Monday, February 13, 2012


News

Petraeus Vows No Change In Rules Of Engagement In Afghanistan

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen (right) with U.S. General David Petraeus at a joint news conference in Brussels.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Ahto Lobjakas
BRUSSELS -- General David Petraeus, the new commander of U.S. and ISAF troops in Afghanistan, has vowed to do "everything humanly possible" to avoid casualties among Afghan civilians.

Petraeus was speaking in Brussels after briefing NATO ambassadors about his plans.

He sought to assuage concerns among NATO allies that the United States will take a tougher approach in operations against insurgents in Afghanistan.

Petraeus acknowledged there were concerns among some troops at the current rules of engagement, which put restrictions on coalition attacks to limit civilian casualties. But he said he had no plans to make it easier for NATO troops to use lethal force and said keeping reducing civilian casualties to an "absolute minimum" would remain a key objective.

"In a counterinsurgency, the human terrain is the decisive terrain," he said, "and therefore you must do everything humanly possible to protect the population and, indeed, again to reduce the loss of innocent civilian life."

Petraeus' visit comes a day after the U.S. Senate confirmed him to replace General Stanley McChrystal, who was fired after he made disparaging comments about the Obama administration in "Rolling Stone" magazine.

General Stanley McChrystal was relieved of his duties after making disparaging remarks about members of the Obama administration.
Petraeus will take charge of the some 140,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan this weekend. Credited with masterminding the successful counterinsurgency "surge" in Iraq, the four-star U.S. general will oversee President Barack Obama's injection of an additional 30,000 troops into Afghanistan, which will peak this August.

Petraeus appeared intent to smooth the feathers his appointment had ruffled in NATO capitals, which diplomats say were not consulted in advance by Washington.

He indicated the broad counterinsurgency strategy pursued by McChrystal -- geared toward pushing the Taliban out from key areas in the south as well as important urban centers -- will not change.

The U.S. general will also have to contend with the growing unpopularity of the war among allied publics, with the Netherlands scheduled to pull out its troops this year and Canada next year.

Petraeus today said the success of that strategy accounts for the increased numbers of NATO casualties, which are now higher than at any point since 2001 when the United States toppled the former Taliban regime.

"When you take away the enemy's safe havens and sanctuaries -- particularly ones that are as important as, say, those in central Helmand Province, in Marjah now, in Nadi Ali, even Lashkar [Gah] -- when you take away his safe havens," he said, "the enemy fights back."

U.S. and NATO officials have in recent months encouraged political reconciliation between the government of President Hamid Karzai and the more moderate Taliban leaders. However, Taliban leaders are reported to have turned down the offer.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai
Petraeus today defended ISAF's record in Afghanistan since the announcement of Obama's surge, saying the increase in fighting follows a known pattern. He said the Taliban had the momentum until early this year, but NATO is now turning the tables. He noted that casualty levels in Iraq also went up once the surge was under way -- only to come down drastically later.

Asked about his short-term criteria of success, Petraeus said he is looking for the expansion of security in key districts, "not entire provinces," as well as boosting the numbers and training levels of Afghanistan's own troops.

Petraeus also indicated he will take a close interest in the way NATO and Karzai's administration interact with the Afghan population in a bid to cultivate popular support for the ISAF mission. He said NATO would in future show greater "inclusivity" and "transparency" towards the Afghan population, in explaining the decisions taken and the way international aid money is distributed.

Petraeus said NATO is building on an outreach drive launched earlier this year by Karzai himself.

"When [Karzai] did a shura council a month or so ago, there were individuals willing to stand up with the microphone and camera on and criticize the Afghan government and, indeed, the president himself, which [Karzai] did in self-criticism also," Petraeus said. "That's the kind of approach, that's the kind of inclusivity and representation, that is essential to achieve the support from all the people of an area -- and not leave some feeling that they don't have a seat at the table."

Western donors, too, are increasingly concerned about the way their money is being spent in Afghanistan. U.S. lawmakers on June 30 blocked $3.9 billion in aid to Kabul citing concerns over corruption and mismanagement.

Petraeus said earlier this month it will take "a number of years" before the Afghan Army and police are able to take over responsibility for the security of the country.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Star71 from: Canada
July 01, 2010 17:16
So our soldiers are expendable.
I very much support all Western Soldiers but with this kind of stupidity, that will not win the an unwinnably war as long as the Afghan People do not stand up and join our troops against the Taliban.
And if they do not stand openly with our troops, they do not deserve one more single life of our troops. Shame on the General willing to sacrifice our soldiers.


by: Jeff from: Kabul
July 02, 2010 11:20
I live in Afghanistan, and most of the "stupidity" I've seen comes from the rank-and-file US troops, not from General Petraeus. These guys are generally not the sharpest tools in the shed - and most of them don't seem to understand that they're being paid to risk their lives for the sake of the Afghans, not the other way around. If they don't agree with the rules of engagement, they should have gone into another line of work.

by: Larry Glick from: Maine-USA
July 02, 2010 14:50
Many of the American troops returning home to the US have been telling me there is an increasing mistrust of our military and civilian leaders. They are beginning to realize that they, and the Afghan civilians dying of "collateral damage," are expendable pawns in a bizarre game.

by: CJ
July 06, 2010 02:14
Jeff,
I think your comments are ignorant and ill informed. When my Marine son signed up several years ago the Rules of Engagment were far different than they are today. The politicians changed these rules to try a different stagedy because the were losing this war which is not working as you can see. My son has an education and is a very sharp tool so putting all of the troops in Afghainstan in a box and making discriminating remarks makes you a bigot , I don't care where you lived. My son did not sign up to protect the Afgan people like you state. He signed up to protect American's and to serve his OWN country. I think he should stand a post on the border to protect our people instead of going to Afghanistan at all. I don't believe in this war and my son does not have a political agenda like Washington does. He goes where they send him and protects his brothers there and if he can protect the Afgan people who just want to live in peace than I honor that. These rules of engagment are killing our troops and NATO troops and it seems not to make any difference in the outcome of this war. Washington does not give our troops any real direction. They don't know who the enemy is and they mix with the innocent civilians. The enemy knows our Rules of Engagment and they do not have any rules of their own so our boys and girls are just getting dead. Since you live in this country free on the blood of others to say such ignorant comments maybe you should take up a weapon and take a post but I am afraid you just want to live off the sacrafice of the blood of others and expect them to do the dying for you. I think you are a coward. Thank God you are not my son, I would be so ashamed. God Bless our Troops and the NATO troops that fight the battle for us so we don't have to.
               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Cold Threatens Russian Fruit Crop

Latest Comment (2 total)

Vakhtang: The cold is certainly bad.
But as it is known that the russian fruit ... More

Libya Asks Niger To Extradite Qaddafi Son

Latest Comment (9 total)

John: you obviously have no idea what an islamic state is. please be quiet ... More

Iran To Make Nuclear Announcement

Latest Comment (9 total)

Chechen: Saudi Arabia and Muslims is Iran's enemy. The midget submarines, Chinook choppers, F-14's ... More