recognized Kosovo as an independent state -- including the United States and most of the European Union.

But Belgrade insists that Kosovo is still a province of Serbia, saying the territory was illegally wrested from its control by NATO forces in June 1999 and held as a protectorate until Pristina was able to make its independence claim.

The Serbian government insists it will never recognize Kosovo's independence, and it has successfully lobbied countries like Russia and China to support that view.

For Pristina, that recognition is needed before Kosovo can become a member of the United Nations General Assembly. Experts say Belgrade's position also could determine whether Serbia ultimately is invited to join the European Union.

Kosovo's president, Fatmir Sejdiu, tells RFE/RL that after two years as a "sovereign and independent country," one of the biggest challenges for Pristina is how to integrate the Serb-majority areas of northern Kosovo -- including areas north of the Ibar River in the divided city of Mitrovica.

Sejdiu says Belgrade has complicated the integration process by setting up parallel government institutions and encouraging Serbs in northern Kosovo to reject Pristina's authority. Sejdiu also says the international community should not tolerate a de facto partition of Kosovo.

"The problems in the north are problems that were here a decade ago, maybe even earlier," Sejdiu told RFE/RL this week. "The efforts [of Belgrade] have always concentrated on finding formulas and potential channels for damaging Kosovo in the post-freedom situation, post-international intervention. You do know that regardless of the international support given in general to Kosovo, Serbia's parallel structures in the north have, unfortunately, been tolerated."

Bringing In The North

Together with the International Steering Committee on Kosovo -- a 25-country body tasked with upholding the fledgling country's independence -- Pristina has come up with a plan for the integration of the north.

Kosovo's Prime Minister Hashem Thaci explains that it took 10 years for Kosovo's local and international institutions to draft the four main points of the so-called "comprehensive approach."

"The first point is the establishment of rule of law. Second is the establishment of a Mitrovica North municipality," Thaci told RFE/RL. "Third is organizing free elections for the three municipalities in Zvecan, Leposavic, and Zubin Potok. Fourth is enhanced engagement for economic development and job creation. To this end, Kosovo's government will set up a special fund."

Pieter Feith, the European Union's special representative in Kosovo, says local acceptance by the Serbian community in northern Kosovo is crucial.

Feith told RFE/RL on February 16 that with proper conditions, work can move forward toward establishing a new municipality in North Mitrovica and organizing local elections there. Once that step is taken, Feith says, governance and links with other municipalities can be extended.

"In the north, [parallel structures] can be replaced by privileged linkages between Belgrade and the population in northern Kosovo," Feith says. "[This] would assure the Kosovo Serb community that they can maintain their traditional way of life, they can receive resources to support education and health, and that we can make best use of the customs revenues that should start flowing again."

But Feith says support from Serbs in northern Kosovo means that Belgrade needs to be brought into the process.

"We would like to consult with Belgrade on further steps with regard to the north, and I'm sure that also from the EU side, there will be further consultations with Belgrade on the situation there," Feith says.

Serbian Opposition

The government in Belgrade isn't buying the plan. Oliver Ivanovic, state secretary at the Serbian Ministry for Kosovo-Metohija, as Kosovo is called in Serbia, told RFE/RL recently that Belgrade can't be expected to support an integration plan that, despite Feith's involvement, does not have the formal backing of the European Union.

Five EU nations -- Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Slovakia, and Spain -- have not recognized Kosovo, largely because of ethnic minority issues of their own.

Analysts tell RFE/RL the problem with the northern integration plan is how to apply it -- including what pressure or incentives the international community will use and, indeed, how much unity there is within the international community for the move.

Janusz Bugajski, the director of the New European Democracies Project at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, explains why only the local representatives of the EU have endorsed the plan so far.

"The EU, if it stands behind something, has to have unanimity," Bugajski told RFE/RL. "Remember, there are five countries within the EU that do not recognize Kosovo. This is one of the confusions that would somehow have to be skillfully handled."

In fact, many countries that have not recognized Kosovo's independence are waiting for a ruling expected later this year from the International Court of Justice at The Hague. That ruling will determine the merits of Belgrade's claim that Kosovo's declaration of independence was illegal.

Kosovo's President Sejdiu says he sees that case as part of wider efforts by Belgrade, "in every corner of the world," to put pressure on countries to delay recognition of Kosovo.

Sejdiu says he does not want to "prejudge" the ruling from The Hague.

"At the same time," he tells RFE/RL, "I can say there can be no decision which will justify a very hypocritical request of Serbia to undermine Kosovo's statehood -- in a formal and legal sense -- because it can't be undone."

In the end, Bugajski says, Belgrade needs to consider that the larger EU countries and the majority of the bloc already have recognized Kosovo.

Bugajski says that leaves him "absolutely convinced" that Serbia will not get a formal invitation to join the European Union until it accepts the independence of Kosovo.

RFE/RL's Arbana Vidishiqi in Pristina and Ron Synovitz in Prague, with contributions from Branka Trivic in Belgrade
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 4
    Next 
by: north vs south from: Serbia
February 17, 2010 17:11
Kosovo Serbs have learned from Kosovo Albanians how to create and maintain "parallel institutions". Kosovo Albanians have been doing this since early 80s, long time before Milosevic came to the power. There's no way that Serbia and its citizens will allow any activity of illegal Albanian government from Pristina to roam anywhere in the north. Unfortunately, Kosovo Serbs in the South live way under any international humanitarian rules, basically depending on a good will of their oppressors, Kosovo Albanians. Ask those dozen Serbs that live today in Pristina, surrounded by barb wire and protected by nato soldiers. That's your "state" in full display.

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
February 17, 2010 19:57
Why can not North-Kosovo secede Kosovo and reunite itself with Serbia?

If Kosovo had the right to secede Serbia because of its majority of Albanian population than why can not it be applied for North-Kosovo where the majority of the population is Serb?

A great double standard by the West again...

It would be much easier also for Serbia to acknowledge the loss of Kosovo if they can regain the Serb populated part of it.

Why do not we follow the path of Woodrow Wilson who talked about the self governation of nations?
If we redraw the borders on the Balkan then why do not we at least try to draw a border which follow the ethnical boundaries instead of creating new minorities in the new state of Kosovo?

If multiethnicity was not work in Serbia between majority Serbs and minority Kosovo Albanians then why do we expect that it will work inside Kosovo between majority Albanians and minority North-Kosovo Serbs?

North-Kosovo should be given back to Serbia as it is a land inhabited by Serbs.
Therefore it has nothing to do with the rest of Kosovo inhabited by Albanians but has much more in common with Serbia itself.

If we want peace in the Balkan then we should not create new spots for ethnical tensions.

by: Peter Paulson from: SF
February 17, 2010 21:54
Why would Serbs in Kosovo want to be part of the poorest country in Europe, when they are part of the most powerful country in Balkans (Serbia).
If EU rejects Serbia over Kosovo, then Serbia should back Serbs independence from Bosnia. Let Eu spend billions more trying to put that country together.

by: Mike from: USA
February 17, 2010 22:52
Kosova won its independence because the West refused to stand by and witness the Serbs attempt another genocide instigated by rabid nationalists as well as the Serbian Orthodox Church. This attempted Serb genocide on the Kosovar Albanians as well as the Serbs penchant for genocide in both Croatia and Bosnia convinced Western countries, led by the USA, to punish serbia with bombing and then after Serbia was sufficiently weakened, supported Kosova in its quest for independence.

To address Zoltan, the Serbs living in North Kosova do not deserve to be able to break away from Kosova and join Serbia simply because they were part of maniacal thirst for genocide attempted on the Albanians and therefore, should not be rewarded for their heinous acts.

by: Altin from: DE
February 18, 2010 00:25
"If Kosovo had the right to secede Serbia because of its majority of Albanian population than why can not it be applied for North-Kosovo where the majority of the population is Serb?"

Fine, as long as Albanians in Presevo Valley (still in Serbia) and Hungarians in Vojvodina get the same right. Let's do it

by: Jim
February 18, 2010 07:21
Altin - Hungarians make up just 14% of the population of Vojvodina, and are an absolute majority in a very few places, unlike Northern Kosovo which is pretty much exclusively Serb.

Also, Northern Kosovo was never a part of what we know as Kosovo today. It was deliberately added by Tito after WWII to add a Serb area to the province. It should by all reckoning be allowed to remain a part of Serbia.

by: sirivanhoe98 from: Sydney Australia
February 18, 2010 12:13
Mike.

Serbs deserve Kosovo because there were there first. The place is littered with ancient Serbian monuments dating back to 8th century. The same monuments that Albanians are destroying with impunity to erase any evidence of who was first in Kosovo.

Albanians shave been persecuting Serbs in Kosovo for a long time. Even before the Balkan wars, when they were vassals of the Ottomans. More recently, in 1981, after violent riots in Kosovo by Albanians during which over a dozen people were killed, some 25,000 Serbs fled Kosovo.

By the time Milosevic came to power, persecution of Serbs in Kosovo was systematic and condoned by the all-Albanian judiciary that existed in Kosovo. Milosevic was elected to put an end to the ethnic cleansing of Serbs that was taking place in Kosovo. Over the 3 decades before Nato's bombing of Serbia some 200,000 Serbs were driven out of Kosovo by Albanians.

NATO helped them get rid of a further 150,000, the remaining now concentrated around Mitrovica. Before NATO's bombing 40,000 Serbs lived in Prishtina. Today there is less than 400. Albanians have taken their homes with little possibility of their return to the rightful owner.

That is ethnic cleansing and genocide.

There was no genocide against Albanians in Kosovo.

by: alfonso from: italy
February 18, 2010 14:23
kosovo is serbian land in history and look at all the churches and all serbina monuments from history kosovo was and is serbian lands and many people see this also and th other funny thing is albanians think that skanderbeg is albanian but from reading he is serbian and part other blood and has nothing to do with the albanian nation but with the serbian and south albania is greek lands and not albanian and the north was serbian lands so why is this not in descussions and the albanians are living worse now than ever in kosovo they are flooding other countries and leaving kosovo why?

by: Ariana from: Prishtina
February 18, 2010 15:06
To whatever your name is from Australia. How can someone say there was no genocide against Albanians in Kosovo. Were you ever in Kosovo? Were you here as a witness? If we want to comment based on emotions, fine...But, if we want to spice up the debate with arguments, then please do some dignified research and come back.

by: Johann from: USA
February 18, 2010 16:55
I don't agree with Mike from USA. Why is he a Muslim supporter?
It is obvious, that if Kosovo can secede from Serbia ( That I support, because I believe in, that it is best for different religions to have their own state, like Isreal is a Jewish state), then Christians in North-Kosovo should be able to secede from South-Kosovo. As a former European resident, I know about the trouble the Cristian population there is having with different religions. The rise of the Neo-Nazism, and increasing support with right wing elements in Europe is because immigrants there doesn't respect the European culture.
All the trouble in Bosnia, was because Tito the Yugoslavian communist was trying to mix to together different religions and nations.
Comments page of 4
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (23 total)

greg: Rafi. you go through round after round accusing me of raping and killing ... More

Loophole Offers Legal Out For Doctor Convicted In Bin Laden Case

Latest Comment (3 total)

khan: i think everyone in the paki gov should be hanged the traiters suking ... More

Putin Wants To Party Like It's 2007

Latest Comment (3 total)

nirvichara: It is so boring to hear all this crap about Putin's "old KGB ... More