map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Features

Salafi Ban Reflects Tajik Officials' Growing Fear

January 09, 2009
By Farangis Najibullah
The government of Tajikistan has banned Salafism, saying the Sunni Islamic movement represents a potential threat to national security.

Tajikistan's Supreme Court on January 9 added Salafis to its list of extremist religious groups prohibited from operating in the country.

The movement claims to follow a strict and pure form of Islam, but Tajik clerics say the Salafis' radical stance is similar to that of the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Salafi leaders insist their movement has peaceful aims, with no political or extremist agenda.

"In order to prevent national, racial, and religious conflicts and damage to the nation's reputation and honor, Tajikistan's Supreme Court, as of January 8, 2009, bans the Salafi religious movement's activities in the country as an illegal group," Supreme Court spokesman Mahmadali Yusufov said, adding that the movement poses a security threat.

Sowing Division?

The Salafi movement, which has been active in Tajikistan for just over two years, claims to have recruited more than 20,000 believers there.

Local officials say the group has only a few hundred supporters.

Tajik authorities are worried the movement will gain traction as it focuses its efforts on the country's younger generations. Most of the movement's local leaders are themselves in their 20s and early 30s, and came to Tajikistan after graduating from Islamic schools in Pakistan or Arab countries.
I've never heard any Salafi follower say anything against the government


One Salafi activist, Hoji Nazirmat, protested the court's decision to ban the group, saying the Salafi movement in Tajikistan has always steered clear of politics.

"Any act of persecution and harassment of Salafi followers would violate Tajikistan's laws, because we live in a democratic, secular country with the rule of law," Nazirmat said. "I've never heard any Salafi follower say anything against the government."

Salafis claim to adhere to a pure form of Islam, and do not recognize other branches of the religion, particularly Shi'ism and Sufism.

A majority of Tajiks follow Hanafi, a relatively moderate branch of Sunni Islam. There are also more than 200,000 Ismaili Shi'a, most residing in an eastern province of the country.

Official Concern

Tajik authorities claim that computer discs and videotapes confiscated from Salafi members show the group's leaders expressing strong anti-Shi'ite and anti-Iranian sentiments.

Local clerics have also warned the group is intent upon creating sectarian divisions within Tajikistan's Islamic faithful.

The Salafis' focus on "pure" Islam and their campaign to recruit young madrasah graduates has prompted many Tajiks to compare the group to the Taliban.

In October, Tajikistan's Council of Islamic Ulema, a grouping of prominent Islamic scholars, demanded that the Salafis abandon their beliefs or stay away from local mosques.

The group's anti-Iran stance has prompted rumors that the group has been funded by Western countries to weaken Iran's influence in Tajikistan. U.S. officials have rejected the allegations as baseless.

Tajikistan has a history of tolerance for Islamic groups that is arguably unique in the region, although official curbs on some expressions of stricter Islamic tenets have emerged more recently.

Dushanbe has cracked down on the most radical Islamic groupings, including Hizb ut-Tahrir. Tajik authorities have arrested hundreds of Hizb ut-Tahrir members, whom they accuse of trying to overthrow the secular government in favor of an Islamic caliphate.

But it is also home to Central Asia's first -- and so far only -- officially registered Islamic political party.

The country's five-year civil war from 1992-97 had pitted supporters of the secular government against members of the Islamic Renaissance Party (IRP). The government that emerged from the eventual truce went on to make peace with the IRP.

Some Tajiks, however, worry that measures like the Supreme Court ban on Salafism will only serve to radicalize the country's outlawed Islamic groups and stir antigovernment resentment.

The IRP criticized the court decision, saying the ban violates people's right to peaceful assembly and association.

RFE/RL's Tajik Service contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 2
by: DENNIS JUNIOR from: NYS/USA
February 15, 2009 06:46
Maybe the authorities in Tajikstan have some underlying reasons for the banning of the Salafi ....

by: Turgai Sangar
January 23, 2009 17:30
"There are cases when civilized imperialism is necessary to prevent thugs from overruning the world."

If that's what you think, fine. Everything depends of how you define 'thugs' of course.

Whatever, this sort of paternalistic 'civilisationist complex' was the line of thinking behind European imperialism and colonialism in the nineteenth and twentieth century and also that behind Soviet imperialism in the Islamic world. Decide what's good for someone else...

Their failure is obvious from history.

And nothing personal, but that of people who think like you will be obvious in the years to come too.

by: Sergey from: USA
January 23, 2009 05:52
"The term 'Islamo-Nazism' is as absurd as to compare Israël to the Third Reich. You know that."

I know that Hamas seek to destroy Israel and murder as many Jews as possible. So Islamo-Nazi term is perfectly good for them because they share with Nazis genocidal hatred of Jews. Hamas also claims to act in the name of Islam, so Islamo-Nazi is perfectly good term.

"And after years of being explused, ghettoised and having their land stolen, the Palestinians are expected to cow tow and say 'thank you, generous Israëli'?"

Oh Yeah. They were "ghettoised" because they repeatedly chose to wage genocidal war against Israel. They refused to live as civilized people side by side with Israel. They send their suicide bombers to Israeli towns blowing up buses, markets and other public places. They raised their children in virulent hatred of Jews.

As thugs should be in jail, if the entire segments of population are poisoned by virulent ideology, it is inevitable that they are "ghettoized" by their own choice of Jew-hatred.

After Israel left, they continued to wage war against Israel, so they got the war by their own choice. You seek the war, you get it. Sorry, Turgai, this is the way the world works.


The Israel, as far as I am concerned, did two stupid things:

1. It left Gaza leaving it to Hamas thugs.

2. While in Gaza, Israel did not outlaw totalitarian Islam and did not setup normal educational system for Gazans so the children could be taught civilized way of thinking and living. In other words, it failed to integrate Palestinian-Muslim population into Israel. If Israel did this, even partially, things might have gone different.

One last thing Turgai. There are cases when civilized imperialism is necessary to prevent thugs from overruning the world. The world needs now much more vigorous Western Imperialism to civilize Islamic world, so Islamists stop murdering and terrorizing people in the name of Allah and stop trying to build Islamic Caliphate.



by: Turgai Sangar
January 20, 2009 08:31
Yolki polki, Sergey! Again: who's a threat to whom here? The US-backed war machine of Tsahal and Mossad versus the resistance of Hamas. I mean, come on: the Qassam firecrackers... let's stay serious.

Also, what Tsahal has done in Gaza now, just like the cluster-bombing South Lebanon and the dislocation of the economy for years there is SHEER TERRORISM!

"Wasn't Israel unilaterally withdrew its forces and forcefully removed Jews from Gaza a few years back?"

And after years of being explused, ghettoised and having their land stolen, the Palestinians are expected to cow tow and say 'thank you, generous Israëli'?

BTW, Hamas was not imposed but ELECTED in an internationally recognised election in 2006 over the corrupt Fatah establishment. The blunder came when the EUnuch, under Zionist and US pressure and in again another show of double standards, suspended its cooperation with Gaza. THAT screwed up the situation.

The term 'Islamo-Nazism' is as absurd as to compare Israël to the Third Reich. You know that.

by: Sergey from: USA
January 19, 2009 18:48
"There are several fascist elements at work: an idea and discourse of supremacy, ghettoisation and banstustanisation, the daily humiliation of certain communities and groups and so on.

The comparison I always bear in mind is South Africa under apartheid. "

Again, Turgai, you keep on blaming Israel. What about Hamas ? Wasn't Israel unilaterally withdrew its forces and forcefully removed Jews from Gaza a few years back ? Wasn't Hamas then turned Gaza into a terror producing factory shooting rockets in Israel ? Didn't Hamas threw out its rival Fatah murdering dozens of its rivals in the process ?

The plight of Palestinians is entirely Islamo-Nazi Hamas fault. They refuse to live in peace with Israel. They choose to wage war of extermination against Jewish state. So they should not be surprised that there is a military answer to their evil actions.

by: Turgai Sangar
January 18, 2009 12:38
I find that also hyperbolic - there is indeed no industrialised extermination machine at work here - even if I myself use the Ziofascist and for a reason.

There are several fascist elements at work: an idea and discourse of supremacy, ghettoisation and banstustanisation, the daily humiliation of certain communities and groups and so on.

The comparison I always bear in mind is South Africa under apartheid.

by: Sergey from: USA
January 18, 2009 01:37
"How abouse shameful killing of children and women, behaving worse then Nasi-Germany"

Nonsense ! It shows, Natasha, that you have simply no idea what Nazi Germany did to Jews. Jews were methodically exterminated in concentration camps with an aim to wipe out Jews as people. Israel does not seek to methodically wipe out Palestinians. If they did, they would simply used carpet bombing and hit everything and everywhere.

So please, think a bit for yourself before posting this Hamas propaganda crap.


by: Natasha from: China
January 17, 2009 11:56
Sergey, by praising Christianity and Judaism it is clear that you are a Jew. Although I am lebaral and beleive in Western liberty, I can't agree with your praise as any religious beleive can be misused. How abouse shameful killing of children and women, behaving worse then Nasi-Germany acted against them- only because of a "believe that the land belongs only to one type of people"???

by: Turgai Sangar
January 16, 2009 09:37
"individual dignity and human dignity (...), and I happen to value these things."

So do I.

by: Sergey from: USA
January 15, 2009 20:27
I would summarize, Turgai, that I fully support banning Salafist and any other totalitarian Islamists movements, because they are a mortal threat to any chance for liberty under law. For all the numerous faults of Tajik and other post-Soviet Central Asian autocrats, they are better than Islamist rule. We see where Islamist rule will lead too, from Afghanistan, to Iran, to Somalia. Islamists can bring nothing but misery, powerty and export of terror and drugs.

You, of course, feel free to disagree vehemently, but I'd rather see these movements banned than see them take over and see what is going to happen to the rights of women and "infidels".

Surely, banning these movements will not be enough. Tajik government need to offer something better to the young generation of Tajiks than Islamic totalitarianism. However, with Islamists, there is no chance for individual dignity and human dignity whatsoever, and I happen to value these things.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 2
TEXT SIZE - +

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile