Tuesday, February 14, 2012


Features

Thirty Years After Tito's Death, Yugoslav Nostalgia Abounds

Yugoslav President Josip Broz Tito in 1953

Multimedia

TEXT SIZE - +
By Ron Synovitz
At a marketplace in the city of Split, a group of elderly Croats talks about whether a statue should be erected to honor late President Franjo Tudjman -- the leader of Croatia during its war for independence from the former Yugoslavia.

There is not much debate. Old enough to remember life in Yugoslavia under communist leader Josip Broz Tito, they quickly agree. Instead of Tudjman, they would prefer a statue of Tito -- a man they still lovingly refer to by the nickname Jozo.

SLIDE SHOW: Tito's Life In Pictures
Tito's rise from Communist Party chairman to Yugoslav prime minister and president effectively amounted to an unchallenged reign of more than four decades. Today, 30 years after his death and nearly 20 years after the disintegration of the Yugoslavia he helped create, Tito still commands affection and respect, a unifying figure in a now deeply divided region.

He is considered by many in the Balkans a World War II liberator because of his leadership of the Yugoslav Partisans guerrilla movement against the Nazi occupation. After the war, Tito played a crucial role in building a multiethnic federation that included what is now Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Slovenia, Macedonia, and Kosovo.

The idea of "brotherhood and unity" of all those nationalities, ethnicities, and religious backgrounds was an anthem that Tito repeated in many of his speeches -- declaring that "a sea of blood" had been spilt for Yugoslavia's unity and that nobody would be allowed to "undermine it or ruin it from inside."

In the West, Tito was respected for refusing to accept Moscow as the supreme communist authority and standing up to Soviet leader Josef Stalin by insisting that Yugoslavia follow its own national interests on the road toward socialism.

'A Soft Dictator'

Even some people who were targeted by Tito's political purges in the former Yugoslavia now have a positive assessment of his impact on world history.

A group of Slovenian tourists take photos beside a bust of Tito in Belgrade.
Tito removed Latinka Perovic from her position as a young communist functionary in 1972 after she had campaigned for the democratization of the Yugoslav Communist Party.

Perovic, today a leading expert on modern Serbian history, says that Tito will be remembered for being a key figure in the battle against fascism and a "crucial agent" in the eventual disintegration of the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc.

"I believe that Tito belongs among such personalities sought out by history, in a certain sense, and above all during those fateful years before and during World War II, and in 1948," Perovic tells RFE/RL.

"His famous break with Stalin in 1948 was a bold and momentous step," Perovic says. "It shattered the ideological and the military-political monolith of the Eastern bloc, just as the world had been divided into two spheres of influence, and it was a crucial moment for Yugoslavia, which led to the deprovincialization of the country, opening it toward the whole world, and in a certain sense humanizing it."

Perovic says Tito will be remembered as a "soft dictator" who brought stability to a turbulent region with a long history of ethnic conflict.

She says he also will be remembered as a modernizer who used centralized power to transform Yugoslavia from an "economically backward, largely agrarian society into a developed industrial nation."

Download
(WATCH: Hundreds of people came to pay their respects on May 4 at Tito's Belgrade memorial, the "House of Flowers.")

Indeed, many of those who remember Tito's rule speak about the relative tolerance in Yugoslavia at the time.

In the southern Bosnian town of Pocitelj, an imam named Dzemal Gadara says that the religious freedom he had in Tito's Yugoslavia was unlike his experience in any other country.

"Yugoslavia was the best country," Gadara insists. "I say this openly. And Tito was the greatest statesman. I have traveled around the world. But such freedom could not be found anywhere. I think that such freedom -- and only God knows this -- will never be again."

At a recent ceremony commemorating a strategic ruse that Tito pulled off against a Nazi-led force in the 1943 Battle of the Neretva, Omer Catic, a resident of the central Bosnian town of Bugojno, said: "They should celebrate him for 1,000 years -- not just 30. He left marks upon the world that will never be erased. You only need to imagine 120 statesmen coming to his funeral."

Golden Era Remembered


To be sure, the forces of nationalism that Tito kept under control during his life would be unleashed after his death -- culminating in the disintegration of Yugoslavia.

Those same forces of nationalism can make nostalgia for the former Yugoslavia controversial in countries that fought wars of independence.

Nevertheless, many now think of Tito's rule as a golden era compared to the war years before he came to power and a decade after his death.

Tvrtko Jakovina, a historian from Croatia, says it was the breadth of Tito's vision, the success of his Yugoslav diplomacy, and the number of encounters Tito had with world leaders that made him a leading statesman of his time.

"As a historian of the Cold War era, it seems to me that he is just about the only historical personality that I can study and still remain in step with the rest of the world," Jakovina says. "That is probably the only period when my people played some sort of pivotal role in world events. In the light of everything that has happened since then, it seems like science fiction."

'We Were Happier Then'

Each year -- honoring Tito on the anniversary of his death on May 4, 1980 -- thousands of sympathizers from across the former Yugoslavia visit his birthplace at Kumrovec in Croatia.

In Croatia and Bosnia, dozens of organizations have been established to keep Tito's memory alive. In Slovenia, Tito has become a kind of pop icon for youngsters, who wear T-shirts and badges bearing his image. And in Belgrade -- the city that arguably has felt most keenly the loss of the Yugoslav Republic -- thousands of people in recent weeks have visited Tito's tomb at the Yugoslav Museum of History and museum exhibitions that feature exhibitions of Tito memorabilia.

A Tito portrait at Belgrade's Korcagin restaurant, which is filled with communist- and Yugoslav-era nostalgia
For 61-year-old Belgrade resident Ljubica Gulic, such exhibitions conjure memories of a time when life was simpler and Belgrade's citizens lived a more comfortable and prosperous life than people in other communist countries.

"I remember President Tito because it was one of the most carefree periods of my life. Compared to the present, I was happy and satisfied back then. I was not afraid of anything. Now I can't go to sleep because I am afraid that something will happen," Gulic says.

"Regardless of people who think that [Tito's era] was a period of fear, in my opinion it was more peaceful. People were happier. [Tito] had charisma."

Thirty-year-old Belgrade resident Nermanja Petrovic is too young to remember life under Tito. Born on May 4, 1980 -- the day Tito died -- he is the first generation to know of Tito only from stories told by those older than himself.

"I know all the historical facts. It was a time when people lived comfortably," Petrovic says. "But there is another argument -- that it was because of that nice life [in those times] that we are now paying the price."

Petrovic says he thinks there was enough time after Tito's death to avoid the dissolution of Yugoslavia and the wars of the 1990s if the right steps had been taken by political leaders. He concludes that blaming Tito for Serbia's current problems "does not make sense and cannot bring anything good."

RFE/RL's Balkan Service correspondents contributed to this report from Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Croatia
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: Ivan from: Sofia
May 05, 2010 01:01
There is nothing wrong with nostalgia about the past. It proves two things - that people were happier then, and communism is better than capitalism, because it achieves the goal of any political system - happiness for its population. Tito was a great man, much greater than Roosevelt and Churchill together, because Tito actually fought in the war, he was a hero and a real man. May his soul remain victorious over fascists, capitalists and other extreme forces of evil.
In Response

by: Andrew from: Tbilisi
May 05, 2010 07:41
Well, looks like Ivan has come out from the closet at last.

Communism "achieved" happiness for some of the population, but I guess Ivan cares little for the roughly 144,000,000 people murdered by communist governments in the 20th century.

By the way Ivan, many elderly Germans look back with fond memories to the Nazi days, does this mean it was a great system because it provided happiness to the majority of its subjects?

Really, you are strange, defending the most repressive and murderous system the world has ever seen.

As for Churchill, he served in the front line in several wars, including leading men "over the top" in WW1 where he was greatly respected by his men for his personal courage.
In Response

by: Petra from: Slovenia
May 07, 2010 13:21
I don't know how old Ivan is but there's a big difference in opinions regarding that period between the generations of ex-Yugoslav nations. Let me elaborate a little:
I once said something against Tito to my grandma and all hell broke loose. Grandpa is different but a lot of old people are like her. People born in the WWI or WWII times. You are born, you have noting, your family has nothing and there is very little left of the cultural landscape. This is your reality. Of course this was after-war Europe, not just Yugoslavia. As Tito came to power things started changing. The people built new infrastructure, new apartments, new hospitals and EVERYBODY had a job - how could they not? Everybody went on vacation, had a home and even a car. He created a new country from scratch and at scratch everybody gets a job if your goal is to put several nations back on their feet. Tito connected the nations and created the "we're all brothers and sisters in Yugoslavia" spirit. Things were flourishing and these people, children of the war, were now young adults that saw life shift 'for the better'. Brainwashed (some more, some less) without a doubt. They were easy targets to brainwash and he kept the people - the majority - content and quiet. Not that they didn't dare say anything against the system at the time but they almost had _no reason_ to. As the years went by a new generation was born.
So it's very different with my parents, a generation of kids born in the 50's and 60's that were actually born in the SFRY. They had homes, schools, some had cars and they got an education. Some had friends from other European countries and it wasn't like you weren't able to 'have a peek across the border' and were hermetically sealed in YU. So they knew what life could potentially be but wasn't and why. It didn't make sense any more that you would work more that some and couldn't do more for yourself with that money. Goli Otok was wrong, killings in the war were wrong, lack of freedom of speech was wrong and everybody knew that the country will inevitably crumble to pieces after Tito's death. The system did no longer work. 'Best' communistic country ever? You could say that. But there was _no way at all_ for its utopian idea to survive.
And then there’s us - the 3rd generation. I was born in SFRY (83) and was the first generation of kids to enter 1st grade in Slovenia. Tito's portraits came off the walls, you were no longer a Tito's Pioneer. Our overall opinion of SFRY is negative. That was NOT THE ONLY WAY to reconstruct the after-war YU.
I'll quote Ivan "...people were happier then, and communism is better than capitalism, because it achieves the goal of any political system - happiness for its population."
I can't under any circumstances agree with that. Ever. It was a happiness in a bubble created by Tito for himself and the southern Slavic nations. A BUBBLE! A bubble is the saddest place to live in, be it a religious one or a political one. Happiness is not something you achieve with communism. Communism is utopia. A dream, an idea which will never again come to reality because you’d simply need to be blind and brainwashed to want to live in it. I'm not praising capitalism either but a healthy balance of the best of qualities from both systems is what we should be after. Otherwise everything falls eventually.

by: Ronald
May 05, 2010 11:04
Tito failed in so many ways and is directly responsible for the extreme violent wars in former YU, it was worng to force those country's into YU after WW2, to much bad blood was bottled up in the YU and had to come out sooner or later.

by: Miha from: Slovenia
May 05, 2010 11:14
A 'soft dictator'? On his personal order Yugoslavian partisans murdered 240.000 people after the end of World War II. I guess he wasnt so soft after all!
In Response

by: BS Buster
May 05, 2010 14:56
He was a red Habsburg that made him a more agreeable Communist for some.

You're correct about his murdering ways and nurturing of some of the people who played lead roles in the carnage of the last decade.
In Response

by: Johann from: USA
May 07, 2010 11:43
This 240.000 people executed were, Nazi, Italian fascists, Romanian and Moldovan Iron Guard members, and people that had been active in killing Serbian Jews. Etc. Criminals !!!
Tito got a lot of his weapons from The USA !!!

by: Chucky from: USA
May 06, 2010 05:15
Is this Radio Free Europe or Red Star Europe? Did RFE forget that the original purpose of having radio free stations was to get news behind the iron wall because dictators like Tito didn't allow for a free press? I have no issue with a report on Yugo-nostalgia because it does exist in some quarters of the former YU...note that I said SOME quarters...where were the dissenting opinions in the article to give it balance? It read just like the sort of propaganda that Tito would have personally approved during his rule.
In Response

by: BS Buster
May 06, 2010 10:05
Tito was biased against the Serbs. Hence, RFE/RL's slant.

The dictatorial creation of "autonomous" zones in Serbia unlike what could've been been done elsewhere like in Croatia.

by: Kenny from: San Francisco
May 06, 2010 07:25
There is definitely something to be said about the role in global events Yugoslavia played, in contrast to the role the former nations play now (or lack thereof in many cases).

by: Johann from: USA
May 07, 2010 00:56
Tito was a Yugoslavian ( Serbian) patriot , that all Jews and anti-fascists bless for his role in defeating Italian fascists and the Romanian Iron Guard that the new government in Moldova is dearly admiring, and they call them self
patriots. What a nonsense !!!

by: Marija from: California
May 07, 2010 04:36
Tito was a ruthless dictator. As long as people kept their mouth shut they could live in peace, but anyone who dared to disagree was soon killed or sent to prison. Over one million people were killed under this "benign" Tito and his "communism with a human face". The West shamefully closed its eyes for its own geo-political reasons, and made living more comfortable for Yugoslavs by paying large sums of money to Tito to keep the Russians out of the Adriatic. Now the money is gone and the commies miss it!
In Response

by: marijana from: belgrade
May 08, 2010 07:38
I am reading all these comments and I cannot stop wandering about what some people are saying. Most of you have no idea about Tito and about life in Yugoslavia in his era. As the Ancient Greeks would put it, it was a "golden era of old Kronos". I'm afraid we will never see that again, and that's why most normal people are nostalgic about him and what he stood for. I remember attending an American high-school as an an exchange student - noone knew to place Yugoslavia on the map, but everyone knew who Tito was! And later, in the 90's, I felt ashamed to say where I came from. Alas, all thing must come to an end, but let's be realistic and try to assess his times and his legacy wihout any "fundamentalist" approaches.

by: Ralf from: Czech Republic
May 08, 2010 17:58
Some say Tito had no right to force the former republics of Yugoslavia to live together... alright, solid argument. But, do any of these people who write such an opinion think of what would have happened had Tito not united Yugoslavia?

For one, Istria and a larger part of Dalmatia would belong to Italy. Ante Pavelic, in trying to create a larger Croatia, had to sign over those parts. Who would, if not for Tito, return this important land mass to Croatia? Croats? How? The population is 4-5 million, maybe less for that time period. In other words: IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSSIBLE TO TAKE IT BACK WITHOUT A UNITED YUGOSLAVIA. In addition, the West would not do anything for Croatia's role in Nazism.

2) Slovenia would have the same fate as Romania, Poland, and Czechoslovakia... By that I mean, it would have been totally robbed of its wealth, or anything left afterwords by Stalinist forces of the Soviet Union. There would be no investments placed into that country. None. Another possibility is, the country might not have existed at all. It could have been divided among Italy and Czechoslovakia.

3) Serbia would not have any infrastructure; to the contrary, all the investments made during Tito's era would not have been possible. Serbia would, like all the other republics, fall victim to Stalinization. Today, Serbia is extremely poor...but imagine if it were not for the infrastructure left during Tito's era, and firms/companies, what Serbia would be today. Worse than Albania.

4) I will not go into details about Macedonia, Bosnia, and Montenegro because, let's face it, without Tito god knows if these "countries" would at all be countries today.

So, aside from the iron fist he held, I must say as a CAPITALIST that Tito was 90% good, and perhaps 10% bad in an overall, realistic and logical assessment of his rule and character. Hopefully others keep these things in mind when they criticize him.
In Response

by: Petra from: Slovenia
May 09, 2010 18:23
Without a doubt if the countries didn't connect after the war they would have been worse off. However, a totalitarian regime is unnecessary. Surely you don't think that communism was the only solution for the ex-Yu countries?

It was important that we were a federation, by all means. But I can not ever support a totalitarian regime in any case anywhere in the world. Tito was a dictator. A dictator himself IS his own country. So whatever he did good - we give him credit for that. But all that does not justify the crimes he committed and the system he led. He was a marshal = the supreme commander of the JNA. His direct orders = his crimes.

And what's positive about keeping your 'nation' brainwashed and quiet? My point is, the only way he could keep the nations together in a symbiosis was by giving them a country, rebuilding it and later by telling them what and how to think, what not to say and he 'took care' of the ones he didn't like committing after-war crimes and putting them into prisons.

You know what I'm trying to say? If you disagree then by all means please do, but please have solid arguments as to why he is _such_ an amazing man all together.

In Response

by: Boris from: USA
May 11, 2010 20:29
excuse me ralf from the czech republic. you say the soviets would've stolen slovenia's wealth? well, who do you think payed for all the infrastructure that you say serbia lacked? wealth was consistently robbed from the more productive slovenia and croatia to pay for infrastructure in the backwards parts of yugoslavia like serbia and kosovo. why do you think that slovenia and croatia led the charge to become independent from yugoslavia? they were sick of all of their wealth being stolen by the communist leaders in order to subsidize poorer and unproductive parts of yugoslavia.

by: Denis from: Perth
May 10, 2010 05:20
Tito was 60% saint and 40% sinner. Overall he comes out ahead in my books.

by: boris from: USA
May 11, 2010 20:19
this article is a joke and a load of historical revisionism. i agree with a previous poster who asked "is this radio free europe or red star europe?" the reason radio free europe was created in the first place was because of dictators like tito. why didn't the author of this article seek commentary from any one of the millions of croatians, slovenes, etc. who were forced to flee communist yugoslavia during his rule? if it was so great in yugoslavia, why did millions emigrate? if it was so great in yugoslavia, why did tito need political prisons like goli otok at home, and murder political opponents abroad? communist yugoslavia had no free press, murdered catholic and orthodox priests, and it's economy was a joke. i guess the yugophiles the author found to interview for this article forgot about the 1000% inflation of the yugoslav dinar in the 80's, and brutal crackdown of pro-democracy protests in croatia in the spring of 1971.

tito was a criminal who murdered and imprisoned hundreds of thousands of croats, slovenes, serbs, etc., and drove many more to seek political and economic refuge in the west.

it is monumentally ironic that, 30 years after the death of a communist dictator and murderer, he is remembered so fondly on the pages of the radio free europe/radio liberty website. it's not just ironic, it's a disgrace to freedom-loving people. congrats to the author for helping to whitewash state-sponsored murder and the communist oppression of millions of croats, slovenes, serbs.
Comments page of 2
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

U.S. Hearing On Balochistan Raises Hackles, Awareness In Pakistan

Latest Comment (2 total)

William: It shows why many people across the world don't trust the US government, ... More

NATO Admits Afghan Children Killed

Latest Comment (1 total)

William: NATO dropped some bombs but does not know who it has killed - ... More

Cold Threatens Russian Fruit Crop

Latest Comment (7 total)

Konstantin: As I suggested, you are probably not Chechen. Russian GRU?
It is Russian stile ... More