Monday, February 13, 2012


The Power Vertical

Spinning Missile Defense In Moscow

The test-firing of Iran's medium-range surface-to-surface Sejil-2 missile

Multimedia

TEXT SIZE - +
MOSCOW -- The message from Moscow was anything but unpredictable: It was the Kremlin's staunch opposition to American plans for a missile defense shield that forced the Obama Administration to drop them.

"We appreciate the responsible attitude," President Dmitry Medvedev said, "toward implementing our agreements." He’ll be standing several inches taller next to President Barack Obama when the two meet on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting in New York next week. But the self-delusion in Moscow this weekend is as heavy as the self-satisfaction profuse.

Russia’s perception that scrapping the Bush Administration's missile shield is a sign of American weakness was one of the decision’s chief dangers. More important was its signal to the Czech Republic and Poland, where the shield’s components were set to be installed.

For Warsaw and Prague, going along with Washington's plan was less about its merits than indicating -- in the aftermath of September 11 -- that they were serious allies prepared to risk Moscow's wrath. The American radar installation and ten interceptor missiles would provide a physical manifestation of the two former Soviet Bloc’s new Atlantic ties at a time when Russia's invasion of Georgia has cast doubt on Washington's commitment to standing up for Western values and protecting its weakest allies.

The Czechs were also worried an announcement would affect upcoming elections, so the real debate in Washington over mothballing the missile shield plans was surely about timing and rhetoric. The insistence that the new system would be more advanced and effective is partly a cover for dropping the old one. But that doesn’t make it any less true.

The previous administration's missile defense program represented a symbolic resurrection of Ronald Reagan's Star Wars program. It was also about telling the world Washington was going to do whatever it wanted. Missile defense made being with us or against an even greater ideological commitment that shook the NATO alliance and gave critics such as Russia more real grist for the mill.

The missile shield plans also called for spending tens of billions of dollars on technology that was never proven to work, a waste even less reasonable during a financial crisis.

If dropping the missile shield plans was all about common sense, one of the dividends is the hope that the decision really will help improve relations with Moscow. Being taken seriously is one of the Kremlin's main considerations, and it’s making as much as it can of telling Washington I told you so.

But the Kremlin’s arguments against American missile defense were never really about common sense or security. Moscow knew ten interceptor missiles in Poland never posed Russia a threat. Still, the Kremlin had vowed to aim nuclear missiles at Europe, although they walked that threat back in the wake of Obama's announcement. Russia’s leaders perceive instability around the world as a plus for Moscow, and they’re almost certain to latch on to something else.

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, the man who really rules Russia, indicated as much on Friday when he said dropping the missile shield plans "inspires hope," but groused, “I do anticipate that this correct and brave decision will be followed by others."

Defending the Bush Administration’s missile defense plans reminds me of a story I heard about a Russian doctor telling a cancer patient it was better to keep smoking because quitting would be a shock to his system. The decision to shelve Bush's plans is the latest proof that reason again reigns in Washington. It will be needed to deal with whatever Moscow throws at the West next.

-- Gregory Feifer

Tags: united , states , missile , defense , Vladimir Putin , medvedev , obama , Russia

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Mamuka
September 21, 2009 17:45
I think that all of Russia's hysterical objection to the missile defense system was shown to be just so much bluster when they announced they would move missile defense systems to the Russian Far East in response to North Korea's missile testing.

by: ukea1 from: ireland
September 21, 2009 18:12
Putin does not 'do' diplomacy. ask Anna Politskaya. sorry,you can't, she was murdered. This development, believe me, will be celebrated night and day down at the lubyanka.

by: Marko from: USA
September 21, 2009 23:18
Good blog. Russia is always looking for signs of weakness from the West, and they will exploit it in any way they can.

One thing that concerns me is that NATO is now considering partnering with Russia for European security (against an attack by Iran, which on the face of it is silly, since Russia has much to do with arming Iran!) Wasn't the splitting of NATO (or some kind of Soviet-NATO convergence) one of the old Soviet Union's strategic goals?

J.R. Nyquist just wrote a column last Friday that raises some good points too about the timing of the announcement to drop our plans for the shield - the 70th anniversary of the invasion of Poland by Stalin.

The Czechs and Poles can't be happy at all with the symbolism of this decision.

According to Nyquist, "[t]he strategic significance of the decision is fourfold: (1) Appeasement in the wake of Russian threats against Poland; (2) appeasement in the wake of Russia's bullying of Ukraine (by Moscow's withdrawal of its ambassador to Kiev); (3) appeasement less than 14 months after Russia's invasion of Georgia; (4) appeasement as an expression of NATO policy, adopted by the new leadership in Washington."

To see read more, please see:

http://strategiccrisis.com/

The article is entitled "Sending The Wrong Message."

Appeasement of an aggressor is always a prelude to war. What irks me is that the West does not see Russia as an aggressor to be worried about.

About This Blog

The Power Vertical is a blog written especially for Russia wonks and obsessive Kremlin watchers by Brian Whitmore. It covers emerging and developing trends in Russian politics, shining a spotlight on the high-stakes power struggles, machinations, and clashing interests that shape Kremlin policy today. Check out The Power Vertical Facebook page or