map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Commentary

Russian Lawmaker's Killing 'Marked Beginning Of End'

Galina Starovoitova tried hard to keep the democratic spirit of '89 alive in the new Russia -- and probably paid for it with her life.

November 20, 2008
By Brian Whitmore
Most of all I remember the crowds. The angry and bewildered masses gathered on St. Petersburg's Palace Square the morning after the assassination. The throngs of grieving ordinary people lining up to view her open casket. The haunting scenes of shivering pensioners in shabby overcoats crashing the gates at Aleksandr Nevsky Monastery to watch the twilight burial.

Ten years ago, on November 20, 1998, State Duma Deputy and human rights activist Galina Starovoitova was gunned down in the stairwell of her St. Petersburg apartment. Depressingly -- but not surprisingly -- those who ordered the killing are nowhere close to being brought to justice.

As a journalist working in St. Petersburg at the time, I knew Galina well, covered the aftermath of her assassination, and even endured a frightening interrogation at the hands of the Federal Security Security (FSB) as part of their so-called "investigation" into the killing.

Recent Russian history is littered with depressing watersheds and turning points as the country abandoned its clumsy, tentative, and half-hearted experiment with democracy in the 1990s.

For me, in hindsight, November 20, 1998 was truly the beginning of the end.

Class Of '89

Starovoitova was a leading member of Russia's Class of 1989, a collection of outsiders, intellectuals, ex-dissidents, and reform communists who rose to national prominence as members of the USSR's Congress of Peoples' Deputies following the Soviet Union's first-ever competitive legislative elections in the spring of that year.

Some of them, like former President Boris Yeltsin, eventually rose to the pinnacle of political power in the new Russia only to bitterly disappoint. Others, like Nobel laureate and human rights champion Andrei Sakharov, tragically died before the Soviet collapse. Most eventually just faded into obscurity.

But a few, like Starovoitova, stayed true to the principles that won her a seat in the first democratically elected Soviet parliament. Against the odds, she tried hard to keep the democratic spirit of '89 alive in the new Russia. And she probably paid for this with her life.

Starovoitova was killed weeks before a hotly contested local legislative election in St. Petersburg. As a federal lawmaker, she infuriated the city's retrograde bureaucracy during that campaign by throwing her weight behind a group of process-oriented reformers who were trying to create a more accountable local government. 

An ethnographer who made her name with groundbreaking field work in the Caucasus region, Starovoitova was one of the last intellectuals remaining in Russian politics in the late 1990s.

Acid Tongue

Not that she was perfect. She could be petulant, like when she shunned her former ally Yeltsin when he launched the first Chechen war in 1994, refusing to even speak to him for years thereafter. She had an acid tongue, once offering mock praise for Communist lawmakers on the floor of the State Duma during the August 1998 financial collapse. "You say you want to return to the Soviet Union. Well congratulations! You're fulfilling your plan. The shelves in all the stores are empty!"

And she fought like an alley cat for her constituents, meeting them regularly and going to bat for them in cases of official abuse and neglect. She was not popular with the bureaucracy.

And this explains the spontaneous crowds of ordinary people pouring out on to St. Petersburg's frigid streets to mourn her death. It was as if they knew something that I missed at the time -- that the brief age where politicians like Starovoitova had any influence was over. "It is like we have all woken up in a different country," liberal politician Irina Khakamada memorably said at the funeral.

And indeed they had. Less than a year after her death, the last remnants of democracy were being rooted out, Russian troops were back in Chechnya for a second time in a decade, and an obscure KGB officer named Vladimir Putin was riding a wave of xenophobia to the Kremlin.

These days, the only crowds allowed to pour out on the streets in Russia are those singing Putin's praises -- or denouncing and harassing his enemies.

Shortly before she was killed, Starovoitova said she was deeply concerned that Yeltsin's successor could turn out to be a "potential dictator" with little interest in democracy.

How right you were, Galina.
This forum has been closed.
     
Comments
by: Anton from: Auckland
December 22, 2008 05:42
"could turn out to be a "potential dictator" with little interest in democracy."

Annoying article! In fact a purebred propaganda. "Democracy"! Empty word, no more. There is no "democracy" in this world, there are regimes using this word as a cover-up. Take US or France as an example - this is not "democracy", this is a "representative democracy", allowing the rich to rule over the poor. Take UK, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Spain, Japan - this would be an "autocratic democracy" ruled by the Monarch. All fakes - same as Russia's "sovereign democracy", ruled by the gangsters. One fake vs another fake.

Democracy is a collegiate rule of the dems, local councils, shires, soviets - where the people PERSONALLY know a politician they vote for. Not a rule of the "demos", popolos (this one is called "ochlocracy").

I met Galina several times in the 80s, when I was close to Democratic Russia. She was a respected leader, a one of them. But they were not reflecting Russia in the democratic sense of this word, as the Russians did not want the democracy we wanted, and we wanted it to be of "western" type. As a result, when the coup was suppressed and "our people" came in power - 99% of them occured to be just Russians, the bounty-hunters who came to loot the country. She tried to become like that, but she failed - because her thinking was not reflecting the thinking of the Majority. And Majority all wanted to be rich - taking the western democracies as an example.

To rule Russia one must be a crook, same as to rule USA - and she was not. Means she was not ready for the role of a politician, and her reactions were inadequate for her time. Meanwhile she was not entirely free from benefiting from privatization, and she had her commercial interests as well - which possibly collided with those of her killers. I'd like to see her idealized, and I feel pity she's gone like that - but what this all has to do with "democracy"???
     
TEXT SIZE - +

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile