Thursday, February 09, 2012


Features

The Pragmatist: Georgia's Irakli Alasania Emerges As Political Alternative

Georgia's Irakli Alasania holds up a leaflet at a July 16 press conference to introduce his new party, Our Georgia--Free Democrats
TEXT SIZE - +
By Brian Whitmore
TBILISI -- It's hard to imagine Irakli Alasania eating his tie.

And that's just one way he contrasts with Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, who absentmindedly began chewing his red silk necktie on television in an apparent fit of nerves during last summer's war with Russia.

Where Saakashvili is mercurial and impulsive, Alasania is calm and reassuring. While Saakashvili thrives on confrontation, Alasania instinctively seeks consensus. And whereas the gregarious Saakashvili revels in drama and the limelight, Alasania prefers to go about his business quietly and modestly.

But there is one area where Saakashvili and Alasania are absolutely in sync. Both are committed to bringing Georgian fully into Western institutions including NATO and the European Union.

Alasania resigned as Georgia's ambassador to the United Nations in December to enter politics back home. On July 16, he announced the formation of a new political party called Our Georgia--Free Democrats, which he hopes to use as a vehicle to broker a peace between the country's warring political factions.

In a recent interview with RFE/RL in his Tbilisi office, Alasania was a model of cool composure, dressed neatly in a dark blazer and white shirt -- but no tie.

He explained that the time had come for Georgia's long and bitter standoff between Saakashvili and the opposition to come to an end.

"These months of demonstrations have led to no tangible results, but they demonstrated something," Alasania said.

"The government alone cannot cope with this crisis, and we in the opposition understand that just street actions and demanding the president's resignation will not lead to the goals we want to achieve," he said. "So the only thing left is to cooperate, to sit down at the negotiating table, and work things out."

Many Georgians, weary of the exhausting high-wire act that has been Saakashvili's presidency, are increasingly looking to Alasania as someone who could break the country's political impasse and finally fulfill the dashed hopes of the 2004 democratic Rose Revolution -- possibly as Saakashvili's successor as president.

Nino Danielia, who teaches media management at the Caucasus School of Journalism in Tbilisi, explains the long and bitter standoff between Saakashvili and his opponents has left many Georgians looking for a fresh alternative.

"I don't know how things will develop, but I think Irakli Alasania is the guy that can fill this niche," Danielia says. "I like his arguments, personally. I think it is clear what he doesn't like in the existing situation and how this can be solved. This is especially true when he is talking about conflict resolution. I think that he knows what he is talking about."

Two-Way Mistrust

After leaving his UN post, Alasania initially supported opposition figures like former parliamentary speaker Nino Burjanadze and Levan Gachechiladze in their calls for Saakashvili's resignation.

But he soon began subtly distancing himself from them and indicated a willingness to negotiate with the authorities.

Saakashvili's resignation, he said, is less important than ending the political impasse and securing long-term reforms in the electoral system, courts, and state-run media. Most importantly, he says public trust needs to be restored.

"There is two-way mistrust in society now," Alasania said. "By taking away the freedom of the media, [the authorities show that] they don't trust journalists to report objectively. But they will report objectively. By taking away the independence of the court system, they [show that] they don't trust judges to make proper decisions. All of this has created mistrust and cynicism that everything that we stood for four years ago is dying."

President Saakashvili after a meeting with opposition leaders in May
He added "that regardless of the differences we have now, within society, within the opposition, between the opposition and the government, we now have a chance to pass this test and come to a national agreement."

A native of the Georgian port city of Batumi, the 35-year-old Alasania served in various posts in the foreign and defense ministries, including stints in Georgia's embassies in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

A Rising Diplomatic Star

In February 2005, Saakashvili tapped him to be his special representative in talks with breakaway Abkhazia. It was a post that had personal significance for the young diplomat.

When Alasania was 19 years old, his father, KGB General Mamia Alasania, was killed together with other Georgian politicians when the Abkhaz capital, Sukhumi, fell to separatist forces in September 1993.

Despite this tragic history -- or perhaps because of it -- Alasania was able to win the trust of Abkhaz separatist officials and establish a good working relationship with them. He was instrumental in resuming the Georgian-Abkhaz Coordination Council, a tool for direct talks between the two sides, in March 2006.

Alasania argued that the best way to bring Abkhazia and South Ossetia back into Georgia since their independence declarations last year is to make Georgia a more attractive place for them.

"The only way to deal with this is to demonstrate to the Abkhaz and the Ossetians that we are building a truly democratic state and democratic institutions. This will take away the fear they have," Alasania said.

"If we can show them this, I believe that in years to come, when we are solidly on the path of European integration, then they will really rethink whether they want to be part of Europe together with Georgians, or whether they want to be part of [Russia's] Krasnodarsky Krai."

In June 2006, Saakashvili named Alasania as Georgia's UN envoy. During the Russia-Georgia war in August 2008, Alasania earned widespread praise as Tbilisi's main international representative, coming across as a calm and reassuring voice during and after the five-day conflict.

Moscow's Worst Nightmare?

Alasania stresses that Georgian relations with Russia did not need to deteriorate to the extent that they did, and gently suggests that Saakashvili's bombastic style played a role in intensifying the confrontation

"The best thing you can do [as Georgia's president] is not to solicit any aggressive behavior from the Russian side with your rhetoric," Alasania said.

"You can keep going with your business of building democratic institutions, integrating more deeply into European structures, but not being so vocal about using this against Russia or [acting like] you are doing this to harm Russian interests. Rhetoric contributed to straining this relationship."

He added that Georgia needs "to have a truly normalized situation with Russia and to try to find some common ground because we are neighbors, we cannot escape this." At the same time, Alasania said he would not waver in Tbilisi's longstanding goal of joining NATO.

"The political forces that I represent are going to be very strong in securing Georgian interests," Alasania said. "We will never let Russia legalize what they gained by using aggressive force in Georgia. They [Russia] will see us as very committed to Georgia's future in the European security architecture."

Lincoln Mitchell, a professor of international politics at Columbia University and author of the book "Uncertain Democracy: U.S. Foreign Policy and Georgia's Rose Revolution," says the combination of Alasania's smooth diplomatic touch and pro-Western policies would make him a strong representative of Georgia's interests in its dealings with Moscow.

"What he can do for Georgia is bring Saakashvili's ideals without Saakashvili's baggage, and that is what Georgia desperately needs," Mitchell says.

"And that is [also] what Russia needs to see. A President Alasania would be cautious, thoughtful, mature, and he would still want to join NATO. He has a strong position on Abkhazia, but unlike Misha [Saakashvili] he can actually talk to the Abkhaz. And he still wants to be pro-Western. This is the worst fear, if you are sitting in Moscow."

'But Is He A Vote Getter?'

Mitchell and others note that it would be difficult -- if not impossible -- for Moscow to vilify and caricature Alasania the way it has Saakashvili.

Not that they haven't tried. A strong signal that the Kremlin fears Georgia's rising political star came in September when nationalist State Duma deputy Vladimir Zhirinovsky, during a meeting with Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, launched into a tirade against Alasania, calling him "anti-Russian" and a "CIA agent."

But before he starts dealing with the Russians, Alasania needs to win public office. Presidential elections are not scheduled until January 2013, although the opposition has been pressing for an early vote -- which Saakashvili staunchly opposes.

Most analysts expect early local or parliamentary elections after reforms to the electoral system are negotiated. Alasania might be expected to play a key role in any of these scenarios.

While Alasania has been winning plaudits, particularly among the Tbilisi intelligentsia, doubts remain whether he has the political skills to win the votes of Georgians, who tend to favor charismatic, larger-than-life figures like Saakashvili.

Mitchell says Alasania's greatest strength -- his calm and measured style -- could equally turn out to be his greatest weakness.

"He's not a natural on-the-stump politician. He needs to work those skills more, he needs to improve those skills," Mitchell says.

"Alasania is clearly, among the opposition figures, one of the few who could conceivably govern," Mitchell says. "But is he a vote-getter? He hasn't proven that yet and he certainly has work to do there."
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: Peter Lavelle from: Moscow
July 18, 2009 16:51
Brian, interesting analysis.

However, I have to wonder if Alasania is really not any different from the Western trend - he talks the the talks and walks the walk, like Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, and maybe Obama - when PR is a substitute for normative politics.

The fact is Alasania is an example of "run of the mill" Georgian opposition figures. None of them, it is seems to me, are really interested in "democracy." Every opposition figure just wants to be Washington's point person in Georgia.

Alasania is not Moscow's nightmare, but Georgia has become Washington's nightmare. And democracy as a value has been compromised (still again).

by: George from: tbilisi
July 18, 2009 18:02
Georgians believe that they are Westerners, but they never really favored Saakashvili. More western Westerners favored Saakashvili from very beginig and Lincoln Mitchel, former director of NDI's branch in Georgia was one of the first among them. If Mr. Whitmore analize two Saakashvilis' "victoriouse" presidential elections, he will see that Saakashvili never was elected by Georgians. He always enjoed more western than inside legitimation - if international organisations assessed both elections positively, Georgians saw manipulations of the sistem as a whole - the altering of the constitutional and legal framework, the use of state resources, and the control of the media by Saaksahvili — in addition to the documented electoral irregularities.
At the same time President Obamas' case proves plainly who trends to favor charismatic, larger -than-life figures.

by: konstantin from: Los Angeles
July 18, 2009 18:51
Putin recomendation for "CIA" Alasania?
It could be Russian typical "matreshka".
West-East polarize is a game of Russka.
Did he stop August invasion in Georgia?
Whith my "Chronology" on Russka-yushka?

Is a main point "bombastic" Saakashvili?
Do Irakli replaces right principals too?
Let Russia kill Georgia by "HowDoYouDo"?
Was hipnotized Saakashvili gamo....buli?
Is Irakli bringing ants hill "v Moskvu"?

Whell, read my "Chronology" in three parts, including interviews with Yamadaev and Timmerman on the website:

www.tiptopwebsite.com/truthacademy

Konstantin.

PS:
Saakashvili had to be more pragmatic, but also defended from Russian telepathy and "Lemurs", not being so easy to provoke...
But than again, why dirty insults by stinking vith nerve gas Cheremushka and obsene language Russian leaders against Georgia and Saakashvili are OK, while Georgian president can't even pasionatly complain about his country being victimized by the very Russians?
Most important, why Georgia should give-up even the very principal of existence and dignity to Russian barbarian part-Neanderthals, to bow to them politely?Would Alasania join Russians, accusing Mashadov of being rude to Great Russia, when they murdred by vacuum bomb one or two hundreds of his reletives and friends?
He saw it and passionatly said that he would beat the Russians that did it with his boots, videotaped by Russian spies. So what?
By the way, not unlike Georgian case, it happened when Mashadov offered to Russia Geo-Strategicly limitted Chechen independence, comprising from Georgian King and his nephiew Peter the Great agreement, thus letting Russia prudently stop genocidal expansion into Ibero-Caucasian World...

by: Dave from: Toronto
July 18, 2009 20:31
Just to let you know Radio Free Europe jurnalist that father of Alasania, was killed together with other Georgian politicians when the Abkhaz capital, Sukhumi, fell to "Russian" and not so called "separatist" forces in September 1993. It was Russian federal solders, Russian aviation and Russian colonel who were supervising this war against Georgia. Stop, please repeating KGB written tales.

by: natalia from: Tbilisi
July 19, 2009 20:36
Despite all the smooth talk, attractive appearance and popularity with Tbilisi intelligencia, Alasania may lack substance. Has anyone heard his views on economy? or what he plans to do if elected? He might be a good Foreign Minister, but a President - I doubt it. I think all the plaudits come from the fact that he might be the best person the West can talk to, but is he the best person for Georgia?

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
July 20, 2009 23:11
I have to agree with both, Natalia and Dave...

Who suffered more in Georgia than Gorgian population of Abkhazia and neighboring provinces since 1992-93?
But the question that is put here is whether the "friendship" with Russia (Alasania-alike)or the West (Saakashvili-alike) is more vital for Georgia survival.
Neither and both - PRINCIPALS ARE MOST VITAL!
Because Russia always expands and exterminate gradually province after province, nation after nation - there is nowbody to talk there too...
Because West, including USA, being forced by imperial resurectors, including Russia, to see it in such a way, can abandon Georgia, Ukraine and the whole Europe and Asia to Russians - if the price is right and the blackmail is sufficient...

HOWEVER, TO STAND ON PRINCIPALS OF LAW OF GOD, INTERNATIONAL LAW, MODERN CONSTITUTION (Including Constitution of USA)OF CIVILIZED WORLD MEANS THAT WHAT RUSSIA IS ALLOWED TO DO TODAY TO GEORGIA IT WILL DO ALSO TO THE REST OF THE WORLD.

Just some friendly humor:
Alasania is at least as good as Lavrentiy, but not as principal as Stalin...
Saakashvili almost as principal as Stalin, but less polite than Alasania, specially being hypnotised by Russian spies-provokateurs...
Both have not that much leverage, because Russians usurped artillery and navy during Peter Bagrationi the First and rockets and A-H-Bombs during Stalin from CIS nations...

The only leverage is left defence of life and dignity of Human Civilization from Russia and alike - the PRINCIPALS.

At some poin what Russians usurped can be equilized - among 7 millions Georgians on this planet and 70 millions of the best representatives of Caucasian race and Human Civilization at large, few Albert Einshteins and Alexander Kartvelies can make the difference...

Konstantin.

by: Jacobsen from: Brussels
July 21, 2009 00:53
Georgia needs a president who brings stability to Georgia and to the region. Being Georgia a small and poor country, it stability comes from strong economy and equal rule of law to all its ethnic communities.

If you provoke people they will react and in this case Georgia will be always loser. NATO alliance will not be in control of Georgia. NATO will use Georgia as its front line if it joins.

EU now is a big family with Christian roots and values and its Eastern neighbourhood policy is designed for stability and not for conflict. The worst thing Georgia can do is to think and play as a major strategic country.


by: alaverdi9
July 21, 2009 17:36
I never trusted this man. It is suspicious he resigned from UN when the last document to be issued. Why? To claim presidency?
The calmness, patience & wisdom is important part of "Georgian" character no less then being artistic and charismatic.
Georgia needs the gifted politician that sees the road, untouched path where the best politicians of the world see nothing.
Georgia needs genius (and more geniuses the better) who can think out of box. Because any roads any examples of past that Georgia can use to achieve its goal of freedom, economical & political stability and democracy, all obvious paths will be vetoed, blocked and restricted By Russia.
Alasania is executor not a leader (and bad one at that since resigned).
and i do not trust anybody who grew up in KGB family. His heart and mnd maybe in a right place but it is too late to find out that it is not when he is the president.
"When Alasania was 19 years old, his father, KGB General Mamia Alasania, was killed together with other Georgian politicians when the Abkhaz capital, Sukhumi, fell to separatist forces in September 1993."


by: alaverdi9
July 21, 2009 22:40
Georgians use word Principal to define a person with firm character, who acts with integrity of purpose.
Konstantin bellow accuses Alasania that he is Wishy-Washy incapable to achieve lofty goals under the pressure. I agree with him.
One person Does not make government of the country, and Georgia is a heavy responsibility.
No person should take even smallest share of Georgian Government lightly. Saakashvili has raised the bar what to expect from president, and the public will be even more demanding in the future.

There is time until 2013. To elect the worthy government with reliable president Georgian citizens have to be more enlightened, people have to be more liberal, more democratic.
Christian democrats cannot be the beacon of democracy , because it is already restricted to(orthodox) Christians only. Traditionalists can not be liberal reformers...
What Georgia needs is a society with democratic and liberal values that is hostile to any criminal intent.





by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
July 22, 2009 07:12
Alaverdi9,
I don't blaime Alasania for character I don't know, but where he stands is important...

What would happened to Georgia, even before it united in 5-th Century BC, as a small country surrounded by barbarian planet, if not leaders like Prince Murvan, the "Peter of Iberia", that brought to the young World PRINCIPALS of Christian Humanism and Knighthood and if Georgia wouldn't try to stand on just PRINCIPALS...

Reverances to evil that Russia is bringing to the World will not help...

Konstantin.
Comments page of 2
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

EU Has Bulgaria, Romania Questions

Latest Comment (2 total)

Eugenio: In other news from the EU: yesterday during the anti-EU and anti-IMF demonstrations ... More

UN Envoy Decries Syria 'Massacre'

Latest Comment (2 total)

Eugenio: Strictly speaking, who cares what the UN evoy has to say: there is ... More

Baby Girls Seen As Mixed Blessing In Afghanistan

Latest Comment (5 total)

Bill Webb: Perhaps the Pashtuns need an example to follow, The United States, surely not ... More