Thursday, February 16, 2012


Transmission

The Language Of Pigs

Will Moldova's protesters be divided now on the national-language issue?
TEXT SIZE - +
By Natalia Morari
The other day I found myself at a demonstration outside city hall with my mother. She's retired, has never voted for the Communists, and is genuinely rooting for the new Liberal government.

She is hopeful about the changes that are going on and even supports the decision by the city council to raise prices for public transport and water (despite her pension of just $57 a month after 40 years of work).

Natalia Morari blogs for RFE/RLs Moldovan Service
I'm not going to write now about the economic sense of the city council's decisions or about the need to create a pension system under which citizens will be able to count on their own savings rather than begging the government for help or about how it is necessary to explain to the current pensioners step by step what changes are going on and why rather than simply bashing them over the head. I want to write about something else.

When we returned home the other day, my mother and I were surfing the Internet. I wouldn't care about all the dirt I saw there if I had read it on my own. But unfortunately, my mother read it too.

I don't know who is writing this or why. But on the pages of various Internet forums, the conflict has already moved to a whole new level.

Most commonly, you read that those among the protesters who speak Russian are speaking "the language of pigs." You read that they all need to be rounded up into cattle cars and shipped off to Siberia. And it's language that is taken as the main factor in identifying the protesters. And that is frightening.

A severe social conflict now would play primarily into the hands of the Communists -- in fact, there could be nothing better for them. It would be the most fertile soil for beginning a new election campaign, but this time with a slogan that is perfectly understandable to one part of society -- "We will end the war." Now we know which part of society this is.

Judging from the current logic, we also know that it is against people like my mother (who, although she knows Romanian just fine, speaks Russian at home). It is against the 23 percent of the population of Moldova who consider Russian their native language (according to Gallup).

Do we know where we are headed? Are we now going to justify every extremist who is inflaming ethnic tensions simply because he speaks Romanian? Or are we going to condemn free-thinking people espousing democratic values just because Russian is their first language? What difference does that make? Let them speak Chinese, for all that it matters.

Extremists need to be condemned because they are extremists, just like pedophiles must be condemned for being pedophiles and criminals for being criminals. It doesn't matter what language they speak. And if we are going to criticize the pensioners who are taking to the streets, let's not do it because of the language they speak.

Can it be we don't see what a hornets' nest we are stirring up? The so-called national problem has always existed here and isn't ever going to go away. It is the same in any former colony.

There is only one way for us to resolve this problem and that is by a long, civilized process of de-Sovietization, such as we have not yet had in the years since Moldova became independent. But to do this, we need political will and complete independence from Moscow.

The Communists should be happy now. This is what they have been working toward for the last eight years.

Tags: language , moldova

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Timo Haapanen from: Suomi
October 06, 2009 18:36
The situation is alarming indeed if language is taken as a criterion for classifying people, I can well understand that the insults deeply offend those speaking Russian, especially if it is their mother tongue. I would be offended too. People should be judged by their deeds, not by the language they speak. And as for speaking, it's the content that counts, not the language as such.
Natalia, your questions should give your readers a lot to think about.

by: Vitalie Stelea from: Detroit, Mi
October 07, 2009 12:30
Natalie,
I agree with your comments. I come from the same background, Romanian and Belarus, and think that we need to work first on economic reforms to promote the wellbeing of the population without stirring nationalism. I hope the new Gov. is smarter than that and will work will all countries to promote free markets and rule of law. Our eyes are on Filat........

by: mykry from: ny
October 07, 2009 15:15
Once there were those who spoke language A. Then came along those who spoke B; but those who spoke B prevented A from being spoken in the schools, theatres, govt. etc. Many people of type A were highly descriminated against and coerced to speak type B. Now type B speakers want as much, in fact more, rights than type A without any consideration to the decades of damage against type A language. One should be able speak any language he wants: but should there not be some consideration to the native type A language and its people, at least from a historical perspective, to undo some of the damage originally perpetrated by type B?

by: Evghenia S. from: London
October 07, 2009 21:47
Natalia, thanks for this, a very timely comment. That is actually frightening, and as a Russian speaker i am glad I am not there... The only thing I would disagree with is "And if we are going to criticize the pensioners who are taking to the streets, let's not do it because of the language they speak". If you ever followed any kind of similar reforms, if they are conducted gradually (usually in the western part of the world) - they are ending up in pensioners taking to the streets, but if they are done in a manner and at a speed that our Municipality does, they are inevitably resulting in pensioners taking to the streets. The problem with our reforms is that they are usually done in best traditions of tzarist times - a man getting out on the square with a manuscript and reading at loud what will happen as of today. The modern-world reforms should be a bit more sophisticated than that. Pensioners SHOULDN't queue for hours only to hear that not everyone will be served, and that to give one-month 70 lei allowance will take 2-3 months. And you are referring to that early in the article, but you still seem to agree that it's ok to criticise pensioners. And what about - relying on your own savings? Are you hinting to private pension scheme or just savings? Pensioners should not rely on their own savings! Forget about private pension scheme in Moldova - you need to have a capital market to invest those pensions which Moldova doesn't have. And if you refer just to savings, pensioners shouldn't rely on savings - in a normal country - and pension is not BEGGING the government, a normal pay-as-you-go style pension is the only option for Moldova, and it should be enough to survive (i underline - survive) without having to have savings. But with the rest - thanks a lot for your article.

by: Ms Moriah from: CA
October 09, 2009 15:08
Natalia,
This happened right after Moldova got it's independence as well. I have Russian speaking friends who lived across the river and went out and started taking Romanian courses figuring they were in an independent Moldova now they should know the language, but gave it up after the rhetoric started up about the evil Russian speakers and they should all be thrown in the river or deported--this was in the early 90s. I know some of the history of what was done in the Soviet Union to the various ethnic groups and the government's policy of sending people from one part of the Union to the opposite end to fill jobs after completing their education/training. It is important to know that government policies are not the decisions on the individual citizens. I have often heard in my travels in the former Soviet Union we like individuals from your country, but it's the government we disagree with. Some of the ills done historically to Moldova were due to Soviet Government policies not the fault of Russian speaking individuals sent to work in the factories.

by: ion
October 12, 2009 22:54
Russian is the language of pigs, i can't believe this chick is even debating it. Accept the fact and move on.

by: Haiduc
October 13, 2009 23:03
Reading all these comments just melts my heart - poor Russians are offended somehow by the people they have occupied and destroyed for decades. People, those of you who don't know history, familiarize yourself. You'll realize that Moldovans, who are a very welcoming people, have been brought to this by Russia's policies. If you want to live in Moldova, you need to integrate and that includes learning Romanian. If you don't want to, then get out.

by: epo from: Chisinau
October 15, 2009 17:04
when will u moldovans, no matter what your first language is, start to understand that your wealth of languages is your asset in the 21st century??? stop this limba noastra nonsense, leave history to the historians & start appreciating what you have!!!

by: haiduc
October 16, 2009 13:51
epo, knowing russian in this case is not an asset. it is another channel that can be used to brainwash people in moldova from moscow, which has been very well used. russian is a beautiful language but as stalin said, “Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.

if russians were peacefully coexisting in moldova respecting its culture, traditions, and people, i would have NO problem whatsoever. but when they occupy my country militarily under some peacekeeping pretext, then that is beyond porcism.


by: Andrei Panait from: London
October 17, 2009 18:36
I agree with you wholeheartedly Natalia, however acknowledge that it's a difficult process for many Romanian speakers who are still in a "siege mentality" since the soviet times and indeed inherit this mentality from their parents who first felt it themselves in the 1940's as a result of the nazi-soviet pact. People need to move beyond language politics, but even so talking of cattle cars and deportations is massively counter-productive, and plays into the hands of the communists (and those who have only to benefit from social division) as you say.

About This Blog

Written by RFE/RL editors and correspondents, Transmission serves up news, comment, and the odd silly dictator story. While our primary concern is with foreign policy, Transmission is also a place for the ideas -- some serious, some irreverent -- that bubble up from our bureaus. The name recognizes RFE/RL's role as a surrogate broadcaster to places without free media. You can write us at transmission+rferl.org