Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

Russian Patriarch Kicks Off Ukraine Visit

Orthodox Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Kirill waves to Ukrainians in Odesa on July 20.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Claire Bigg
Russian Patriarch Kirill is in Ukraine for an eight-day pilgrimage, exactly one year after a similar visit sparked angry protests and scuffles in Kyiv.

He arrived on July 20 in the southern port city of Odesa for what the Moscow Patriarchate has described as a "pastoral visit" to the predominantly Orthodox Christian country.

He will then travel to Dnipropetrovsk, in Ukraine's mainly Russian-speaking East, before heading to the capital, Kyiv.

In contrast to his first Ukrainian pilgrimage as head of the powerful Russian Orthodox Church last July, Kirill this time will stay clear of the county's Western, Ukrainian-speaking regions.

"He is wise enough to understand that a visit to western Ukraine would not be constructive," Ukrainian religious expert Lyudmila Filippovich says.

"His visit to Kyiv will be controversial enough since Russia is about to celebrate Christianization of Rus Day for the first time and the initiator of this holiday will not be in Russia on this date."

The patriarch no doubt remembers the chaos that marred his visit to Kyiv last summer, when his followers clashed with demonstrators hostile to his presence in Ukraine.

The Moscow Patriarchate retains formal authority over Ukraine's Orthodox faithful. But the country's Orthodox community is split between parishes loyal to the Moscow Patriarchate and an autonomous Ukrainian Orthodox Church that broke off from Moscow in the 1990s following the Soviet collapse.

An Orthodox priest blesses demonstrators protesting against Kirill's visit in Kyiv last July.
Kirill's repeated calls for closer spiritual ties between Russia and its mainly Orthodox neighbors Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova rile many Ukrainians, who say Kirill's vision puts Russia at the center of the Orthodox faith.

Moscow's Agent

Despite Kirill's assurances that his sole aim is to unite the country's fractious Orthodox Christians, growing numbers of Ukrainians also accuse him of doing the Kremlin's bidding and seeking to reassert Russian domination over their country.

Aware of the tensions, the Russian Orthodox Church insists Kirill's latest visit is strictly pastoral, and not political. But this has failed to convince many Ukrainians.

"Today, the Russian Orthodox Church is the most politicized church and clearly demonstrates its dependency on the political orders of the Kremlin," says Igor Isichenko, an archbishop of the autonomous Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

"The visit will yield many nice pictures, but I'm afraid it will not add to the spiritual growth of the faithful."

The recent election of Moscow-friendly Viktor Yanukovych as Ukraine's president cast further doubt on the patriarch's motives.

Kirill himself has made no secret of his support for Yanukovych, even flying to Kyiv to bless him following his election victory.

He is due to hold talks with Yanukovych and Prime Minister Mykola Azarov during his visit. And in a televised interview just days ahead of this week's visit, Kirill applauded the new government's political and economic performance.

"It's obvious that a political stabilization is already taking place," Kirill said. "Economic performance is more stable, relations with the world are deepening, with its close neighbors including Russia as well as with Europe and the United States. I think the lives of Ukrainians are significantly changing for the best."

Ukraine's Growing Importance


Many Ukrainians resent the Moscow Patriarchate for its consistent refusal to grant formal independence to the autonomous Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which it considers schismatic.

Newly elected President Viktor Yankovych (right) receives Kirill's blessing in Kyiv in February.
Advocates of an independent Ukrainian Church -- including Yanukovych's Western-leaning predecessor as president, Viktor Yushchenko -- contend that the country has more Orthodox faithful than Russia and deserves its own, separate church.

They note that the Moscow Patriarchate is losing growing numbers of faithful to Ukrainian splinter churches and is simply worried about losing influence in Ukraine.

Roman Lunkin, the director of the Moscow-based Center of Religion and Law, says this explains Kirill's frequent visits to the country.

"Ukraine represents a big part of the Russian Orthodox Church, and there are huge numbers of Orthodox parishes there. So Ukraine has vast importance for the Moscow Patriarchate.

Patriarch Kirill is aware that Patriarch Aleksy II rarely visited Ukraine and that this lack of attention was a mistake, because while Moscow was looking away different Orthodox movements and splinter churches developed in Ukraine."

Recent polls suggest that the Kyiv Patriarchate attracts some 14 million believers, while some 9 million Ukrainians visit churches under the Moscow religious authorities.

RFE/RL's Russian and Ukrainian services contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Gregory from: Gainesville FL USA
July 21, 2010 15:55
Patriarch Cyril needs to remember that Jesus Christ, not Russia, is at the center of the Orthodox Christian faith, and that the Church is not here to advance human geopolitical agendas in sync with the Kremlin, but the gospel of Jesus Christ. Mixing nationalism and politics with religion and spirituality is one of the reasons so many people are turned off by Christianity today. Jesus Christ said his kingdom was "not of this world."
In Response

by: nic0kr from: Poland (currently)
July 22, 2010 01:12
Interesting but a bit oversimplified (on purpose or by mistake?): there is no one "autonomous Ukrainian Orthodox Church" but TWO: the "Ukrainian Orthodox Church - Kiev Patriarchate" and the "Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church", the later being lately not so united.

by: Kateryna Shably from: Chicago, IL
July 21, 2010 21:46
Yes, Jesus CHrist, not Russia, nor the Catholic CHurch (Roman or Eastern) is at the center of the Kyivian Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Let's not forget, that catholicism was first at the center of destruction of everything orthodox for centuries and continues to this day using the so called Greek-Catholic church to desiminate catholicism throughout Ukraina. They call it "patriotism". They believe, inspired by metr. Sheptysky, that only when Ukraina is catholic, she will be free and Russia will have no power over her. they are working towards that goal. Uniates have become from the most devoted orthodox to the most trecherous catholics. Uniates do not care that Ukraina is suffering because of their madness, the goal has become Vatican's goal.

by: Bergschlawiner from: Seattle
July 22, 2010 03:06
Orthodoxy in the Rus started in Ukraine and Ukraine is the heart of Christianity in Eatern Europe, not Moscow. The patriarchate should be in Kyiv and not Moscow, which had no patriarch under the last Tsars until 1918. Kiril should go as a visitor and not a ruling patriarch.
In Response

by: BS Buster
July 22, 2010 06:11
Nonsense.

The patriarchate was moved from Kiev to the Moscow area.

BTW, nations have been known to have regional power shifts.

Ukraine is now an independent nations which Russia recognizes.

The minority wing of crackpot Ukrainian Russia haters try to spin the idea that Russia and Ukraine aren't so closely related.
In Response

by: Anonymous from: USA
July 22, 2010 13:26
Russia does not recognize Ukraine's current border with Russia. Putin himself declared that Ukraine was "not a state".....strange way of recognizing Ukraine's independence. The Ukrainians have had their own language, distinct from Russian, for ages. Pope John Paul II spoke it while visiting Ukraine. In fact, the languages are as different as Portugese and Spanish. Even Yanukovich agrees that Ukraine has a distinct language from Russian and (along with Russian) should be one of the official languages. Whether Crimea belongs to Ukraine is debatable. Geographically it belongs, ethnically it does not. How do these facts represent anti-Russian hate? The only real crackpot appears to be BS Buster.
In Response

by: Vetos Bird from: USA
July 22, 2010 16:13
There is no close relations between Ukraine and Russia and, two peoples accordingly.
Just because Muscovite's tzar Peter took Greek form of the name of the ancient Ukrainian state Kyivan Rus (Russia), it doesn't mean that nowadays Russians have much relations with the people of Ukraine or Kyivan Rus before.
Muskovites (nowadays Russians) has always been a disaster for the people of Rus. They took their land, they took their history and, they enslaved them for centuries.
According to genes tracing, modern Russians (Muscovites) have only some percent of Slavic genes when Ukrainians are overwhelmingly Slavic. And now, Muscovites want to be a center of a Slavic world with its Muscovite's church??? It simply nonsense, for they just do not belong to the Slavic nations.
About Russian Orthodox church, the fact that Kyivan Rus' orthodox church has moved its office to Moscow because of destruction of a Ukrainian state, doesn't mean that that church can have any influence over Ukrainian, a real Rus' Orthodoxy. Centuries ago that church have lost its Rus' identity, and now it's only Muscovite's Orthodox church that have always served its tzars and still does.
In Response

by: elmer
July 22, 2010 17:16
Following up on what Vetos Bird said:

tsarina Catherine, who was from Germany (Prussia) specially invited Germans to come to Russia - with special privileges that Ukrainians did not have.

They came as Mennonites - they were permitted to own land, have their own religiion, and much more. Meanwhile, Ukrainians were treated as serfs and slaves, and the assorted tsars and commissars forbade - and tried to destroy - Ukrainian language and culture.

To this very day, there are Mennonites in Ukraine who freely practice their religion.

Kirill is a sovok relic who does not believe in Jesus Christ or God - he believes in Putler and whatever is convenient for him to maintain political power, a limousine, and his $100,000 watch.

Ukraine and Russia are "closely related" like Nazi Germany and France were "closely related."

Ukraine and France are "closely related" like the Spanish Armada and England were "closely related."

Ukraine and Russia are "closely related" like Genghis Khan (and his Mongols) and Russia are "closely related."

Kirill is not a patriarch - he is a politician, a Putler puppet, and a travesty.

He ought to stay in Maskva.

by: elmer
July 22, 2010 13:24
I see that Kirill has been careful not to show his $100,000 watch. And there are no pictures of his limousine.

After its independence, Ukraine formally recognized - freedom of religion. President Yushchenko cited it often, although he did also urge a Urkainian church - not one dominated by Russian.

In Ukraine, religion was used as a political tool. In Western Ukraine, where parts of it were ruled by the Austro-Hungarian empire, and Poland, Catholicism was forcibly instituted - but Orthodox traditions were preserved by specific treaties.

In other parts of Ukraine, where Russia dominated, the Urkainian Orthodox Church was also politically dominated by Russia. Because under the tsars, the Russian Orthodox Church was interwoven with potlicis. The tsar appointed the partriarchs, just as in England various kings appointed archbishops and bishops, and the king became the head of the Church of England.

During soviet times, the Russian Orthodox Church was the only "official" chruch, heavily tied in with the KGB - stil centered in Moscow.

There were various Ukrainian Byzantine Rite Catholics, Baptists, and Ukrainian Orthodox Church faithful who nevertheless managed to keep their faiths under atrocious soviet circumstances.

Kirill is a soviet relic - the purpose of his visit to Ukraine is political, not religious. Putler and the Russian Orthodox Church are tightly interwoven politically, and the Russian Orthodox Church is not a church - it is a political tool.

Kirill ought to stay out of politics. But, as a sovok relic, he can't - so he ought to stay in Maskva with his $100,000 watch. He is a travesty of religion. He is not a cleric - he is a politician.

And leave Ukrainians alone to practice their own faiths under freedom of religion.

by: Luda Semeniuk from: Inverness Florida
July 23, 2010 13:01
It's a sad state of affair, here we are in the new millenium and Ukraine still tolerates intrusion from Russia under the auspices of Russia's version of Orthodoxy. The fact of the matter is Russia is about 90% muslim and pagan while Ukraine is about 80% Christian. This Patriach of what's Russian probably figured out, if he wants to keep his job, he's not going to be able to much longer in Russia with their major religious climate change, so he's barging in through Ukraine's religious door. The Pentecostals from the West haven't been much better for the sovereignty of Ukraine, nor have they considered to make any restitution for the damage and sins they caused in Ukraine, that generates negative affects towards ethnic Ukrainians. Pentacostals are just as guilty for perpetuating Russian propoganda as well, and continue to do so today. The American Orthodox church is guilty of perpetuating Russian Propoganda, and Ukraine should consider not being so welcoming towards them either.

by: Bruce from: UK
July 23, 2010 22:54
Orthodoxy in almost all the Slav countries really starts in Moravia, possible Miulc(z)ice, with Byzantium and the old Church Slavonnic, Poland became Catholic only after the fall of Great Moravia, but the present Russian patriarch follows the old Byzantine custom still, and does not observe in spirit the Catholic division of church and state. The change of the authority from the Kiev Principate to Moscow underlines the POV of the Russian Patriarch, that the various Rus states are systemically united under that faith. Like Byzantium, Russia has also had a sometimes troubled relation with the West, but they have also come to its rescue too, supported by that faith. Given the history from 1204, with the stab in the back at Byzantium, to the tacit consent of the Catholic's to Hitler, the Orthodox attitude is hardly surprising.
In Response

by: Anonymous from: USA
July 24, 2010 14:40
Catholics consented to Hitler? Where do you get that rubbish? Some did, some didn't. Lutherans, Orthodox, and Muslims consented too. Hitler's allies spread across Europe from Finland to Turkey. Ever heard of the Iron Guard of Romania? Bulgaria had allied itself to Hitler too. Neither is a Catholic nation. By contrast, Hitler vowed to destroy Poland, one of the most Catholic nations in Europe.

by: Wolodymyr from: USA
July 24, 2010 05:40
Ukrainian poet Taras Shevchenko wrote " Fall in love dark brows but not with the Moscawmen, because Moscawman are foregn people doing bad things to you". Every good Ukrainian understand the meaning of this poem as for centuries and till now days Moscowman , Russians are continuing infiltrating Ukraine and control it. To Moscow Patriarch Kirill--- Please live Ukraine alone and go home to Moscow and teach your Russian flock 10 commandments and how to treat your neighbor.

by: Volodymyr from: USA
July 26, 2010 19:13
SOS *** ** *** SOS *** ** *** SOS *** ** *** TO ALL GOOD PEOPLE OF THE FREE WORLD ! Russians are Invading UKRAINE. Please dont help the monster to grow bigger. To Moscow Patriarch --- GO HOME to MOSCOW.
In Response

by: Anonymous from: USA
July 27, 2010 14:50
Unfortunately, Russians invaded Ukraine centuries ago and never really left. They are a majority in East Ukraine. What will probably happen is the Western half will try to split off once the people get tired of Yanukovich and Co. Russia will waste money, resources and time trying to keep Western Ukraine under its thumb. Me thinks that Obama decided to throw Ukraine under the Russian bus in order to create a "reset".

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
July 27, 2010 08:48
Taras Shevchenko said it all!
Kirill is not the True Christian believer:
Not love to equal Christians but hatefull wall
Is growing in any place where go Russian leaders.

Dark brows and lovely faces have some Russian girls,
But even best of them have tragic seal upon their faces
And shaddows of being broken by tiranny running gulls
That put in them a sting of burning hate in lovely gaizes.

I am nailed to a Cross, being Crussified by Russians.
They sentenced me to die at 4, anone with mother,
Because I refused to be plagiarised by Prusians
And Russians of Moscow - "Christian brother".

The most imprtant of commandments, Kirill,
Russia violates against all that are Blessed.
It is Visantine that Russia forgeing and steal,
Like a Rurik that married women from Visant.

They were plandering Ukraine without mercy,
He teared apart between two trees for greed,
His wife avanged his death like bloody craizy,
And Russia simce still follow their evil deads.

Russian Ortodoxy have to accept equal in faith
Of their neighbors - without any reference to rule
Of Visantine gomics "stabb eyes and cut-off heads"
Over other nations and churches - as Macedonian gull.

Kpnstantin.


by: Pete from: New Jersey
August 18, 2010 02:05
Seems to me that Ukraine remains at the crossroads of selecting who will be their partners (actually masters), will it be Poland or will it be Russia. Obviously the English are not interested in Ukraine.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (23 total)

greg: Rafi. you go through round after round accusing me of raping and killing ... More

Loophole Offers Legal Out For Doctor Convicted In Bin Laden Case

Latest Comment (3 total)

khan: i think everyone in the paki gov should be hanged the traiters suking ... More

Putin Wants To Party Like It's 2007

Latest Comment (3 total)

nirvichara: It is so boring to hear all this crap about Putin's "old KGB ... More