Saturday, May 26, 2012


Persian Letters

Some Iranians Watching Kyrgyz Developments With Envy

x
TEXT SIZE - +
Some Iranians have been watching the events in Kyrgyzstan with interest, while drawing parallels with the post-election crisis in their own country.

They have expressed envy over what they see as the success of the Kyrgyz opposition to oust the government and frustration over the failure of Iran’s opposition Green movement to bring changes.

Reports about the Kyrgyz developments and videos of the unrest were widely shared among Iranians on Facebook and also on Farsi news websites.

Former Vice president and blogger Mohammad Ali Abtahi, who was among those jailed in the post-election crackdown, wrote on Facebook that he has been following the events in Kyrgyzstan closely. “It’s strange how in one afternoon they managed to change the government," wrote Abtahi, who said he was in Bishkek several years ago.

One blogger and human rights activist wrote, "The government of Kyrgyzstan collapsed. I am hoping for the collapse of other governments.”

A young girl responded by saying, “Ours will also collapse, be patient.”

Another young Iranian asked whether the Kyrgyz opposition had any “training courses.”

One young man, however, wrote that the situation in Kyrgyzstan cannot be compared to the situation in Iran: “We don’t want bloodshed and we don’t want another revolution."

Many commented on the Kyrgyz events on Radio Farda's website, including Arash from Rasht, who wrote, “I believe the Kyrgyz people acted more effectively than us. Some of us are still after reforming an establishment that has proved it cannot be reformed.”

"The people of Iran must watch this, they could, we can too," wrote Minou.

Another reader had a more careful reaction: “I'm not very optimistic and I’m afraid they will face the same calamity as we Iranians faced in 1979. We have to wait and see whether they will really put in place a democratic system in Kyrgyzstan.”

On the popular web portal "Balatarin," bloggers noted that Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiev was among those heads of state that had congratulated Iran’s President Mahmud Ahmadinejad following his disputed reelection last year. They posted a link to Bakiev’s message.

A blogger named “sight” posted a item titled "The Story of Kyrgyzstan and the Green Movement":

"They say a group of people reached a river and stood there. One said that the speed of the water is very fast and went back. Another one said, 'we have to wait until the water is calmer.' One talked about building a bridge while another one talked of unity and said if they all would hold each other's hands, the river would not be able to do anything against them. One said the water is cold and that stepping into it could bring diseases. Another one called for resistance against the water current. Meanwhile, the river was flowing with more force. All of sudden,someone arrived, rolleed up his pants, and crossed the river. He didn’t even look at the surprised faces of those standing on the other side of the river."

A commentary posted on the “Akhbar Rooz" news website had a similar message:

“The Kyrgyz events are important for us and we have to follow them carefully because it shows that unlike what the reformists say and write, there are other ways to fight dictartorship.”

--Golnaz Esfandiari
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Ostaad from: USA
April 09, 2010 16:35
I am glad you mentioned "some Iranians" are watching the Kyrgyz "developments" with envy, because that is certainly not true about many, and I daresay the majority of Iranians. I KNOW as a pure propaganda organization you have an interest in seeing real democracy to flourish in Iran as long as the current regime is replace with something like the one in Egypt. Allow me to explain. What happened in Kyrgyzstan was mother Russia reclaiming its backyard by organizing a coup. But what is going on in Iran is the slow a deliberate building of democratic thinking and infrastructure as the grassroots level. There is no way that anyone with a genuine interest in democracy in Iran would ever compare these two fundamentally different situations except those who strive to have puppet regimes in Iran. Of course propaganda outfits like Radio Farda, Radio Free Europe and their mirror outfits in Farsi are seeing their aims of destabilizing Iran is not bearing fruit, therefore they are spreading more gossips about what "some" Iranians think. I think the title of your gossip piece should have been, "Some Propaganda Outfits Watching Kyrgyz Developments With Envy, Because Their Plots Are NOT Working in Iran".
Better luck next time.

by: Amuzegar from: London
April 11, 2010 12:38
Ostaad from the United States is absolutely right. There is no comparison between what has happened in Kyrgyzstan and the political development in Iran since the June 2009 presidential election. It underlines one thing: the Iranian watcher, the person in charge of the 'The Persian Letters" column, does not have a reasonable grasp of what is going on in Iran and the world and looks at events superficially. Too often the so-called Persian Letters are the translation of what Iranian bloggers have written in Persian. Since RFE/RL can by no means verify and authenticate what bloggers inside Iran have written are correct, the Persian Letters column is no more than a gossip column . This column is debasing the standing of RFE/RL. What you are writting are not stories or analyses. They are pure gossip and in contravention of RFE/RL's charter. They are not fair, impartial and balanced, and any novice in the business of jounalism can tell you that. I just hope that someone in RFE/RL can see the point I am trying to make.

by: Ali from: NY
April 12, 2010 03:05
To Oostad and Amuzegar, I'm a Iranian and when I learned about events in Kyrgistan I said to myself I wish this could have happened in Iran. I agree that conditions are different but many Iranians including myself hope that one day we can get rid of the Islamic government.
In Response

by: Turgai from: Eurasia
April 13, 2010 14:11
"one day we can get rid of the Islamic government."

Yes and become a colony and servants of the US, Israël, the international financial institutions and the Western aid organisations who will toss rests of bread at the Iranians.
In Response

by: saar from: somewhere
April 13, 2010 15:38
so the only alternative to fundamentalist theocracy dictatorship is "servants of the US"? how sad is your thinking, how limited. iran's theocracy is as evil as communism for the same reason: authority cannot be questioned, the government has exclusive right to the truth. this will always fail eventually, thankfully, especially as information gets harder and harder to control.

by: A Taheri from: USA
April 15, 2010 06:53
To those Iranians who have illusions while looking at the example of Kyrgyzstan, they should realize that they have lost the class struggle for capturing state power, and they must grow up and get over it. For those who liken the Islamic Republic of Iran with socialism in the Soviet Union, I must say, they do not have any inkling or understanding of socialism or even capitalism, for that matter.

About This Blog

Persian Letters is a blog that offers a window into Iranian politics and society. Written primarily by Golnaz Esfandiari, Persian Letters brings you under-reported stories, insight and analysis, as well as guest Iranian bloggers -- from clerics, anarchists, feminists, Basij members, to bus drivers.

Guerrilla Translators

Seen anything in the Iranian blogosphere that you think Persian Letters should cover? If so, contact Golnaz Esfandiari at esfandiarig@rferl.org