Wednesday, February 15, 2012


Features

Russia's Message To Ukraine Echoes Across Former Soviet Union

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (left) and Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko (photo illustration)
TEXT SIZE - +
By Robert Coalson
Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko's chief of staff has denounced the "aggressive tone" of an open letter from his Russian counterpart that sent shock waves through Ukraine's political elite.

Vera Ulyanchenko accused the Russian leadership of being "hostage to old imperialist complexes" and capable of speaking to its neighbors only "in the language of insults and threats."

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin countered by saying the missive reflects Moscow's "concern" about deteriorating relations, accusing Ulyanchenko of "willfully misinterpreting" Medvedev's message.

In the letter, Medvedev accuses Kyiv of adopting policies intended to undermine a 1997 bilateral agreement on friendship and partnership, and says he hopes "the new political leadership of Ukraine" that emerges after the presidential election in January takes steps to improve relations.

Medvedev offers a litany of specific complaints against Yushchenko, including the claim that Kyiv provided arms to Georgia in the run-up to the war in the Caucasus last August and that Ukraine is "distorting" Soviet history by insisting the Great Famine of the 1930s was an act of "genocide" against Ukrainians. He also complains that Yushchenko's government is suppressing the Russian language and "obstructing" the activities of Russia's Black Sea Fleet, which is based in the Ukrainian city of Sevastopol.

"I am certain that new times will come. But in the current situation, I have decided not to send our ambassador to Ukraine," Medvedev says in a video blog post filmed at Medvedev's Black Sea residence in Sochi. "He will begin work later. Exactly when will be determined by the real dynamics of our relations."

Medvedev goes on to say he's "certain that the multifaceted connections between Russia and Ukraine will return, and on a qualitatively new level -- on the level of strategic partnership."

"Such times are not far off," Medvedev adds, "I hope that the new Ukrainian leadership will be ready for this."

Medvedev's blunt message comes shortly after a controversial 10-day visit to Ukraine by Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, a trip that was marred by protests by Ukrainian nationalists and complaints that the visit was part of an attempt to exert Russian authority in Ukraine.

It also comes as politicians in Ukraine prepare for the country's January 17 presidential election. Opinion polls show Yushchenko with just 4 percent support, trailing Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko by 10 percent and Party of Regions leader Viktor Yanukovych by 20 percent.

Just The Start?

Many observers see Medvedev's initiative as an attempt to influence the campaign and the election.

"This is an attempt to make a direct and forceful intervention in Ukraine's domestic politics, and this is an open attempt to give Russia's aggressive politics a decisive influence on the outcome of the upcoming elections in Ukraine," says Andro Barnov, the head of the Institute for Strategy and Development in Tbilisi. "Russia has much more resources and leverage in Ukraine than in Georgia, and so the possibility that this Russian policy will be successful there can not be excluded."

Marek Siwiec, a Polish member of the European Parliament, echoes that sentiment.

"[This is] the beginning of the Russian involvement in the election process in Ukraine," Siwiec says. "I think the language of imperial policies is very well recognized in Europe. The Russians want to be active in the presidential election process and they demonstrate it. That's it."

But former Ukrainian President Leonid Kravchuk dismisses such concerns, saying it's the voters -- not the Kremlin -- who will decide who the next president of Ukraine will be.

"God forbid that our relations should come to a conflict, to a confrontation, or bring about a situation where people are suffering because there is no heat in their homes, where rather than working on overcoming our economic crisis we are worrying about how to please Russia and Russia is thinking how to change the ruling powers in Ukraine," Kravchuk tells RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service. "The Ukrainian people will vote for that president, which it wants to elect. This is our right and Russia must accept this, just as we must accept what is happening at the highest level of Russian politics. This is not our business, just as it's not Russia's business to dictate to Ukraine."

Getting Their Attention

Still, most observers are taking Medvedev's signal seriously. Russia's "Nezavisimaya gazeta" wrote on August 12 that Medvedev is sending "an unambiguous message to pro-Russian forces in the neighboring country: Moscow would like to see the Ukrainian government re-formed." The moderate daily added that the capitals of all the other former Soviet states are watching these developments closely and warned that such actions could "lead to our close and not-so-close partners distancing themselves further from Russia."

Writing last week in "The Moscow Times," former Duma Deputy Vladimir Ryzhkov argued that "Russia's leaders have managed to alienate even its strongest allies." He discusses Moscow's "policy failures" vis-a-vis Belarus, Armenia, Turkmenistan, and Azerbaijan. In Ukraine, Ryzhkov wrote, "Moscow's actions have helped consolidate Ukrainian society around an anti-Russian platform."

Russian political analyst Dmitry Oreshkin, however, says Medvedev's letter is primarily aimed at a domestic audience. He says the Kremlin feels the situation at home -- he mentions the violence in the North Caucasus and growing discontent at the economic crisis worsens and unemployment rises -- is "getting out of control."

As a result, Oreshkin says, Russia's leaders are resorting to the old tactic of building domestic support by convincing Russians their country is surrounded by enemies.

"Over the last few years, we are constantly being encouraged to hate some enemy -- [whether] it is Estonia, or Georgia, or Belarus, or, now, Ukraine," Oreshkin says.

Oreshkin adds that, most likely, Medvedev's open letter to Yushchenko is only the beginning of a new period of heightened tensions.

"I think that since Russia's leaders have decided to ratchet things up like this, this is only the first step and most likely there will be some further steps to come," Oreshkin says.

RFE/RL's Ukrainian, Russian, and Georgian services contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Michael Averko
August 13, 2009 05:06
There's another matter to consider, which was suggested to me by Eugene Ivanov at his blog The Ivanov Report (see the posted comments ection under his July 12 entry: http://theivanovosti.typepad.com/ )

It's no secret that in Russia, there's second guessing of the decision to have Zurabov replace Chernomyrdin as Russia's ambassador to Ukraine. The opposition is greatest among Russian foreign policy elites.

With reason, they note Zurabov's limited foreign policy experience and the criticism of him in relation to a non-foreign policy position he had in government.

With this in mind, it'll be interesting to see if Zurabov ends up as Russia's next ambassador to Ukraine.

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
August 13, 2009 09:25
As we can see Russia have ignited its rockets regarding ukrainian elections. Therefore the EU should also come up with its incentives to anchor Ukraine at the western shores.

We need to finalize the Stabilisation and Association Agreement until autumn with Ukraine and offer a clear membership prospect in medium term.
Without membeship pledge there is a danger of Ukraine retreats from its democratic path.

But if Europe considers Ukraine officialy a candidate country the gravity of the developed Europe will keep Ukraine on its way towards futher democratization and market economy.

The best way to counter Russian imperialistic influence in the post-Soviet space is to offer membership in the EU for those countries.
And frontrunners are certainly Ukraine in the second row Georgia and now after the elections Moldova.

by: Alaverdi9
August 13, 2009 22:46
EU & NATO offer: You have to build the democratic society & guarantee stability in the country and after that we will offer the real membership.

I do not think anybody is that naive. This is a vicious Circle, when the first depends on second & second is not offered until the first is achieved.

But one needs a breath of free air & regardless of limited support from the west People In these countries can not restrain from breathing the air to accommodate foreign policies of neighboring Russia.

by: Michael Averko
August 14, 2009 03:52
With Yushchenko's low poll numbers in mind, it can be said that Medvedev is reachiong out to the Ukrainian population at large.

;)


by: Zoltan from: Hungary
August 14, 2009 07:30
Do not let Ukraine to be the second failure of the democratization process of the ex-Soviet Union!

Look at the Russian example: in Yeltsin's time Russia was the far developed and matured democracy in the region compared to its neighbours like Kuchma's Ukraine, Lukashenko's Belarus or Nazarbayev's Kazakhstan.
OK it was not a western style real and matured democracy but it was on the way to achieve that. Russia was the truly frontrunner talking about democracy to prevail in the ex-Soviet Union.

But later this good beginning have failed and the process of democratization reversed.

In my opinion this happened because of the absence of any "anchor" or gravity center for Russia to follow that path. Russia was given no incentive to go ahead therefore Putin's Russia had nothing to loose with a U-turn.

I think this was the main difference between the fate of Central-Eastern-European countries like Poland or Hungary and the ex-Soviet states like Russia.

The development of Poland or Hungary was helped and catalysed by western institutions and as early as 1990-92. EU then European Community signaled crystal clear that those countries are welcomed if they meet the certain criterias.

But those countries have a clear view about their future. Regarding western integration every party regardless of right or left one agreed. Governments have changed but the European path remained a corner stone of domestic politics.
These states have become true democratic countries with market economy. They have really integrated into western institutions.

But meanwhile Russia was given no pledge about a possible future join to the "elite club" neither EU nor even NATO so they simply left out. Therefore Russia have nothing to loose with Putin's turn.

Do not make the same mistake again! Do not loose Ukraine as the West have lost Russia 10 years ago.

Ukraine into the EU!

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
August 17, 2009 06:42
Why fall for traditional Russian game?
Sacrofizing nations, Russia did expand.
Provoking NATO-Russia, preparing a maim.
Friends were betraid, by Russian hands.

"NATO for Peace" is respond to Russia,
As limitted USA-EU defence of freedom,
Not being leured by Russia to parasha,
For Russian agressors expand "Durdom".

Konstantin.

by: Michael Averko
August 17, 2009 09:22
Re: Follow-up to some of the below comments

------------------------------------------

Excerpt:

"Do not let Ukraine to be the second failure of the democratization process of the ex-Soviet Union!"

****

Does that mean the continued support of a currently very unpopular leader (Yushchenko) after he loses the election? Unpopular to mean in his country, as opposed to his standing in neolib and neocon leaning think tanks.

-----------------------------------------

Excerpt:

"But meanwhile Russia was given no pledge about a possible future join to the 'elite club' neither EU nor even NATO so they simply left out. Therefore Russia have nothing to loose with Putin's turn.

Do not make the same mistake again! Do not loose Ukraine as the West have lost Russia 10 years ago.

Ukraine into the EU!"

****

Russian concerns were overlooked by some of the same folks maintaining high profile positions.

However, it's wrong to believe that Russia is "lost." Rather, Russia's development is an ongoing process. The respect for Russia's legitimate concerns can play an influential role in how it views Western intentions.

Meantime, a recent poll in Ukraine indicates that Putin would win the Ukrainian presidency over any Ukrainian non-Ukrainian politician worldwide. The same poll shows more Ukrainians favoring closer ties with Russia over EU membership.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
August 25, 2009 07:44
Russia accuse, as Ukraine's fault, the unfriendly policy of Russia, since Ukraine "was on Georgian side" during "Saakashvili's agression against Southern Osetia", as Russians put it.
(It was an arrogant Russian agression, read its "Chronology" on my site:
www.WorldFreedomAndTruth.info)

It reminds me Visantine emperor's question to a Georgian king:
- "Why dare you to say it wasn't christian-like to blind by knifes all male population in Bolgaria? Now I will kill all your World between Black and Caspian Seas!"
The answer was, Mister Medvedev and Putin:
- "Because what you did to them you will do to us also!"

Konstantin.

by: jan from: E.U.
September 01, 2009 08:38
Simple reply required;
'Thank you for your comunication; the Democratic Ukraine will of course retain relationships based on the constitution.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Iranian Bomber Wounded In Bangkok

Latest Comment (1 total)

arash: As I've said before this terrorist regime must be thrown out of the ... More

Kosovo Serbs To Vote In Referendum

Latest Comment (4 total)

Eugenio: Ah, Alija, your open-hearted admission of desire to cleanse the ethnic Serbs from ... More

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (11 total)

Mah: Really? You wanna divide Balochistan? That's the outrageous idea I've heard so far. ... More