Tuesday, September 30, 2014


News / From Our Bureaus

Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan Ranked As Among World's 'Worst' Societies

A huge portrait of Turkmen President Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov on the side of a building in Dashoguz
A huge portrait of Turkmen President Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov on the side of a building in Dashoguz
The human rights records of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, as well as the Russian republic of Chechnya, are ranked as among the eight "worst of the worst," according to a new report of the world's most repressive societies by Freedom House.

"The countries and territories in 'Worst of the Worst' are precisely the ones that the [UN] Human Rights Council should focus on," says Paula Schriefer, Freedom House's director of advocacy. "In these countries, regimes control the daily lives of citizens by denying them basic human rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of belief."

Other countries on the "worst-of-the-worst" list are Burma, Equatorial Guinea, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, and Sudan. Also included are two territories, Chechnya and Tibet, whose inhabitants, Freedom House says, "suffer intense repression."

In an interview with RFE/RL's Turkmen Service, Arch Puddington, research director for Freedom House, says Turkmenistan "has not really embraced democratic change" since the death of former President Saparmurat Niyazov.

He says Turkmenistan "does not have real political freedom, nor does it have real elections, and no real free press."

But Puddington acknowledges some improvements in Turkmen society, adding that "observers do see one change, which is the absence of the cult of personality" that existed under Niyazov.

The Freedom House report also includes nine additional countries near the bottom of Freedom House’s list of the most repressive: Belarus, Chad, China, Cuba, Eritrea, Laos, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Zimbabwe. The two territories of South Ossetia and Western Sahara are also included in this group.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Zahid
March 16, 2009 11:56
I do not subscribe to the word worst of the worst - this terminology is bias and does not tell the real story. I suggest RFE to think before posting such statement about people in these countries

by: David
March 17, 2009 16:27
Zahid,<br /><br />They're not commenting about the people of the country. They're talking about the government, and what the countries do to their people with the policies they promote. If anyone whould think, it's the governments of these countries who take away information, communication, and opportunities from these people, setting them up for lives that are limited and devoid of enthusiasm and hope. It's destructive for the vibrancy of the countries and for the world, because the people of these countries no doubt could be the best of the best...they're just stuck in places that are the worst of the worst - not because of geography or crime, but because of governments that control, steal and suppress.