Sunday, May 26, 2013


The Power Vertical

The August 'Revolution'

Russian rocker Yuri Shevchuk performs at a protest rally in Moscow on August 22.
Russian rocker Yuri Shevchuk performs at a protest rally in Moscow on August 22.
TEXT SIZE - +
Vladimir Putin's provocative interview with "Kommersant," which hit the newsstands Monday, provided a fitting end to what has been a tumultuous August in Russia.

Putin taunted and belittled the opposition, which has found its voice and has shown a renewed confidence of late, saying they do little more than "say things around the corner from a public toilet and the whole world hears about it because all the television cameras will be there." Those who attend non-sanctioned demonstrations, he added, can expect to "be beaten upside the head with a truncheon."

It was vintage, trash-talking Putin, complete with the scatological "waste 'em in the outhouse" style rhetoric has become his trademark when he wants to play tough guy.  The "Kommersant" interview was one of a series of media appearances Putin granted as he drove a vintage yellow Lada on a manly four-day road trip across Siberia.

Putin's stunt appeared designed to deflect media attention away from a series of victories for Kremlin opponents.

The most dramatic of these was President Dmitry Medvedev's decision to suspend the felling of Khimki forest, slated for destruction to make way for a new Moscow-St. Petersburg highway, pending further study. Environmentalists had been trying to save the forest for years. Mikhail Beketov, the editor of a Khimki newspaper who reported on the issue was severely beaten in 2008. Efforts to stop the felling crystallized with spirited protests this summer.

Chirikova and Shevchuk
Medvedev also decided to review the country's forest code, enacted by Putin in 2007, which ecologists say heavily favors the timber industry at the expense of protecting Russia's woodlands.

And finally, the decision not to retain the embattled Georgy Boos as governor of Kaliningrad met a key demand of the opposition in Russia's Western exclave, who had been agitating for his removal since January.

Medvedev's most recednt nods to opposition sentiment came just days after thousands gathered on Moscow's Pushkin Square for a demonstration in defense of Khimki forest.

They also reversed decisions made by Putin's himself, reviving the inevitable chatter about whether the ruling tandem is on the verge of splitting up.

But what is more interesting, and in the long run more consequential, than this palace intrigue and tandem tea-leaf reading is the exciting dynamic that is emerging in Russian society -- and the ruling elite's confused, and often confusing, reaction to it. A coalition is emerging around the idea that the way Russia has been run for the past decade has reached the point of diminishing returns, will no longer cut it, and needs to be changed.

In many ways, Russian civil society began to come of age in the crucible of this long hot August.

This was visible in the case of Yevgenia Chirikova, the previously apolitical mother of two who spearheaded the protests to save Khimki forest.

You could see it in the meteoric rise of Noize MC, an earnest and clever 25-year-old rapper who is making a name for himself by railing against police brutality and official impunity (and who comes across in interviews as wise and level-headed beyond his years).

Noize MC
A more mature Russian civil society is also exemplified by the thousands of volunteers like Dr. Liza who mobilized to help their fellow citizens during this month's relentless forest fires, as the authorities appeared hapless and clueless. Dr. Liza's very public dishing of the ruling United Russia party, which has sought to co-opt her for their own political purposes, encapsulated the emerging dynamic perfectly.

And a reinvigorated civil society was clear as day as rocker Yury Shevchuk emerged as the poet bard of the democratic opposition, railing against the regime at a concert, berating Putin at a televised meeting, and headlining last weekend's Pushkin Square protest rally.

All this does not yet constitute an August Revolution (my headline was intentionally over the top), but Russian society is clearly waking up from its long slumber and people appear more ready than at any time in recent memory to demand more from their rulers.

The question now is: How will the elite respond to the changed atmosphere? Will Medvedev's recent piecemeal concessions to public sentiment be the order of the day? Or will it be more of Putin's tough talk -- and police-state tactics? Or -- as is most likely -- will it be a little of both?

Despite its factionalism, the ruling elite's main priority is hanging on to power and preserving the essence of the current political status quo. The disagreements are over how best to achieve this end. The siloviki favor cracking down. The technocrats and 'civiliki' favor loosening things up. And as a result, the regime appears schizophrenic.

That schizophrenia was on display today when police broke up a protest rally in Moscow by the Strategy 31 movement, detaining opposition leader Boris Nemtsov and others.

In a recent interview with RFE/RL's Russian Service, opposition politician Vladimir Ryzhkov said the elite is experiencing "nervousness and fear of increasing social activism and protest sentiment," and trying desperately to get things back under its control.

"The authorities are alarmed by the fact that such a peripheral issue like a forest in the Moscow suburbs attracted over three thousand people to Pushkin Square," Ryzhkov said. "We cannot talk about a split in tandem. But it is correct to speak of the authorities' confusion and fear of a growing civil society and opposition sentiment."

As I have blogged here, the political situation in Russia increasingly resembles that of the early perestroika period. In a recent article in Slon.ru, political analyst Stanislav Belkovsky makes a similar argument.

"The ghost of Khimki forest that is haunting Russia is the harbinger of a new perestroika, a replay of the one that took place nearly a quarter century ago, " Belkovsky wrote.

"The inefficiency of the system, which was based on total corruption, is approaching a critical level. The government, meanwhile, is not ready to make any changes that are not purely formalistic in nature."

The summer is over and Russia has navigated another tumultous August. And the autumn political season is about to begin.

-- Brian Whitmore

Tags: kaliningrad, Vladimir Putin, medvedev, khimki Forest, Noize MC, Russia protests, civil society, Yury Shevchuk, Yevgenia Chirikova

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: George E. Hudson from: Tbilisi, Georgia
September 01, 2010 05:41
Brian Whitmore's comments about growning civil activism in Russia in recent months brings to mind the origins of activism in the 1990s, when a number of enviornmental NGOs popped up. In a series of interviews with environmental acrtivists in 2004, I discovered that Soviet neglect of the environment (particularly the rivers and forests in the case of my interviewees) raised the level of consciousness of enough people to help an environmental movement coalesce after the fall of the USSR. It resulted in the formation of such groups as "Pomozhem reke" (we help rivers). It looks like the forest fires are helping to invogorate activism, again. We shall see if this has further political ramificaitons, however, or whether activism and the postiive response of Russian officials is just temporary.

--George E. Hudson

by: Ray F. from: Lawrence, KS
September 01, 2010 13:11
It’s a modern tragedy that many Russians equate democracy with western meddling (see for instance this sample of Kremlin counter-propaganda) .

http://rutube.ru/tracks/312982.html?v=7b8ddba1cf3d093e6c426621bf84c3e8

Mr. Whitmore rightly chastises Putin for his heavy hand, but some of the alternatives lurking in the Kremlin gutters are far worse. As this country celebrates its glorious end of military operations in the new, democratic Iraq (and possibly soon in Afghanistan), perhaps it might be prudent to tone down the revolutionary rhetoric. In this age of easy information manipulation, the demos have been known to make poor choices.

by: Dmitry Gorenburg from: Cambridge, MA
September 01, 2010 16:49
I am sympathetic to Brian's analysis, but we should remember one crucial factor that allowed the early perestroika activism to turn into something more -- the willingness of the authorities to allow it to develop and to grow. I'm pessimistic about the current authorities' willingness to do the same. More likely, any efforts to expand protests will be met with force by the government.

Perestroika was only in part a popular protest movement. Popular protest developed and grew because Gorbachev wanted to use it to break the back of the conservative CPSU bureaucracy. I see no parallels in the current environment to this aspect of perestroika, and therefore it seems to me that protest will remain relatively small scale for the foreseeable future and will not threaten the Putin/Medvedev regime.

by: Mark Galeotti from: New York
September 02, 2010 21:35
Dmitry Gorenburg is spot on, that one of the key variables is the willingness of the vlasti to allow civil society to begin to articulate an alternative political platform before they start getting "beaten upside the head."

On the one hand, my sense of the relevant "truncheon-bearers" is that they are willing to intervene if need be, and are probably better prepared in terms of training, hardware and numbers than ever they were in the 1980s.

On the other, as presidential elections loom, I can't help but wonder if, as Medvedev begins to realise he can't win as MiniPutin, he might try to articulate a role as a 'listening tsar', instead, and in the process provide civil society - for, to be sure, the most self-interested of reasons - a degree of protection and freedom that could become if not self-sustaining, at least harder to squelch quickly and easily.

by: Starchild from: San Francisco, California
September 18, 2010 10:31
For the sake of the Russian people, I hope that Brian Whitmore is correct that they are increasingly waking up and ready for change.

It is indeed a tragedy, as Ray F. points out, that Russians have been led to equate democracy with attempts by Western leaders to manipulate events in Russia for their own narrow interests. If these leaders had clearly stood for principles of freedom, instead of being so quick to cast their lot with corrupt (Yeltsin) and authoritarian (Putin) leaders who emerged on top, Russia might be in much better shape today.

But most politicians in the United States and Europe are guilty of undermining freedom in their own countries even if those societies do not (yet?) allow the type of outright repression as Putin engages in, so it is probably silly to expect them to do what's right for freedom in Russia rather than what's in their perceived pragmatic interests.

What the world needs is a libertarian international, an alliance or network of the truly pro-freedom political parties and dissidents in different countries, to work together and help each other.

by: akn from: inde
September 28, 2010 16:32
please log on to " www.naziat.org" to know about future of russia

About This Blog

The Power Vertical is a blog written especially for Russia wonks and obsessive Kremlin watchers by Brian Whitmore. It covers emerging and developing trends in Russian politics, shining a spotlight on the high-stakes power struggles, machinations, and clashing interests that shape Kremlin policy today. Check out The Power Vertical Facebook page or

Listen

Partner Media